Putin's big set-back

I know that some people here denied that Russia actually tried to seize Kiev during the original invasion and failed. After this ongoing setback for Russia I think that opinion will have to be reconsidered.

kharkiv.PNG

Ukraine has essentially taken back all of the land near Kharkiv that Russia seized 6 months ago.
A large part of the reason for this is because of U.S. weapons and U.S. intelligence. A small part of the reason is because of Ukraine.
But the largest part of the reason is because of the lack of professionalism in Russian forces in that region. I'm not sure if it's because of morale, or logistics, or poor leadership, or something else. But one thing is for certain - Russian forces simply collapsed.

khersov.PNG

The frontline around Kherson has barely budged, but we are beginning to see some movement far to the north of Kherson.

This is the part that virtually every liberal in the United States will f*ck up and not be able to figure out - things can get worse!
It's not leftists in Russia that are getting angry. It's the right-wing.
If Putin gets kicked out it is better than even odds that a more authoritarian, more militaristic leader will take over for Putin.
If Ukraine's military actually does manage to take back Kherson and start driving into Crimea you can be almost 100% certain that there will be a right-wing coup in Russia and that they will drop nukes on Ukraine before giving up the home of the Black Sea fleet.

Share
up
8 users have voted.

Comments

reliable sources to explain this latest, except perhaps that it exposed the Putin special military operation's weakness, which was probably bound to happen, of trying to accomplish a major military goal in a fairly large country with strict limits on engagement and commitment.

Def there will be pressure on Vlad from the Kremlin right to finally get tough and take off the gloves, go for the jugular instead of the capillaries. If I know Vlad, and I don't, he won't wait until either the UKR forces threaten Crimea or until he's about to be ousted by rightist forces.

Right now I see this as a very mini-Battle of the Bulge, a temporary victory for the side which had been losing everywhere previously and which might in hindsight mark the lone high point for that side's military effort.

up
14 users have voted.
CB's picture

This is a SMO war between Russia and NATO. Ukraine just supplies the "meat for the grinder". I expect Putin to escalate as is required.

[video:https://youtu.be/7plcfdPommU?t=144]

up
8 users have voted.

not to believe any Intel from either side at this juncture.

up
12 users have voted.

@JtC
I generally ignore any reports on the small movements, and almost everything coming from U.S. and U.K. media.
But this was a big move that even Russia had to acknowledge to its own people.

up
8 users have voted.
Pricknick's picture

I know that some people here denied that Russia actually tried to seize Kiev during the original invasion and failed.

Myself and many others did not deny what you believed. We disagreed.
Same as you deny that Russia had no choice. That is your belief not mine so we disagree.

up
12 users have voted.

Regardless of the path in life I chose, I realize it's always forward, never straight.

Mike Tyson took a few shots to the face
in his career

This was inevitable, it’s a war regardless of what you might want to call it
give it a week see where it ends up by friday

up
11 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

article in the Evening Blues definitely applies when reading this opinion. Because this is most certainly an opinion.

My biggest difficulty when seeing the current situation is reconciling the contradictions involved. For example I am vehemently anti-corporatist. I feel like the neolib/neocon anti-social movement since the 1970s has done our nation a most grevious injustice, a wound which even to this day drives us even further into an absolute dystopia. We have lost personal rights and protections. The wealth accumulated by the sweat of common peoples efforts and innovations has been stolen by the elitists. This "war" is beggaring our future by taking value that could be used to improve our lives and throwing it away.

In effect the value of our blood and sweat and efforts is being used to further an effort which steals those same values from us. In effect we are buying the rope being used to lynch us.

I find myself in a position where I cannot support the position of my "leaders".

When I look at the history of the russian state since the breakup of the USSR I see nothing more than a theft of their resources the same way our resources are stolen even to this day. I think that the big battle over Ukraine is not one of political ideology but more one of resource theft. Eg, Z is offering his country at bargain basement prices to our oligarchs. All he wants is the finders fee and he doesn't seem to care who dies along the way. I can't help believing that the corporations that have already invested in the Ukraine farmland are the loudest voices screaming for our intervention.

Z is in good company tho. I consider our current MIC (morons in charge) to be exactly the same with exactly the same motives. Not a nickesl difference between Pelosi, Schumer, Biden, Obama, McConnell, etc, and Z. They too have watched their own people die and not shed a tear.

On the other side is russia. That nation I was taught to hate and fear in my school days. Perhaps you might find russia to be your enemy but I think I would throw in my lot with a change in our direction.

A multi-polar world where a nation's word is its bond.

up
17 users have voted.
CB's picture

up
5 users have voted.
The Hindsight Times's picture

Russia had planned a withdrawal from that region so it really wasn't such a big deal...
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQEOEoS9T5I]
Of course the dominate media in the west is trying to make it more than what it is... it is in no way a humiliating defeat... It is war. It sucks.

up
12 users have voted.
CB's picture

I know that some people here denied that Russia actually tried to seize Kiev during the original invasion and failed.

There is no way Russia could have actually taken a city of 3 million with only 40,000 troops, especially as the majority was, by far, anti Russia. It was a feint to get Zelensky to capitulate. It almost worked. All Putin wanted at the time was the Minsk Agreement signed/honoured and to not have NATO in Ukraine.

Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul a success, Putin and Zelensky meeting could happen
March 29, 2022
...
The Russian delegation for the Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul announced two steps to reduce the escalation of the conflict in Ukraine after the first day of talks.

RIA citing the Russian delegation, said the measures included “a drastic reduction in military activity in the direction of Kyiv and Chernihiv,” and a possible meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky simultaneously with the initialization of a peace agreement between the foreign ministers of the two countries.

The head of the Russian delegation, the top official in Russia’s presidential office, Vladimir Medinsky, called the talks “constructive,” and Moscow would take two steps to defuse the conflict, Medinsky said after talks in Istanbul.
...

Boris Johnson talked Zelenski out of it by promising more military support. NATO had by this time invested too much to let this opportunity for a military conflict with Russia to go to waste. The US neocons had spent more than five billion in creating a colour revolution followed by a successful coup in Ukraine for this very purpose.

Did Boris Scuttle Peace Talks Between Ukraine and Russia?
1 September 2022

Peace talks between Ukraine and Russia have been frozen since July, and there’s no indication they’re about to restart. However, evidence has emerged that talks in early April bore fruit – only to be scuttled by the Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

On 8th April (shortly after Russian forces withdrew from Kiev) Johnson made a “surprise visit” to Ukraine’s capital, where he met with President Zelensky. At the meeting, Johnson pledged his “unwavering support” to Ukraine and promised another $130 million worth of “sophisticated weaponry”.

Yet according to Ukrainska Pravda (a pro-Western newspaper in Ukraine) pledging support wasn’t the only reason for Johnson’s visit. “Sources close to Zelenskyy” told the newspaper that Johnson was an “obstacle” to peace talks because he’d brought “two simple messages”.

The first is that Putin is a war criminal, he should be pressured, not negotiated with. And the second is that even if Ukraine is ready to sign some agreements on guarantees with Putin, they are not. Johnson’s position was that the collective West … now felt that Putin was not really as powerful as they had previously imagined, and that here was a chance to “press him.”

...

The only mistake Putin made was to NOT have taken Donbass regions (along with Crimea) back in 2014 when they were begging him to do so. The neocons and NATO suckered him. BTW, the Kharkiv Oblast does not have a population that is willing to join Russia. It was simply a buffer area to be bargained and discarded so it's loss is not great in the scheme of things.

Kharkiv Oblast

During the 1991 referendum, 86.33% of votes in Kharkiv Oblast were in favor of the Declaration of Independence of Ukraine. A survey conducted in December 2014 by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found 4.2% of the oblast's population supported their region joining Russia, 71.5% did not support the idea, and the rest were undecided or did not respond.[4]

Yeltsin fucked over Russia big time. It's taken Putin over two decades to try and fix it. Fortunately he has made significant strides and the Russian people know it. You should not take Russian media pundits so seriously.

Why Putin is still so popular in Russia
Polls suggest leader’s appeal has grown since Ukraine war amid popular perceptions the West wants to keep Russia down
by Alexander Hill September 7, 2022

up
14 users have voted.

@CB Reg the mistake :

https://gilbertdoctorow.com/2022/08/26/book-review-alexander-zhuchkovsky-85-days-in-slavyansk/

up
3 users have voted.
CB's picture

@Funkygal
Thank you...

For all of these reasons, it is appropriate to credit the Kremlin with realism and common sense in its dealings with Donbas and Ukraine in 2014, however disappointing its decisions then may have been for the Russian Spring movement.

up
3 users have voted.

Still enough denial to compete with that river in Egypt.

Soon Russian opinion will shift also. Most people love a good war, look at the US with Iraq.

Naked imperialism puts a lot of people off and makes all of Europe nervous, expect a huge arms build up. Poland and the Baltic Republics will arm with the very real worry that they live next door to a ruthless fascist regime. Belarus is a puppet for now but they understand they could be next. Kazakhstan is buying as much armaments as it possibly can. It's like knowing the dog next door probably has rabies.

Crimea will be returned to Ukraine, and rightly so. No country in this day and age should be able to simply take pieces from a neighbor. The portions of Ukraine that thought they might like to be independent have learned just what it's like to live with Russia. All the men were pressed into service and used as cannon fodder. All those Russian passports they were issued aren't recognised at the border and the collaborators are forced to remain in Ukraine.

Anyone who wants to place a very small wager on Putin (or whoever runs the country then) dropping nukes when Ukraine takes back Crimea? Russian security and intelligence officials are selling houses there and moving out, they had it good for awhile. Ukraine's biggest headache is providing for all the POWs whose ranks are growing exponentially, and consolidate all the territory Russians have abandoned in one of the biggest routes in recent memory. Russia announced yesterday they are stopping sending more troops, all they do is give Ukraine more leverage as they immediately turn into POWs.

Screen Shot 2022-09-11 at 12.58.12 PM.png

up
1 user has voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@ban nock

Belarus is a puppet for now but they understand they could be next. Kazakhstan is buying as much armaments as it possibly can. It's like knowing the dog next door probably has rabies.

