Normalizing the New Normal
This is an opinion piece. I have no proof other than my lying eyes. And my intuitive gut. I'll throw this out there as speculative fodder for the un-indoctrinated and open mind.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
I've been thinking for a while now that both sides of any given narrative are controlled.
Full Spectrum Dominance - Are we there yet?
Sure does seem like it to me. Please consider this:
Suppose you are a propagandist. Would it not be optimum to control both sides of a narrative? Both sides of an issue, pro and con. That would be total control, full spectrum dominance if you will. Could it be possible that our realities are so controlled that the idea of oppositional perception is but a facade? In today's world who knows what is real, right? With all the gaslighting and lying is it any wonder that folks are confused? Is that not the tenet of Full Spectrum Dominance?
I think that if you look you can see it in many issues nowadays, it may be subtle as is all good propaganda. The yin and yang may be manipulated into a soup of disinformation and obfuscation. Think about how you form your opinions, what you read, what you see, what you think about. If one could control that input then one could formulate your reality.
Examples:
Elon Musk: Something just hasn't sit well with me about this Elon Musk and Twitter deal. It all seems contrived. I certainly don't consider him a hero as some have made him out to be. Could there be more to his Twitter acquisition than just his self proclaimed altruistic motivation. I'll put a theory out there and let you be the judge.
Let's suppose that freedom of speech may not be Musk's ultimate goal in buying Twitter. Let's suppose that normalizing the new normal is actually the goal. What do I mean by that?
Musk is bringing front and center the alphabet agencies hand in censoring Twitter users. He is exposing that which many of us have suspected for a long time, that is, the government is colluding with big tech to catapult their narrative and to shut down oppositional view points. Exposing that is a good thing, right? My immediate reaction was, "Sure is". But, wait a minute.
Since I've been going on about normalizing the new normal, let me try to explain. The behind the scenes collusion of big tech and the state is being exposed with the intent to normalize that unholy marriage. To put it out there for all to see. It's shocking, right? But after a while the shock wears off and people begin to accept it. There's nothing that can be done about it, so we have to live with it, right? There's no hope citizen, accept your medicine and let Big Daddy Government handle this. Accept this fact and prepare yourself for CBDCs and digital slavery. Go back to sleep.
People are and will be outraged. "My Constitution" is crying out across the land. Folks will ululate, throw up their hands, shake their heads, call out for reform. But slowly, over time, the short attention span majority will move on to the next big thing and the tech/state collusion will be normalized and we the people have lost another right. Perhaps the most important right of all. And it's out there for all to see.
The new normal has been normalized.
Is there a precedent for this new normalization process? Yes, I think there is.
Edward Snowden: The revelations he made astounded the world. I've always had an uneasy feeling about his revelations. Things just didn't sit right with me. Now I think I can verbalize that uneasy feeling.
How and why would Snowden's revelations be considered controlled narrative to catapult the new normal? It was about exposing the clandestine operations of the alphabet agencies to normalize the fact that we are being spied on. To get you to accept the fact that nothing can be done about it. To get you to accept it and shut up about it. In short, to normalize spying and the loss of rights. You have to admit, it worked. It's out there now and there hasn't been a thing done to thwart it. In fact, it's gotten worse.
You may surmise, "But Snowden's life was ruined over his revelations". Was it? Do you really think that he couldn't be snatched up if the alphabets really wanted to get him?
Conclusion: Trust nothing. Question everything. Fear and despair are the medium, your mind is the target.
Comments
Good morning Free Rangers...
please dissect this and tell me what you think.
Because I wonder...
who'll stop the rain?
Hi JtC and all
Thank you JtC for creating the oasis this place is. Thank you all for your contribution to sustaining it.
Happy New Year!
Re Snowden
I don't think the alphabets planned to strand him in Russia. I think they were expecting to strand him in Somethingstan, where they could move in with impunity. That did not go according to plan, and VV Putin wasn't (and isn't) playing the alphabets' game. It suited him to let them sit there with egg on their collective faces, because anything that makes the West look bad is good for Russia.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
You’re not
wrong hoss
check out cj hopkins @consent factory
folks think he’s hyperbolic w/o actually reading his work
I just think(like you) he’s not wrong
the real question is what is to be done about it
good post as usual
Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .
Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .
If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march
Yep I was going to suggest reading him
CJ Hopkins
He thinks Musk and the Twitter files are a limited hangout or in other words controlled opposition. If Musk really wanted to spill the beans he’d just release all the files and let people dig through them.
