Racist attacks on Muslims, Poles and others
Submitted by tapu dali on Mon, 06/27/2016 - 9:01pm
increase as as result of Brexit vote.
The "Leave" "victory" is a victory for British xenophobes and racists, exemplified by the racist leader of the Ukip, Boris Johnson (Bo.Jo.)
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/27/sadiq-khan-muslim-counci...
Please don't paint this as a "win" for the Left. It isn't.
Comments
Wait a minute.
Cherry picking much? Why four weeks earlier instead of three or six or twelve or the average over the past 12 months? Because four weeks ago was a record low point and it's good propaganda to use it as a base?
And who gives a shit if it's good for "the left"? If it's good for workers, that's what I care about. Any instance where employers import workers that they pay less and treat worse is a loss for humanity. Any instance where middle and lower class workers are put out of work in the name of fatter corporate profits is a loss for humanity.
Fuck "the left" if they can't understand that.
Brexit is not good for the working classes.
Many, many people are now expressing "Bregret".
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-anger-bregret-leave...
Pensions are plummeting, the decline of the pound is affecting everyone's pocketbook.
The assumption that "what's bad for the rich is good for the poor" has not been validated.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
You're peddling nonsense.
And propaganda.
Pensions are a long-term asset. It's only been 3 days.
The decline of the pound has positives and negatives. It encourages more tourism as foreign currencies go farther. It increases exports because British goods will be cheaper for other nations.
Britain was never even a full-compliance EU member. They kept their own Pound instead of adopting the Euro. They retained the ability to pick and choose which EU rules and regulations applied to them. One of the few EU-ish things they did was open their border to cheap foreign labor at the expense of British workers.
The effects of leaving the EU remain to be seen. Setting your hair on fire and running around in circles after just 3 days -- and they haven't even exited yet -- is just plain silly.
I'm not running around with "my hair on fire".
You will of course have noticed that PM Cameron has resigned and that the Leader of HM Loyal Opposition Corbyn is facing a vote of non-confidence. Half of Corbyn's Shadow Cabinet have resigned.
Britain is a Parliamentary Monarchy, not a "republic" so it is difficult to provide equivalences.
But the approximate equivalent would be the forced resignation of the Speaker of the House, the Minority Leader being under attack from his own Representatives, and having half of the Ranking Members of the House Committees resign in disgust.
I guess that wouldn't be a big deal in Congress, would it?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
A quibble re pensions - they can lose a great amount of value
in minutes, depending upon what they are invested in and how they are managed. Depending upon the extent to which they are invested in leveraged funds, some of that could be permanent.
That, in its essence, is fascism--ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. -- Franklin D. Roosevelt --
No argument with that.
But as a general rule, it's not worth sweating a couple of days retrenchment on investments that mature over the course of years or decades. I still regret selling the Amazon.com shares I bought in 2001 for $13.
Global stocks are up today
The Brexit panic is already over, after just two days.
What is a Investor State Dispute Settlement clause in
a trade agreement, specifically the proposed TTIP between the EU and the US?
FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.
Not only is it cherry picking
It's pretty obvious.
What will they blame on Brexit next?
Don't fall for the conservative line. It is not the importation
of workers that causes wages to fall. It is the greed of the 1% that causes wages to fall. If they can't import workers, they'll find some other reason to pay less. And/or to cut out your jobs. Eventually they'll automate. They want you blaming the other, the immigrant, because then you're not placing the blame where it really belongs.
Until "wealthy" is defined as "creating lots of good-paying jobs" rather than how much money you can stash in the Caymans; until "the business of business is profit" is no longer a thing, and instead "the business of business is to create lots of good-paying jobs while providing high-quality products and services," it's not immigrants who threaten native workers.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. That's why government was created with checks and balances. What have been big businesses' checks and balances? Government, media, unions, competition. The first two have been bought off, the third has been diminished to insignificance, the fourth will be done away with or bought out. There is nobody to check and balance their corrupt power any more. Immigrants didn't do that. The 1% did that.
