So Harris has decided to co-sponsor Medicare-For-All with Sanders.
SnappleBC already called bullshit on this, and I'm not going to disagree with him on most of it.
However, even if her gesture is misdirection, it still isn't meaningless.
You would think that way that the Democratic establishment has viciously smeared the progressive left when they've dared to question Kamala Harris' bona fides, that she would be a shoo-in to win in 2020.
Guess what? There's already been a match-up poll, and Harris didn't impress.
Second only in the pantheon of my love for DWS is the Camel--c'mon, you know who I mean. You know, the next chosen one for 2020, should HRC croak before then.
My latest Hillary pic--she's all dressed up with pink hat befitting her Heinous
In case there was any confusion, the rules of Democratic Party politics have not changed.
Identity Politics trumps economic justice, and those progressives that complain are smeared in the exact same way the Dems will try to smear Republicans (and fail).
A week ago, I wrote an essay Kamala Harris: a dangerous Democrat. On the Cusp schooled me with the comment "what Democrat isn't dangerous?" Being at a loss for words, I decided to show why K. the Camel Harris particularly dangerous. To OtC et. al., this does not mean that most Democrats are not dangerous.
Today I was awakened by my iPhone chirping a new message from my news app:
Trump hearings launch Kamala Harris
Oops!
Sell-out Sen. Kamala Harris, while attorney general of CA, ordered subordinates who had already uncovered 1000 illegal transactions by Steven Mnuchin's Bank One of California, to drop the whole thing; the attorneys under her control, were already working on another 1000 cases, not quite ready for prosecution when the order was given. Of course, Mr. Mnuchin is now a Trumpocrat, Secretary of the Treasury.
