Normalizing the New Normal

This is an opinion piece. I have no proof other than my lying eyes. And my intuitive gut. I'll throw this out there as speculative fodder for the un-indoctrinated and open mind.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

I've been thinking for a while now that both sides of any given narrative are controlled.

Full Spectrum Dominance - Are we there yet?

Sure does seem like it to me. Please consider this:

Suppose you are a propagandist. Would it not be optimum to control both sides of a narrative? Both sides of an issue, pro and con. That would be total control, full spectrum dominance if you will. Could it be possible that our realities are so controlled that the idea of oppositional perception is but a facade? In today's world who knows what is real, right? With all the gaslighting and lying is it any wonder that folks are confused? Is that not the tenet of Full Spectrum Dominance?

I think that if you look you can see it in many issues nowadays, it may be subtle as is all good propaganda. The yin and yang may be manipulated into a soup of disinformation and obfuscation. Think about how you form your opinions, what you read, what you see, what you think about. If one could control that input then one could formulate your reality.

Source

Examples:

Elon Musk: Something just hasn't sit well with me about this Elon Musk and Twitter deal. It all seems contrived. I certainly don't consider him a hero as some have made him out to be. Could there be more to his Twitter acquisition than just his self proclaimed altruistic motivation. I'll put a theory out there and let you be the judge.

learning-while-earning-the-new-normal_0.jpg

Let's suppose that freedom of speech may not be Musk's ultimate goal in buying Twitter. Let's suppose that normalizing the new normal is actually the goal. What do I mean by that?

Musk is bringing front and center the alphabet agencies hand in censoring Twitter users. He is exposing that which many of us have suspected for a long time, that is, the government is colluding with big tech to catapult their narrative and to shut down oppositional view points. Exposing that is a good thing, right? My immediate reaction was, "Sure is". But, wait a minute.

Since I've been going on about normalizing the new normal, let me try to explain. The behind the scenes collusion of big tech and the state is being exposed with the intent to normalize that unholy marriage. To put it out there for all to see. It's shocking, right? But after a while the shock wears off and people begin to accept it. There's nothing that can be done about it, so we have to live with it, right? There's no hope citizen, accept your medicine and let Big Daddy Government handle this. Accept this fact and prepare yourself for CBDCs and digital slavery. Go back to sleep.

People are and will be outraged. "My Constitution" is crying out across the land. Folks will ululate, throw up their hands, shake their heads, call out for reform. But slowly, over time, the short attention span majority will move on to the next big thing and the tech/state collusion will be normalized and we the people have lost another right. Perhaps the most important right of all. And it's out there for all to see.

The new normal has been normalized.

Is there a precedent for this new normalization process? Yes, I think there is.

Edward Snowden: The revelations he made astounded the world. I've always had an uneasy feeling about his revelations. Things just didn't sit right with me. Now I think I can verbalize that uneasy feeling.

How and why would Snowden's revelations be considered controlled narrative to catapult the new normal? It was about exposing the clandestine operations of the alphabet agencies to normalize the fact that we are being spied on. To get you to accept the fact that nothing can be done about it. To get you to accept it and shut up about it. In short, to normalize spying and the loss of rights. You have to admit, it worked. It's out there now and there hasn't been a thing done to thwart it. In fact, it's gotten worse.

You may surmise, "But Snowden's life was ruined over his revelations". Was it? Do you really think that he couldn't be snatched up if the alphabets really wanted to get him?

Conclusion: Trust nothing. Question everything. Fear and despair are the medium, your mind is the target.

Share
up
21 users have voted.

Comments

please dissect this and tell me what you think.

Because I wonder...

who'll stop the rain?

up
17 users have voted.
janis b's picture

@JtC

Thank you JtC for creating the oasis this place is. Thank you all for your contribution to sustaining it.

