The Quest for the New World Order

The incessant Russia/Putin propaganda we've been subjected to over the last four years along with the aggressive U.S. actions against Russia, i.e., Ukraine regime change, further encroachment of NATO on its borders, sanctions, the U.S. led Syria and Libya wars, etc., have led many to believe a military war with Russia might happen.

But what about China? Two respected geopolitical writers have both asked the same question, are we headed for war with China over the South China Sea?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/countdown-to-war-in-the-south-china-sea/553...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/29/is-war-inevitable-in-the-south-ch...

Joachim Hagopian asks the question in his article, "Obama’s Infamous Pivot to Asia: Countdown to War in the South China Sea?"

"On July 12th, 2016 the UN arbitration decision against China’s claim of territorial islands based on “historical rights” ruled in favor of the Philippines, serving as the latest international war machine’s ratcheting up imminent all-out war. The United Nations as a globalist extension of American Empire’s dominance over the rest of the world is just another engineered US machination designed to instigate further conflict and tension as the latest face of Obama’s announced 2011 Asian pivot, pushing, prodding and provoking a high risk military showdown against re-designated cold war enemy China being potentially pinned in on all sides by US attempted aggression."

Pepe Escobar asks the question in this article, "Is War Inevitable in the South China Sea?"

"The strategic geopolitical centrality of the South China Sea is well known: A naval crossroads of roughly $5 trillion in annual trade; transit sea lanes to roughly half of global daily merchant shipping, a third of global oil trade and two-thirds of all liquid natural gas (LNG) trade.

It’s also the key hub of China’s global supply chain. The South China Sea protects China’s access to the India Ocean, which happens to be Beijing’s crucial energy lifeline. Woody Island in the Paracels, southeast of Hainan island, also happens to be a key bridgehead in One Belt, One Road (OBOR) – the New Silk Roads. The South China Sea is strictly linked to the Maritime Silk Road."

The United States, on its way to the New World Order, i.e., world hegemony, sole superpower deluxeorama, can't let China have that power.

"So these are the stakes. The indispensable nation’s military hegemony over the whole South China Sea must always be undisputed. Always. But already it is not. China is positioning itself as a cunning, asymmetrical aspirant to “peer competitor”. For the moment Beijing ranks second in the Pentagon’s list of “existential threats” to the US. Were not for Russia’s formidable nuclear power, China would already be number one.

But make no mistake; at some point in the future, there will be a serious confrontation between the US and China over“access” to the South China Sea."

They're not going to stop. The quest for the New World Order will not stop until they either achieve it or blow everything up trying. Back in 2007, General Wesley Clark told us about the "seven countries in five years" plan of the Bush administration. Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. But it was never going to stop there. The plan has always been for the United States to rule the world. Or at least those behind it, those that really benefit from that sort of thing. China and Russia are in the way and must be dealt with.

"Clearly over the last several years the Western ruling elite’s agenda has ultimately been bent on triggering unthinkable levels of violence and earthly destruction between the forces of the West and East fought in every corner of the globe. Ever since the dissolution of the Soviet Empire a quarter century ago that left the US Empire the last superpower still standing, put simply, sharing global power in a bipolar world with Eastern nations runs counter to New World Order’s one world government tyranny.

Be it the US military, NATO or ISIS, all are simply malevolent tools misused by evil-minded globalists to promote planetary destabilization and destruction in order to usher in their New World Order. Their Great Game must be stopped. before it’s too late.

We citizens of the world must finally rise up and begin holding accountable the controlling psychopaths who’ve hijacked for far too long both humanity and our only planet we call home."

Trump vs. Clinton? It doesn't matter which one, this agenda is set. The Nobel Peace prize War Criminal Obama proved that. This global power struggle is probably unstoppable. The only possible way to stop it is if enough people rise up and stop these crazy bastards. This is a giant game the people of the earth don't want to play, it's the psychopaths among us taking us for a ride.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

detroitmechworks's picture

Is the kind of person who thinks mass murder is acceptable. But it doesn't count as Genocide, Because Nukes don't freaking discriminate, and that's what the American public really cares about... INTENT.

