The title is a question posed to me by a long time dear friend in an email. We've had extensive email and phone discussions about this elections season. Today he sent this:
4-in-10 GOP insiders want to derail Trump at the convention
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/donald-trump-convention-block-gop-...Where will Berniecrats go??
Disney owned ABC comes up with this evidence of Hillary shoehorning a donor to the Clinton Foundation, a skeevy Chicago securities trader, onto a highly sensitive government intelligence advisory board alongside members with top security clearances. Video and text at link:
I read this post earlier today, and was 'inspired' by its eye-brow raising implications:
Election Fraud likely Benefited Clinton Over Sanders - By a Lot
by Steven D — 06/10/2016
Steven D summarizies the study results, with which I agree:
Holy shit.
This is not a good look for Hillary Clinton or the Clinton Foundation.
They said they didn't do this.https://t.co/B6Jg8XKz7T
— Shaun King (@ShaunKing) June 10, 2016
Watching the party apparatus close the doors with a deafening clang with we are all one, Kumbaya, look it's a love in! Bleech.
The problem with revolutionary ideas is that they belong to nobody, they are not just shut down with words, they demand actions.
Matt Taibbi gets this:
Rowan Elijah Feldhaus submitted a name change petition which Columbia County Superior Court Judge J. David Roper rejected. Rowan's previous name had been Rebeccah Elizabeth Feldhaus.
The question presented is whether a female has the salutatory right to change her name to a traditionally and obviously male name. The court concludes that she does not have such right.
--Judge Roper
Lambda Legal submitted a filing to the Georgia Court of Appeals challenging the denial yesterday.
The next nationwide informational call this Sunday, June 12th at 8:00pm Eastern / 7:00pm Central / 5:00pm Pacific time. Register here: link
Thanks, Steve
Bernie decided to run on the Democratic Ticket, Bernie decided to speak truth to power. We can see the consequences of his actions. At various times we all (each of us as individuals) have initiated actions, and those actions have effected (in large or small ways) people we know and for whom we care.
To assist in the larger effort I think we as a group (c99%) should adopt some specific action item(s) to promote during the next few months. I think this would unambiguously generate a positive message that won't be ignored or legitimately faulted.
The Democratic Party and especially HRC intend to scare the US American people into voting against her opponents rather than doing anything that would encourage us to vote for her or the party. That tactic can also work for us. Let's turn the tables on them.
From the conclusion of study of the Democratic Party primary elections this year by Rodolfo Cortes Barragan, Stanford University, and Axel Geijsel, Tilurg University, The Netherlands, entitled: "Are we witnessing a dishonest election?
