And it seems they each were allotted more time than Bernie.
Funny how first the MSM first jacked up Harris, then Beto, then Warren, and now Buttigieg. Flavor of the month to keep them all in the race to divert support from Bernie.
My guess is that they are going to be taking more and more potshots against Warren now.
And they'll be running with how those "urban" radicals are supporting Bernie. How precious of them! First, he didn't have enough minority support, now he's criticized when he gets pivotal endorsements from minority women who are the future of the Democratic Party.
You know the DC pundits. They’re going to downplay the significance of the #BernieSquad. They’ll say things like “this doesn’t expand his base” and “this was always going to happen.” But these endorsements are game changing. Everyone knows these women are the future of the party.
What the hell does “is this too urban?” mean? A CNN reporter just said this in response to an Omar, Tlaib, AOC endorsement of Bernie.
Also, might we remember who won the rural map in the 2016 Democratic primary? Right. Bernie.
@Dr. John Carpenter@Dr. John Carpenter
Bootagig's second round of MSM fawning coverage. His corporate media backers are of course in it for the corp-friendly moderate ideology. His well-heeled individual backers might be in it more for the IdPol.
#10.1 (Corey Booker, quietly humming Kumbaya, waits his turn.)
@wokkamile
Early on, te media couldn’t decide who they liked more, O’Rourke or him. I feel they pushed them both for a while. I don’t know why they feel Mayo Pete is going to have more of an impact now, but I suppose we shall see.
#10.1.2#10.1.2 Bootagig's second round of MSM fawning coverage. His corporate media backers are of course in it for the corp-friendly moderate ideology. His well-heeled individual backers might be in it more for the IdPol.
up
0 users have voted.
—
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
All the reviews of the debate say Tulsi lost and lost bad
I thought for sure the establishment, and their media henchmen, would see the truth in what Gabbard was saying about wars for profit. So I guess if they say Gabbard lost, they will make sure she does. Which is, after all, the more salient point of their message.
and lost bad.
Of course the reviews also say that Tulsi was "repeating Assad's talking points".
The media is jumping ship on Biden and throwing in with Mayor Pete, saying that he had a great non-response to Tulsi Syria question.
up
0 users have voted.
—
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
Tulsi talks of soldiers' lives whilst Pete talks about honor.l The honor of war. The honor of killing. The honor of destroying families. Yeah, Pete--sign me up for some of this honor.
This might be your kingdom
Seems that way to me
But what becomes of wisdom
When the power and the glory disagree
Hawaii congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard again topped the rankings of the most Googled candidate during the Ohio Democratic presidential debate Tuesday night. Gabbard, who had threatened to boycott the debate calling the process “rigged,” slammed the sponsors of the debate, CNN and the New York Times, calling both organizations’ attacks on her “despicable.”
Gabbard said, “The New York Times and CNN have also smeared veterans like myself for calling for an end to this regime change war” - referring to her position on Syria. Gabbard’s debate performance won her the Drudge Report's non-scientific, snap poll, with an overwhelming %40 percent saying she won the debate.
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist. She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
But have yet to see any credible evidence, much less a verbal unpacking of what "supporting" actually entails.
She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party.
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist. She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
up
0 users have voted.
—
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist.
By whom?
I am very reticent indeed to discriminate against someone for her religion, having experienced religious discrimination myself.
So who is it that is calling Tulsi Gabbard's branch of Hinduism Fundamentalist? And upon what evidence?
She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
Is she an unqualified Modi backer? Direct evidence?
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
And what I've seen thus far indicates that she'd give back better than she got. Please mind: I'm a Bernie man; but I'd be happy with Sanders/Gabbard.
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist. She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
up
0 users have voted.
—
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist.
By whom?
I am very reticent indeed to discriminate against someone for her religion, having experienced religious discrimination myself.
So who is it that is calling Tulsi Gabbard's branch of Hinduism Fundamentalist? And upon what evidence?
She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
Is she an unqualified Modi backer? Direct evidence?
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
And what I've seen thus far indicates that she'd give back better than she got. Please mind: I'm a Bernie man; but I'd be happy with Sanders/Gabbard.
other than "why are you an apologist for a dictator?"
