British Preparations for War with the United States, 1861-1863 EXPANDED
Cross-posted from Real Economics.
One of the most astonishing comments I ever read at DailyKos was some historically ignorant bloviator arguing that the United States and Britain never differed all that much. Their comment was a reaction to my mentioning there was almost a war between the two countries during the U.S. Civil War, which this ignoramus thought was a lie.
Well, unfortunately, I have found that there is, in fact, widespread ignorance about the historic enmity between the United States and Britain. This ignorance, I believe, has crippled the ability of people to understand that there was once a great chasm between the political economies practiced by the two countries. No, Adam Smith's ideas were NOT the foundation on which the American economy was built.
And this ignorance is also reflected in the inability of people to understand what it means for the U.S. to be a republic. Perhaps it is easier to understand what a republic is supposed to be by looking at what a republic is not: not a monarchy, not an oligarchy, not an aristocracy, and not a despotism. If you read a lot of history, this fight between a republic and the other forms of government keeps coming up in one way or another. For example, after the famous battle of the Monitor and the Merrimack in March 1862, the Monitor's inventor, John Ericsson, wrote to Assistant Secretary of the Navy Gustavus Fox, that if the Navy proceeded to arm the monitors then being built with heavier ordnance, "we can say to England and France, leave the Gulf [of Mexico]. We do not want your Kings and monarchical institutions on this continent."
How many people even know what Ericsson's reference to the Gulf of Mexico means? The powers of Europe--all run by oligarchs and monarchs who had been trained since birth to rule over subject peoples--had never ceased dreaming of eliminating the American experiment in self-government one way or another. When the U.S. Civil War broke out, Britain, Spain, and especially France landed troops in Mexico and the Caribbean, and imposed a monarchy on Mexico. The British began landing troops in Canada, preparing to crush the Union in a pincers, and basically force acceptance of the Confederacy, breaking the United States in two.
It is easy to be confused by American history, because at the same time that the new American System of political economy was being built and practiced, the British system was competing with it for control of the domestic economy and polity, as well as internationally. A reasonably accurate summary is that the British system was dominant in the slave South, and fought for free trade in opposition to the American System’s protective tariffs. Compare, for example, the North's Doctrine of High Wages, with the South's Mudsill Theory. Another example--which is crucial to understand why today's Republican Party and conservative/libertarian movement are so destructive, is the South's rejection of a Constitutional mandate to promote the General Welfare. More than anything else, rejecting the concept of the General Welfare is what marks today's conservatives and libertarians as neoconfederates. And, more than anything else, rejecting the concept of the General Welfare is how today's conservatives and libertarians are ripping apart the social and economic fabric of the United States. It is ironic that the economic thinking of conservatives and libertarians today is based on the work of two Hapsburg Austrian economists: the "Emperor" imposed on Mexico was the younger brother of Hapsburg Austrian emperor Francis Joseph I.
The following timeline is very incomplete, but I think, and hope, there is enough here to shock most people, and leave them with a lot of questions. The timeline is taken primarily from:
"British Preparations for War with the North, 1861-1862," by Kenneth Bourne, The English Historical Review, Vol. 76, No. 301 (Oct., 1961), pp. 600-632, available in pdf here.
Clad in Iron: The American Civil War and the Challenge of British Naval Power, by Howard J. Fuller, Praeger, Westport, Conn., 2008
The Cause of All Nations: An International History of the American Civil War, by Don H. Doyle, Basic Books, New York, NY, 2015.
Timeline of British War Preparations Against the United States
24 May 1861 – British Prime Minister Henry John Temple, Third Viscount Palmerston, writes to Colonial Secretary, the Duke of Newcastle, that PM was increasingly anxious to establish in Canada a force of at least 10,000 regular troops before the winter cut off communications to Canada. Palmerston reiterated this concern in 9 July 1861 letter to Foreign Secretary, Lord John Russell.