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
It plays a strong part in helping keeping wages lower.
To deny that this doesn't have an impact is to embrace pretense over reality. Too many workers and too few jobs helps keep wages lower, so yes, importation of workers does cause wages to become stagnant and to fall.
The immigrant is doing what is in their best interest. The elitist is doing what is in their best interest. The existing worker has been helpless to do anything when the elite ship opportunities out of the country, or give opportunities to those immigrating, while ignoring the existing workers.
As you admit a couple of times, lots good paying jobs are needed and the elites actively endorse policies which depress wages and ship jobs out of the country in the form of free trade agreements.
It's those in power who no longer think of their own working class. The immigrants are a secondary threat and another obvious outlet for frustration for those who are being taking advantage of and ignored. That the workers in Britain chose to leave the EU should be no surprise.
One can not have globalism, sovereignty, and democracy all at the same time. For globalism to flourish, at least one of the other two must suffer. in the case of the EU, both sovereignty and democracy have suffered.
And the people have no recourse because those controlling the EU make themselves insulated from any checks and balances. They've insulated themselves form accountability to the people in many ways. So now, accountability has come in a different form, the British Exit from the EU. Those Britains who voted to leave choose to no longer be subjugated by EU control.
Immigration and control of one's borders is a step toward ensuring one can control the population, and thus have an impact on the availability of jobs and the wages they command.
Pretending otherwise won't make it so.
I think that what the austerity measures imposed by the EU
did in the southern countries of Europe is increasing the jobless rates and the families who lost their houses to bankcruptcy and lost their pensions.
Much of the internal EU migration of workers is caused by the unemployment rates in those countries.
They actually wanted the free movements made possible in the EU. Before you complain about lower hourly wages of workers, you have to have a job with an hourly wage to begin with. The workers from various European and ME countries that migrated to the EU countries are well skilled. They are an asset. They made a living in their new host countries and rather would like to keep what they built than lose it. They will be able to go back into their home countries. The movement can go both directions.
Btw, Germany has just raised its minimum wage to Euro 8,84 today and is higher than the federal US minimum wage. I know a lot of immigrants here in the US, who were immigrant in Europe before and most admit that the struggle here is harder than in the EU.
Millions of people will be scared of losing value of their currency while living on minimal little pensions. I have very much empathy with all the people in Greece, Spain, Italy and where ever else the austerity measures have crashed their livelihood. So, the EU is broken, it needs fixing. But like with the thing in the furniture stores, you brake it, you have to pay for it, you wouldn't think the way to fix what is broken means you throw a bomb into the furniture store and burn it down, no?
There are working class people, who want to work within the EU and not losing their rights to do so.
https://www.euronews.com/live
No, sorry, it's not a pretense. Again, if the 1% are no longer
allowed to import workers, they'll depress wages or get rid of jobs some other way if they are allowed to do so. They'll automate, most likely. Sure, immigrants do whatever is in their best interests, they're trying to survive. Rather than pass a law against immigrants, why not pass laws against depressed wages, including enforcement with teeth?
The impact of the immigrant is perception, not reality. The 1% wants you blaming the poor immigrant. Then you don't blame the 1%. Why is there a flood of workers? Because the 1% wants it that way. Why do these workers compete for jobs? Because the 1% wants it that way. If I could afford to hire someone, I would decide what the job was worth, and since I believe in a living wage, it would be at least $25/hr. I don't care how many people were available to apply for that job, I would not encourage a competition that then provided the job to the lowest bidder. It's an excuse, a blaming to turn your attention from those who control the economy to those who have no control. Too many workers and too few jobs create lower wages? No, an executive decision created lower wages. Too many workers and too few jobs are what the 1% have created. They then point as that as "why" wages are low. The 1% can pay whatever wage they feel the job is worth, just like I could.