War Pigs doesn't even feel heavy enough for the disgust I feel towards that kind of idiot.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

Big Al's picture

8 year term at war. Ain't that special.

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

that the US will never experience peace again.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

Bisbonian's picture

Only first Prez to serve his entire 8 year term at war.

Hillary is gearing up the Two Minutes Hate for Russia already, long before her term has started.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

dervish's picture

order of business. That will inevitably lead to some sort of event or situation, accidental or intentional, that will bring us into conflict with Russia. God help us.

She has a long list of neocons as "advisors" many of whom we know from the past.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

sojourns's picture

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

up
0 users have voted.
featheredsprite's picture

nations as Russia and/or China since WWII. Do these hawks have any idea what they're going up against? We can boast of having the greatest military in the world but we really don't know that. There is no guarantee that the destruction of war would take place "over there." It could very well happen right here.

Then what? We could be bombed back into the 19th Century, split into about 5 different countries rife with border conflicts. What fun!

Of the four possible people for president before us today, Hillary is the most likely to get us into a big, huge war.

up
0 users have voted.

Life is strong. I'm weak, but Life is strong.

equipped or even intended to win wars. The intention is to prolong as long as possible to maximize profits. Equipped with fighters and bombers that don't, battle ships that can't, and body armor and armored vehicles that aren't. You cannot convince me that a military that spends more than the next 9-12 (depending on how you calculate) countries combined, and an Air Force larger than the next six combined, with the USNavy being #2, cannot bomb a small stone aged country into the stone age unless it is intentional.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no such thing as TMI. It can always be held in reserve for extortion.

Here's how cynical I've become. They're all in it together. The US, China, Russia. All controlled by big money. It's all orchestrated for the benefit of us common folk, here and elsewhere. I don't know how the Russian and Chinese economies work, but I'm sure Putin and his counterpart in China have vested interests in their own MICs. We all go to war for a few years, kill a few million people, the big three sign a "peace agreement" and divide up the spoils. A handful of psychopaths in Russia, China and the good ol' USA get even wealthier. And as usual, it will be the poor doing the fighting and dying. But hey, there's medals to hand out and patriot songs to sing...

up
0 users have voted.

No maybe about it. They may be, too, but that won't make our radioactive future any better.

up
0 users have voted.
Bisbonian's picture

The radiation will make the place uninhabitable.

up
0 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

Maybe next time there'll be a rational species.

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

about Iraq, yet they shrugged it off, and learned nothing. I can hear them now, "Everybody wants to go to Damascus, but real men go to Moscow (and Beijing)".

The US hasn't experienced the full effect of a real war since the Civil War, complete with refugees, destruction of homes, civilian deaths, etc. These neocons haven't the first clue.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

tapu dali's picture

would rather not prefer to return to the embrace of Mother Russia.

I believe they have that right under the UN charter.

up
0 users have voted.

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

dervish's picture

Putin has made no indication that that would ever happen. The larger risk is the US pushing Russia further into a corner through NATO. Hillary's very first order of business will be starting at the very least, a proxy war with Russia. The aggressor here isn't Russia.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

sojourns's picture

a single aggressor. Under Putin, Russia has plans within plans to expand its borders. Does it not strike you that snatching up Crimea is an example? As it see it, Putin's behavior is just the excuse that Clinton want to further beef up forces in neighboring Europe, expanding her desire for military adventurism. And she will do it, but no-one is twisting Putin's arm.

Annexing Tibet was not exactly a good will gesture on the part of China and their island building exercises are far more than a defensive posture both western interests and those of neighboring Asian nations.

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

lotlizard's picture

was, of course, an exemplary good will gesture on the part of Western world leadership and its values.

up
0 users have voted.
Azazello's picture

In fact, I think Russia's actions are defensive in nature and "Russian aggression" is kind of like Bigfoot or Saddam's WMDs. Some claim to have seen them, I remain unconvinced.

up
0 users have voted.

