‘The system is rigged.’ As not said by Trump.
Said by Le Monde Diplomatique under the title [please read the whole piece it is excellent, accurate and well written]
At the centre, but on the margins
‘The system is rigged.’ We already knew that the candidate with the largest share of the national vote does not always become US president; that the race for the White House ignores three-quarters of the states, in which the outcome of the election seems a foregone conclusion; that almost six million Americans with criminal records have lost their right to vote; that 11% of potential voters lack the identity papers required to cast a ballot; that the electoral system gives the two main parties a decisive advantage. Nor were we unaware that money, the media, lobbies and redistricting distort the democratic process
Not holding back on the language either
Yet its [democrats] vision of progress has ceased to be egalitarian: it is sometimes individualist and paternalistic (‘try harder’) and sometimes meritocratic (‘study more’), but it offers no future to the peripheral America of the heartlands which, far from the coasts, remain cut off from the prosperity of the great global cities. This America is witnessing the disappearance of the industrial jobs that had long been the mainstay of a middle class with little college education yet confident in its future.
Before Trump, the Republican Party had little to offer them either. The party’s priorities were reducing taxes on businesses and letting them export capital and outsource production. But by talking about country, religion and morality to workers and the white proletariat, and by encouraging the American heartlands to believe their decline was caused by pampered minorities and arrogant intellectuals, the conservatives ensured that the designated victims of their economic and business policies served as their electoral canon fodder for years
This year it’s still too risky for the Clintons’ party to scold all those who react badly to the problems the Democrats created, and to suggest that they seek training or a new career, or relocate. Because, with Trump in the ring, the Democrats can no longer be certain that they are the sole electoral refuge for what remains of a working-class base
She already scolded us for being irrationally childish and wanting "free stuff".
And ends with:
Rigged or not, we will soon know whether the US system has become so fragile that it may yield to a man like Trump. But if another terrorist attack, a bad TV appearance or the discovery of more compromising emails between now and the election keeps Clinton out of the White House, it would prove not just that the party of the status quo could not fight the authoritarian right, but that the latter derives much of its energy from the failed policies of the neoliberal left.
I think it is a well written piece and worth a read as it points out the heart of the problems and castigates our defunct political system accurately.
The kicker paragraph for me was
But there’s more to it in this election: a feeling that crosses party divisions, an anger expressed in the primaries by the 12 million people who voted for Senator Bernie Sanders and the 13.3 million supporters of Republican billionaire Donald Trump. They reckoned the system is rigged because politicians, both Republicans and Democrats, have launched wars in the Middle East that have impoverished the US without bringing victory. Rigged, because a majority of the population continues to pay for the consequences of an economic crisis that has cost those who caused it nothing.
Bingo as they say.
Sorry to keep quoting from foreign sources but Serge Halimi is a very good writer and editorial director.
Sometimes it takes someone outside of the system to point out the bloody obvious which our own MSM ignores completely and deliberately.
Ignored, abused and lied to for all too long is there any wonder that any straw is grasped? Even if the base arguments are vile in their divisiveness. Both the Republican and Democratic Parties are completely to blame for this division, they have worked tirelessly to maintain them so as to assure their own power for their ever decreasing base [the elite and corporations]
War crimes committed are pardoned amongst themselves, re Obama's "look forward not back" rhetoric, they protect each other no matter what; so as to maintain the iron fisted hold of the duopoly. This can also be seen by the political, media and financial elites closing of the ranks around Hillary, not because they agree, but because they fear the consequences.
The system is rigged.
Democracy has been battered into submission.
If you continue to fall for and vote for the "least bad"/"lesser of two evils" you are aiding and abetting its destruction.
Eventually you will have no choice at all.
Comments
PS I also reccomend reading Le Monde Diplomatique
it has an English version every month.
http://mondediplo.com/
If polls on single issues are to be believed, and I think by and
large they should be, the USA has not been an effective representative democracy for several decades. The American people consistently poll to the left of Congressional, Presidential and Judicial actions, yet the majority seldom see their preferred positions enacted: Usually it's quite the opposite.
One example, is that Social Security is a much appreciated and essential program and happens to be very efficiently run. Obama was the latest president to try and weaken the SSA with his "catfood commission" established to bring in a verdict that Social Security needs to be privatized. The commission failed to reach a recommendation and the expiration date came and went; yet, Obama and most politicians speak of the commission of having made recommendations when it did not. The catfood commission legally had a date to meet and failed to meet it because enough commission members would not vote to begin to dismantle this very popular program.
A once popular agency, the Environmental Protection Agency, has been captured by the corporations it was meant to regulate. Obama knew this coming in yet has done nothing to reverse its decline. The EPA under Bush said the air was safe to breathe immediately after the destruction of the World Trade Center when it was extremely toxic. Firemen, EMTs and police rushed to the scene to give aid and now are dying, or have died, from breathing deadly airborne particles. The EPA could not be bothered to do a proper analysis of the situation.
