This phenomenon of having the "liberal" wing of the "librul medua" define democrats as not-republicans became very clear during my time as an avid viewer of MNBC prime time. While Olbermann was so phenomenonally necessary during the Mess of W, especially for someone living in a very conservative area. But after 2006 and 2008, they just kept up attacking the now minority party, giving those dimwits on the right much more credit and power than was deserved. It was at that time thst MSNBC truly began to morph into the FoxNC for the Dems. Their excessive negativity when so many opportunities abounded was depressing as hell.

This was the gyst of my only post ever made on GOS: that the front pagers were nothing more than members of FoxDem, distracting the masses with the daliances of the right, while failing to project a clear reason or series of reasons for anyone to be proactive rather than reactive. I realize every time I read or write about TOP that I remain guilty of violating my own best interests. Ugh.

Seriously. Leaving the airwaves to Bernie today. No reassuring statement for the troops. Her handlers may be afraid of what she might say.

and the variance of same policy statements increase with the averages, aka flip-flopping on issues, this is an unstable system. that's inherently a scientific principle in statistics. average increase, variance of averages increase, instability. i can think of a few known case-studies.

so even if she''s not outright lying and engaging in hypocrisy, at the very least that system, rightwing/leftwing/whatever, it will not be conducive to public trust in an elected official.

for comparison, as bernie's average number of policy statements increase, and that is really normal as he lays out a vision for his administration, and one detects no variance in those same policy statements on record. this is an inherently stable system.

now the same could be said for trump, he has been outlining consistently fascist and rightwing policy statements, outlandish and objectional as they are, but not much variance in those positions that i can detect so far. which means we can reasonably predict a stable government, of the mussolini persuasion. unfortunately that does not rule out actual war-mongering across the globe, to be sure.

i don't want to live in an unstable system. no matter how progressive. and i don't want to live in a stable but quasi-fascist dictatorship under trump. the choice is plain as day to me. i just hope i won't have to write-in a candidate in november.

Headline: Hillary 2nd in Alaska, Washington & Hawaii. Talk about putting lipstick on a pig.

She's still trying to win by sticking to fund raisers. She has 3 campaign events scheduled in Wisconsin Monday & Tuesday; that's it for the week. every thing else is a fund raiser.

She is great because the establishment says so, unless the GOP candidate is greater.

You Could Do Worse, If Only Barely - Vote Hillary!

You made me go there. Well OPOL's diary was worth it.

and focus more on the horizon.

Vote For Ted, Eh?

But guysm!

I went from Hillary To Bernie back to Hillary! Here's how a saw the light on my startling, enlightening towards self-actualization!

OPOL needs to head on over here. That site is donezo.

...except that dark farce works better with a modicum of irony, not played totally straight.

way back when after President Obama was sworn into office in 2009 on a blog site which I used to visit were displayed the president's approval numbers in the left-hand corner. I noticed that these numbers became net unfavorable. Then, one day, then numbers disappeared, never to be seen again.

I wish you peace and love, reader.