We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.

dervish's picture

Right? Or that it's majority Russian, and voted overwhelmingly to leave the chaos of Ukraine?

Russia annexing Ukraine is not the equivalent of the US sponsoring coups and other acts of aggression on Russia's own borders.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

sojourns's picture

follow up reading on the history of Crimea. In short, Crimea existed as the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, with in Ukraine from 1991 to 2014. To me, that indicates that, the annexation is two fold. Yes, Russians in Crimea wanted very much to be annexed and Russia wants Crimea primarily as it is an important port, something Russia does not have enough in excess.

I wasn't really trying to make a comparison as to who is the worse hegemon: The U.S. or Russia or China. I'm saying there is enough blame to go around and it most certainly doesn't help the U.S. to elect another hawk.

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

Big Al's picture

That's not what happened. That's the propaganda line, but the people of Crimea voted for it.

up
0 users have voted.

What is there in Poland or the Baltics that is of material or strategic importance to risk a war? Risk a war against a military alliance those defense budgets exceed Russia's easily 10X? Even Putin has said Russian could not with conventional weapons resist the full onslaught of NATO. So Putin believes he can overcome NATO directly and manage an occupation of tens of millions of people--doing what the US military could not do against third world rebels in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Putin's "snatch" of Crimea was in total reaction to the violent coupe in the Ukraine.

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

It's almost like a Tom Clancy novel (Red Storm Rising) and every bit as fictitious. It seems that some take it as priori that Putin wants to conquer the Baltics, Poland and elsewhere, and that just won't happen, can't happen.

They just don't want NATO to keep expanding, like a noose around her neck, and want the US to stop fomenting chaos on Russia's borders. It's not too much to expect.

One thing that gives me hope is the rumor that Russia tipped off Erdogan about the coup attempt, and that the US was implicated. If Erdogan believes this, and he cooperates less with the US, then the American plans for Syria will be ruined. If that's true, and ISIS can be demolished by January, then World War 3 will have to start someplace else.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

lotlizard's picture

http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2016/07/southern-syria-opposit...

the American plans for Syria will be ruined

Ah, but with America there’s always a plan B.

up
0 users have voted.
dervish's picture

Another "safe zone" is in Lebanon. I expect that Islamist militias will increasingly take refuge there, as their fortunes fall in Syria. We've already seen evidence that Sunni Islamists have found refuge in Palestinian enclaves in Lebanon, where they are effectively untouchable and uncontrollable. Add that to the big influx into the Bekaa, and there is a huge recipe for disaster. The Lebanese Army has it's hands tied by Sunnis in government, they are supposed to ignore this trend.

I could foresee a situation wherein ISIS and allied groups finds haven in Lebanon, and slaughter any who oppose them, add a little Israeli support, and Lebanon could be completely overrun. Israel won't rest until every state in the middle east is a failed ruin of anarchy and destruction.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

snoopydawg's picture

it is my understanding that after another illegal coup by the US that overthrew another democratically elected president, the people in Crimea took a vote to whether they wanted to stay in Ukraine or not. They voted overwhelming with Russia.
Russia has had a base in Crimea for decades and had every right to defend that.
Imagine if there was a coup in a country that had a US base in it. Don't you think that the US would fight to keep their base?

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

TheOtherMaven's picture

That's a long time for people to sink their roots and have a vested interest in their surroundings.

Is it so surprising, then, that ethnic Russians, whose background and traditions are Russian, would want to UkrExit and formally rejoin Russia?

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

snoopydawg's picture

I only knew that it has been a Russian base for a long time, but didn't know how long.
But that's another propaganda campaign against Russia so that people will get behind the war that the United States and NATO are trying to goad Russia into.
They are blaming Russia for the violence in Ukraine when it was Hillary's puppet Nuland that helped set up the coup.
But people are only listening to the msm and they are spreading the propaganda.
The people in this country are so damned gullible.
They actually believe that our troops are fighting for our freedoms. They never stop to ask how terrorists could take them away from us.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

dervish's picture

and even now is less than 25% Ukrainian, ethnically. They voted overwhelmingly for union with Russia, which is not surprising. The US points to this as "aggression", yet it gives itself a pass on it's own ratfucking games, ie coups, bombings, arming Islamists, drone strikes, etc. The US, under Neocon management, is the greatest threat to world peace that exists.

