Iran Still in the Crosshairs, What's Up?
Trump appears to have made Iran a centerpiece of his presidential imperialism chapter, that and ISIS. He's repeatedly complained about the Iran nuclear agreement, wants it rescinded or renegotiated and who knows what else. I'm sure he doesn't know that yet. But it brings up questions as to why. Iran has always been on the "list" of the neocons. Remember General Wes Clark's revelation about the seven countries in five years. The seven countries were Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and "finishing off" with Iran. Iran was always the centerpiece to the neocon remaking of the middle east. They've spent five years trying to overthrow Assad in Syria, changed tactics various times, and the Obama administration has seemed to back off somewhat on that goal. So Trump's indications of possibly working with Assad to fight ISIS maybe isn't far off the current plan. But Iran was always next and the so called nuclear agreement was always just a smokescreen, a step to be taken to justify the final approach, a means to and end which is the same as always, take down another middle east country and it's government.
Maybe it is Iran's turn and Trump is the man to do it. He's got John Bolton who would bomb Iran tomorrow if he could. His son-in-law silver spoon Kushner is anti-Iran. Michael Flynn is anti-Iran.
Now the stage is being set.
"The US House of Representatives has voted to bar the sale of commercial Boeing and Airbus airplanes to Iran.
On Thursday, the Republican-controlled House voted 243-174 to pass the legislation to prohibit the Treasury Department from issuing the licenses US banks would need to complete the transactions.
The measure would also revoke previously enacted authorities enabling aircraft sales to the Islamic Republic. The bill must now clear the Senate.
The move comes about two months after the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control granted Airbus and Boeing permission to sell airplanes to Iran in a multibillion-dollar deal."
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/11/17/494066/US-House-bill-block-comme...
The reason the House could take this action at all was because of what they did earlier in the week. They got right down to it because of this.
"On Tuesday, the House voted almost unanimously to extend the ISA (Iran Sanctions Act) for 10 more years.
“We're going to take up the House bill. I think it's already held at the desk and we are going to pass it,” McConnell told reporters at the Senate's weekly GOP leadership media conference.
The House voted 419 to 1 to reauthorize the bill, which was first introduced in 1996 on the unfounded accusation that Tehran was pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program, an accusation that the Islamic Republic has rejected."
419 to 1. AIPAC was busy. To think the neocons have lost some power here is wrong thinking. Iran is next and that's the way they want it.
Strange happenings, but dangerous ones.
Comments
Interesting how the vote for the ISA was 419 - 1,
but the vote barring the sale of commercial aircraft to Iran was much different.
419?
Anybody got a minute?
420 somewhere in the world!
peace
Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .
Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .
If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march
I like the way you think... :)
And I will pretend it is 4:20 here in your honor...
It's not that I want to do it, it's purely out of respect.
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
I don't understand the Airbus connection.
So little of Airbus is mfg'd in US. A small factory in Arkansas if I remember right.
There is no such thing as TMI. It can always be held in reserve for extortion.
As Israel's mercenary...
we bust heads when necessary, we sanction when desired, we regime change (or try to) when possible, and we leave the Middle East a bitter, war-torn haven for terrorists seeking revenge. What could go wrong?
I have long suspected that Lithium is the reason we are still
involved with Afghanistan and hence, Iraq.
Lithium is going to be the new "Oil" of the future when we eventually transition from fossil fuels to renewable or sustainable energy.
This gets them two birds for one war.
They get to keep pumping the oil now while knowing that they got the lithium in the same transaction.
It's quite the BOGO offer...
{Sigh}
I have been thinking about writing an essay about this subject but every time I start to do the outline it gets to the point where it is practically book length in and of itself and I hadn't even scratched the surface yet.
If I am gonna write a novel it's going to be fiction about a dystopian future.
Actual reality is just far too dark and depressing for me...
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
Lithium from the Middle East?
According to this, none of these countries are top lithium producers.
The US numbers are undisclosed, but iirc there has been some recent interest in opening closed mines. The fact that a lot of the known US lithium reserves are in Nevada probably accounts for why Tesla wants to build a battery factory there. Couple that with the fact that lithium processing uses electrolysis and the ongoing construction of solar thermal plants in the state that could provide the electricity, and you have a nice local industry.
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
There have been several large mineral deposits recently located
but very little has been reported/disclosed for some reason. (Huh, wonder why.)
Here is an older article from 2010 talking about a newly located Lithium deposit (Itself estimated at appx $1 trillion dollars.)
However, on the other side of the argument there was an article shortly thereafter put out by wired trying to debunk the NY Times article that had ran earlier revealing this, which later had an "update" added to it which seems to then go ahead and support the Times article. The crux of their argument at that point then solely revolved around, "Well, we don't know if that 1 Trillion is completely accurate and the government already knew about this." which was hardly compelling
From the Wiki:
The existing and new mineral reserves that have been discovered (not counting the likely others that remain "undiscovered") estimate that Afghanistan alone contains anywhere between 22 and 35 TRILLION dollars worth of relatively easily accessible mineral supplies. (depending on who's numbers you look at)
Even if those estimates are inflated by as much as 50% that is still no small piece of change for such a relatively tiny nation.
"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me
Apparently, half the World's known lithium reserves
are in Bolivia.
Beware the bullshit factories.
And then there is Trump's tutor Vladimir Putin
Iran, Russia start construction of new Iranian nuclear plant
And then you got Stuxnet;
Russian nuclear power plant infected by Stuxnet malware says cyber-security expert
And if you want to go full on conspiracy theory;
Five Russian scientists who helped Iran with nuclear secrets were among 45 killed in plane crash
I expect Putin will prevail and Trump will not cancel the Iran accord.
The political revolution continues
Bibi's got little traction
in this administration, so I strongly doubt that his priorities will be put at the fore-front. Expect Bibi to push back heavily, but I don't think it will go anywhere. Btw, Bolton was never under consideration for the State Dept., that was a media trope floated by his supporters. He'll get nothing, believe me.
Iran remains an issue, but I'm hopeful that we'll work it out.
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
In the Trump administration?
Indications are Trump will be very pro-Israel, whatever about Netanyahoo. And Bolton, while probably not getting the job, is "admired" by Trump. Trump knows what he's about and still seriously considered him. I'm not sure who you're suggesting as "we'll work it out", it sure won't be you and me, but this new ten year sanctions Act is an Act of War, continuing war, against a country that is zero danger to the U.S. The primary purpose of a 419-1 vote is Israel, on that there's no doubt.
We need Iran to destroy Isreal so Jesus can come back.
Sounds pretty stupid but that's what the Christians believe. Why Jesus just doesn't just beam down is beyond me. Maybe it's all about entrances. But anyways, this is the theology driving the ideology that will soon take the White House. Nothing like a nuclear winter to offset that pesky global warming, amirite?
The real SparkyGump has passed. It was an honor being your human.