@edg

Did you also read any of the affidavits/exhibits from the MI or GA filings?

Maybe, for starters, you could explain why if fractionalization was not being employed (in this case in MI) then how/why was the live feed from Dominion to TV networks going out *fractionalized*?

And maybe you can rebut the claims of expert affiants such as Russel J. Ramsland and numerous others to the effect that the systems of Dominion and all the other major vendors are, in fact, rife with vulnerabilities?

Filing and supporting exhibits are here at Court Listener

Ramsland is exhibit #14 in the original filing, also suggest a look at #15 by a retired Army Colonel cyber/information war specialist. More on him later.

Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1-14, PagelD.625 Filed 11/25/20 Page 1 of 6

Affidavit of Russell James Ramsland, Jr.

1. My name is Russell James Ramsland, Jr., and I am a resident of Dallas County,
Texas. I hold an MBA from Harvard University, and a political science degree from
Duke University. I have worked with the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA) and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), among
other organizations, and have run businesses all over the world, many of which are
highly technical in nature. I have served on technical government panels.

2. I am part of the management team of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC,
(ASOG). ASOG is a group of globally engaged professionals who come from various
disciplines to include Department of Defense, Secret Service, Department of
Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency. It provides a range of
security services, but has a particular emphasis on cybersecurity, open source
investigation and penetration testing of networks. We employ a wide variety of
cyber and cyber forensic analysts. We have patents pending in a variety of
applications from novel network security applications to SCADA (Supervisory
Control and Data Acquisition) protection and safe browsing solutions for the dark
and deep web. For this report, I have relied on these experts and resources.

...

12. The following data strongly suggests that the additive algorithm (a feature
enhancement referred to as “ranked choice voting algorithm” or “RCV”) was
activated in the code as shown in the Democracy Suite EMS Results Tally and
Reporting User Guide, Chapter 11, Settings 11.2.2. It reads in part, “RCV METHOD:
This will select the specific method of tabulating RCV votes to elect a winner.”
For instance, blank ballots can be entered into the system and treated as “write-ins.”
Then the operator can enter an allocation of the write-ins among candidates as he or
she wishes. The result then awards the winner based on “points” that the algorithm
computes, not actual voter votes. The fact that we observed raw vote data coming
directly from the Dominion data feed that includes decimal places proves that the
winner was selected by an algorithm, and not individual voter’s choice. Otherwise,
votes would be solely represented as whole numbers (votes cannot possibly be
added up and have decimal places reported). Below is an excerpt from Dominion’s
direct feed to news outlets showing actual calculated votes with decimals.

state timestamp eevp trump biden TV BV
michigan 2020-11-04T06:54:48Z 0.534 0.448 1925865.66 1615707.52
michigan 2020-11-04T06:56:47Z 0.534 0.448 1930247.664 1619383.808
michigan 2020-11-04T06:58:472Z 0.534 0.448 1931413.386 1620361.792
michigan 2020-11-04T07:00:37Z 0.533 0.45 1941758.975 1639383.75
michigan 2020-11-04T07:01:462 64 0.533 0.45 1945297.562 1642371.3
michigan 2020-11-04T07:03:17Z 65 0.533 0.45 1948885.185 1645400.25

SELzE

13. Yet another statistical red flag in Michigan concerns the dramatic shift in votes
between the two major party candidates as the tabulation of the turnout increased.
A significant irregularity surfaces. Until the tabulated voter turnout reached
approximately 83%, Trump was generally winning between 55% and 60% of every
turnout point. Then, after the counting was closed at 2:00 am, the situation
dramatically reversed itself, starting with a series of impossible spikes shortly after
counting was supposed to have stopped. The several spikes cast almost solely for
Biden could easily be produced in the Dominion EMS control system by pre-loading
batches of blank ballots in files such as Write-Ins, then casting them almost all for
Biden using the Override Procedure (to cast Write-In, Blank, or Error ballots) that is
available to the operator of the system. A few batches of blank ballots could easily
produce a reversal this extreme; a reversal that is almost as statistically difficult to
explain as is the impossibility of the votes cast to the number of voters described in
Paragraph 11 above. See Melissa Carone Affidavit, attached.

Dominion also has a “Blank Ballot Override” function. Essentially a save for later bucket that can be manually populated later.

13. The final red flag is perhaps the greatest. Something occurred in Michigan that
is physically impossible, indicating the results were manipulated on election night
within the EMS. The event as reflected in the data are the 4 spikes totaling 384,733
ballots allegedly processed in a combined interval of only 2 hour and 38 minutes.
This is physically impossible given the equipment available at the 4 referenced
locations (precincts/townships). We looked at ballots processed and cross
referenced the serial numbers and types of the scanning devices used at each
location to determine the amount of ballot processing capacity per the equipment
performance specifications. The Model DRM16011 processes 60 images/min.
without accounting for paper jams, replacement cover sheets or loading time, so we
calculate 2,000 ballots/hr/machine in field conditions, which is probably generous.
This calculation yields a sum of 94,867 ballots as the maximum number of ballots
that could be processed. It should be noted that in the event of a jam and the
counter is not reset, the ballots can be run through again effectively duplicating
them - This was noted in Ms. Carone’s affidavit, a Dominion Contract Employee
working in Detroit (attached). The existence of the spike is indicative of a manual
adjustment either by the operator of the system (see paragraph 12 above) or an
attack by outside actors. In any event, there were 289,866 more ballots
processed in the time available for processing in four precincts/townships,
than there was processing capacity.

#2

I plan to write a future Election Fraud Lies essay pointing out just how frivolous it is. She even misspelled 'district' in District Court. This is right from the heading of the Georgia suit (bolding mine):

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICCT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRCOICT OF GEORGIA, ATLANTA DIVISION

@travelerxxx

See my reply to EDG.

See also any of the presentations that have been given to state legislators in hearings in PA, MI, AZ and GA where you can hear testimony of affiants, both those who were witnesses to ballot processing and expert witnesses.

Here is a pretty substantial attorney's take on Powell's GA and especially MI cases:

#2

I read it the next day. From all lead up to it, I was expecting some types of new revelations. Frankly, I didn't note anything different than what she'd mentioned in the previous press briefings. Yeah, some legal stuff that may or may not be pertaint, but no new ground that I caught.

For all the glowing praise for her previous work, I'm not very impressed. Maybe I'm missing something? Certainly nothing was of a "Biblical" nature.

I must admit that part of the reason I read it was to find what exactly a "Kraken" (sp?) was. I mean, I read that it was some mythical Norse creature or something, but I thought maybe there was something more. And why would it matter if said mythical creature were to be "released." I was disappointed. There were no sea creatures discussed.