Happy New Year!

up
8 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

I don't think the alphabets planned to strand him in Russia. I think they were expecting to strand him in Somethingstan, where they could move in with impunity. That did not go according to plan, and VV Putin wasn't (and isn't) playing the alphabets' game. It suited him to let them sit there with egg on their collective faces, because anything that makes the West look bad is good for Russia.

up
15 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

wrong hoss
check out cj hopkins @consent factory

folks think he’s hyperbolic w/o actually reading his work

I just think(like you) he’s not wrong

the real question is what is to be done about it

good post as usual

up
16 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

snoopydawg's picture

@Tall Bald and Ugly

CJ Hopkins

He thinks Musk and the Twitter files are a limited hangout or in other words controlled opposition. If Musk really wanted to spill the beans he’d just release all the files and let people dig through them.

Also see his thread reader link that takes a look back at what happened during the earlier days of the Rona experiment. I didn’t know things had gotten that bad.

I’m with you here JtC. I’m trying to read both sides with an open mind. We suddenly get a new shiny thing to look at and off we go whilst the PTB are doing something else that they don’t want us to see.

up
12 users have voted.

There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?

Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.

Cassiodorus's picture

well, there was Barack Obama, who normalized everything George W. Bush did to make the Federal government into a fascist autocracy. As for the post-pandemic reality, I don't think there's going to be a new normal. The neoliberals are firmly in power, and their responses to situations appear increasingly stupid. They don't "fail" because nearly everyone in the power-mongering class is one of them. An extreme example would be the United Kingdom, where Brexit has screwed the economy. The Conservatives' response? We'll borrow a bunch of money, cut taxes, and it will all work out. Its protagonist? Liz Truss, who lasted 45 days before being ousted as Prime Minister.

up
10 users have voted.

“When there's no fight over programme, the election becomes a casting exercise. Trump's win is the unstoppable consequence of this situation.” - Jean-Luc Melanchon

When Marie Antoinette said "let them eat cake" she was not saying what people today think. "cake" was what the French called burnt crusts of the bread that were trimmed off and discarded. She was not telling them to eat something anyone with a brain would know they could not afford, she was literally telling them to eat garbage.
When Obama said, "You're right. Now make me do it." he was not quoting FDR, he was gloating.
What comes next? Pelosi would say the National Guard and Kent State. But Arendt said after Kent State comes the guillotine. She was wrong, but that was because the government blinked. They won't this time, but we probably will.

up
15 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

TheOtherMaven's picture

@doh1304

The story predates her by quite a chunk (Rousseau's Confessions, written 1765), and may date back to the reign of Louis XIV, as Rousseau did not specify which "great princess" was supposed to have said it.

up
6 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

I'll connect it up in a second.

“More borrowing only ever makes sense if you are expecting a larger economy in the future. All economic expansion is based on energy. Countries with energy can expand, those without cannot.” Chris Martenson

Vladimir Putin in last weeks Press Conference: "We have everything. Ukraine has only what it can beg or borrow.

This conflict/war has filled the media since February and America has been rallied mercilessly around it as our money goes into thin air, or more accurately, the wealthiest pockets.

It is a war in that hundreds of thousands of people are suffering and dead. Ukraine is a dark smoldering ruin.

But it is not a war about winning and losing. Just a money laundering scheme that will be replaced by another "emergency" sooner than we think.

Snowden as part of The Plan? IDK.

Musk? Probably.

If there is anything that can deter derail The Plan, I cannot see what it is.

up
13 users have voted.

NYCVG

enhydra lutris's picture

I take as my text the second book of Alice, "Through The Looking Glass", Chapgter IV. Peruse it thoroughly, no skimming, at least twice, but three is better "What I tell you three times is true" L. Carroll, "The Hunting of the SnarK".

They were standing under a tree, each with an arm round the other's neck, and Alice knew which was which in a moment, because one of them had `DUM' embroidered on his collar, and the other `DEE.' `I suppose they've each got "TWEEDLE" round at the back of the collar,' she said to herself.

They stood so still that she quite forgot they were alive, and she was just looking round to see if the word "TWEEDLE" was written at the back of each collar, when she was startled by a voice coming from the one marked `DUM.'

`If you think we're wax-works,' he said, `you ought to pay, you know. Wax-works weren't made to be looked at for nothing, Nohow!'

`Contrariwise,' added the one marked `DEE,' `if you think we're alive, you ought to speak.'

