I'm afraid the date in your title is confusing.
Otherwise, fear not.

Thanks for posting!

stand 'the dose' on it's head. It would convey our reality?
Thanks as always Lookout. I'm just digging in to what you have posted, much appreciated.

which have used Ivermectin and the statistics show a reduction of cases and deaths. This will not be the best list, as I forget over time. Here goes:
- Europe...Czechia, Slovakia,
- India...Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, with millions; other states in India?
- Japan...has just chucked the 'vaccines' out in favor of Ivermectin. See that in MSM?
- Africa...Zimbabewe, South Africa, Nanibia, the large middle sixty (60)% has been on Ivermectin for years to treat parasites. Many have said that the northern countries have hoarded the shots, which they have. The predictions were that underserved countries would have high levels of COVID. They have not. Rather they might be better off.
- South America/Central America...Panama, which countries? Peru? Chile?
- Florida...US. FLCCC doctor in Florida is free to prescribe Ivermectin. Cases are no worse than locked down California. There might be other states and cities which do not punish doctors from using preventatives, and treatments.
- South east Asia...?Philippines, Indonesia?
- Sweden...is an unusual situation. They have not mandated shots, although uptake is fairly high. But there have been no lockdowns; schools are open; people are carrying on normally. More on this? Ivermectin?

Any other countries or areas come to mind? I would love to get a single list together.
ETA: Mexico...high Ivermectin countries.
Bangladesh...poor country, with greatly better metrics than the US

We could always create the other side of the coin: the highly vaccinated countries and states. For example:
- Gibraltar...over 100% shots, and they are cancelling Christmas because of COVID surges.
- Israel...suddenly dropped out of sight with the third and fourth shots. How are they doing?
- US States...with mandates not doing so well. Specifics?
- Australia...they are hardly bumping the numbers above average yearly deaths, cases. But totalitarian lockdown and mandates.
- New Zealand...another country with few deaths, in lockdown.
- Other highly injected countries??

Thank you for any additions.

that from here, where i am, I can watch 54 channels on TV, including the foreign ones.

I guess that his way I see a lot of images, which not all of you can see.

To tell you the truth, it's not always helpful.

I agree that most is about control and money, which go hand in hand. As it is so unpleasant to realize and watch, I shut down most of the exposure I could have. I can live without it.

Hope you all are ok, healthy and confident that there will be better times coming up one day.

Good Night from Germany. i
(BTW I find this Mengele blah really inappropriate. What should that be helpful for?)

The Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 imposes fines and prison sentences on anyone who “knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains or possesses any biological agent, toxin or delivery system for use as a weapon”

what about landlords who knowingly attempt to use verified toxic mold to drive away good, rent paying tenants, simply because they want to churn tenants to push rent controlled tenants out and get new tenants in who pay four times as much rent? Using biological weapons (satratoxin h is one) to drive rent-payers out, and ruining their health if they stay? Why cant these kinds of criminal landlords be punished?

Satratoxin H is a CBW, officially. Its around the 60th most toxic substance known to mankind. It shouldn't be legal to knowingly and intentionally use such toxic substances to drive good tenants out.

people.

A real lot. Since peoples rights are all tied to their nationality, that is the case these days. We really screwed up in the aftermath of World War II to not create a means of protecting people whose national affiliation had left them stripped of the rights that accrue from nation-states.

Please read Arendt's Origins of Totalitarianism, I think its Chapter 9.

In the last two decades, money has aquired a all new set of rights.. Your money has a right to be treated eually. It is invested with rights. It is a voice.

If millionaires money is not given the same respect as billionaires money in proportion to its amount, that is trade distortion and bad. I am farly certain that this is a basic principle of neoliberalism.

