Which chromosome brings the hate?

 photo XY_zpspubtmgt8.jpgOf course you are aware that around the country there are legislative efforts to force transgender people to use the bathroom and locker rooms reserved for the sex we were assigned at birth. In some places, it is phrased rather as requiring those facilities to be segregated by chromosomes.

Awkward, that. As a society, we have never determined assignment of sex at birth by a test of chromosomes. I'm 68 years old and, as far as I know, I have never had my chromosomes tested. Ever.

I find it stranger still that the forces calling for this anti-transgender discrimination have such little regard for science in general. These are people who believe the universe was created between 6000 and 7000 years ago, that a woman was created from the rib of a man, and that Jesus rode to Sunday School on the back of a dinosaur.

I've often seen religious screeds calling science just another belief system...just another form of religion. That comes from the fact that they do not understand what science is...that scientists regularly challenge what they believe to be true and try to prove that an alternative explanation for a phenomenon may be possible. As a mathematician, I've often proved that something is true by proving that no alternative is possible. Religion does not do this. This way of thinking is the province of science.

Anyway, we find ourselves in the middle of a debate about whether chromosomes determined who we are as people...a debate with people who do not even understand exactly what chromosomes are or how they function.

In the nucleus of each cell, the DNA molecule is packaged into thread-like structures called chromosomes. Each chromosome is made up of DNA tightly coiled many times around proteins called histones that support its structure.

Chromosomes are not visible in the cell’s nucleus—not even under a microscope—when the cell is not dividing. However, the DNA that makes up chromosomes becomes more tightly packed during cell division and is then visible under a microscope. Most of what researchers know about chromosomes was learned by observing chromosomes during cell division.

Each chromosome has a constriction point called the centromere, which divides the chromosome into two sections, or “arms.” The short arm of the chromosome is labeled the “p arm.” The long arm of the chromosome is labeled the “q arm.” The location of the centromere on each chromosome gives the chromosome its characteristic shape, and can be used to help describe the location of specific genes.

--NIH

Ah...genes. Very important concept. If one doesn't understand genes, one has no chance of understanding chromosomes.

A gene is the basic physical and functional unit of heredity. Genes, which are made up of DNA, act as instructions to make molecules called proteins. In humans, genes vary in size from a few hundred DNA bases to more than 2 million bases. The Human Genome Project has estimated that humans have between 20,000 and 25,000 genes.

Every person has two copies of each gene, one inherited from each parent. Most genes are the same in all people, but a small number of genes (less than 1 percent of the total) are slightly different between people. Alleles are forms of the same gene with small differences in their sequence of DNA bases. These small differences contribute to each person’s unique physical features.

--NIH

Also important is gene expression, "the phenotypic manifestation of a gene or genes by the processes of genetic transcription and genetic translation."

When genes are expressed, the genetic information (base sequence) on DNA is first copied to a molecule of mRNA (transcription). The mRNA molecules then leave the cell nucleus and enter the cytoplasm, where they participate in protein synthesis by specifying the particular amino acids that make up individual proteins (translation).

--NIH

Errors in transcription and translation can, and do, happen.

Of course, many folks are only interested in the sex chromosomes.

The X chromosome is one of the two sex chromosomes in humans (the other is the Y chromosome). The sex chromosomes form one of the 23 pairs of human chromosomes in each cell. The X chromosome spans about 155 million DNA building blocks (base pairs) and represents approximately 5 percent of the total DNA in cells.

Each person normally has one pair of sex chromosomes in each cell. Females have two X chromosomes, while males have one X and one Y chromosome. Early in embryonic development in females, one of the two X chromosomes is randomly and permanently inactivated in cells other than egg cells. This phenomenon is called X-inactivation or Lyonization. X-inactivation ensures that females, like males, have one functional copy of the X chromosome in each body cell. Because X-inactivation is random, in normal females the X chromosome inherited from the mother is active in some cells, and the X chromosome inherited from the father is active in other cells.