The Neocon establishment (I refuse to call them Neoliberal, because if Kissinger, Kagan and Lieberman are the advisors, they definitely aren't liberal) wants a "war to end all wars", they want hegemony over everything and everybody. Stopping them is imperative, yet it's also probably impossible. I fear for our future, to the extent that there is one.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

snoopydawg's picture

I agree with you. Too bad others don't stop and think about what country has invaded more countries since 1945 and before

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

lotlizard's picture

up
0 users have voted.

banging on about a New World Order since Woodrow Wilson's 14-point-plan at the end of WWI and the subsequent establishment of the League of Nations.

Inasmuch as there was also a Pacific theatre component to WWI - fought as naval battles by New Zealand and Australia against German forces - all of this doesn't look to me like much "news," just a continuation of a very long-standing effort to conquer the world for WASPs, i.e., Great Britain and its current enforcer the US.

up
0 users have voted.

Only connect. - E.M. Forster

sojourns's picture

up
0 users have voted.

"I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones."
John Cage

riverlover's picture

plus military installations on that New set of islands[we are told], below that geographically are pirates out of Malaysia plus the looming specter of the TTP, a direct retaliation by trade deals aimed at China. Plus a possible petro reserve sitting in ships anchored off Hong Kong, some of which are controlled by Goldman Sachs. Sticky fingers.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

Plus its own experience being divided up and colonized by western countries not so long ago.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

For thirty years the U.S. maintained the fiction that "Nationalist China" (the Kuomintang regime on Formosa / Taiwan) was the one and only “real” China.

Incidentally, China’s formal claim to the South China Sea predates the 1949 revolution — it goes back to a map drawn up in 1936. Even this map was just an attempt to squeeze into a Western legalistic framework a historical circumstance born of ages before there existed any such cultural construct as borders.

http://opednews.com/articles/The-Real-Secret-of-the-Sou-by-Pepe-Escobar-...

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

Maybe...just maybe...we can settle disputes in world courts. Of course the US would have to agree to abide by the rulings - which we haven't agreed to do.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/world/asia/south-china-sea-hague-rulin...
In its most significant finding, the tribunal rejected China’s argument that it enjoys historic rights over most of the South China Sea.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

Big Al's picture

U.S. and is actually being used to do the opposite.

"Given that the Hague tribunal is already rigged, over-stacked with representatives from imperialistic Western nations, and the fact that the UN has long played a prejudicial, criminal role actively or passively enabling the US-NATO aggressor to defiantly break every international law invading, occupying and otherwise warring against Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Syria and Yemen just to name its half dozen short list, destroying nation after nation in its wake by willfully turning each into a failed state as the West slaughters four million Muslims."

"The United Nations as a globalist extension of American Empire’s dominance over the rest of the world is just another engineered US machination designed to instigate further conflict and tension as the latest face of Obama’s announced 2011 Asian pivot, pushing, prodding and provoking a high risk military showdown against re-designated cold war enemy China being potentially pinned in on all sides by US attempted aggression."

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

See: Reagan mining Nicaragua’s harbors, or Morocco’s occupation of West Sahara, or anything involving Israel-Palestine — the list is long.

I don’t imagine China will behave any differently.

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

why should they?

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

That "strategy" is: We can do whatever we want, because Russia and China will always back down.

It's a winning "strategy", until it isn't.

up
0 users have voted.

What I find most scary is that the PNAC plan that the neocons have been unfolding, is messianic. So, I believe you are right, that it doesn't matter if world hegemony wins; there is no losing. And I am betting the psychopaths believe their own bluster that they will survive and rule.

up
0 users have voted.