Just bomb. Per Curtis LeMay (G. Wallace's running mate) "back to the Stone Age".

Which one, though? Palaeo- , Meso-, or Neolithic?

Not precise enough.

AUMF is not a declaration of war(s) but an excuse to start war whenever and wherever wanted. No House of Representatives. No Senate. No pretense of any thing echoing "popular sovereignty"--especially not in those lands being the receipt of our bombs. And if the country has oil---ooh! get's so much better--more bombs.

It has been from the beginning starting with the reason for the Iraq war.
Our government knew that Saddam had WMDs because they gave them to him.
During the Iran/Iraq war they gave Saddam chemical and biological weapons to use on the Iranian troops along with the coordinates of where the troops were.
The reason why they decided that Saddam had to go had nothing to do with WMDs. It was for two reasons.
The first was to start removing the governments of countries in the Middle East so that Israel could be the only super power in the Middle East.
Wesley Clark is on record stating that the US was going to bomb (overthrow) 7 countries.
The second reason was to get the oil and other resources of those countries for corporations and to build pipelines to transport natural gas that other countries and corporations had contracts with like Russia has in Syria as one example.
The other reasons that the war on various terrorist groups is bogus is because our government and our allies are creating, arming, training and funding them.
We now know that Saudi Arabia government officials helped finance the terrorists that attacked us on 9/11, but for over 15 years our government hid that fact from us and continued relationships with them.
Our government knows that Saudi Arabia, Turkey and our other allies are funding the various terrorists organizations, yet don't cut ties with them.
And our government is also funding and training its own groups of terrorists to help overthrow Assad.
And again why does Assad need to go? Because he used sarin gas on his own people. Except it wasn't Assad that used the gas, it was one of the terrorists groups that the US created. Oop, good thing that our media is complicit in covering up that fact. No the reason why Assad needs to be removed is again all about oil, resources and pipelines that other corporations want.
The Al Quada group that the troops fought against during the Iraq war are now fighting alongside our troops in Syria. You didn't know that?
Our government tells us that it has to send the military in to other countries to protect the people from their government that is killing them but instead of protecting them, the troops kill them, bombs are dropped on them or they are killed by the terrorists that our government created.
The defense contractors, companies like Blackwater, the banks and everyone else who profits from wars are getting richer as they always do with any war.

This article goes into detail about all the countries that are funding the different terrorist organizations, including ISIL.
It's long but worth the read that shows why the war on terror is bogus.
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/europe-is-harbouring-the-islamic...

foreign policy in the Middle East.

If not for Putin, the neocons along with Israel and Saudi Arabia had hoped that Obama would launch military strikes on Syria and Iran that could open the door to more “regime change” across the Middle East, a dream at the center of neocon geopolitical strategy since the 1990s. This neocon strategy took shape after the display of U.S. high-tech warfare against Iraq in 1991 and the collapse of the Soviet Union later that year. U.S. neocons began believing in a new paradigm of a uni-polar world where U.S. edicts were law.

The neocons felt this paradigm shift also meant that Israel would no longer need to put up with frustrating negotiations with the Palestinians. Rather than haggling over a two-state solution, U.S. neocons simply pressed for “regime change” in hostile Muslim countries that were assisting the Palestinians or Lebanon’s Hezbollah.
Iraq was first on the neocon hit list, but next came Syria and Iran. The overriding idea was that once the regimes assisting the Palestinians and Hezbollah were removed or neutralized, then Israel could dictate peace terms to the Palestinians who would have no choice but to accept what was on the table.

The Rise of Obama.

The neocons were dealt another setback in 2008 when Barack Obama defeated a neocon favorite, Sen. John McCain. But Obama then made one of the fateful decisions of his presidency, deciding to staff key foreign-policy positions with “a team of rivals,” i.e. keeping Republican operative Robert Gates at the Defense Department and recruiting Hillary Clinton, a neocon-lite, to head the State Department.

Obama also retained Bush’s high command, most significantly the media-darling Gen. David Petraeus. That meant that Obama didn’t take control over his own foreign policy.

Gates and Petraeus were themselves deeply influenced by the neocons, particularly Frederick Kagan, who had been a major advocate for the 2007 “surge” escalation in Iraq, which was hailed by the U.S. mainstream media as a great “success” but never achieved its principal goal of a unified Iraq. At the cost of nearly 1,000 U.S. dead, it only bought time for an orderly withdrawal that spared Bush and the neocons the embarrassment of an obvious defeat.