OTOH, if you don't give a rat's rump about the worker, you will automate and do without as much as possible, cruelly enjoy the competition for the few jobs you deign to create, and see how low you can make people stoop. The presence or absence of immigrants doesn't make much difference.
In fact, assuming you have space, increased immigration could probably be designed to be a good thing. More people creates more demand for products and services and thus potentially creates more jobs.
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
Actually the last 3 middle classes occurred in periods of
global trade.
In fact the only 3 times there was a middle class since the Black Plague.
FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.
that's weird.
did the UK police, en masse, start failing at their jobs after PoundSign Brexit?
i guess the problem is police training or something?
GIANT ALL-CAPS SIG
Unlike the US,
the Uk is not a police state.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
lol.
really.
one CCTV camera for every soul in britain.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/10172298/One-surveillance-camera-f...
surely these are freedom surveillance cameras. lol.
GIANT ALL-CAPS SIG
Who cares about CCTV cameras?
So long as they're not in your house, who gives a damn about CCTV cameras at all? If they're monitoring what is going on in public, how is that a bad thing? If you were ashamed about doing something, you wouldn't be doing it in public in the first place most likely. So who the hell do the cameras affect at all? They're not really any different than if you had people around you in public.
Seriously?
You are really going to go "What do you have to hide?" on us?
Unless we go FULL 1984, then its no big deal?
Hah! Don't even
try accusing me of using the same argument as the morons who support the NSA spying on you in your own home. I clearly pointed out that as long as it's in PUBLIC, who cares? If you're doing something in the public eye, clearly you aren't trying to hide anything you are doing from anybody at all, so what does it matter if there is also a camera on you or not? How is having a camera seeing what you're doing worse than having a crowd of people seeing what you're doing? Is it because the camera can record you? So can the crowd of people, and they can share what they record with the world in an instant. People are a bigger threat to your public "privacy" than any CCTV camera ever could be.
I view CCTV cameras as no different than requiring body cameras on police. In fact, I favor them over the body cameras, because it's probably way harder for a crooked cop to get one of those CCTV cameras shut off than to have that body camera mysteriously shut off just before the person they were innocently questioning did something so heinous that the cop had no choice but to put them in a coma with several broken bones.
Also, your response didn't address anything I asked at all.
Quite a coincidence...
that a lot of the anti-immigrant messaging (graffiti and laminated cards (?)) is focused on the Poles of all groups.
I'm sure the recent spate of 'attacks' has absolutely nothing to do with the staunchly anti-EU stance of the recently elected Polish government, nor that anyone in the British establishment would have ANY interest in discrediting EU dissolution in the eyes of voters in Poland by manufacturing Polish hate speech and blaming it on the Brexiters.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Awfully sorry, not following you.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
You should really try ...
not to take everything you read from the Guardian at face value, nor make assumptions about culprits without understanding the larger political context.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Boris Johnson is not a respectable person.
The Ukip is a racist, xenophobic, anti-immigrant Party.
Like Trump, he's even got a bad comb-over!
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Did Boris Johnson tag the anti-Polish graffiti?
Because that's what I thought we were talking about.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Perhaps not personally.
But he has certainly agitated his racist-fascist followers to all sorts of evil.
So, yes, I blame him.
And you? What do think of BoJo and the Ukip?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
You are completely missing my point.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Not at all.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Unfortunately
it appears to be true from here.
Just sayin'. The simplicity of your argument would be spectacular if it were only that easy. But it's not. There is a lot more nuance than you're allowing for. It is not all about "racism".
Not all, to be sure.
But a very great deal is.
Please read my links, rather than dismissing them as "MSM rubbish".
Here's another one from The Independent:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-eu-referendum-raci...
Or are the Guardian, the Times, the Telegraph, the Independent, the Scotsman, the BBC, etc. all "MSM bullshit"?
What's left, the CPGB-run "Daily Worker/Morning Star"?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
And MSNBC screams all day about The Donald
And the situation is not as simple as ANY ONE of those sources is trying to make it out to be.