`I'm sure I'm very sorry,' was all Alice could say; for the words of the old song kept ringing through her head like the ticking of a clock, and she could hardly help saying them out loud: --

`Tweedledum and Tweedledee
Agreed to have a battle;
For Tweedledum said Tweedledee
Had spoiled his nice new rattle.

Just then flew down a monstrous crow,
As black as a tar-barrel;
Which frightened both the heroes so,
They quite forgot their quarrel.'

`I know what you're thinking about,' said Tweedledum: `but it isn't so, nohow.'

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'

`I was thinking,' Alice said very politely, `which is the best way out of this wood: it's getting so dark. Would you tell me, please?'

But the little men only looked at each other and grinned.

They looked so exactly like a couple of great schoolboys, that Alice couldn't help pointing her finger at Tweedledum, and saying `First Boy!'

`Nohow!' Tweedledum cried out briskly, and shut his mouth up again with a snap.

`Next Boy!' said Alice, passing on to Tweedledee, though she felt quite certain he would only shout out "Contrariwise!' and so he did.

`You've been wrong!' cried Tweedledum. `The first thing in a visit is to say "How d'ye do?" and shake hands!' And here the two brothers gave each other a hug, and then they held out the two hands that were free, to shake hands with her.

Alice did not like shaking hands with either of them first, for fear of hurting the other one's feelings; so, as the best way out of the difficulty, she took hold of both hands at once: the next moment they were dancing found in a ring. This seemed quite natural (she remembered afterwards), and she was not even surprised to hear music playing: it seemed to come from the tree under which they were dancing, and it was done (as well as she could make it out) by the branches rubbing one across the other, like fiddles and fiddle-sticks.

`But it certainly was funny,' (Alice said afterwards, when she was telling her sister the history of all this,) `to find myself singing "Here we go round the mulberry bush." I don't know when I began it, but somehow I felt as if I'd been singing it a long long time!'

The other two dancers were fat, and very soon out of breath. `Four times round is enough for one dance,' Tweedledum panted out, and they left off dancing as suddenly as they had begun: the music stopped at the same moment.

Then they let go of Alice's hands, and stood looking at her for a minute: there was a rather awkward pause, as Alice didn't know how to begin a conversation with people she had just been dancing with. `It would never do to say "How d'ye do?" now,' she said to herself: `we seem to have got beyond that, somehow!'

`I hope you're not much tired?' she said at last.

`Nohow. And thank you very much for asking,' said Tweedledum.

`So much obliged!' added Tweedledee. `You like poetry?'

`Ye-es. pretty well -- some poetry,' Alice said doubtfully. `Would you tell me which road leads out of the wood?'

`What shall I repeat to her?' said Tweedledee, looking round at Tweedledum with great solemn eyes, and not noticing Alice's question.

`"The Walrus and the Carpenter" is the longest,' Tweedledum replied, giving his brother an affectionate hug.

Tweedledee began instantly:

`The sun was shining -- '

Here Alice ventured to interrupt him. `If it's very long,' she said, as politely as she could, `would you please tell me first which road -- '

Tweedledee smiled gently, and began again:

`The sun was shining on the sea,
Shining with all his might:
He did his very best to make
The billows smooth and bright --
And this was odd, because it was
The middle of the night.

The moon was shining sulkily,
Because she thought the sun
Had got no business to be there
After the day was done --
"It's very rude of him," she said,
"To come and spoil the fun!"

The sea was wet as wet could be,
The sands were dry as dry.
You could not see a cloud, because
No cloud was in the sky:
No birds were flying over head --
There were no birds to fly.

The Walrus and the Carpenter
Were walking close at hand;
They wept like anything to see
Such quantities of sand:
"If this were only cleared away,"
They said, "it would be grand!"

"If seven maids with seven mops
Swept it for half a year,
Do you suppose," the Walrus said,
"That they could get it clear?"
"I doubt it," said the Carpenter,
And shed a bitter tear.

"O Oysters, come and walk with us!"
The Walrus did beseech.
"A pleasant walk, a pleasant talk,
Along the briny beach:
We cannot do with more than four,
To give a hand to each."

The eldest Oyster looked at him.
But never a word he said:
The eldest Oyster winked his eye,
And shook his heavy head --
Meaning to say he did not choose
To leave the oyster-bed.