The poor cant be given anything in disproportion to how much money they spend. Spend a lot, you get the best, spend less you must get less. The poor can be given help but ithas tobe the most minimal thats possible to address whatever the issue is. Look up "trade restrictiveness" and Likeness. Governments are not allowed to substitute things for others if the effect is to replace them, ability to replace something iis the definition. Government could not substitute one service for another if it reduces sales of the commercial one..

istort trade. See the EC Bananas case.. (This is for for something to be WTO legal, it cannot be a "like service". ) Also look up discrimination under WTO law. For example, the poor peoplke and middle class people people would not buy Health insurance if some government gave them free healthcare so that is probably clearly a violation in countries that made commitments in financil services like the UK. For the NHS to be FTA legal it would have to be a public service and there is only one definition that is permissible and the UK government seems to be intentionally lying as to what it is. They have done this for more than 20 years. But the definition is very well known and unambiguous, it seems tom me. They do not pass the two line test. So, NHS is going to be lost because they have been selling for profit health insurance. Any country that sells for profit health insurance cannot have public healthcare.

It cannot subsidize healthcare except if its minimally trade restrictive, the most minimal in scope possible.

That means not when they actually could afford the cheapest HC. Even if thats in another country. Many may may be forced to travel to it. (forced medical tourism, seems likely due to the WTO rules and stements by many in he neoliberal elite. Reservations the US has made thet try to make it look illegal to pay other countries for Americans medical care unless the provider is licensed in the US, have been stated to be violations iof WTO rule, given that we committed to allow international trade in medical and hospital services. That means that healthcare will be globalized, and likely privatized. The same goes for education and teaching.

How do some countries get away with having free public hospitals? Canada begun their healthcare system before the creation iof the WTO and it was designed in a way that avoided the WTIO trap. Commercial health insuranceof the kind that covered people was forbiden since before the cutiff came when the WTO was created. See "Putting Health First".

For example, in the UK, it seems that some of what they call the nonconforming monopoly services are being dismantled before the beginning of next year. What that means is that people will I suspect have to pay for healthcare if they have assets. (like homes) Most people may be required to buy insurance like in the US. I would put money on this happening within the next few months. They will make it look like its some mess up between the captured parties there. Just wait and see. Read upon the government authority exclusion.

The UK's NHS is likely seem by the WTO as a trade barrier. a form of discrimination against foreign financial services suppliers, since it prevents Britons from buying commercial insurance in the quantity that foreign corporations are entitled to. Like here. We have promised foreign insurers and banks the business, would it do for government to step in and give people an alternative. Say it prevented people from needing some commercial service, like high interest second mortgage loans, in the face of a financial crisis, when millions were losing homes. When we had made commitments to allow all innovative finncial services.. Some kinds of loans are very high interest and have high returns. This is a payback for joining the WTO that is a repayment of a debt. To keep our obligations, we could not have a Medicare for All;, nor can we forgive loans for students because those students would compete with foreign guest workers for those future jobs. Right now they cant because they have to pay loans back which means thei wages would have to be too high disqualifying them from competing in the job market. If we have public education, that competes with foreign, for profit schools. We made a commitment to get out of the education business gradually. Irreversibly. Corporate services are the future, we insist. Water, we and the international global economic governance orgs we control are pushing privatization of water, an essential that is both a good and a service. So it has the potential to become a huge generator of profit.
The truth is they agreed to do all this way back in the 90s,

Wish we had stood up for the people then. Why dion't we? Because the Clinton Administration only saw one way to solvethe lack of affordability of healthcare., Cmmercial health insurance., The Biden Administration does too. Another alternative is sending the sick to the countries where they can afford healthcare. To buy it there. We basically have done the equivalent of promising the oligarch ruled "Most unequal nations" we would do this, in the 1990s.

One of the most disgusting but important videos on social media. The hypocrisy of the liberal establishment and Democrats.

The people who would send you to jail for not taking the vaccine were the original anti-vaxxers just because of party politics. pic.twitter.com/yf1VVvkS1l

— Mahyar Tousi (@MahyarTousi) November 28, 2021

As always it’s the f’cking hypocrisy in the end. I just wonder how the shitlibs would have reacted if Trump had mandated the vaccines.. At first we were told that it would take years to create a vaccine for Covid but it took less than 1. That is just one of the reasons I don’t trust them. How many patents were given on the coronavirus years before we heard about it? How many does Fauci have?

Omnicron = MORONIC

It seems the people behind the COVID fear mongering we are being subjected to 24/7 are having a laugh at our expense.