17 July 1861 – Mexico’s President Benito Juárez suspended loan-interest payments to foreign countries. U.S. efforts to avert this crisis, and preclude intervention by European powers, resulted in the McLane-Ocampo Treaty, signed in Veracruz 14 December 1859. But the bitter rivalry between northerners and southerners in the U.S. Senate prevented ratification. The McLane-Ocampo Treaty is little known in the U.S. today, but is a well known issue of academic controversy in Mexico, with one side arguing the Treaty shows Juárez was not progressive at all, but sold out to the U.S., ignoring the probability that the U.S. assistance would have probably prevented the following train of events which led to an invasion by European powers, the foreign deposing of Juarez, and the imposition of a European monarch.
2 September 1861 - Captain R. Collinson, Royal Navy surveyor, submitted “Memoranda on the Assistance which can be rendered to the Province of Canada by Her Majesty's Navy in the event of war with the United States” to the Admiralty, listing measures to strengthen the defense of Canada, and stressed in particular the impossibility of keeping the St. Lawrence open once war with the U.S. had begun.
31 October 1861 - France, Britain, and Spain agreed to the Treaty of London, to coordinate the use of force to extract loan repayments from Mexico. This violated the Monroe Doctrine, but the European powers calculated, correctly, that the U.S. government would not be willing to respond appropriately because of the Civil War it was engaged in.
8 November 1861 - USS San Jacinto, commanded by Captain Charles Wilkes, intercepted the British mail packet RMS Trent in international waters between Cuba and the Bahama. The Trent was stopped and boarded, and James Murray Mason and John Slidell, Confederate officials on their way to Britain to serve as diplomats, were arrested and removed to the San Jacinto.
29-30 November 1861 – PM Palmerston’s Cabinet met and drafted initial draft to U.S. of demands for satisfaction, including release of Mason and Slidell, apology, and disciplining of US Navy Captain Wilkes
4 December 1861 – British War Office decided to expedite immediate shipping of guns and rifles to Canada which had been delayed by lack of regular transport, and send a small reinforcement of regulars, plus officers and non-commissioned-officers to supervise construction of defense works and expansion of the Canadian militia.
8-17 December 1861 – British, French, and Spanish fleets and troops arrived at Veracruz, Mexico and begin military seizures of towns and facilities. France would land over 38,000 troops and begin a campaign to capture Mexico City and impose a monarchy, with Ferdinand Maximilian, younger brother of the Austrian emperor Francis Joseph I, as “Emperor.” The Roman Catholic Church in Mexico, upper-class conservatives, and some Indian communities accepted and collaborated with the French-imposed monarchy.
8 December 1861 – British War Office decided to increase the force being immediately sent to Canada to four battalions of infantry, three batteries of field artillery and two companies of engineers, about 5,000 men.
9 December 1861 – British War Office decided to double force being sent to 10,000 men.
14 December 1861 - Commander-in-chief of the British Army, the Duke of Cambridge, sends orders to Commander-in-chief in North America, Lt. General Sir William Fenwick Williams. Immediately upon learning of the outbreak of war with the U.S., Williams is to attack Rouse's Point, New York (where Lake Champlain flows into the Richelieu River, thus one of the key strategic points of the North American continent) and block any attempt by American forces to advance toward Canada.
15 December 1861 - First news of British reaction to boarding of Trent and seizure of Mason and Slidell reached the United States.
15 December 1861 – Secret Royal Navy assessment of vulnerability of U.S. Atlantic coast to attack is circulated in the Admiralty and to Commander of the North American Station, Royal Navy Admiral Sir Alexander Milne. The title says it all: List of the Chief Ports on the Federal Coast of the United States, showing the Shipping, Population, Dockyards and Defences as far as known; also how far accessible or vulnerable to an Attack, as far as can be gathered from the Charts. With an approximate Estimate of the Number of vessels required to Blockade the several Ports and Rivers. Includes latest intelligence on U.S. coastal defense forts and batteries, and specific suggestions for attacking Boston, New York City, and other points. Here is the Google books scan of this frightening document.
5 January 1862 – The British ship Melbourne, carrying the staff officers of the force sent to Canada, docked in Halifax. It had left Cork on 14 December but became separated from its convoy in bad weather, began to run out of coal stopped to refuel at Sydney, Cape Breton. Since the the passage of the St. Lawrence was now more dangerous because of ice, and the Melbourne engine's malfunctioning, the staff officers were sent on a mail packet to Boston, “where, having removed the military labels from their baggage, they traveled to Montreal by the Grand Trunk Railway.”