But four young oysters hurried up,
All eager for the treat:
Their coats were brushed, their faces washed,
Their shoes were clean and neat --
And this was odd, because, you know,
They hadn't any feet.

Four other Oysters followed them,
And yet another four;
And thick and fast they came at last,
And more, and more, and more --
All hopping through the frothy waves,
And scrambling to the shore.

The Walrus and the Carpenter
Walked on a mile or so,
And then they rested on a rock
Conveniently low:
And all the little Oysters stood
And waited in a row.

"The time has come," the Walrus said,
"To talk of many things:
Of shoes -- and ships -- and sealing-wax --
Of cabbages -- and kings --
And why the sea is boiling hot --
And whether pigs have wings."

"But wait a bit," the Oysters cried,
"Before we have our chat;
For some of us are out of breath,
And all of us are fat!"
"No hurry!" said the Carpenter.
They thanked him much for that.

"A loaf of bread," the Walrus said,
"Is what we chiefly need:
Pepper and vinegar besides
Are very good indeed --
Now if you're ready Oysters dear,
We can begin to feed."

"But not on us!" the Oysters cried,
Turning a little blue,
"After such kindness, that would be
A dismal thing to do!"
"The night is fine," the Walrus said
"Do you admire the view?

"It was so kind of you to come!
And you are very nice!"
The Carpenter said nothing but
"Cut us another slice:
I wish you were not quite so deaf --
I've had to ask you twice!"

"It seems a shame," the Walrus said,
"To play them such a trick,
After we've brought them out so far,
And made them trot so quick!"
The Carpenter said nothing but
"The butter's spread too thick!"

"I weep for you," the Walrus said.
"I deeply sympathize."
With sobs and tears he sorted out
Those of the largest size.
Holding his pocket handkerchief
Before his streaming eyes.

"O Oysters," said the Carpenter.
"You've had a pleasant run!
Shall we be trotting home again?"
But answer came there none --
And that was scarcely odd, because
They'd eaten every one.'

`I like the Walrus best,' said Alice: `because you see he was a little sorry for the poor oysters.'
`He ate more than the Carpenter, though,' said Tweedledee. `You see he held his handkerchief in front, so that the Carpenter couldn't count how many he took: contrariwise.'

`That was mean!' Alice said indignantly. `Then I like the Carpenter best -- if he didn't eat so many as the Walrus.'

`But he ate as many as he could get,' said Tweedledum.

This was a puzzler. After a pause, Alice began, `Well! They were both very unpleasant characters -- ' Here she checked herself in some alarm, at hearing something that sounded to her like the puffing of a large steam-engine in the wood near them, thought she feared it was more likely to be a wild beast. `Are there any lions or tigers about here?' she asked timidly.

`It's only the Red King snoring,' said Tweedledee.

`Come and look at him!' the brothers cried, and they each took one of Alice's hands, and led her up to where the King was sleeping.

`Isn't he a lovely sight?" said Tweedledum.

Alice couldn't say honestly that he was. He had a tall red night-cap on, with a tassel, and he was lying crumpled up into a sort of untidy heap, and snoring loud -- `fit to snore his head off!' as Tweedledum remarked.

`I'm afraid he'll catch cold with lying on the damp grass,' said Alice, who was a very thoughtful little girl.

`He's dreaming now,' said Tweedledee: `and what do you think he's dreaming about?'

Alice said `Nobody can guess that.'

`Why, about you!' Tweedledee exclaimed, clapping his hands triumphantly. `And if he left off dreaming about you, where do you suppose you'd be?'

`Where I am now, of course,' said Alice.

`Not you!' Tweedledee retorted contemptuously. `You'd be nowhere. Why, you're only a sort of thing in his dream!'

`If that there King was to wake,' added Tweedledum, `you'd go out -- bang! -- just like a candle!'

`I shouldn't!' Alice exclaimed indignantly. `Besides, if I'M only a sort of thing in his dream, what are you, I should like to know?'

`Ditto' said Tweedledum.

`Ditto, ditto' cried Tweedledee.

He shouted this so loud that Alice couldn't help saying, `Hush!

You'll be waking him, I'm afraid, if you make so much noise.'

