Iran Still in the Crosshairs, What's Up?

thQ3U1NKLH.jpg

Trump appears to have made Iran a centerpiece of his presidential imperialism chapter, that and ISIS. He's repeatedly complained about the Iran nuclear agreement, wants it rescinded or renegotiated and who knows what else. I'm sure he doesn't know that yet. But it brings up questions as to why. Iran has always been on the "list" of the neocons. Remember General Wes Clark's revelation about the seven countries in five years. The seven countries were Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and "finishing off" with Iran. Iran was always the centerpiece to the neocon remaking of the middle east. They've spent five years trying to overthrow Assad in Syria, changed tactics various times, and the Obama administration has seemed to back off somewhat on that goal. So Trump's indications of possibly working with Assad to fight ISIS maybe isn't far off the current plan. But Iran was always next and the so called nuclear agreement was always just a smokescreen, a step to be taken to justify the final approach, a means to and end which is the same as always, take down another middle east country and it's government.

Maybe it is Iran's turn and Trump is the man to do it. He's got John Bolton who would bomb Iran tomorrow if he could. His son-in-law silver spoon Kushner is anti-Iran. Michael Flynn is anti-Iran.

Now the stage is being set.

"The US House of Representatives has voted to bar the sale of commercial Boeing and Airbus airplanes to Iran.

On Thursday, the Republican-controlled House voted 243-174 to pass the legislation to prohibit the Treasury Department from issuing the licenses US banks would need to complete the transactions.

The measure would also revoke previously enacted authorities enabling aircraft sales to the Islamic Republic. The bill must now clear the Senate.

The move comes about two months after the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control granted Airbus and Boeing permission to sell airplanes to Iran in a multibillion-dollar deal."

http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2016/11/17/494066/US-House-bill-block-comme...

The reason the House could take this action at all was because of what they did earlier in the week. They got right down to it because of this.

"On Tuesday, the House voted almost unanimously to extend the ISA (Iran Sanctions Act) for 10 more years.

“We're going to take up the House bill. I think it's already held at the desk and we are going to pass it,” McConnell told reporters at the Senate's weekly GOP leadership media conference.

The House voted 419 to 1 to reauthorize the bill, which was first introduced in 1996 on the unfounded accusation that Tehran was pursuing non-civilian objectives in its nuclear energy program, an accusation that the Islamic Republic has rejected."

419 to 1. AIPAC was busy. To think the neocons have lost some power here is wrong thinking. Iran is next and that's the way they want it.

Strange happenings, but dangerous ones.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Big Al's picture

but the vote barring the sale of commercial aircraft to Iran was much different.

up
0 users have voted.

Anybody got a minute?
420 somewhere in the world!

peace

up
0 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

Alphalop's picture

And I will pretend it is 4:20 here in your honor...

It's not that I want to do it, it's purely out of respect. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

So little of Airbus is mfg'd in US. A small factory in Arkansas if I remember right.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no such thing as TMI. It can always be held in reserve for extortion.

edg's picture

we bust heads when necessary, we sanction when desired, we regime change (or try to) when possible, and we leave the Middle East a bitter, war-torn haven for terrorists seeking revenge. What could go wrong?

up
0 users have voted.
Alphalop's picture

involved with Afghanistan and hence, Iraq.

Lithium is going to be the new "Oil" of the future when we eventually transition from fossil fuels to renewable or sustainable energy.

This gets them two birds for one war.

They get to keep pumping the oil now while knowing that they got the lithium in the same transaction.

It's quite the BOGO offer...

{Sigh}

I have been thinking about writing an essay about this subject but every time I start to do the outline it gets to the point where it is practically book length in and of itself and I hadn't even scratched the surface yet.

If I am gonna write a novel it's going to be fiction about a dystopian future.

Actual reality is just far too dark and depressing for me... Wink

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

Hawkfish's picture

According to this, none of these countries are top lithium producers.

The US numbers are undisclosed, but iirc there has been some recent interest in opening closed mines. The fact that a lot of the known US lithium reserves are in Nevada probably accounts for why Tesla wants to build a battery factory there. Couple that with the fact that lithium processing uses electrolysis and the ongoing construction of solar thermal plants in the state that could provide the electricity, and you have a nice local industry.

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

Alphalop's picture

but very little has been reported/disclosed for some reason. (Huh, wonder why.)

Here is an older article from 2010 talking about a newly located Lithium deposit (Itself estimated at appx $1 trillion dollars.)

However, on the other side of the argument there was an article shortly thereafter put out by wired trying to debunk the NY Times article that had ran earlier revealing this, which later had an "update" added to it which seems to then go ahead and support the Times article. The crux of their argument at that point then solely revolved around, "Well, we don't know if that 1 Trillion is completely accurate and the government already knew about this." which was hardly compelling

UPDATE:

One retired senior U.S official is calling the government’s mineral announcement “pretty silly,” Politico is reporting. “When I was living in Kabul in the early 1970s the [U.S. government], the Russians, the World Bank, the U.N. and others were all highly focused on the wide range of Afghan mineral deposits. Cheap ways of moving the ore to ocean ports has always been the limiting factor.”