So what source do you recommend for me
to find the "true facts"?
Some blog?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
You mean like this one?
Depends on how hard you're pushing something.
Speaking only for me: What's up with all the drama?
You are entitled to your opinion. Others are entitled to theirs.
First, anyone can paint it anyway they want to. If the msm can paint Hillary and Trump, both under criminal investigation, as viable candidates, anyone can say anything and call it news.
Who but you said it was a win for the left? As some smart person here said, it is always nice when the people give the insiders a "big fuck you". That isn't left or right. It is people standing up for what they believe in even if its wrong. Populism isn't about right and left, it is about up and down.
When the elites piss on people long enough, they get pissy.
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
this is what
populism is about:
You know it is against the rules for you to win. :D
Sometimes hair of the dog that bit ya will cure the problem. Yes, Hillary is using populism to hide the corrupt policy that is she. Bernie used populism to spit in her eye. It isn't over yet
"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon
boys
never win. Not against girls. ; )
Nonsense. (Not you, but whoever you are quoting, which
the link did not lead me to.) The definition of populism is representing the common people; belief in the rights, wisdom, or virtues of the common people (Merriam Webster). The example they give is the U.S. populist party of the 1890s, which represented farm interests, advocated free coinage of silver, and wanted the government to break up monopolies.
Anybody can claim to be anything, and it's popular for the exact opposite of populists to lay claim to populism, but that doesn't make it so. That's Orwellian-speak.
Bern is truly populist. Increased wages and a strong safety net are populist. Being tired of war and wanting to spend that money on needs at home is populist. Hill is only populist when she pretends to support populist ideals. Sigh. If only she were genuine.
Don't let them commandeer a perfectly good word. They will take a perfectly good proposal such as a higher minimum wage and claim that it's somehow a worldwide plague. The last thing true populism is, American or otherwise, is empowered by wealth. In fact, these attempts to smear populism, in all likelihood, are empowered by wealth.
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
you might want
to go a little deeper than the dictionary.
"The U.S. populist party of the 1890s" wanted all Negroes killed or caged, brought about the Prohibition that not only, for a time, outlawed alcohol, but also directly resulted in the drug laws that plague the Americans to this day, had a huge hard-on for Roosevelt I's imperial extermination compaign against the "wogs" in the Philippines and elsewhere, etc., etc., etc.
Populism is a mob. Without a brain.
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq1KeyEARBU]
Sanders is not a populist. He is a reformer who ran a 1936 campaign. In 2016.
Well heck, Merriam Webster steered me wrong. How could they?
Okay, but we can make populism whatever we want it to be. High wages and strong social safety nets are popular. My conviction is that racist attitudes are not popular if people have access to the facts. Populism does not need to be unthinking mob rule. Our votes are, basically, populism. If you don't respect the wisdom of the common person, then why would you protect the right to vote?
Please check out Pet Vet Help, consider joining us to help pets, and follow me @ElenaCarlena on Twitter! Thank you.
I haven't had Cable TV for 17 years.
FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.
Let's turn this around
Hillary is a neoliberal war monger. Therefore all Hillary supporters must be neoliberal war mongers.
Bernie is an old, white male, socialist. Therefore all Bernie supporters must be old, white male, socialists.
People all have reasons for voting the way they do, and those reasons aren't always obvious.
the
British have a history of hallucinating about Poles:
Maybe in 1947 they did.
After all, they had just recently fought quite a big war over Poland.
But nowadays? The idea that the Poles (not Muslims or Hindus or Chinese any other darker complexioned immigrants) are taking the brunt of the post-Brexit schadenfreude is downright suspicious, especially considering the larger geo-political issues currently involved.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
You're being totally incoherent.
England fought NS Germany over the invasion of Poland.
They were defending Poland from aggression, ffs. Unlike the Sudetenland. Hitler just went "one step too far" with the invasion of Poland.
How do you logically equate defending Poland with a now xenophobia?