Also see his thread reader link that takes a look back at what happened during the earlier days of the Rona experiment. I didn’t know things had gotten that bad.
I’m with you here JtC. I’m trying to read both sides with an open mind. We suddenly get a new shiny thing to look at and off we go whilst the PTB are doing something else that they don’t want us to see.
There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?
Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.
If you want normalizing the new normal --
well, there was Barack Obama, who normalized everything George W. Bush did to make the Federal government into a fascist autocracy. As for the post-pandemic reality, I don't think there's going to be a new normal. The neoliberals are firmly in power, and their responses to situations appear increasingly stupid. They don't "fail" because nearly everyone in the power-mongering class is one of them. An extreme example would be the United Kingdom, where Brexit has screwed the economy. The Conservatives' response? We'll borrow a bunch of money, cut taxes, and it will all work out. Its protagonist? Liz Truss, who lasted 45 days before being ousted as Prime Minister.
“When there's no fight over programme, the election becomes a casting exercise. Trump's win is the unstoppable consequence of this situation.” - Jean-Luc Melanchon
A slight disagreement
When Marie Antoinette said "let them eat cake" she was not saying what people today think. "cake" was what the French called burnt crusts of the bread that were trimmed off and discarded. She was not telling them to eat something anyone with a brain would know they could not afford, she was literally telling them to eat garbage.
When Obama said, "You're right. Now make me do it." he was not quoting FDR, he was gloating.
What comes next? Pelosi would say the National Guard and Kent State. But Arendt said after Kent State comes the guillotine. She was wrong, but that was because the government blinked. They won't this time, but we probably will.
On to Biden since 1973
Wasn't even Marie Antoinette who said it
The story predates her by quite a chunk (Rousseau's Confessions, written 1765), and may date back to the reign of Louis XIV, as Rousseau did not specify which "great princess" was supposed to have said it.
There is no justice. There can be no peace.
Agree with the core of your argument, JTC
I'll connect it up in a second.
“More borrowing only ever makes sense if you are expecting a larger economy in the future. All economic expansion is based on energy. Countries with energy can expand, those without cannot.” Chris Martenson
Vladimir Putin in last weeks Press Conference: "We have everything. Ukraine has only what it can beg or borrow.
This conflict/war has filled the media since February and America has been rallied mercilessly around it as our money goes into thin air, or more accurately, the wealthiest pockets.
It is a war in that hundreds of thousands of people are suffering and dead. Ukraine is a dark smoldering ruin.
But it is not a war about winning and losing. Just a money laundering scheme that will be replaced by another "emergency" sooner than we think.
Snowden as part of The Plan? IDK.
Musk? Probably.
If there is anything that can
deterderail The Plan, I cannot see what it is.NYCVG
It is a tale oft told and quite well at that -
I take as my text the second book of Alice, "Through The Looking Glass", Chapgter IV. Peruse it thoroughly, no skimming, at least twice, but three is better "What I tell you three times is true" L. Carroll, "The Hunting of the SnarK".
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
It seems to me,
that there are far too many oysters parading along the beach today.
Many levels to explore in Carroll‘s writing. Always worth another read. Thanks for sharing!
“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024
He was a master at social, political and existential
commentary and analysis. Also a very good logician.
be well and have a good one
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
Bravo!
I was with you every step of the way. I've been spotting marvelous social parallels in the English literature of that period, as well.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"
the files confirm what we already knew...
or at least suspected. Let's see the CIA/FBI/DHS/etc were manipulating social media...well color me surprised. I remember Operation Mockingbird...and the file prove it is alive and well. Duh.
Wikileaks did the same, but when TPTB hold the megaphone, the people remain ill-informed.
Never trust an oligarch, but I'm glad we're seeing this bit of a reveal of the dark underbelly of deep state.
Thanks for the OT. Everyone have a great New Year!
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
Whereas,
the alphabet agencies stayed undercover, the New Normal is for them to be out in the open.
Whereas, they once secretly buried Truth, they overtly bury Truth.
They must believe the Truth will set you free.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
We learned during Bush that the phone companies
were letting the spy agencies have total access to our phone calls and yet nothing came from it except that congress made it legal and Obama signed off on it.
We’ve seen since Russia Gate that ex intelligence goons had been hired to tell us the news. People who used to decry that just accepted them doing it.
But of course republicans are going to hold hearings to get to the bottom of it right? Yeah sure you betcha!
There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?
Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.