At least two American geologists have been advising the Pentagon on Afghanistan’s wealth of mineral resources for years. Bonita Chamberlin, a geologist who spent 25 years working in Afghanistan, “identified 91 minerals, metals and gems at 1,407 potential mining sites,” the Los Angeles Times reported in 2001. In 1995, she even co-wrote a book, “Gemstones in Afghanistan,” on the topic. And Chamberlin worked directly with the Pentagon, after they commissioned her to report on sandstone and limestone caves mere weeks after 9/11.

“I am quite surprised that the military is announcing this as some ‘new’ and ‘surprising” discovery,’ she told Danger Room in an e-mail. “This is NOT new. Perhaps this also hints at the real reason why we would be so intent on this war.”

And Jack Shroder, a geologist at the University of Nebraska, told the Associated Press in 2001 that mineral deposits in Afghanistan were so rich, they could be vital in rebuilding the country. He’s collaborated with Pentagon officials since the 1970s, when he worked on mapping the country. In 2002, Shroder was approached by several American companies who hoped to start mining the area.

It’s not clear exactly what those experts shared with military honchos, but the Pentagon’s knowledge of Afghanistan’s minerals clearly preceded the 2004 discovery of “an intriguing series of old charts and data,” as the Times reports. In 2002, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that the U.S. Department of Interior’s Mineral Yearbook, among other atlases, noted Afghanistan’s “significant deposits of gold, precious stones and other minerals waiting to be mined.”

But whatever the U.S military knows, and no matter how long they’ve known it, Russia likely has ’em beat. At a 2002 conference on rebuilding Afghanistan, reps from several countries complained that Russia continued to withhold decades-old information about mineral deposits in the country.

From the Wiki:

Lithium is a vital metal that is mostly used in the manufacture of rechargeable batteries for mobile phones, laptops and electric cars. It is believed that Afghanistan has plenty of lithium. The country’s lithium deposits occur in dry lake beds in the form of lithium chloride; they are located in the western Province of Herat and Nimroz and in the central east Province of Ghazni. The geologic setting is similar to those found in Bolivia and Chile. The deposits are also found in hard rock in the form of spodumene in pegmatites in the north-eastern Provinces of Badakhshan, Nangarhar, Nuristan, and Uruzgan. A pegmatite in the Hindu Kush Mountains in central Afghanistan was reported to contain 20% to 30% spodumene

The existing and new mineral reserves that have been discovered (not counting the likely others that remain "undiscovered") estimate that Afghanistan alone contains anywhere between 22 and 35 TRILLION dollars worth of relatively easily accessible mineral supplies. (depending on who's numbers you look at)

Even if those estimates are inflated by as much as 50% that is still no small piece of change for such a relatively tiny nation.

up
0 users have voted.

"I used to vote Republican & Democrat, I also used to shit my pants. Eventually I got smart enough to stop doing both things." -Me

are in Bolivia.

up
0 users have voted.

Beware the bullshit factories.

Shockwave's picture

Iran, Russia start construction of new Iranian nuclear plant

Iran began building a second nuclear plant with Russian help on Saturday, in a $10 billion project which follows Tehran's landmark nuclear deal with world powers last year, state media reported.

State television showed Iranian and Russian officials at launching ceremonies for the 10-year project which will include two power plants with a total capacity of more than 1,000 megawatts after their completion.

Iran already runs one Russian-built nuclear reactor at Bushehr, its first. Russia signed a deal with Iran in 2014 to builup to eight more reactors in the country.

And then you got Stuxnet;

Russian nuclear power plant infected by Stuxnet malware says cyber-security expert

And if you want to go full on conspiracy theory;

Five Russian scientists who helped Iran with nuclear secrets were among 45 killed in plane crash

I expect Putin will prevail and Trump will not cancel the Iran accord.

up
0 users have voted.

The political revolution continues

dervish's picture

in this administration, so I strongly doubt that his priorities will be put at the fore-front. Expect Bibi to push back heavily, but I don't think it will go anywhere. Btw, Bolton was never under consideration for the State Dept., that was a media trope floated by his supporters. He'll get nothing, believe me.

Iran remains an issue, but I'm hopeful that we'll work it out.

up
0 users have voted.

"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."

Big Al's picture

Indications are Trump will be very pro-Israel, whatever about Netanyahoo. And Bolton, while probably not getting the job, is "admired" by Trump. Trump knows what he's about and still seriously considered him. I'm not sure who you're suggesting as "we'll work it out", it sure won't be you and me, but this new ten year sanctions Act is an Act of War, continuing war, against a country that is zero danger to the U.S. The primary purpose of a 419-1 vote is Israel, on that there's no doubt.

up
0 users have voted.
SparkyGump's picture

Sounds pretty stupid but that's what the Christians believe. Why Jesus just doesn't just beam down is beyond me. Maybe it's all about entrances. But anyways, this is the theology driving the ideology that will soon take the White House. Nothing like a nuclear winter to offset that pesky global warming, amirite?

up
0 users have voted.

The real SparkyGump has passed. It was an honor being your human.