The American people, as stated in the article, are paying for actions that the majority strongly oppose. It is a sham democracy that allows this time after time.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
It's one hell of a shell game, when 99% are ignored
for so long
I agree. It's a shell game when the 1% can get away with that;
they use strong arm tactics when the con fails.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
The game is called Money Ball
If you can't pay you can't play.
"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott
Not to mention that USDA
and the FDA are wholly owned subsidiaries of agribuz, especially Monsanto.
Mary Bennett
Vilsack has seen to the USDA. It was usually Big Ag most of
the time; now it's Big Ag all of the time and farmers who own moderate sized farms are feeling the squeeze.
"The justness of individual land right is not justifiable to those to whom the land by right of first claim collectively belonged"
Amen! n/t
Rebuglicans broke the government
with the Democrats help, they are different parties in name only and represent corporations only, after all they are people aren't they?
A government of the people wouldn't go after OWS, BLM, Water Protectors
the deplorables the 47% etc.etc.etc.
The FBI, DOJ both being compromised, leaves us with a system that is rigged.
I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish
"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"
Heard from Margaret Kimberley
Paper subscription to the German daily “Tageszeitung / taz.de”
includes a subscription to the German edition of Le Monde Diplomatique.
I highly recommend Le Monde Diplomatique (not to be confused with the French daily named Le Monde).
And, the Tageszeitung’s good choices of international partnerships are one of the reasons I tried to put my money where my mouth is and joined the co-operative that publishes it.
It was founded by Hubert Beuve-Méry who also
founded and directed Le Monde, the split came in the 80s and le Diplo became completely independent [as an SA] in 1996.
Le Monde is actually a pretty good newspaper, the hardest hitting in France are the monthly magazines.
PS. I think it is still owned by Le Monde.
Don't apologize for using foreign sources.
So many around the world are watching us with alarm, and some of them care enough to try warning us.
I hope enough of us listen.
it's really a bit of a fauxpology
Thank God for the foreign press!
If not for them (and Wikileaks, and Greenwald), we wouldn't know a damned thing of import.
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
Wow
What Serge said. That is something I wish I'd written. I was thinking about doing an election post-mortem essay, but now I fear it will be hard to avoid cribbing large parts of this wholesale.
Think I'll be subscribing to the English version of Le Monde Diplomatique.
Please help support caucus99percent!
Hiya - yes it is worth it, what is the harm with the odd
use of a crib sheet? heh.
I'm a little bit in post-mortem already - I think the patient may well be dead.
Thanks for bringing this to us
The patient is still twitching. Not sure it matters whether the metastatic cancer or the septic shock finally does it in.
Please help support caucus99percent!
You're welcome
There is still plenty well written and accurate journalism out there even though it gets harder to find.
Speaking of rigging
Here's something about Bernie and other stuff from Wikileaks:
Here Mook and friends are arranging for female Senators to shame Bernie Sanders for going negative, on camera. Everything about the Hillary campaign was apparently a carefully crafted and scripted PR stunt.
Here Mook is talking about Bernie going negative as being against some agreement, and having leverage over him. This was in late May, when it was almost over. Welch is the Congressman from Vermont, they were talking about using him as a communications channel.
Hillary's Rapid Response Team discuss media compliance.
The Clinton campaign is soft on sexual harassment, when it's one of their own.
You can't make this one up! I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy). Soros and Saban had enormous influence and access to the campaign. You and I? Not so much.
Here's what Saban wants to do to Bernie with an arrow.
And finally, Podesta on Peter Kadzik of the DOJ.
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
One more
This one is about the Clinton Foundation. It's basically an internal risk-management assessment done in 2008, and they came up short on a number of compliance issues. You have to click on the attachment tab at the top of the e-mail to see the good stuff.
"Obama promised transparency, but Assange is the one who brought it."
I love the memo about sic-ing women and "brown" people
On Bernie. It finally exposes identity politics as a fraud.
Seconded. Halimi has said what I have been trying to
say since before the primaries even began. The signs are there for those who will see them.
It is discouraging, though, that so many turned out to celebrate the Chicago Cubs World Series win making it the fifth largest gathering in human history, according to ABC "news." Yet demonstrations like tribes defending against DAPL, are attacked by riot police. The MSN makes sure that we stay distracted with puff pieces like "KitKat" treats college student." Real news gasps for air as do the people fighting for justice.sigh
"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now do you begin to understand me?" ~Orwell, "1984"
It goes even beyond that.
Super delegates. Establishment media. Decades of propaganda from Democrats claiming liberals cannot win elections. Decades of propaganda from Democrats, Republicans, and media discrediting liberals in other ways as well. Decades of muddling the term "liberal" by using it as a synonym for "Democrat." With apologies to Wilde, we dare not speak our name anymore,* using instead the DLC-approved term "progressive." Please know that today's politicians are not using "progressive" as a synonym for "liberal:" Hillary and Obama both self-identify as "progressive." However, of "progressive," "moderate" "conservative," and "liberal," the only characterization that they never use for themselves is "liberal." Hillary even knee-jerked chagrin when Chris Matthews referred to her as a liberal on his show, then awkwardly mumbled when she caught herself.
