Team Clinton/DNC does something illegal or unethical to shore up itself and its disaster of a candidate the current incarnation of the Democratic party is one day closer to destruction.
I find that thought comforting.

to realize that in these primary elections, the Democratic Party is MORE corrupt than the Republicans. They haven't suppressed their voters. Their exit polls match their vote totals.

All this information, all these signs of electoral fraud and voter suppression, is online, for Bernie supporters to find, and find them they will. Not in the complicit MSM. But with the Bernie Blackout, just how do those thousands of people know about his rallies, often on short notice? We've already bypassed the MSM. The Clinton Neoliberal machine is disgusting an entire generation of internet savvy voters.

My argument was that the Democratic Party in Puerto Rico was the one responsible for, through their own decision making, the voter suppression of a colonized, exploited Latino people. The facts show that, through a number of actions by Clinton supporters, the turnout was reduced from 700,000 expected, or 380,000 who voted in 2008 to what appears to be around 90,000 yesterday.

1. "On Friday, El Nuevo Día, a Puerto Rican newspaper, reported that the number of polling places for the upcoming Democratic presidential primary had been reduced from 1,510 to 455. Roberto Prats, the leader of the Democratic party in Puerto Rico..." "Prats has previously spoken in support of Clinton." http://www.bustle.com/articles/163838-why-puerto-ricos-democratic-primar...

2. These were held on the same day as the local primary and necessitated attending two separate polling places in the 7 hours alloted.

3. The weather report showed a day in the mid-90's with typical high humidity.

4. There is no transport to speak of in Puerto Rico on Sundays (the same goes here in Dominica).

5. Sanders observers did not receive their certification in a timely manner for the prisons, which I assume would be the first votes counted. Gangs (the Netas) interior to the prisons were reported to have been forcing through threats of violence other prisoners to vote for Clinton.

6. The Sanders campaign knew these factors were at play BEFORE anyone had a clue of results, and without any polls. There response was to send out messages to help old people and disabled move to the frontof the line, and to ask for volunteers to provide four vans for each polling place to move voters to the polls. See: http://www.inquisitr.com/3163692/navy-vets-response-to-reduced-polling-l...

So election day arrives and results in 3-5 hour long lines in broiling heat. Water venders, for whatever reason, weren't around. Old people were filmed after fainting from the heat. A whole ballot box disappeared at the airport. Two villages reported that they had not received ballots at all. There were reports that people were being sent to non-existent polling locations by Democratic Party officials.

The results of the the decisions of the oficialista Democratic Party was that their decisions caused and the expected 2016 turnout to go from 700,000, or 380,000 who voted in the 2008 primary to LESS THAN 100,000. That, my friends is a textbook case of voter suppression with expected results. Perpetuated by the official Democratic Party against colonized Latino voters.

To top it off, the Democratic Party started smearing the Sanders campaign that it was our fault that there were so few polling locations. That was the final straw.

Naturally, having been a victim of voter suppression and fraud for decades at home in Bolivia back in the time of the neo-liberals and Clinton 1 and 2, this enraged me. I will now fight Clinton in the trenches and the barricades. If she comes to Bolivia or Dominica (doubtful) , I will help blockade the roads.

In an essay devoted to the topic I was the victim of typical orange fascist bullying and personal insult, so quickly I couldn't keep up with it. I did my best against a gang of non-Latino Clintonites who probably couldn't find Puerto Rico on the map, accusing me of getting my information from "facebook charts" (for one thing, there was much worse).

As many may know, I have insults down to a linguistic art/game, a bit more detailed than "Yo, mama..." Its kind of an academic multi-cultural verbal double dutch. I do wish I could use obscenity on-line, but Americans don't get it.

I finally got exhausted but before going back to BNR (C99 was closed) I posted the following retort to being accused of being a "sore loser" who should "face the math" and get their informations from places other than facebook charts. Enjoy my response to a gang of bullies:

"You want to insult me? Go for it.

I have my doubts if you have the ability to read anything beyond insulting Clintonian verbiage on a dumb-phone and would guess you would get mugged in my neighborhood, not to mention a good case of the trots which reflect what comes out of your mouth. Your garbage mouth is full of the cut and paste stench of the wars and ethnic cleansing your candidate supports. It stinks like vulture funds and private detention centers that pay your candidate’s way. I have read her policy statements, many of her emails at wikileaks, and speech transcripts from, well, a long time ago to present. You are also free to do so. But then, as I said, I doubt if you have the critical ability of a two-year old orangutan or can tell a cackling hyena from a nematode. I doubt very much you will survive the global meltdown your dear candidate’s policies will exponentially hasten while lining her and her nasty husband’s pockets with greasy million dollar speech fees etc. from big oil."

Immediately flagged.

By the way, this morning the count is at 59/38 with 30% of the precincts not reporting. This after the 68/32 from the prisons stayed on corporate media for HOURS!