@thanatokephaloides

Does the healing work on mental disorders and injuries to the 'human' part of the brain?

If so, we could maybe colour it like goat's blood and offer quantities of it round on a salver at various PTB social functions/invasion and attack planning sessions. They'd start off gloating over the prospective kills and advance-divvying up the loot they planned to steal, and wind up providing National Health Care and a living wage in their own country instead.

#3

That label...

What happens if you don't keep your unfiltered poison chilled? Does it spoil? Cause I've heard that spoiled poison is nasty.

It reverts to a potion of extra healing......

@ggersh @ggersh

... "That Money's Already Been Spent" - Clinton Foundation Won't Return $250,000 Weinstein Donation

After the Clinton Foundation’s chief spokesman suggested as much in a tweet on Saturday, the Clinton Foundation has confirmed that it will not be returning a $250,000 donation from disgraced Hollywood studio chief Harvey Weinstein, Fox news reported.
OCT 16, 2017 7:00 PM

It may have been dirty money once, but Her has many experts on money-laundering and Knows How To Get Things Done.

Edited because I failed to notice that the block-quotes hadn't taken. Sigh...

#4 "That Money's Already Been Spent" - Clinton Foundation Won't Return $250,000 Weinstein Donation

After the Clinton Foundation’s chief spokesman suggested as much in a tweet on Saturday, the Clinton Foundation has confirmed that it will not be returning a $250,000 donation from disgraced Hollywood studio chief Harvey Weinstein, Fox news reported.
OCT 16, 2017 7:00 PM
114

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg

Hey, Her's still got the Ace card of 9/11 to pull out and wave like a little flag. Remember that first debate in the Dem nom-nom-nom selection process, where Her pointed out how much good Her'd done for Wall St., getting money from President Bush for rebuilding after 9/11.

http://www.politico.com/states/new-york/city-hall/story/2016/04/on-state...

On Staten Island, Clinton thanks Bush for 9/11 aid

By AZI PAYBARAH

04/17/2016 10:00 PM EDT

...The appearance on Staten Island comes as Clinton seeks to project a broader message of electability in November, and prove she can attract white, blue-collar voters. Hours before Clinton’s rally here, Republican frontrunner Donald Trump was six miles away at the Hilton Garden hotel, also on Staten Island, for a speech at the county’s annual luncheon.

Clinton praised Bush for delivering $20 billion in federal aid to New York after the terrorists attacks on September 11. She said that was the dollar figure she requested from the White House, when she was a New York senator. ...

..."I have no time for people who are partisan for the sake of being partisan," she added.

Clinton has not exactly made a habit of praising Bush or promising not to raise taxes on the campaign trail. When Senator Chuck Schumer introduced her at a rally at the Apollo in Harlem recently, the crowd booed when he said Bush tried to privatize Social Security, as Clinton smiled and nodded.

Well, of course, there was this, showing that there was nothing wrong with Republican policy, since the Clinton Dems approved and had tried to initiate this privatization of SS earlier, only Bill got his Dick stuck between a cigar and a hot face hard place:

https://www.counterpunch.org/2004/10/30/how-monica-lewinsky-saved-social...

October 30, 2004
How Monica Lewinsky Saved Social Security

by Robin Blackburn

...Late in 1998 or in the State of the Union message of 1999 a solemn Clinton would have told Congress and the nation that, just like welfare, Social Security was near-broke, had to be “reformed” and its immense pool of capital tendered in part to the mutual funds industry. The itinerary mapped out for Clinton by the Democratic Leadership Committee would have been complete.

It was a desperately close run thing. On the account of members of Clinton’s secret White House team, mandated to map out the privatization path for Social Security, they had got as far down the road as fine-tuning the account numbers for Social Security accounts now released to the captious mercies of Wall Street. But in 1998 the Lewinsky scandal burst upon the President, and as the months sped by and impeachment swelled from a remote specter to a looming reality, Clinton’s polls told him that his only hope was to nourish the widespread popular dislike for the hoity-toity elites intoning Clinton’s death warrant.

In an instant Clinton spun on the dime and became Social Security’s mighty champion, coining the slogan “Save Social Security First”. ...

...Participants at the Harvard conference conceded that severe technical problems beset efforts to introduce commercial practices. The existing program has low administration costs whereas running tens of millions of small investment accounts would be expensive. The secret White House team sought to finesse the problem by pooling individual funds and stripping down the element of choice or customer service. But Summers was unhappy: as one Team member now recalls it, “Deputy Secretary Summers was fond of saying that we had to guard against the risk of setting up the Post Office when people were used to dealing with Federal Express”. And pooled funds were also to be avoided because they would risk government control of business. ...

