A couple of days ago, I was discussing with some friends how would we describe the situation in the Labour Party; was it a movement, a revolution, how could we describe it? I am not comfortable with the term “revolution” as I think it plays into false usage of the term; it is a much misused term being used to describe almost any change that occurs.
Recent charges against Jill Stein and Amy Goodman are a sign that the oligarchy is warning us that it is going to be rougher from here on. Yes there have been arrests all along, but big oil is worried. The native People are challenging their ability to do as they please and costing them money in the process.
I have been a supporter of Bernie Sanders for years. He and I are of an age. I was thrilled when he started up a revolution of positive change. Take a close look at the word positive. One of the definitions of positive from Merriam-Webster is " indicating, relating to, or characterized by affirmation, addition, inclusion, or presence rather than negation, withholding, or absence ." It is change we can believe in.
One of the hottest discussions we are seeing is the one surrounding the universal basic income (UBI) or citizens’ income (CI); in Britain it has been advocated by the Trade Union Unite (it was adopted at the last convention), it has been incorporated into the Green Party of England and Wales’s manifesto for a sustainable economy, the Labour Par
I'm currently reading "A Start in Life", a 1970 novel by one of my favorite authors, Alan Sillitoe. His books have tough Northern England types who get by on "cunning" and are brutally honest. In the spirit of that...
The man who posted the Jill Stein is a "DICTATOR IN WAITING!" post now says he is on the BERNIE SANDERS RULES COMMITTEE. I am sorry but in my personal experience people who have such views are dlc centrists 99% of the time, so the only conclusion I can draw is that conned his fellow "Berners" in to giving him this job, just so he could sheepdog them and Nader bait them.
We are about to see the end point of the Democratic Party scam that they called a "Primary". The Republicans are doing their version and the theater just gets more and more sickening.
Stealing the First Lady's speech has caused another wave of reaction to the well established disregard for truth or ethics that should be expected by now.
in love.
She is BRILLIANT!
This short video is from an episode of the Joe Rogan Experience podcast from over a year ago, I was catching up on some episodes I missed that sounded interesting and she was talking about all shit that is wrong with Clinton way before anyone else in the media was.
I don't know her, I don't know her politics, but I do know she frigging nailed it in this segment.