As I said, incoherent and illogical.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Lots of Polish refugees...
in postwar UK, at a time when Britain was in dire economic straits.
Easy to see how Polish immigrants of that time would be the ones to bear the brunt of nativist antipathy.
But this isn't 1947, and Brexiters likely didn't do the tagging.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
Tnat seems uncalled for
referring to someone as "incoherent" to make a point when the words on the page make perfect sense. Perhaps you don't mean it to be insulting?
that sort of thinking
did not magically disappear in 1948.
And I don't think anyone is saying the Poles are taking the brunt of it. But the Poles are taking some of it.
For centuries, it was baked-in to being British to feel superior to other peoples. Not just to "wogs," but also, as seen above, to people like the Poles. That attitude is still there.
"Table next to me says to Polish waitress 'How come you're so cheerful? You're going home.' Him and the missus started laughing. Disgusting"
Maybe all these people, they are lying. But maybe they're not.
Find me an article from this century...
about the huge spate of anti-Polish sentiment in the UK, and I'll entertain the notion that this isn't all just manufactured outrage.
The current working assumption appears to be that our Shroedinger's Cat system is still alive. But what if we all suspect it's not, and the real problem is we just can't bring ourselves to open the box?
so now the
"spate" has to be "huge"? ; )
Here's one from last year.
Here's one from 2014.
And another from 2014.
And this one from today.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brexit-eu-referendum-raci...
M'kay?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
And I must say that no-one is without blame here:
The Ukip, because of course they are.
The Tories, because of their xenophobic wing.
And even Labour, (vide supra) because they're afraid of foreigners taking jobs from t'lads at t'mill.
Odd thing is, English lads no longer want to work at t'mill.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Wait, what?
Is that a variation of the "They won't do THOSE kind of jobs, so why shouldn't
illegal immigrantsbrown peopleothers take them? Somebody has to do the work...."Oh, please.
I'm not being racist in the least.
Many Brits [1] don't want to work in mines, mills or smelters (BTW, my late dad was a union official at his local of the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Union_of_Mine,_Mill_and_Smel...
so kindly don't pull anything on me)
but, [2] don't want foreigners taking those jobs either.
That's what I'm saying.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
I'm going to put aside the obvious larger irony
of your response to show you something:
Don't be pulling anything on me, OK? I can read.
Received shared vid on BREXIT - resharing here as well
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYqzcqDtL3k width:500 height:400]
Brexit is a result of ancient fault lines within the Tory Party
and their fellow travellers (see Farage).
Nothing to do with the common man.
Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.
Nigel Farage Vs the EU Establishment - The Great Escape - BREXIT
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQphEsOEh9U width:500 height:400]
Is this meant to be in defense of this crackpot and
quasi-fascist POS?
Climate change denier?
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
Because
Farage snubbed Charles of Everprince during a speech, he's to be ridiculed? AYFKM??
Did you read
climate change denier??
Or I guess that doesn't matter anymore, as long this fascist POS is an "anti-royalist"?
I don't know whether you're British or American, but if [1] you're missing the point entirely, and if [2] butt out.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
His points on democracy and sovereignty are dead on.
Whether you or I like the man, many of the points he makes are quite valid.
With globalist tendencies, people can have the Anti-Democratic European Union with it's global economic integration, but you're going to have far less sovereignty for the member states, and far less democracy for the people in each country.
Those are the tradeoffs. Some may be willing to trade democracy and sovereignty for the globalist agenda of the EU, but others are taking a long look back, and then a long look forward and deciding self determination is far better than being led around by appointed leaders in the EU who have no accountability.
If you support less democracy and less sovereignty, that's your choice. If you choose to be an apologist for oligarchy, that's your choice as well. I'll choose democracy and sovereignty over the elitists global agenda, and that's what Britain's chose as well. Good for them.
Calling those voters racist xenophobes does seem to be what the globalist agenda would naturally do (and have done) in order to attempt to shame those people for voting in their own bests interests.