`Well, it no use your talking about waking him,' said Tweedledum, `when you're only one of the things in his dream. You know very well you're not real.'

`I am real!' said Alice and began to cry.

`You won't make yourself a bit realler by crying,' Tweedledee remarked: `there's nothing to cry about.'

`If I wasn't real,' Alice said -- half-laughing though her tears, it all seemed so ridiculous -- `I shouldn't be able to cry.'

`I hope you don't suppose those are real tears?' Tweedledum interrupted in a tone of great contempt.

`I know they're talking nonsense,' Alice thought to herself: `and it's foolish to cry about it.' So she brushed away her tears, and went on as cheerfully as she could. `At any rate I'd better be getting out of the wood, for really it's coming on very dark. Do you think it's going to rain?'

Tweedledum spread a large umbrella over himself and his brother, and looked up into it. `No, I don't think it is,' he said: `at least -- not under here. Nohow.'

`But it may rain outside?'

`It may -- if it chooses,' said Tweedledee: `we've no objection. Contrariwise.'

`Selfish things!' thought Alice, and she was just going to say `Good-night' and leave them, when Tweedledum sprang out from under the umbrella and seized her by the wrist.

`Do you see that?' he said, in a voice choking with passion, and his eyes grew large and yellow all in a moment, as he pointed with a trembling finger at a small white thing lying under the tree.

`It's only a rattle,' Alice said, after a careful examination of the little white thing. `Not a rattle snake, you know,' she added hastily, thinking that he was frightened: only an old rattle -- quite old and broken.'

`I knew it was!' cried Tweedledum, beginning to stamp about wildly and tear his hair. `It's spoilt, of course!' Here he looked at Tweedledee, who immediately sat down on the ground, and tried to hide himself under the umbrella.

Alice laid her hand upon his arm, and said in a soothing tone, `You needn't be so angry about an old rattle.'

`But it isn't old!' Tweedledum cried, in a greater fury than ever. `It's new, I tell you -- I bought it yesterday -- my nice NEW RATTLE!' and his voice rose to a perfect scream.

All this time Tweedledee was trying his best to fold up the umbrella, with himself in it: which was such an extraordinary thing to do, that it quite took off Alice's attention from the angry brother. But he couldn't quite succeed, and it ended in his rolling over, bundled up in the umbrella, with only his head out: and there he lay, opening and shutting his mouth and his large eyes -- 'looking more like a fish than anything else,' Alice thought.

`Of course you agree to have a battle?' Tweedledum said in a calmer tone.

`I suppose so,' the other sulkily replied, as he crawled out of the umbrella: `only she must help us to dress up, you know.'

So the two brothers went off hand-in-hand into the wood, and returned in a minute with their arms full of things -- such as bolsters, blankets, hearth-rugs, table-cloths, dish-covers and coal-scuttles. `I hope you're a good hand a pinning and tying strings?' Tweedledum remarked. `Every one of these things has got to go on, somehow or other.'

Alice said afterwards she had never seen such a fuss made about anything in all her life -- the way those two bustled about -- and the quantity of things they put on -- and the trouble they gave her in tying strings and fastening buttons -- `Really they'll be more like bundles of old clothes that anything else, by the time they're ready!' she said to herself, as he arranged a bolster round the neck of Tweedledee, `to keep his head from being cut off,' as he said.

`You know,' he added very gravely, `it's one of the most serious things that can possibly happen to one in a battle -- to get one's head cut off.'

Alice laughed loud: but she managed to turn it into a cough, for fear of hurting his feelings.

`Do I look very pale?' said Tweedledum, coming up to have his helmet tied on. (He called it a helmet, though it certainly looked much more like a saucepan.)

`Well -- yes -- a little,' Alice replied gently.

`I'm very brave generally,' he went on in a low voice: `only to-day I happen to have a headache.'

`And I've got a toothache!' said Tweedledee, who had overheard the remark. `I'm far worse off than you!'

`Then you'd better not fight to-day,' said Alice, thinking it a good opportunity to make peace.

`We must have a bit of a fight, but I don't care about going on long,' said Tweedledum. `What's the time now?'

Tweedledee looked at his watch, and said `Half-past four.'