The word "normally" is important here. Besides XX and XY, there are people whose chromosome arrangements are XXY, XXXY, XYY, and XO (missing chromosome).

And there are XY people with androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS), whose body will develop with all the physical traits of a woman...and XX males (de la Chapelle syndrome).

Chromosomal anomalies occur in an estimated 1 in ever 500 live births. They have varying affects on physical development. Transgender people generally have a different kind of physical anomaly...one that seems to be located in the brain.

While we don't know the precise cause of this condition, it has been hypothesized to be the result of abnormal hormone levels in the uterine environment at crucial moments during pregnancy.

Sex differences may be induced by specific genes, by hormones, by anatomy, or by social learning. Some of the differences are entirely physical (e.g., presence of a uterus) and some differences are just as obviously purely a matter of social learning and custom (e.g., relative hair length). Many differences, though, such as gender identity, appear to be influenced by both biological and social factors ("nature" and "nurture").

Nevertheless, even the sex-dichotomous differences are not absolute in the human population, and there are individuals who are exceptions (e.g., males with a uterus, or females with an XY karyotype), or who exhibit biological and/or behavioral characteristics of both sexes.

--Wikipedia

In most animals, differences of exposure of a fetal or infant brain to sex hormones produce significant differences of brain structure and function which correlate with adult reproductive behavior.

This is the case in humans as well; sex hormone levels in male and female fetuses and infants differ, and both androgen receptors and estrogen receptors have been identified in brains. Several sex-specific genes not dependent on sex steroids are expressed differently in male and female human brains. Structural sex differences begin to be recognizable by 2 years of age, and in adult men and women include size and shape of corpus callosum (larger in women) and fasciculae connecting each hemisphere internally (larger in men), certain hypothalamic nuclei, and the gonadotropin feedback response to estradiol.

The absence of the genes that generate male genitalia do not single handedly lead to a female brain. The male brain requires more hormones, such as testosterone, in order to properly differentiate. Thee hormones are released due to a gene expressed during embryonic development.

--Wikipedia

Though during the first few weeks of fetal development your baby's internal and external genital structures are the same, the organs will eventually change. Your baby's gonads will either become ovaries or testicles. The phallus will become either a clitoris or a penis, and the genital folds will become either labia or scrotum. This all depends whether or not testosterone is present. Testosterone will be present in embryos with a Y chromosome, and male sex organs will begin to form. If testosterone is not present, female organs will develop, making female the "default sex" for human beings.

--Link

The anti-transgender forces believe that biological sex creates gendered behavior.

Testosterone, when released in the womb, causes the development of male sex organs (at 7 weeks) (in the presence of a Y chromosome) and acts upon the hypothalamus which results in the masculinization of the brain.

At the same time testosterone acts on the developing brain. The brain is divided into two hemispheres, left and right. In all humans the left side of the brain is more specialised for language skills and the right for non-verbal and spatial skills.

Shaywitz et al (1995) used MRI scans to examine brain whilst men and women carried out language tasks and found that women used both hemispheres, left only used by men.

--Simply Psychology

Experiments in animals have shown that exposure to testosterone during prenatal development can cause permanent change to the sexually dimorphic nucleus in the hypothalamus.

Hines (1982) studied female babies born to mothers who had been given injections of male hormones during pregnancy to prevent miscarriage. They were found to be more aggressive than normal female children. Hines concluded that the extra testosterone in the womb had affected later behavior.

One should really pay attention to the fact that the uterine environment is just as biological as the sex genes in the chromosomes. It's quite possible that we really should dispense with the term "biological sex."

Of course, the title of this essay asks a different question...one easily answered. Hate is not in the genome. Hate is not heritable. You have to be carefully taught.

Anti-transgender people like to state that we have no right to exist because "God does not make mistakes." On that I can agree. Transgender people are not mistakes. We are real people. To put it in their words: God-created people. God put us here. God must have had a reason. And I cannot believe that our purpose is to see just how badly human beings can be treated. Rather, it is my belief that we are here because God needed to test the Christian actions of his followers.

I'm sure God is sorely disappointed.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

For further study, I invite you to read Evolution's Rainbow by Joan Roughgarden

up
0 users have voted.

That is what this is really about. That's the whole abortion issue too. Upon conception, you are government property.

You're arguing Nature, yet is Nature making the argument? The government is making the argument. Should a biased, imperfect and corrupt artificial construct be allowed to dictate what is natural and why is this construct better than any other?

up
0 users have voted.

and yet government has shown some readiness in some areas to become more flexible.

The argument against this evolution in law and policy is coming from self-appointed spokespersons for God.

up
0 users have voted.

Euterpe2

Not only is it about exploiting a group of people who seek harmony with their nature, on the other hand, it's about those who don't identify and are comfortable with being labelled acceptable. It's a subtle bias that exploits differences. The people in government shouldn't be in anyone's pants. That's the real issue.

The people in government are becoming more flexible. Their position is evolving. Self-appointed spokespersons for God always find themselves in the company of many "good" individuals who will not speak up for what is right and they will watch as the most horrible of horrors are inflicted upon the non-traditional. It means their position is wrong and has always been wrong. And that's because they didn't give a rat's ass about the underlying principles. It's always about control.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

I'm no geneticist, but I've had several classes. Your essay was interesting and I was curious about your question of hate. I found no studies in a quick search, but some work has been done on genetic predisposition to violence (an expression of hate?).

So some researchers have begun to hunt for signs of gene defects or genetic variants associated with abnormal serotonin metabolism. Last year, for the first time, a mutation that apparently leads to serotonin disturbances was found in male members of a Dutch family with low IQ and a history of violence--though whether the defect is vanishingly rare or will turn up in other impulsive, aggressive people isn't yet known. Since then another study has turned up a genetic variant in violent, suicidal Finnish men. That's not to say that the case for linking genes to violence has by any means been proved--this research is still in its infancy.

The conclusion of the article probably speaks to your question too.

I believe very much in an interaction between the environment and genetic susceptibilities. That is to say, nobody is predestined to be violent. Nobody is predestined to be a criminal. But given a certain environment and a certain genetic predisposition, then the risk of violence can increase.

http://discovermagazine.com/1994/nov/violencegenesand446/

So both nature and nurture play their role. Maybe those of us who know love can help erase the hate. We can hope.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

but on a tangent, it seems that some people are born with a higher intrinsic need for order, changelessness, and clear-cut distinctions. (For just one anecdotal example, I always remeber how Jean Kerr in her humorous 1950s classic, Please Don't Eat the Daisies, described one of her sons -- just one -- who would get upset if a Venetian blind slat in his room was tilted or different foods were in contact on his dinner plate.)

Some of it's likely nurture, too; different cultures differ widely in their concern about order and/or purity per se.

Hence perhaps a part of the visceral anger of some: real panic because what seemed like basic, immutable therefore trustworthy categories are dissolving. (And if the male-female categorization can dissolve, what -- these individuals may feel -- CAN be relied upon?) And then that deep-down fear's exploited by the power-hungry.

up
0 users have voted.

Euterpe2

I don't think you do. I don't believe it keeps you up at night ... so to speak. You probably don't obsess what your neighbor does with her vagina.

There is something about sex that the power-hungry have found they can reliably exploit. If we're to get anywhere, the masses must lose their hang-ups. Who and how we love, including ourselves, should not be subject to the whims of a fickle bureaucracy.

up
0 users have voted.

with more examples in front of them that humanize those who have different preferences. It's taking quite a while, but the progress within the US compared with the 1950s-60s is impressive.

up
0 users have voted.