An antidote is offered in the following video.
Billions Of People Are Affected By This & They Don't Realize It

[video:https://youtu.be/INHpQL9fgto]

Its not surprisng that those who are in control would try to stay so, when they saw changes that might expose attempts to engage in global pillage, like the Guptas in South Africa's cozy relations with the ANC, or the US's Clintons ofr Trump families. All I can say is people need better noses for bullshit.

They are trying bto create situations that divide the nation and enable more and more repression, whie making their global pillage of areas like AFrica permnent. Its a huge land and power grab that intends to take all thats left in the world as fas as it can be stolen.

They want this to appear to be legal. They are urently seeking monopoly on knowledge and provision of information.

Not all of the rich and powerful act that way, though. Some, particularly tech people have scruples against it. They take pride in their accomplishments attained without dirty tricks. They want meritocracy, or so they say.

Not the fake WTO style equality, though. That's a rigged system within which we cannot win. We the people doesnt even exist as voters.

The so called rules based system is intended to keep many people whose status as rulers is of questionable legitimacy, and basically they are supported because they re okay with global pillage, the looting of resource possessing nations by the elites, and the leaving them with unpayable debt.

Thats just what we do, its what the US stands for these days.

Look at WHO previous and it seems also current Administrations support, wanna be dictators and corrupt criminal groups, groups that have been involved in large scale murders of the poor and poweless to take the world's natural resources.

It always turns out to be about that. their track records are really bad. Crooks.

Some run questionably tax exempt (they should not be tax exempt) "foundations" that seem like hotbeds of bribery, through and through.

Many remain on the gopvernment payroll, giving them a shady appearance of legitimacy they dont deseve. However they are it seems immune to reasonabe conflict of interest disclosure requirements. This is the revolving door thats out of control now.

Fake NGOS are the worst.

This theft is destroying the world, by design. Its basically a way to give elites "low show" (easy) jobs at the taxpayers expense.

Its part of a sham made up "amoral system" that deliberately twists moral values to put the rich on top. And pretends that is equality. Its kind of a parody of the changes brought about by the US civil rights movement, but of by and for corporations.

Sustainable means profitable. The current system is deemed non sustainable because of rises in wges, and increases in regulation such as laws that make doing business more expensive in any way, such as limits on transactions of any kind.

Allowing for the optimal (most profitable) taking for profit of all the world’s resources in accordance with the objective of sustainable development (profit making) and seeking to protect and preserve the exploitation of environment (in the most profitable manner) are fundamental to the WTO. These goals, enshrined in the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement, (which is meaningless because preambles are not binding and often in fact are the opposite of whats really being done) go hand in hand with the WTO’s objective to reduce trade barriers (laws and products of voting of any kind) and eliminate discriminatory treatment in international trade relations (such as limits on work related travel based on nationalities) . For WTO members, the aims of upholding and safeguarding an open and non-discriminatory multilateral trading system, on the one hand, and acting for the protection of the environment and the promotion of sustainable development, on the other, can and must be mutually supportive.

In the SCOTUS case thats forms its root.

Corporations are not people and they don't or shouldn't possess or nullify human rights.

The global despotry who are supported by the US elites seeks to create regulatory harmonization downward so that no country's workers are better off than the lowest common deniominator, thereby removing the increntive some saw in the past to move to the US.

This will make a single global labor market where workers are hired based on value for money with corporations bidding for government contracts such as taking care of people in any way. Education and healthcare will be totally privatized, and aid will be limited to only the poorest who need help the most. Money paid in error to people whose incomes were not reported fully and completely will be electronically clawed back, sometimes leaving people with six or seven figure debts. Precious, vanishing entry level Jobs will be shifted to be done by huge "services" staffing companies.. corporations located in the lowest wage poorest lowest income countries. (Supporting the often repressive leaderships of the countries with the highest yields to investment)

Privatization of roads will leave those without a positive balance unable to pass numerous private roads or enter cities. Voting will be tied to location of last residence, gradually leaving the potentially huge numbers of once-housed but homeless unable to vote.