*Truth is, liberals do need a different name, IMO, but it is not "progressive." Thanks to Al From, I see "progressive" as the "Chance the Gardener" of political labels. https://medium.com/@matthewstoller/its-al-froms-democratic-party-we-just...
However, "liberal" is also problematic because the web puts us in easy communication with people all over the world, many of whom emphasize the "laissez faire toward business" bit of liberalism much more than do Americans. (A young European once attacked me for my alleged corporatism because I had described myself as liberal.)
Precisely. In Germany, liberal = “laissez-faire toward business”
“The Liberals” is what the Free Democrats call themselves.
The system is more than rigged, it's
simply not a democratic system. People think we can "get the money out" or go the third party route when this representative system is actually an oligarchic system. It was designed that way. 537 people representing 330 million people is ridiculous, particularly when the rich control all the institutions. Having one person as president is antiquated and short sighted.
Some people, including myself, have had enough of this system and want a new one.
But hey, vote for Stein, keep the system and try to compete within it, see what happens.
I am voting for (have already, in fact)
Jill Stein, with obviously no expectation that she will win. Why? It's free. They have at least given me a small vehicle to express myself, and I will use it, before it expires. Especially since it does not prevent me from 'wanting a new system' in any way. Also, because I see it as at least chipping away at this one, no matter how microscopically.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
We must create election reform NOW!
I now get scolded as a Trump supporter when I speak of the fraud in elections.
Victimized for being a victim. But what do you expect from our 1% Dynasty?
I don't see much being done until it's too damn late. Americans are for the most part - ignorant, stubborn and easily distracted. I don't anything being accomplished without a lot of pain and suffering first and then it will probably take more bloodshed.
Get rid of the electoral and delegates. Simply count each fucking vote and it make it have a paper trail.
Otherwise your voice is being gagged. Don't expect that your silly little ballot has been counted correctly. Don't be that gullible.
"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison
Everyone that speaks out is treated as a:
1] Trump supporter
2] Russian spy
3] Misogynist
Personally I have never seen before this election so many supposedly intelligent people striving to be pig ignorant [my apologies to pigs]
One must march lock-step and complain later, any complaint now will be treated as treason.
(((LaFem)))
I got scolded for not supporting strong women. That somehow I am intimidated by "real" women. Yes, they went there - "real" women.
I didn't know Hillary supporters could be crazier than Sarah Palin.
It will be worse with HRC. I've protested some baddies and she's the worst. We are all going to find out exactly what we are made of.
"Love One Another" ~ George Harrison
This realization has shocked me, that democrat partisans
have a lower collective IQ than the Tea Party and less tolerance.
... It will be worse with HRC
Unfortunately, we're made of flesh, blood and bone, rather than corporate money bound together with arrogance and guile... makes us worthless and quite too, too terribly disposable.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
They're having trouble dismissing the FBI
"The FBI is Russian" doesn't really work.
Funniest thing I have read in a long time
Now if it had only been about Trump!
Sat, 11/05/2016 - 12:19pm —
Sat, 11/05/2016 - 12:19pm — coolepairc
They could still be Russian moles in collusion (or possibly in love) with Trump's squirrel.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Indeed, so that it can always
Indeed, so that it can always be democracy with jam on tomorrow but never, ever, ever, today.
"We'll fix that ability to cheat later, now that we've got our people in again using it, but for now it's a done deal that would be too much trouble to change" - but the PTB always want their representatives in 'next time', too...
I mean, here they've gone to the expense of changing laws to suit themselves and bought two whole political parties to do it, so obviously want to stick with one rep of the two that suits them best, while, since the people only pay for everything else, including the magically ever-expanding profits of the PTB typically drained out of the people, and with which they do all of these marvelous things, why let the peons change what works so nicely?
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.
Trump was speaking about things he heard people claiming when
he was ten, like dead people voting. With the computerized systems in place now, that is not an issue. You walk in, they check you off. Maybe you show an electric bill or i.d. Done. No problem unless someone else with my name and address tries to vote at my polling place.
He would have been more accurate, and sounded more sophisticated, if he had have spoken of other forms of rigging, like what the DNC and media did to Sanders and vote counting, maybe potential for abuse in absentee ballots.
While I watch very little TV, TV is on a lot in my home, so I hear a lot of it. And I often hear MSNBC. Republicans and Democrats both said the same thing over and over to "debunk" what Trump had said
I know that to be true, but, after I heard it so carefully worded so many times, I could not help but notice that carefully excluded were mail in ballots and election fraud. Then, I remembered the stories about Hillary supporteres in the primary delivering armloads of absentee ballots. The potential for fraud there has to be huge.
Consume and be happy. Those are your marching orders.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - JFK | "The more I see of the moneyed peoples, the more I understand the guillotine." - G. B. Shaw Bernie/Tulsi 2020
Lol, people'd be a lot
Lol, people'd be a lot happier if they were paid a living wage and could afford to consume enough to get by on.
Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.
A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.