From the transcript:
I want to turn now to foreign policy. President Trump ordered the withdrawal of all American forces from northern Syria, abandoning America's long-time Kurdish allies. As a result, Turkey has now evaded Syria, ISIS detainees have escaped, and the Kurds have announced a new deal with the government in Damascus, a victory for Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, and Russia, and Iran.
Asked of Biden first, then Gabbard. I think she got asked 3 questions on the night.
I'm sort of neutral about her. At least I don't hate her like I do "Mayor Pete".
IT'S ON!! Hillary accuses Tulsi Gabbard of being a Russian "asset" - We knew it would come to this eventually, Hillard still owns the DNC and she is defending her "property". She also expressed fears that Tulsi would mount a third party candidacy and is scared to death of that possibility! Hardly wait for the Clinton / Gabbard steel cage match - it ought to be good!!
"Democracy is technique and the ability of power not to be understood as oppressor. Capitalism is the boss and democracy is its spokesperson." Peace - FN
Comments
Krystal Ball's take on Tulsi etc
And she makes assessments of other candidates, too:
[video:https://youtu.be/I0RQDVrcZF0]
Good on Bernie
Loved hearing Bernie call out Biden to his face on the Iraq war, those infamous trade deals, and the crippling bankruptcies laws.
"Yeah Joe, you did get a lot done"
Smack! That ones gonna leave a mark.
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
“ Harris, then Beto, then Warren, and now Buttigieg”
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
I think this is
Yeah it is.
Idolizing a politician is like believing the stripper really likes you.
I'm a little surprised at that
I thought for sure the establishment, and their media henchmen, would see the truth in what Gabbard was saying about wars for profit. So I guess if they say Gabbard lost, they will make sure she does. Which is, after all, the more salient point of their message.
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
Tulsi slaps Mayor Pete silly as he defends power and the glory
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdYu2yXpmqo]
Tulsi talks of soldiers' lives whilst Pete talks about honor.l The honor of war. The honor of killing. The honor of destroying families. Yeah, Pete--sign me up for some of this honor.
This might be your kingdom
Seems that way to me
But what becomes of wisdom
When the power and the glory disagree
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXu7MG8VY-M]
how about this?
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/gabbard-again-most-googled-candidate-sla...
Two reasons I won't support her:
#1--she believes in and is part of a branch of Hinduism that is defined as Fundamentalist. She is a supporter of Indian leader Modi and his nationalistic Hindu party. Modi's cabals are going after non-believers especially Muslims, killing them.
#2--She is not experienced enough. The swamp/shark pit would regard her as a cocktail.
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
I've heard this mentioned before
But have yet to see any credible evidence, much less a verbal unpacking of what "supporting" actually entails.
There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier
questions on your response
By whom?
I am very reticent indeed to discriminate against someone for her religion, having experienced religious discrimination myself.
So who is it that is calling Tulsi Gabbard's branch of Hinduism Fundamentalist? And upon what evidence?
Is she an unqualified Modi backer? Direct evidence?
And what I've seen thus far indicates that she'd give back better than she got. Please mind: I'm a Bernie man; but I'd be happy with Sanders/Gabbard.
"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar
"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides
There is plenty of evidence of her supporting ahole Modi,
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
BTW, she has only been a US House Rep. I would like a POTUS
Inner and Outer Space: the Final Frontiers.
hard to say how she did when they didn't ask her anything
other than "why are you an apologist for a dictator?"
From the transcript:
Asked of Biden first, then Gabbard. I think she got asked 3 questions on the night.
I'm sort of neutral about her. At least I don't hate her like I do "Mayor Pete".
No time to read all the comments, but thanks . . .
for that fabulous video. Posted it to Facebook.
Marilyn
"Make dirt, not war." eyo
IT's ON!! Hillary vs. Gabbard - this is going to be good!!!
IT'S ON!! Hillary accuses Tulsi Gabbard of being a Russian "asset" - We knew it would come to this eventually, Hillard still owns the DNC and she is defending her "property". She also expressed fears that Tulsi would mount a third party candidacy and is scared to death of that possibility! Hardly wait for the Clinton / Gabbard steel cage match - it ought to be good!!
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hillary-clinton-says-tulsi-gabba...
"Democracy is technique and the ability of power not to be understood as oppressor. Capitalism is the boss and democracy is its spokesperson." Peace - FN
Pages