It's obvious
The only dividing line in this country is the clear delineation of the 99% and that most fortunate and deserving 1%.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
Amen
I don't know, Snode,
What I do know is they are hiding it. I draw the conclusion they have good reason why we hoi polloi should be kept ignorant of The Plan. That leads me to my next conclusion: If I (we) knew the details of The Plan, we just might make a volcano eruption look like weak tea. We have one, and only one power. We outnumber them 99 to 1.
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981
I have no proof but consider this possibility.
The attempt to remove Huawei from the 5G competition was not so much about security concerns but rather that the alphabets would not have access to a backdoor to spy on citizens.
I am not nearly as suspicious as you are
...to my great surprise. I thought I was on the bleeding edge of cynicism and skepticism when it comes to spotting US gaslighting. Now I see where I slipped up.
I was very troubled by the ongoing US attack on the privately-owned tech-firm Huawei. Even the latest global "chips" chaos being orchestrated against China by US trade sanctions looks tame next to Huawei. However, I completely missed the CIA motive of establishing a proprietary spying system on American telephones, that you suggest. When the "anonymous US Officials "claimed that Huawei had hidden a spy chip in their 5G products," I was greatly amused. US military scientists never found said chip, afaik, yet they insisted that the spy chips were there all the same. Hahaha.
I assumed that the US attack on Huawei, worldwide, was a singular attack on China's economy. This, so that the US could carve out a competitive advantage over China in the global market. It was a successful attack, too. (Even though the unintended consequences and adversity blowbback have been enormous.) It just didn't occur to me that the geniuses at the CIA had a secret plan to engineer a backdoor in US telephone equipment, which all Americans would be forced to use. (This holds true for compliant US allies and their own retrograde populations.)
One consequence of this folly is that the pseudo 5G network in the US is a far cry from the deployment of an authentic integrated 5G network, with all its potential intact. Asia will usher that era in. However, tech is evolving so rapidly (with the help of quantum computing in China), that tech innovators are currently sketching 7G-level platform concepts, which include intra-solar system communications and potential interstellar linking and dialup.
Unintended consequences.
Currently, the US has declared a global blockade to stop any nation from selling advanced semiconductor chips to China. This has forced China to design their own advanced semiconductors for use in the advanced electronics they produce and export. But Chinese scientists have already made a great leap forward in the semiconductor area, according to announcements this past week. This is exactly what happen when the US flatly refused to sell China Intel chips for their University system academic network. Eighteen months later, China had built the fastest super computers in the world using advanced chips that they designed themselve. Suddenly, quantum computing was on display. China was using its new supercomputers to transport physical matter across space and time. Among other things. Yikes.
The laws of physics seem to suggest that if a rival nation develops quantum computing — even just one year before you do — the rival will advance so fast you will never catch up to them again.
More unintended consequences.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"
Great post!
More of a starting point than a finished product with this wisdom:
The challenge posed by the Casey quote is to find some way to retrieve objective reality from the quagmire of mediated "information." I come closest to committing the sin of despair when I see or hear people whose opinions are in synch with mine talk about reliable "sources."
I'm certain that within the cacophony of asserted facts and offered opinions that we can observe on our flat screens, there are lots of honest and accurate accounts. But how do you know which ones? Anything can be a false flag, planted to define the opposition in a particular way to suit the liars.
This is a desolate concept, this trust nothing business. But it is the only way back.
Lies are relatively easy to suss out. Figuring out the purpose of a given lie is a little harder, but at least the tool of logic is helpful. The liar is hiding something.
Beyond this rudimentary glance into the looking glass, it gets extremely difficult to determine the precise answers to the traditional journalistic questions of who, what, when, where and how. Harder still, to figure out Why?
Daunting task, getting to the truth, but you have to start somewhere.
I cried when I wrote this song. Sue me if I play too long.
Normalizing Naziism is all I can feel.
Which ends up to have nothing but Nazis around with a controlled anti-Nazi and anti-war propaganda, which is pretty worthless. I just saw a documentary abbout the KZ, Dachau and some surviving
hostages of Hitlers SS, the Wittelsbacker family (barons (?))
Die Wittelsbacher
What would the world look like if the Amiericans hadn't liberated the Germans from themselves? And the KZs?
Or without the Russians fighting against the invading German Wehrmacht, successfully, thank God.
Why don't you never admit that you did some very good. Your modesty sounds a little ... too modest. Great essay, JtC.
https://www.euronews.com/live