@EdMass
money for all she’s done”...?

Like they say she deserves to be in the White House because she won the ‘popular’ vote.

[comment:body]

@MrWebster

Was watching the Nomiki Konst/DNC stunner on a couple of different video commentaries just earlier and wondering how much of this might have been the corporate/Clinton Dem wing simply using the Dem Party/elections as a laundering op for dirty uses - whether out of direct personal kleptomanic acquisitiveness or not - of money donated for candidates...

Hillary Clinton did have that private purchased agreement to run the DNC; did have control over the funds; will do literally anything to make or take a buck and certainly wasn't campaigning, just money-raising, both from the 1%ers and, at least at one point, from supporters among the relative Poors making one-time donations but from whose bank accounts they drew multiple times.

Device used permitting, gotta read the following in full at source to get the full listing of petty - and not so petty - thieving committed by the Clintons that's been reported here. They never miss a chance to rob even the poorest in as many ways as possible and some that shouldn't be.

http://observer.com/2016/09/exclusive-hillary-clinton-campaign-systemati...

Exclusive: Hillary Clinton Campaign Systematically Overcharging Poorest Donors
Wells Fargo fraud department inundated with calls from low-income Clinton supporters reporting repeated unauthorized charges
Liz Crokin09/15/16

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.

The overcharges are occurring so often that the fraud department at one of the nation’s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign. One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state’s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.

“We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary’s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,” a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer. The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. However, the Clinton campaign strategically doesn’t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.

“We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100,” the fraud specialist explained. “The Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100. We’ll see her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100.” The source, who has worked for Wells Fargo for over 10 years, said that the total amount they refund customers on a daily basis who have been overcharged by Clinton’s campaign “varies” but the bank usually issues refunds that total between $700 and $1,200 per day. ...

... Wells Fargo recently came under fire after news broke that various regulators fined the big bank $185 million for opening 2 million phony customer accounts without their customers’ permission. This massive scandal resulted in the firing of 5,300 Wells Fargo employees. ...

... The New York Times reported in 2007 that Clinton’s first presidential campaign had to refund and subtract hundreds of thousands of dollars from its first-quarter total often because donors’ credit cards were charged twice. Additionally, it was reported that Clinton had to refund a stunning $2.8 million in donations, three times more than the $900K President Barack Obama’s campaign refunded.

Another bank source told the Observer that Clinton’s motivation in purposefully overcharging donors is not only to rake in more money for her campaign but also to inflate her small donor numbers reported to the FEC. “This gives a false impression about how much money Clinton has raised,” the source said. “The money that the bank has refunded would not be reflected in the FEC filings till after the election. This gives off the illusion to the public that her support and the amount she’s raised is much greater than what it is in reality.”

A Clinton campaign worker named Kathy Callahan, who worked on Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2008, claimed in a blog post that Clinton fraudulently overcharged her by several thousand dollars. She wrote that she voluntarily left the campaign’s finance committee after she discovered $3,000 in unauthorized charges made by Clinton’s campaign to her Visa card. Callahan said the unauthorized charges caused $400 in overdraft and bank charges and put Callahan over the legal donor limit. Callahan said that after a month of “begging and pleading,” she wasn’t able to get her money back until she threatened to go to authorities. However, when she was finally refunded her money the Clinton campaign refused to compensate her for the $400 in overdraft and bank charges.

Callahan also wrote that Matt McQueeney, who worked in the compliance and accounting department at Clinton’s campaign headquarters at the time, told her, “What happened to you with credit card errors is happening to others.” ...

And that ain't it, by a long shot, as you can read at source.

Never vote for evil again; only a Prog will try to help others out of the boiling pot that the Psychopaths That Be trickle-down their piss into.

Holy shit. And asshole George Coloney defended his big fund raiser for Clinton in part because the money was going to down ballot candidates which was an utter lie. The Clintons were like locust devouring the DNC and state parties. Well, appears the same with Obama.

@Shahryar
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Victory_Fund

[comment:body]

@ovals49

Many of the picklepusses with microphones and their names in front of them, however, look like they would rather not have the light shining on the big stinking turd sitting in the middle of the floor in front of them.

@Wink
spending $400 million or more on "consultants" only to come in second.
That's gotta hurt.
The commission's reaction? whatever...

post that here yesterday, but site wouldn't take the FB link.
I LOVE the expressions on some of those mugs as Nomiki is giving them hell. "whatever... "
They'll find out whatever soon enough.

@Steven D @Steven D

Hey, the Dems are transparently corrupt. Isn't that close enough for them to mock'n roll everybody lacking the power to control them?

Edit to add:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vgnj2NcMMDY

Godsmack - Greed

will be adopted when I see it happen.

No trust in Democrats to actually follow through, even on these minor "reforms."