People should vote their own best interests. The globalist agenda isn't serving 'the people'. The EU cushions its leadership from any accountability to the people it wants to govern. As we've seen in America, a lack of accountability causes a lot of problems, and outrage with the people. American jobs are being shipped off by our own elite and we're supposed to have democracy and accountability, - checks and balances - and look at the American situation.
I have friends who voted leave and I support them and their perspectives. But hey, you've made up your mind. So have I. I'm not here to change your mind and you won't change mine either.
I do find it interesting how willing some people are to classify all those voters in such a bad light, especially considering the way Clinton puppets and supporters classify Sanders supporters.
..but whatever.
Well, he was mocked today by Juncker and I am glad he was ...
EU’s Juncker to Farage: Why are you here?
Who’s laughing now, asks the UKIP leader.
Well, one thing is for sure, not many people will be laughing in the future.
I think, I am an outcast and loner among you now. I believe you completely miss the larger picture and always compare things that you shouldn't compare.
Makes me wonder ...
https://www.euronews.com/live
worst thread on C99p I have read so far ...
I really didn't have the intention to say anything, but then I got mad at the comments. Some seem to be in denial about facts.
UK Muslim group calls for reconciliation amid Brexit hate crimes surge
Hate crimes are everywhere on the rise, in Europe and the US. But I guess that's all lies. One of our senior correspondents in DC and then bureau chief in Moscow said once sarcastically in a tweet to her colleagues home: "Und ich les' mit grossem Interesse unsere böse Lügenpresse". Her kind of sarcasm. And she was the only one who had "seen through" Obama way back in 2007.
Auf Deutsch gesagt, man kann es auch übertreiben.
https://www.euronews.com/live
Bestimmt.
Ich auch kann es kaum verstehen, was manche Leute sagen wollen.
Das Rassismus ist eine Tatsache, dass niemand leugnen kann.
There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.
btw, some more numbers ...
Jahresbericht des Verfassungsschutzes
Zahl extremistischer Gewalttaten stark gestiegen
Well, you can ignore it if you want. It's in German and is the official report of the German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. The google translation is awful and it's too long to edit the translation.
If you think hate and violence is not on the rise and a factor, you just accepted to close your eyes and be in denial about it.
https://www.euronews.com/live
You are correct, Mimi - racism and hate crimes are real
I think the issue is - as usual - that the cause of it is income inequality and neoliberal policies - but the effect is many effected people react by blaming the "other" instead of blaming those truly responsible - the neoliberal 1%.
So, really, both sides are correct on this one. It's not really ABOUT racism, but racism and hate crimes are an effect of these policies, as many working class people direct their anger to immigrants, instead of those responsible for the way things are.
I think the cause for the rise in hate crimes is
is different in different countries. Of course this is true in general:
But the income inequality was there before the rise in hate crimes started. So it's certainly not the only and not the main reason within the EU countries.
So I really urge everyone to see each country on its own and each countries reactions to the influx of refugees separately and not compare it with neo-liberalism discussions in the US and the 1% here. In Europe different countries have different attitudes and history and language and cultures and very different forms of showing their ethnic resentments and reactions. But the people want still work and survive and make a living. And for many the EU made that possible and they don't want to lose that. And those are working people, poorer people, people out of former Eastern European countries who found a living because of the EU, not because the EU had oppressed their chances to find decent work.
I am sorry to say that I believe the whole refugee and immigration migrations from all over Europe within the EU and from ME and Africa has caused the "ugly beast of hate" come out and go wild again among many.
I blame that squarely on US foreign policies. Sorry. Many of those migrating workers and refugees and immigrants into EU countries are glad they could go there and could work freely, something they may lose in the future. It's a huge problem.
Brexit will not solve any of those problems. That's why I do not believe that it actually will happen, unless really a lot of other EU membership countries will break away as well.
https://www.euronews.com/live
BINGO!!!