8 March 1862 – the Confederate ironclad CSS Virginia (former USS Merrimack) enters Hampton Roads and easily destroys first-line sailing warships USS Congress and USS Cumberland. It is actually the destruction of these two U.S. Navy ships that makes the Admiralty immediately realize wooden sailing ships--no matter how large and how well armed--have become instantly obsolete.
9 March 1862 – USS Monitor enters Hampton Roads and engages CSS Virginia in battle. The ability of Monitor's turret to accurately revolve and fire was a capability the Royal Navy was working feverishly on, without success. That the Americans had achieved this technology first greatly increased the Admiralty's apprehensions of operating and fighting in U.S. coastal waters. (Another technological breakthrough the Admiralty feared was U.S. Army artillery officer Thomas Jackson Rodman's perfection of casting core-cooled artillery in 1859. Rodman's method of casting removed the metallurgical flaws of traditionally cast guns, allowing castings of guns up to 20-inch bore size. A 15-inch Rodman gun, of which 323 were made during the Civil War, could hurl a 352-pound shell 5,018 yards. By contrast, the Royal Navy's standard 32-pound cannon had an effective range of 1,220 yards.)
10 March 1862 - Milne wrote to First Sea Lord (military commander of the Royal Navy, in contrast to the political First Lord of the Admiralty) Sir Frederick Grey: “If it had been war the great want would have been Frigates and Corvettes.... The Line of Battle ships would never have stood the gales and sea of the American coast. Every one of them would have been disabled, in fact I don’t see of what service I could have employed them. As to attacking Forts it much never be done by anchoring ships but by ships passing and repassing in rotation so as not to allow a steady object to the Enemy. Ships with larger draft of water are unfit for this mode of attack; you need not build any more. Their days are numbered except [against] France…. If she ever gets up a Navy.”
5 May 1862 – Mexican army under General Ignacio Zaragoza defeated the French army in the Battle of Puebla. This halted the French army’s advance on the capital, Mexico City, but only temporarily. But the victory is celebrated today as the Cinco de Mayo holiday.
7 October 1862 – News arrived in Britain of Lincoln's decision to issue the Emancipation Proclamation.
30 April 1863 - Battle of Camarón, in which a French Foreign Legion patrol of 62 soldiers and three officers fought to the death against Mexican infantry and cavalry units numbering three battalions, about 3,000 men. This made the French Foreign Legion France's most famous instrument of empire, and 30 April remains the most important day of celebration for French Legionnaires.
Comments
Well done and very instructive! Thank you. n/t
Betty Clermont
Crazy Carlota ..
Maximilian's wife, the Empress of Mexico, was the sister of Leopold II of Congo fame, or infamy.
We wanted decent healthcare, a living wage and free college.
The Democrats gave us Biden and war instead.
@Azazello Small world, huh!?
Small world, huh!?
- Tony Wikrent
Nation Builder Books(nbbooks)
Mebane, NC 27302
2nbbooks@gmail.com
Knew the South looked to the UK as an ally
That's where they wanted to sell their cotton for a better price than the northern mills offered. However there were many details you laid out that I didn't know.
...and of course there's the animosity created during the War of 1812 as well.
https://www.britannica.com/event/War-of-1812 (sorry it has ads)
Some things never change I guess. Thanks for the history lesson.
“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”
@Lookout
One of the best diaries I remember from TOP, DK, was someone who wrote that cultural split between North and South USA was the result of the North being settled by Puritans and Quakers, for who community cooperation was central to their beliefs and way of life, and most who came to USA motivated by desire for liberty; while the South was settled by the second, third, and fourth sons of British oligarchs who could not inherit because of the laws of primogeniture. They came to USA motivated by avarice and ambition.
The laws of primogeniture are one of the issues which I believe points to how incorrect much of the left's analysis of American political economy is. The issue is simply ignored, but it is very important: if the founders had really wanted to create an economy that favored the wealthy and the privileged, why would they move so aggressively to discard the British common laws of primogeniture and inheritance?