So, instead of a major personnel shakeup in the wake of the catastrophic Iraq War, Obama presided over what looked more like continuity with the Bush war policies, albeit with a firmer commitment to draw down troops in Iraq and eventually in Afghanistan.

Wow!

Hillary has hinted that she isn't on board with the Iranian deal that Obama and Kerry brokered with Iran and the other countries, as well as most of the republicans and the neoconservatives who want to overturn it.
Many people have commented in a different essay that she has said that she would obliterate Iran if they used nuclear weapons on Israel, but what else could Iran do that would nullify the Iran deal?
I was surprised by how Obama was left out of loop of the Ukraine coup. If this is true, then it does show that the president is basically just a puppet and others are setting the foreign policy agenda.

The gravest threat to this Obama-Putin collaboration has now emerged in Ukraine, where a coalition of U.S. neocon operatives and neocon holdovers within the State Department fanned the flames of unrest in Ukraine, contributing to the violent overthrow of democratically elected President Viktor Yanukovych and now to a military intervention by Russian troops in the Crimea, a region in southern Ukraine that historically was part of Russia
Though I’m told the Ukraine crisis caught Obama and Putin by surprise, the neocon determination to drive a wedge between the two leaders has been apparent for months, especially after Putin brokered a deal to head off U.S. military strikes against Syria last summer and helped get Iran to negotiate concessions on its nuclear program, both moves upsetting the neocons who had favored heightened confrontations.

Putin also is reported to have verbally dressed down Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-Saudi intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan over what Putin considered their provocative actions regarding the Syrian civil war. So, by disrupting neocon plans and offending Netanyahu and Bandar, the Russian president found himself squarely in the crosshairs of some very powerful people.

https://consortiumnews.com/2014/03/02/what-neocons-want-from-ukraine-cri...

Obama and NATO had already sent troops into countries surrounding Russia before the DNC hack. But since the hack the neoconservative have been ramping up the rhetoric about Russia's interference with not only our election, but the election in other countries and accusing Russia's aggression.
And the people are swallowing this propaganda.

Here’s some news you all have ignored: US fighter jets target ISIL in Libya for first time

Hillary has lot’s of experience:

Michael Crowley, a liberal senior writer for Politico, summed up that rich experience. She “backed a bold escalation of the Afghanistan war… pressed Obama to arm the Syrian rebels … endorsed airstrikes against the Assad regime… backed intervention in Libya, and … helped enable Obama’s expansion of lethal drone strikes [as] the administration’s most reliable advocate for military action,” in Afghanistan, Libya, and the bin Laden raid, taking “a more aggressive line than [Secretary of Defense Robert] Gates, a Bush-appointed Republican.” Crowley left out her backing for such “democracy promotion” efforts as the extrajudicial killing of bin Laden, drone assassinations with hundreds of added “collateral damage” murders, the illegal Israeli West Bank dispossessions and housing settlements on Palestinian territory, and the 2009 coup in Honduras that forced the democratically elected president, Manuel Zelaya, out of the country. Clinton denied that his removal was a coup even though a leaked document from the US Embassy in Tegucigalpa said, “there is no doubt… [that his ouster] constituted an illegal and unconstitutional coup.” In short, her experience in the State Department was primarily a string of lies and imperialist coups masquerading as support for democracy, just as her ruthless deposing of Gaddafi (“We came, we saw, he died”) and bombing of Libya is portrayed as civilized in spirit.

~snip~

Did Hillary’s Clinton sidekick, Deborah Wasserman Schultz rig the Democratic campaign primaries? You bet she did, and as punishment, she has been put in charge of the Clinton campaign nationwide. Clinton asked a Senate investigative committee, what difference did it make why Libyans attacked the US embassy in Benghazi? One might ask what difference does it make who exposed the DNC illegalities? It can be assumed by their behavior that the MSM is just a megaphone for establishment (i.e., ruling class) power and legitimacy, and uninterested in questions of justice and legality. It is humorously ironic that the Obama administration and its acolytes in the MSM are absorbed in Russian conspiracies while engaging in the greatest conspiracy of all – hiding the truth from the citizens of the US and the world.

Emphasis Added

American Elections: Weapons of Mass Distraction

Good job HillBots. The MIC thanks you for your patriotism.

under educated
abused
neglected

While Obama and his minions use the money that could help our children but instead he and WE are using the money to drop bombs on men, women and children.

Fine fucking job America.

Nice priorities.