When you have an immigrant population USED to depress wages in areas where wages are already depressed, people don't know WHO to be pissed at but the immigrant as that is all they see. This has been used repeatedly in many countries, not just the US or Britain. A great example I read about is busing and desegregation. By mandating that it be done in NOT wealthy areas, in areas where people are already struggling, and then stoking the racial hatred, you get a lot of legislation and pushback on other legislation from that. And you get to call the people against it merely racist, instead of looking at the actual flawed policies themselves.
Just like illegal immigration - illegals don't make OSHA complaints, they don't demand overtime, they don't complain at all like a legal citizen would do. Sure, they're "taking the jobs" but at whose behest? Certainly not the people whose wages they have displaced but the employer who wants to pay lower wages. But never let that willful intent be known, merely spin it as the racist ravings of a bunch of "sore losers" or low information Luddites. Then add in some Faux Noise propaganda, and viola - anything that person who lost their job votes for can be spun to be merely racist and ignorant, when it's really one hell of a lot deeper than that.
This whole Brexit to me is a prime illustration of our own Tea Party, but this time the vote went, kind of, the other way. Sure, the elites will still win ultimately, they're already busy at work figuring out just how to short it or whatever they need to do to profit. So maybe it isn't a completely good thing. But it does make a statement, and what I fear is
we'rethe MSM is too busy worrying and even spreading the meme that this is ONLY due to racism, and it isn't. But the more our economies weaken, the racist rhetoric will be used, once again, to ensure elites get what they want - whether that means getting the racist to vote your way, or just saying racism is the ONLY reason you don't get your way. I liken that to Mr Obama's claim that mere racism is what makes so many dead set against our own TPP. Do you think it's racist to vote against Fast Track just because racism has been used in the past against Mr. Obama? To me, this is the shitty, triangulated world we live in now, where sometimes, the guy who seems only like a racist shill may actually have a point of fact.Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur
Cross posted from The Evening Blues
Thank-you joe shikspack!
I've avoided the nonsense posts about Brexit/Racism, because it is shallow misreading of the vote.
http://caucus99percent.com/content/evening-blues-6-27-16
"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn
Xenophobic attacks are
Xenophobic attacks are increased, but saying it was because of the "Brexit vote" is to large a brush. The campaign was xenophobic on both sides, but there are perfectly progressive and logical reason to oppose membership to the EU. The campaign is over now, and despite the fact that many are motivated by xenophobia, I think Brexit will prove a good thing, particularly when the UK finally elects a true progressive government and they want to run a deficit to boost the economy. There will be no EU tying their hands telling them they can't do it, because they won't be bound to its rules anymore.
There will be a brief recession, but it will be an unusual one in that the rich will be more affected than the poor. This will be a shot in the arm to the dispossessed, since there be less money for political bribery, and right wing propaganda, and will make it easier to elect a progressive government. In the long run the economy will get moving again, and this time the affects will be to the poor and middleclass rather than just rich people.
Coincidence, Correlation, Causation
This original post was a classic example of confusing correlation with causation.
I agree with you that temporary economic dislocation will be outweighed ny the long term benefits of escaping the EU economic straight jacket imposed by Merkel.
"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn
Boris Johnson is not UKIP
He's Tory. If you don't know that, you are clearly not sufficiently knowledgeable about Brexit to comment on it.
Brexit is not really about xenophobia; the UK's economy really has made it a magnet for cheap labor from elsewhere in the EU. I think Brexit has some potential to help the working class by shutting down the cheap labor that suppresses working class wages, and also because the pound is so ridiculously cheap now, it's hard to see how it will not improve demand.
so may be Samantha Bee will help you out with your confusion?
Samantha Bee Cautions Americans About the Parallels Between Trump and Brexit (Video) - Posted on Jun 28, 2016
Even if you have a different opinion, both videos are very funny.
https://www.euronews.com/live
This essay and most of the comment thread s disgusting.
FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.