And I think you are very on target with your identification of tories as a rotten element in the creation of an American establishment. The desire of American elites to mimic British oligarchs was a cultural phenomena during the Gilded Age repeatedly lampooned by writers and playwrights.
- Tony Wikrent
Nation Builder Books(nbbooks)
Mebane, NC 27302
2nbbooks@gmail.com
The book is called Albion’s Seed
Four British folkways in North America. The fourth group was the Borderers, who emigrated from Northern Ireland and Scotland to Appalachia.
One thing I got from it was the understanding that Trump is a borderer strong man (like Andrew Jackson).
We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg
The Civil War was Round 3 of the English Civil War
This is the conclusion of Kevin Philip's The Cousins Wars. (Yes, KP of Nixon's "Southern Strategy").
According to KP, the South behaved like a bunch of Royalist Cavaliers while the North took the role of Roundhead Parliamentarians.
It's a long book, and the recital of statistics and obscure places is mind-numbing. So, I would only recommend it to hard core history buffs. (You sound like one.)
KP has an argument that is counterpoint to the one you are making. Namely, that, in addition to the pro-Confederate faction in the UK, there was a faction in the UK that was on the side of the North - because it was ECW3.
KP points out that during our Revolutionary War (ECW2), the same internal division was present in the UK. there was immense internal sabotage of the UK war effort. One example I remember is that some admiral took 30 days to transport an army from New York City to Pennsylvania, in the middle of the summer.
Of course, for anyone to make sense of KP's argument, they would have to know their Anglo-Saxon history back into the 1630s. These days, no one knows about the 1930s, much less the 1630s.
-----
BTW, thanks for the OP. Any discussion of history is a breath of fresh air in the age of corporate media dumbing-down.
@arendt
I have all of Phillips' books on my shelves, but the only two I have read in whole are American Dynasty, on the Bush family, and American Theocracy, which has some excellent chapters on the Confederate roots of conservative thinking. I started reading The Cousin's War a number of years ago, but never got close to finishing it. Thanks for the reminder.
- Tony Wikrent
Nation Builder Books(nbbooks)
Mebane, NC 27302
2nbbooks@gmail.com
It would be interesting
Outstanding essay, and I'll undoubtedly be referring to it many times as I go along. I'm a genealogist and I'm up to the Revolutionary War generation of the family.
One of the things I first learned when I started this was that the "they came for religious freedom" meme falls far short of telling the whole story. Following the religious freedom seekers were lot of people coming in the hopes of setting up a new kingdom here - with themselves as the Lords and Masters. For a long time now I've had the suspicion that many of today's ultra-elites are descendants of pre-Revolution Tory families. I know it's said that the Tories went to Canada, but not all of them left.
These people just seem to dislike this whole Democratic Republic set up and being forced to obey laws that limit their power and influence (to the extent that such laws still exist that is). Some day I might start tracing some of these folk's roots just to see how often I'm right.
Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons - For thou art crunchy and good with ketchup
John McCain comes from a southern
New England fortunes, Cabots and Lodges, were made in the slave trade, with Providence, RI as a major entrepot. You have heard of the infamous triple trade across the Atlantic? Human cargo from Africa to the Caribbean Islands, to be exchanged for rum, rum to New England, sold for timber, timber and furs to England, and then back to Africa.
Mary Bennett
Boston Brahmins
"Here's to dear old Boston,
The home of the bean and the cod,
Where Lowells speak only to Cabots,
And Cabots speak only to God."
You know, it's odd. Although both the Cabots and the Lodges are considered Boston Brahmins, is bears noting that the Cabots lived in Salem for many years, and only moved to Boston in 1784. I can't seem to find when Giles Lodge, the progenitor of the American family, came here. He was born in 1770 in London though. So, in conjunction with the arrival of John Cabot in 1700, these folks were furriners to those who came in the early 1600s.
Yes, you have to love how the Cabots made their initial fortune running opium, rum and slaves - then got involved in America's next biggest money maker... politics.
Is it any wonder this country has never lived up to its advertising?
Meddle not in the affairs of Dragons - For thou art crunchy and good with ketchup