And I wonder if that $20 billion all went to her constituents, Wall St.? What else needed to be rebuilt in New York, other than the repair of some damage to presumably insured buildings around the heavily insured buildings brought down on 9/11? (I haven't looked into other damage requiring rebuilding, although there was certainly a lot of deadly dust from the vaporization of the Twin Towers, but those in the know didn't seem to be worried at all about that or the health damage sustained by those exposed.)

So, she paid off with a vote...

http://observer.com/2016/03/the-troubling-friendship-of-hillary-clinton-...

The Troubling Friendship of Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush
Both families have circumvented what democracy is supposed to prevent
By Michael Sainato • 03/17/16

...In the most recent Democratic town hall on MSNBC, Ms. Clinton told Chris Matthews her vote for the Iraq War—a manifestation of the Bush administration—was born from her agreement with George W. Bush to secure $20 billion toward rebuilding New York City after 9/11.

“I’m sitting there in the Oval Office, and Bush says to me, ‘What do you need?’ And I said, ‘I need $20 billion to rebuild, you know, New York,’ and he said, ‘You got it.’ And he was good to his word,” Ms. Clinton said. “Literally, that same day, I get back to the Capitol, and the Republicans are trying to take that money away. We kept calling the White House, Bush kept saying, ‘I gave them my word, I’m going to stick with it.’ So, you know, I had a different set of experiences.”

Ms. Clinton’s response was a tangent in defense of her vote for the Iraq War, which Senator Bernie Sanders—who voted against the war—often cites to highlight her poor judgment in foreign policy affairs. ...

but I am curious as to what that $20 billion was spent on, how much went into helping affected New Yorkers and cleaning/repairing public property and how much went to help out Wall St. millionaires/billionaires who, one would think, had insurance.

Plus, I find it hard to imagine that there wasn't profit for Her in there somewhere, going by Her money-grubbing record of betrayal for cash.

(Edit: especially because it's all "I asked for, and got, the money"; Bush said "I gave them my word about the money.")

Does anyone know anything about this?

Kitty has been nobly warming a portion of my side of the bed and I have a book over there, calling me...

#4

of right wing attacks that they just made up against her and Bill so that they looked like they played fast and lose with the rules, not that they had ever done anything wrong?

I'll be here all night. And the next day, weeks, months, years and centuries

@snoopydawg
Did he tire of us or did he get banned for repeatedly trying to blame us all for Trump?

I stopped interacting with him when I figured out what he was doing (campaigning for Her 2020 run), and asked how much he was being paid.

#5

she knows that if there was any solid proof that Russia did anything to interfere with the election, the NSA and all those intelligence agencies she is fond of misquoting would have released it.
If she does actually believe this, then she should direct her anger at Obama for not doing anything to stop it. He said that he was aware of this, but he wanted McConnell to make a joint statement about. McConnell refused so Obama did nothing.
However, before he left office he said that there was no evidence that this happened. And as Linda stated in her comment, all we are seeing are the words alleged and the other words in that context.

Time after time there will be a headline that states: Russia hacked the Vermont energy grid, Russia hacked 21 states voting rolls, ect. But inside the article there is no definitive proof of anything. This is the well known play that makes propaganda work. Someone makes an accusation but then offers no proof that it happened. However, people read the headlines and skip over the words such as alleged.

My opinion is that Hillary is either just stringing her bots along and keeping the tabloid diaries on ToP on the wreck list, or she is spreading this propaganda so that the New McCarthyism makes people more acceptable for a war with Russia. Obama spread lies about Russia all during his tenure. He accused Russia of being aggressive in Ukraine, Syria and other countries when it was actually his administration doing these things.

Unfortunately the propaganda is working on the ToPbots. Every day there is a new accusation about Russian interference. Yesterday I learned that Facebook has destroyed democracy in America forever. And ever Amen. Good grief.
Another thing I have noticed while trolling ToP is that there is a flood of new users with one or two comments and their usernames have numbers in them. Frank1234 or Thelma4321. These types of names flood ToP in 2016 when Correct the Record was paying people to spread pro Hillary messages or combat anti Hillary comments.