`Let's fight till six, and then have dinner,' said Tweedledum.

`Very well,' the other said, rather sadly: `and she can watch us -- only you'd better not come very close,' he added: `I generally hit everything I can see -- when I get really excited.'

`And I hit everything within reach,' cried Tweedledum, `whether I can see it or not!'

Alice laughed. `You must hit the trees pretty often, I should think,' she said.

Tweedledum looked round him with a satisfied smile. I don't suppose,' he said, `there'll be a tree left standing, for ever so far round, by the time we've finished!'

`And all about a rattle!' said Alice, still hoping to make them a little ashamed of fighting for such a trifle.

`I shouldn't have minded it so much,' said Tweedledum, `if it hadn't been a new one.'

`I wish the monstrous crow would come!' though Alice.

`There's only one sword, you know,' Tweedledum said to his brother: `but you can have the umbrella -- it's quite as sharp. Only we must begin quick. It's getting as dark as it can.'

`And darker.' said Tweedledee.

It was getting dark so suddenly that Alice thought there must be a thunderstorm coming on. `What a thick black cloud that is!' she said. `And how fast it comes! Why, I do believe it's got wings!'

`It's the crow!' Tweedledum cried out in a shrill voice of alarm: and the two brothers took to their heels and were out of sight in a moment.

Alice ran a little way into the wood, and stopped under a large tree. `It can never get at me here,' she thought: `it's far too large to squeeze itself in among the trees. But I wish it wouldn't flap its wings so -- it make quite a hurricane in the wood -- here's somebody's shawl being blown away!'

be well and have a good one

up
7 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

@enhydra lutris
that there are far too many oysters parading along the beach today.

Many levels to explore in Carroll‘s writing. Always worth another read. Thanks for sharing!

up
3 users have voted.

“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024

enhydra lutris's picture

@ovals49

commentary and analysis. Also a very good logician.

be well and have a good one

up
2 users have voted.

That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --

Pluto's Republic's picture

@enhydra lutris

I was with you every step of the way. I've been spotting marvelous social parallels in the English literature of that period, as well.

up
2 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

or at least suspected. Let's see the CIA/FBI/DHS/etc were manipulating social media...well color me surprised. I remember Operation Mockingbird...and the file prove it is alive and well. Duh.

Wikileaks did the same, but when TPTB hold the megaphone, the people remain ill-informed.

Never trust an oligarch, but I'm glad we're seeing this bit of a reveal of the dark underbelly of deep state.

Thanks for the OT. Everyone have a great New Year!

up
10 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

the alphabet agencies stayed undercover, the New Normal is for them to be out in the open.
Whereas, they once secretly buried Truth, they overtly bury Truth.
They must believe the Truth will set you free.

up
8 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

snoopydawg's picture

@on the cusp

were letting the spy agencies have total access to our phone calls and yet nothing came from it except that congress made it legal and Obama signed off on it.

We’ve seen since Russia Gate that ex intelligence goons had been hired to tell us the news. People who used to decry that just accepted them doing it.

But of course republicans are going to hold hearings to get to the bottom of it right? Yeah sure you betcha!

up
7 users have voted.

There were problems with running a campaign of Joy while committing a genocide? Who could have guessed?

Harris is unburdened of speaking going forward.

@snoopydawg that there is no dividing line between the media and government. While they are at it, there is no dividing line between media corporate sponsors and media. Don't blink! You might miss that minuscule difference in Rs and Ds.
The only dividing line in this country is the clear delineation of the 99% and that most fortunate and deserving 1%.

up
6 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

@on the cusp Bothsiderism inserts doubt, infects facts with mistrust. Politics is heat and light but no meaningful difference. It used to be forget what they say, watch what they do. If everything is done behind the curtain, who knows. It's all lets you and him fight. So why not control both sides of the latest kerfuffle. The big question is what's going on elsewhere while we're all watching the Punch and Judy Show.

up
8 users have voted.

