Borrowed from another's FP article, with a few minor modifications.

"But while the “why” of Trump’s HRC's actions is important, it’s not necessary. In fiction, the motive behind a crime is the primary factor, because fiction is attempting to tell a good story. In real life, motive is far less valuable. the evidence of the crime itself is all that’s required. If no one, anywhere, ever understands why Donald Trump HRC chose to obstruct the FBI’s investigation into Michael Flynn the email server, that would be a tragedy. But it shouldn’t prevent moving forward with impeachment prosecution. Because you don’t need to understand the motive if you understand the crime.

And there is one person who clearly understands that what Donald Trump HRC did was wrong — Donald Trump HRC."

Funny how this works, isn't it?