@snoopydawg Yup, saw that one dairy the FB (and Russians really) destroyed American democracy. Here I was thinking that corporate lobbyists, big Pharma, oil companies, for profit hospitals and insurance companies, MIC, etc. were the ones subverting democracy. When I do write something and get a response, nearly all are at various levels accusing me of being a Russian troll or offering up bizarre and fantastic counter claims.

#5

she knows that if there was any solid proof that Russia did anything to interfere with the election, the NSA and all those intelligence agencies she is fond of misquoting would have released it.
If she does actually believe this, then she should direct her anger at Obama for not doing anything to stop it. He said that he was aware of this, but he wanted McConnell to make a joint statement about. McConnell refused so Obama did nothing.
However, before he left office he said that there was no evidence that this happened. And as Linda stated in her comment, all we are seeing are the words alleged and the other words in that context.

Time after time there will be a headline that states: Russia hacked the Vermont energy grid, Russia hacked 21 states voting rolls, ect. But inside the article there is no definitive proof of anything. This is the well known play that makes propaganda work. Someone makes an accusation but then offers no proof that it happened. However, people read the headlines and skip over the words such as alleged.

My opinion is that Hillary is either just stringing her bots along and keeping the tabloid diaries on ToP on the wreck list, or she is spreading this propaganda so that the New McCarthyism makes people more acceptable for a war with Russia. Obama spread lies about Russia all during his tenure. He accused Russia of being aggressive in Ukraine, Syria and other countries when it was actually his administration doing these things.

Unfortunately the propaganda is working on the ToPbots. Every day there is a new accusation about Russian interference. Yesterday I learned that Facebook has destroyed democracy in America forever. And ever Amen. Good grief.
Another thing I have noticed while trolling ToP is that there is a flood of new users with one or two comments and their usernames have numbers in them. Frank1234 or Thelma4321. These types of names flood ToP in 2016 when Correct the Record was paying people to spread pro Hillary messages or combat anti Hillary comments.

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg

From TOP with numbers following his name who posted essays and comments here that fell along the lines that we weren't sufficiently focused on banding together under the Democratic umbrella to fight Das Pumpkinfuhrer with the likes of Kamala Harris as part of the democratic progressive solution we former Berners should support?

#5

she knows that if there was any solid proof that Russia did anything to interfere with the election, the NSA and all those intelligence agencies she is fond of misquoting would have released it.
If she does actually believe this, then she should direct her anger at Obama for not doing anything to stop it. He said that he was aware of this, but he wanted McConnell to make a joint statement about. McConnell refused so Obama did nothing.
However, before he left office he said that there was no evidence that this happened. And as Linda stated in her comment, all we are seeing are the words alleged and the other words in that context.

Time after time there will be a headline that states: Russia hacked the Vermont energy grid, Russia hacked 21 states voting rolls, ect. But inside the article there is no definitive proof of anything. This is the well known play that makes propaganda work. Someone makes an accusation but then offers no proof that it happened. However, people read the headlines and skip over the words such as alleged.

My opinion is that Hillary is either just stringing her bots along and keeping the tabloid diaries on ToP on the wreck list, or she is spreading this propaganda so that the New McCarthyism makes people more acceptable for a war with Russia. Obama spread lies about Russia all during his tenure. He accused Russia of being aggressive in Ukraine, Syria and other countries when it was actually his administration doing these things.

Unfortunately the propaganda is working on the ToPbots. Every day there is a new accusation about Russian interference. Yesterday I learned that Facebook has destroyed democracy in America forever. And ever Amen. Good grief.
Another thing I have noticed while trolling ToP is that there is a flood of new users with one or two comments and their usernames have numbers in them. Frank1234 or Thelma4321. These types of names flood ToP in 2016 when Correct the Record was paying people to spread pro Hillary messages or combat anti Hillary comments.

@k9disc

2016: Narcissistic Liar vs Lying Narcissist.

Horrid taste! More filling!

#6

@Snode

But, across America, the large mass of kids in the middle—the ones without money, book smarts, or athletic prowess—were outsiders in their own schools.

I know from personal experience that those who only possess the "book smarts" are also listed among the designated losers. Without money or athletic prowess, they (we) had no realistic shot at college, or were doomed to a life of failure laboring under student loan debts. In many cases, social pressures at school and at home resulted in less-than-optimal grades, especially when GPA-killing Physical Education enters into the mix. And, of course, the support we needed wasn't there; those who had a reasonable shot at a bachelor's degree -- those with money or athletic talent to cover the cash money bills -- were the ones who got it.

#7 Atul Gawande in the 10/2/17 New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/02/is-health-care-a-right had an article "Is Health Care a Right?" and in the middle he had an observation obliquely touching on why the election went the way it did. He speaks of a teacher wanting to bring the best out in all her students, no matter what level they could reach.

" When she first started out as a teacher, she said, her most satisfying experiences came from working with eager, talented kids who were hungry for her help in preparing them for a path to college and success. But she soon realized that her class, like America as a whole, would see fewer than half of its students earn a bachelor’s degree. Her job was therefore to try to help all of her students reach their potential—to contribute in their own way and to pursue happiness on their own terms.

But, she said, by eighth grade profound divisions had already been cemented. The honors kids—the Hillary Clintons and Mitt Romneys of the school—sat at the top of the meritocratic heap, getting attention and encouragement. The kids with the greatest needs had special-education support. But, across America, the large mass of kids in the middle—the ones without money, book smarts, or athletic prowess—were outsiders in their own schools. Few others cared about what they felt or believed or experienced. They were the unspecial and unpromising, looked down upon by and almost completely separated from the college-bound crowd. Life was already understood to be a game of winners and losers; they were the designated losers, and they resented it. The most consistent message these students had received was that their lives were of less value than others’. Is it so surprising that some of them find satisfaction in a politics that says, essentially, Screw ’em all?"

Not too much different from the democratic, self defined meritocratic party.

@Snode The class, racial, and ethnic divisions by late grade school are also profound. I went form a small Catholic school where poor students like me were easy targets for violence by the nuns to a public school which where most of the students were black or Hispanic (The Catholic school shut down as the church shut down). There were three "tracks". The first was mostly white with a smattering of Hispanic and black students. The academic best. The middle track was working class whites and mostly Hispanics. The third was nearly all black students. I was tracked in the lowest category and for a good part of my public school education, I was the only white student in many classes. It was obvious to me being that young that nobody cared about the 2nd and 3rd tiers.

#7 Atul Gawande in the 10/2/17 New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/02/is-health-care-a-right had an article "Is Health Care a Right?" and in the middle he had an observation obliquely touching on why the election went the way it did. He speaks of a teacher wanting to bring the best out in all her students, no matter what level they could reach.

" When she first started out as a teacher, she said, her most satisfying experiences came from working with eager, talented kids who were hungry for her help in preparing them for a path to college and success. But she soon realized that her class, like America as a whole, would see fewer than half of its students earn a bachelor’s degree. Her job was therefore to try to help all of her students reach their potential—to contribute in their own way and to pursue happiness on their own terms.

But, she said, by eighth grade profound divisions had already been cemented. The honors kids—the Hillary Clintons and Mitt Romneys of the school—sat at the top of the meritocratic heap, getting attention and encouragement. The kids with the greatest needs had special-education support. But, across America, the large mass of kids in the middle—the ones without money, book smarts, or athletic prowess—were outsiders in their own schools. Few others cared about what they felt or believed or experienced. They were the unspecial and unpromising, looked down upon by and almost completely separated from the college-bound crowd. Life was already understood to be a game of winners and losers; they were the designated losers, and they resented it. The most consistent message these students had received was that their lives were of less value than others’. Is it so surprising that some of them find satisfaction in a politics that says, essentially, Screw ’em all?"

Not too much different from the democratic, self defined meritocratic party.

@thanatokephaloides

That filling probably has mercury in it, too.

#10

She's delusional. Doctors are opining that Trump is nuts.
I have little doubt he is. However, I have little doubt she is, too.

As I said above, "horrid taste, more filling"!

@Ellen North @Ellen North
I actually only saw a pic gallery on the huffpo piece unless I got distracted lol (shocker they haven't taken that long piece down), and the 2nd link has a video I could only view by clicking the YouTube link in the video box.

Heading to 3rd link now.

Edit add: all 3 links, and videos I found within, worked.

Didn't you recently update your iOS? Might be that.

#13

Well, the first video started to play for a bit, then stopped and said it wasn't available. The second just became a white, blank space when I clicked on it; FB wouldn't let me see the University's FB page from either link, probably just because I'm not a member and don't even want to click on the 'not now' button; and the last link said 'sorry, that page does not exist'. Bit I can just imagine what the students would have had to say about the shameful prostitution of the heads of their institution to the Mad Bomber...