Debate watchers thread 2-19-20
Submitted by Alphalop on Wed, 02/19/2020 - 8:07pmLets hang out and watch the Debate and talk about it together!
Join me Below!
Lets hang out and watch the Debate and talk about it together!
Join me Below!
#Hogwarts is spreading.
Joe Biden said that North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong un called him a rabid dog who should be beaten with a stick. Overnight polling of likely Dem voters after the debate shows Kim pulling ahead of John Delaney in Iowa.
Here we go boys and girls.
You see instead of demanding the heat be raised to 76 degrees in the debate hall she should be demanding that Cuomo wear a dress just like her so he won't be so hot under the klieg lights and he'll raise the temperature...
I spent a bit of time on the political compass website making this little graph. Perhaps it could use a bit more information, but I feel this point stands.
2017 is turning out to be be continuing on the path set by 2016 by becoming wierderer and wierderer. Imagine if you will, the Clinton News Network broadcasting a full, unedited political debate in an really non-partisan way (really! I mean it). The format was straightforward. The speakers were self-controlled, by and large sticking to the questions proffered by the audience. The audience questioners presented represented a fair balance of differing opinions..
There has been a lot of commentary on the farce of a debate brought to the USA public by the corporate controllers. And a lot of people who either boycotted it, or plain refused to make themselves ill watching it. I tried to watch it after the real debate, which was watched by a bit less than 2000 people who followed the City Council meeting in Charlotte, NC.
The Donald sucks at this. Not the I was gonna vote for him. Nor HRC for that matter. But hoped for something better than this crap.
Her Heiness is cleaning up.
god save us all.
sigh.
You may have caught the recent point counter point over at The Nation magazine, as regards whether its readers should or shouldn't vote Green. Joshua Holland's entry, "Your Vote for Jill Stein is a Wasted Vote," talks about the Green Party for several paragraphs before concluding with a rather contestable assumption: