well, big words, nice and civil, wishy-washing over something apparently everybody is forgetting.

He said that Sanders has brought the young people into the process of voting and triggered their enthusiasm. I can only say that I have met more old people, fifty up to eighty years old, who are all going to support Sanders, because for the first time there is a consistent socialist democrat candidate, who takes the 'little people's" need to be treated equal very serious. Equality, not according to their gender or race divided into a little bit more equal than the others, no, equality for all all in the same manner.

I am old and a woman, I don't vote for Hillary, because she has proven that she tries to deal with people on the basis of gender and race and "opportunities" differently without really seeking the equality she claims to be after. I was waiting for Elizabeth Warren to show her true colors. I liked her but am not happy she endorses Clinton. Why? What for? No courage?

I don't get those Democrats, really.

I don't know how I would go forward, if I were Bernie. He should run as indipendent and build a coalition with the Green Party and the Socialist Democrats. I don't know how this is practically done in this awful system. If I were Bernie, I would build my cabinet, announce the people he would be working with as a President, and run with the whole bunch up front as an independent. He shouldn't be shy to go into coalitions with people from very diverse corners of the existing small party spectrum.

Tell people precisely what you are going to do and then stick with it, no matter what.

I guess Sanders' arguments have fallen on deaf ears. As expected. Soldier on. Let them have a conniption over his refusal to concede. Let everyone vote and then count each one (and that includes the convention). Keep pointing out the machine that has been working for the annointed (and against any challengers) one since the last election. That's the Sanders way!

but msm is announcing Liz Warren is going with hilly? Someone please throw me a life vest. I'm d(r)owning.

How can I vote for her? To cast my one and only vote for Hillary Clinton, I would have to ignore:

* Her $250,000 an hour speeches to Wall Street firms.
* Her total support for the Trans Pacific Partnership (until this year).
* The pay-to-play scheme between Hillary's State Dept and foreign governments who donated to the Clinton Foundation.
* Her lies. From white lie weasel words to flat out whoppers.
* Her votes on the PATRIOT Act and the invasion of Iraq, a foreign nation that had done us no harm.
* Henry Kissinger. 'nuff said.
* Honduras. 'nuff said, again.
* Her refusal to support marriage equality until the polls made it clear that a large majority of Americans supported it.
* The fact that she and a number of subordinates are currently the subject of an FBI investigation.

These are just the first few off the top of my head, after thinking for about 5 minutes. I can't pretend that all of this, and so much more, does not exist. How is so very easy for Hillary supporters to pretend it's not there?

what I call the nightly propaganda. I know right now it will just make me want to throw the remote and scream, so I just won't watch any of it. I used to watch Al Jazeera but now that's gone, and even it had a Corporate spin to it many, many times.

I cannot recall seeing Obama say anything about election fraud. Maybe someone else has and I just missed it, but I think it would have made at least a little noise. The convention is not over, so once again trying to subvert the fact that half of the people of the US voted for or tried to vote for Sanders. Obama must be in a real rush to hit the speaking circuit. Bet he gets paid more than HRC...man, you know.

when Democrats are shown to be less honorable than Republicans (your second link).

I would like to get an estimate of how much the many, many, many investigations in the last 25 years have cost the American taxpayers. Maybe in could be calculated in the number of services that could have been funded if we didn't keep electing the ethically challenged.

And I never trusted Gore after the way he treated Zappa despite claiming to have listened to his music. If Gore actually listened to Zappa, he'd have been much more interesting.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRnNDkHb0MU]