NOTES FROM THE RADICAL MARGIN: “STOP THIS TWO-PARTY MUSIC!” OR, “WHAT HAPPENS AT GEORGETOWN PREP, STAYS AT GEORGETOWN PREP”.

So, Kavanaugh seals the deal of the Supreme Court among all the goodwill and collegiality required for the occasion. That is to say, he affirms the trend already set by a court which had pronounced Bush to be the “elected” President in 2000, and had decided that corporations were people just like us, and so on. In the BB (before Brett) years, the Roberts court has ruled for corporations and employers, and against labor and employees about 2/3 of the time, and Brett will “enrich” such decisions to be sure. But let’s not pretend that suddenly SCOTUS has an immaculate political birth. Please!.

Don’t forget the recent cacophony of media voices that magnified their discord with sonic booms. It is worth taking a look now at where they belong in the percentage calculations of this caucus site’s users— top 1%, 2%… 5%?

You decide.

Also, in general, do they not patronize the same (segregated by class) country clubs and golf courses, be they neo-liberals, neo-fascists, or whatever? Men or women? White or “other”? I don’t know where you place your bets, but I made a short list of familiar names who make more than a million dollars in yearly salary (not net worth or total family assets mind you—just salary). A relevant prelude for the marginal notes to follow, I thought, especially after the “two parties” and their media allies used Christine Ford as a political pawn, eventually sending her back to the silence from which she had dared to emerge. Talk about the victimization of survivors!

So, here are 9 men and 9 women from broadcast TV journalism and 3 “political” entertainers. We must remember too that the Senate’s reputation as a political club of millionaires remains intact, and was never called into question in this round of attacks and counterattacks anyway.

The entertainers first: Stephen Colbert, followed by the two Jimmies—Fallon and Kimmel.
The 9 women: Rachel Maddow, Erin Burnett, Maria Bartiromo, Mika Brzenski, Megyn Kelly, Martha MacCallum. Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, Ann Curry, Tamron Hall, Brooke Baldwin.

The 9 men: Anderson Cooper, Chris Matthews, Shepard Smith, Chris Cuomo, Wolf Blitzer, Chris Wallace, Brian Williams, Sean Hannity, Joe Scarborough.

Everyone who visits this site knows (or, can easily discover) their media affiliation and political views. A few things to add here.

One, from the hypocrisy (climate change is not up for discussion) in face of the calamitous hurricanes Florence and now Michael, to the acrimony generated by Ford versus Kavanaugh testimonies, many people on this list are reincarnated with a different dress code, along with their “panels”, but always with indisputable omniscience. No matter what the challenge facing them.

Two, other than Tamron Hall, isn’t it the case that everyone else in this elite bunch (20 out of 21) is white? Too, what are the roles assigned by the mother companies (CBS, NBC et al) to women on late night TV? We know there are many comedic, witty, politically savvy women for these jobs, right?

Three, these people belong to our top layer—1, 2…5%, as does an indignant President, as do combative Senators. As such, they do not represent—politically or existentially—millions of us in the other percentage brackets—men, women, LGBT people in lower echelons of America, for whom “Georgetown Prep” could well be an expensive liquor brand.

So, we could take a different road to the truth, which would include for any victim of violence (which rape is) all dimensions of her world: the existential-experiential to be sure, but also econo-political, social-cultural and historical.

Actually, this road has been taken over and over: in my lifetime, clearly and what we used to think, decisively, by the women’s liberation movement and the emergence of American feminism in the Vietnam War era. Why doesn’t anyone bring forward this uplifting period of the struggle—on all fronts—by women in the US and other countries? I don’t expect corporate media stars to even mention this achievement, although many women in the firmament have benefited from the struggles of their mothers and grandmothers. But why are other voices largely silent? Voices of women and men who know better. Some in the neo-fascist media have presented the connection thus: “See? This anti-Brett, anti-Trump, anti-men shouting today is prompted by the barking of women’s lib hounds of the sixties and seventies.”

A brief look at the legacy then.

Right now, I am staring at a few books from my youth. They look worn out from the labor of having gathered together, informed and generated both the understanding of and impetus for the feminist movement of that period.

Sisterhood Is Powerful: An Anthology of Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement, edited by Robin Morgan, 1970.
The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, by Shulamith Firestone, 1970.
Liberation Now: Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement, 1971. (An editorial statement follows.)
Women, Resistance and Revolution: A History of Women and Revolution in the Modern World, by Sheila Rowbotham, 1972.

The editors of Liberation Now, introduce the anthology thus: “We have intentionally omitted our names from the cover of this anthology. It is our personal/political conviction that to single out only our own names for special notice would distort the fact that the book was made possible by the efforts of every woman whose work appears herein.” Those words pretty much reflected the politics of “sisterhood” shared by all the movement women I had the privilege of working with. Notwithstanding the differences between different viewpoints.

The publication dates of these books (1970, 1971, 1972) are significant. In my youth, every writer and every activist from the women’s liberation movement lived and worked in the shadow of the Vietnam War. So, no one could deny the necessity of women and men struggling together to end that war. What is lost in the present context of setting up generic enemies of all kinds is the following simple truth. Every woman I knew or knew of, was painfully aware that their lives were intrinsically connected with the lives of men, by way of family, class, caste, culture, national origin, and also with other “sisters in revolution”: liberation struggles of women in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and Europe.

Inside the US, the most immediate threat to men and women alike was the draft—the conscription of young men into America’s war machine. Again, simply put, almost every woman with whom I talked or laughed or marched knew someone or of someone who was or could be fighting in Indo-China. More simply, sons and brothers, fathers and uncles of women across the country were returning home in body bags or stretchers and the feminist movement attacked structures that shattered lives inside American families. The personal had to be political. Thus, Firestone’s arguments against patriarchal social formations, against “sexual class” asserted that men were victims of the system as well. Thus, these anthologies included Charlotte Gilman’s “Women and Economics”, Emma Goldman’s “Marriage and Love”, Sheila Hobson’s “Women and Television”, Carol Glassman’s “Women and the Welfare System”, Martha Shelley’s “Notes of a Radical Lesbian”, Debby D’Amico’s “To My White Working-Class Sisters”, the position paper of “Women’s Caucus, Political Science Department, University of Chicago”, and so on. Such writings were part of an exciting “pedagogy of the oppressed” to which we subscribed and brought into our classrooms. I don’t know who consults them anymore. But as a radical, I am curious.

There may not be conscription today, but wars started by the US continue endlessly. And there’s still an “economic draft” which deserves a serious discussion—certainly in the context of poor and working-class families. For now, let us remind ourselves that alumni of Georgetown Prep—Brett Kavanaugh’s predecessors, were not drafted to go fight in Vietnam. Nor were most of the Senators today. In fact, boys from elite schools and empowered wealthy families found a hundred and one ways to dodge the draft and then later boldly advocated the cause of the mightiest army that ever existed. Isn't "no consent needed for rape" at Georgetown Prep, part of the same tradition?

We must continue (and I shall to be sure) with discussion of “women, resistance and revolution”, because neo-libs have been ascribed the identity of the American “left”—it seems even by some radicals. Who is kidding whom?

The cynical ploy of using Christine Ford, survivor, to advance political agendas can be truly condemned and rebuked only by examining where we are today in relation to feminism and women’s liberation as a whole.

END

Share
up
19 users have voted.

Comments

The Aspie Corner's picture

up
11 users have voted.

Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.

snoopydawg's picture

after he lied his way through the hearings and not just about his time during the working for Bush administration. But for his behavior after Ford gave her testimony. But nope. He and the missus went to quite a few after confirmation parties where he was greeeted as a big dude on the hill

Also, in general, do they not patronize the same (segregated by class) country clubs and golf courses, be they neo-liberals, neo-fascists, or whatever?

Many of his friends also went to the preppy schools and who knows what they got up to?

The cynical ploy of using Catherine Ford, survivor, to advance political agendas can be truly condemned and rebuked only by examining where we are today in relation to feminism and women’s liberation as a whole.

And ratings. The media only focused on the she said he said part of the hearings and ignored the number of times he perjured himself.

up
8 users have voted.

To really control a country, you must first control its courts. Then whatever you do is legal and anything the opposition does is illegal

Centaurea's picture

@snoopydawg If I had done 1/100th of what these folks** do, I would be so embarrassed that I'd hide under my bed and never show my face to the world again.

They seem to have no sense of shame, or any sense of right and wrong. Not only do they not hide under the bed, they keep repeating the bad behavior, and they're rewarded for it. In the screwed-up (a)moral world in which they exist, they and their peers view themselves as superior beings.

** By "these folks", I mean almost all of the politicians in D.C. and all of their hangers-on and enablers, the K Street lobbyists, the Wall Street bankers, the Big Pharma-Big Agriculture-Big Oil CEOs, Jeff Bezos, the Waltons (and I'm not referring to John-Boy), and maybe the most shameful of all, the so-called "journalists" who work for the mainstream news media.

up
6 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone

mhagle's picture

Wow.

I am going to have to read it several times. I graduated in '75, so was younger than these authors, but still, I remember the women's movement as a pure thing. And not a man-hating thing either. That is in my upper-midwestern slant. My parents were feminists, even though they did not call themselves that. At that time, in that place, farming families were partners in the effort. All of my parents and aunts/uncles I knew well were partners.

And the media voices and senators all going to the same country clubs. Sickening.

up
7 users have voted.

Marilyn

"Make dirt, not war." eyo

EyeRound's picture

I look forward to further dialogues. I think I'm from roughly the same era as you, and I share your interest in how far things have or haven't come since then. For now, may I add a couple of titles to your book list from 'back in the day': Mary Daly's Gyn/Ecology and Luce Irigaray's Speculum of the Other Woman.

up
7 users have voted.
Centaurea's picture

It sounds like what you've written resonates with quite a few of us here. I recall the late '60s and first part of the '70s as being an exciting, creative time, before the cultural and societal "great sleep" of the '80s and '90s set in.

I'll add to your list Kate Millett's Sexual Politics and Simone de Beauvoir's The Second Sex, which were on my bookshelf next to Morgan and Firestone.

(By the way, her name is Christine Ford.)

up
4 users have voted.

"Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep ... Don't go back to sleep."
~Rumi

"If you want revolution, be it."
~Caitlin Johnstone