@Snode what the bastards are doing in hiding.
What I do know is they are hiding it. I draw the conclusion they have good reason why we hoi polloi should be kept ignorant of The Plan. That leads me to my next conclusion: If I (we) knew the details of The Plan, we just might make a volcano eruption look like weak tea. We have one, and only one power. We outnumber them 99 to 1.

up
3 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

The attempt to remove Huawei from the 5G competition was not so much about security concerns but rather that the alphabets would not have access to a backdoor to spy on citizens.

up
9 users have voted.
Pluto's Republic's picture

@humphrey

...to my great surprise. I thought I was on the bleeding edge of cynicism and skepticism when it comes to spotting US gaslighting. Now I see where I slipped up.

I was very troubled by the ongoing US attack on the privately-owned tech-firm Huawei. Even the latest global "chips" chaos being orchestrated against China by US trade sanctions looks tame next to Huawei. However, I completely missed the CIA motive of establishing a proprietary spying system on American telephones, that you suggest. When the "anonymous US Officials "claimed that Huawei had hidden a spy chip in their 5G products," I was greatly amused. US military scientists never found said chip, afaik, yet they insisted that the spy chips were there all the same. Hahaha.

I assumed that the US attack on Huawei, worldwide, was a singular attack on China's economy. This, so that the US could carve out a competitive advantage over China in the global market. It was a successful attack, too. (Even though the unintended consequences and adversity blowbback have been enormous.) It just didn't occur to me that the geniuses at the CIA had a secret plan to engineer a backdoor in US telephone equipment, which all Americans would be forced to use. (This holds true for compliant US allies and their own retrograde populations.)

One consequence of this folly is that the pseudo 5G network in the US is a far cry from the deployment of an authentic integrated 5G network, with all its potential intact. Asia will usher that era in. However, tech is evolving so rapidly (with the help of quantum computing in China), that tech innovators are currently sketching 7G-level platform concepts, which include intra-solar system communications and potential interstellar linking and dialup.

Unintended consequences.

Currently, the US has declared a global blockade to stop any nation from selling advanced semiconductor chips to China. This has forced China to design their own advanced semiconductors for use in the advanced electronics they produce and export. But Chinese scientists have already made a great leap forward in the semiconductor area, according to announcements this past week. This is exactly what happen when the US flatly refused to sell China Intel chips for their University system academic network. Eighteen months later, China had built the fastest super computers in the world using advanced chips that they designed themselve. Suddenly, quantum computing was on display. China was using its new supercomputers to transport physical matter across space and time. Among other things. Yikes.

The laws of physics seem to suggest that if a rival nation develops quantum computing — even just one year before you do — the rival will advance so fast you will never catch up to them again.

More unintended consequences.

up
2 users have voted.

More of a starting point than a finished product with this wisdom:

Conclusion: Trust nothing. Question everything. Fear and despair are the medium, your mind is the target.

The challenge posed by the Casey quote is to find some way to retrieve objective reality from the quagmire of mediated "information." I come closest to committing the sin of despair when I see or hear people whose opinions are in synch with mine talk about reliable "sources."

I'm certain that within the cacophony of asserted facts and offered opinions that we can observe on our flat screens, there are lots of honest and accurate accounts. But how do you know which ones? Anything can be a false flag, planted to define the opposition in a particular way to suit the liars.

This is a desolate concept, this trust nothing business. But it is the only way back.

Lies are relatively easy to suss out. Figuring out the purpose of a given lie is a little harder, but at least the tool of logic is helpful. The liar is hiding something.

Beyond this rudimentary glance into the looking glass, it gets extremely difficult to determine the precise answers to the traditional journalistic questions of who, what, when, where and how. Harder still, to figure out Why?

Daunting task, getting to the truth, but you have to start somewhere.

up
4 users have voted.

I cried when I wrote this song. Sue me if I play too long.

mimi's picture

Which ends up to have nothing but Nazis around with a controlled anti-Nazi and anti-war propaganda, which is pretty worthless. I just saw a documentary abbout the KZ, Dachau and some surviving
hostages of Hitlers SS, the Wittelsbacker family (barons (?))

Die Wittelsbacher

What would the world look like if the Amiericans hadn't liberated the Germans from themselves? And the KZs?

Or without the Russians fighting against the invading German Wehrmacht, successfully, thank God.

Why don't you never admit that you did some very good. Your modesty sounds a little ... too modest. Great essay, JtC.

up
7 users have voted.