Euterpe2

riverlover's picture

Most of us at that training level can deal with nuance and gradations and it's to be expected that many fall outside of norms. I Did not say normal, that is an artifice. Reptiles do not have sex chromosomes, sex is determined during embryogenesis by the incubation temperature of the egg. So no sex chromosomes work! Birds do, so dinosaurs likely did. Interesting divergence. Another discussion, but connected to Robyn's essay there is little carved in stone. DNA is not even the only carrier of genetic information, there is RNA, (Hello, influenza and HepC) and there is a lot of genone that is not protein-coding and 20 years ago was considered Junk, and now it's regulatory for protein expression. New science, changes to old paradigm. We can accomplish that as scientists (including mathematicians). Disbelieved by the fearful.

up
0 users have voted.

Hey! my dear friends or soon-to-be's, JtC could use the donations to keep this site functioning for those of us who can still see the life preserver or flotsam in the water.

but I like your avatar!

up
0 users have voted.
tapu dali's picture

There is a lot of geno[m]e that is not protein-coding and 20 years ago was considered Junk,

Some geneticists never believed in "junk" DNA. Turns out they were right?

up
0 users have voted.

There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

featheredsprite's picture

If I am seriously interested in engaging in sex with you, then maybe I do have a need to know a lot of things. But if I don't have this agenda, it's none of my business.

up
0 users have voted.

Life is strong. I'm weak, but Life is strong.

or science in general to respect your fellow traveler. Religious nuts don't get that,but of course they should.Their religion is all about love thy neighbor and all. To me they're plain control freaks. Half of my family tree is infested by them! They are afraid of anything they do not understand.
Have you ever wondered why most religious people are so afraid of death?

up
0 users have voted.

" El pueblo unido jamás será vencido. The people united will never be defeated "

sends them to religion for comfort.

up
0 users have voted.

Euterpe2

Cassiodorus's picture

is that it escapes neat attempts to pin down "human nature." This is because human beings are capable of lifelong epigenetic development -- development based upon interaction with the world.

up
0 users have voted.

“Those who make Bernie Sanders impossible will make Luigi Mangione inevitable." - Dan Berger

I just want to state my support for members of transgender community. I am am very sorry for what you have to put up with from those who do not support you.

up
0 users have voted.
Alison Wunderland's picture

in a binary fashion. Things are or they aren't; on or off; light or dark, true or false; night or day. They have no room in their thinking patterns for nuance or ambiguity; no room for more than binary options to make choices. I've noticed that it doesn't matter what the context is. For example, they're for Team A and you're for Team B, (or no team at all,) and they're right and you're dead wrong. The more stringently they adhere to certain opinions, or beliefs, the less likely they are to admit any alternative viewpoints into their thinking, or contradictory evidence.

It's about control. Things that are, or aren't, can be controlled because they can be made to be, or made to not be. It's simple in their opinion. When things fall outside this binary, it causes rifts in their perceptions of controlability over their narrow perception of the world and everything in it.

mint julip hits the nail squarely on the head...

You don't have to understand genetics or science in general to respect your fellow traveler. Religious nuts don't get that,but of course they should.Their religion is all about love thy neighbor and all. To me they're plain control freaks. Half of my family tree is infested by them! They are afraid of anything they do not understand.
Have you ever wondered why most religious people are so afraid of death?

Those for whom all the answers are held in a single book - The Book - appear to be the most arrogant, narrow-minded, bigoted, and self-righteous of the lot. Though a generalization is somewhat dangerous, they also appear to be among the least well-educated, the least informed. Though I'm sure this is self-justified. Why bother or why seek broader perspectives when all the answers are plain to see in a single book?

Is hatred part of certain genotypes? It probably is. It may well be discovered that narrow-mindedness can be re-enforced and passed down through generations by selecting for that trait. Personally, I don't believe that hatred and bigotry are noticeably more prevalent throughout the Bible Belt.

up
0 users have voted.