I pretty much read that word for word yesterday on DK and like you have provided none I saw no links to back it up. Lukashenko is an ally of Russia and see no reason why Russia would invade Belarus. A few years ago America attempted a coup on Lukashenko, but he was warned about it by Russia intelligence and recently Russia put some bombing planes in the country. Or was that for when they decide…? Fck it I’m not going down this rabbit hole.

It’d be nice if you provided some links on this fantasy that someone pulled out of their hat.

As for Ukraine taking back Crimea would you like to place a wager on it? Loser donates to the site. I’m saying that it will never happen. Crimea belongs to Russia.

ETA link

up
11 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

CB's picture

@ban nock
Where do you get your talking points? Dkos???

Kazakhstan buys Russian S300 air defence systems and have a open contract for SU-30's. The only differences is that President Tokayev has to keep relationships open with Europe (vis-à-vis the status of Donetsk and Lugansk) to facilitate the possible billion dollar joint venture to supply Europe with green hydrogen within 5-10 years.

President Tokayev Meets Vladimir Putin in Sochi to Intensify Bilateral Ties
20 August 2022

NUR-SULTAN – Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Russia’s Black Sea resort of Sochi on Aug. 19 to intensify bilateral ties that this year mark 30 years, reported the presidential press service.

The two leaders voiced solid optimism about the development of bilateral relations. According to Tokayev, the two countries “have every reason to be satisfied with the way the cooperation is developing.”

“Indeed, Kazakhstan and Russia have a strategic partnership. This year we celebrate a very big date – the 30th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations,” said Tokayev during the meeting that lasted two and half hours.

Why don't you ever back up your posts with links and data? If you hadn't noticed, C99% is a reality based web site unlike TOS.

up
10 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@CB

See the link I posted that goes to a diary on dk about Belarus. I read it yesterday and just laughed at how the echo chamber took it as gospel even though he provided no links. Take a look.
Oh yeah and kos should get a Pulitzer for his coverage that comes from some of the best Ukraine propaganda sites.

up
6 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

@ban nock

No country in this day and age should be able to simply take pieces from a neighbor.

Syria says "Hey! Remember us?"
We're currently occupying 1/3rd of their country. Illegally, even by our own laws.
While we steal their oil.
Or maybe we should consider the case of Kosovo.

Crimea will be returned to Ukraine, and rightly so.

If you are looking for a nuclear war, one in which those nukes start by dropping on Kiev, then this is how to do it.
Do you really want Ukraine to get nuked? Think about it carefully.
Then think about how the people of Crimea don't want to be part of Ukraine, as proven by every referendum and poll since 1991.

Russia announced yesterday they are stopping sending more troops, all they do is give Ukraine more leverage as they immediately turn into POWs.

WFT are you talking about? Where did you get that koolaid?

up
9 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@gjohnsit

bases in other countries and many against the will of the people and leadership. Japan and Iraq have both asked Americans to leave their country, but Americans refuse to do so. And how about Guam and Gitmo! What about the huge base in the former Yugoslavia? And what gives America the right to invade countries against the will of the UN? Americans really need to buy a mirror and look into it before bitching about other countries.

up
10 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

snoopydawg's picture

@gjohnsit

After the Kharkov counteroffensive, I strongly suspect that Russia will look for a way to strike back at the United States, without crossing red lines that could lead to a more direct confrontation. Syria is the place where this would happen. The United States maintains several illegal bases on Syrian soil, which Russia could strike using its Syrian allies much the same way that the United States is using Ukraine. Russia is in the finishing stage training a new Syrian airborne division. With Russian air cover, an attack on one of the American bases in Syria would be possible - the USA would be forced to choose between shooting down Russian planes and flirting with nuclear war, or humbly accepting the loss of an illegal base that it has worked hard to hide from its own citizens. Given the utter lack of enthusiasm among the American public for yet another war in the Middle East, it seems that the USA would simply have to swallow the loss.

From this essay.

up
7 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

@snoopydawg
Syria has all of the makings for a proxy war.

The U.S. has the Kurds and several head-chopping jihadists groups.

Russia has the Syrian government forces and multiple Iran-backed militias.

And Russia certainly wants to get back at us.

up
7 users have voted.

@gjohnsit I don't know Gjohnsit, last neighbor I can think of we took over was back before the civil war. You know, TX, NM, and all that. Not sure what you are on about Syria and Kosovo, last I looked we had 50 states. Of course I might be wrong, me and the rest of the free world. And Kim of N Korea might have the inside dope on what is free and fair, or maybe Xi. I'll stick with liberal democratic democracies thank you very much, and the topic is Russia's unprovoked invasion of their neighbor Ukraine.

But why I logged back on was to thank you for the vid, I haven't watched Saagar and Krystal Ball in a long time, they are two commentators I can actually watch. I'd urge all to watch from about the 2:00 mark to 20:00.

Saagar and many others can't get over the genius of the Ukrainian strategy. Comparisons go all the way back to WWII. In the Atlantic, "The overall planning by the Ukrainian government and armed forces worked well on so many levels that it produced one of the greatest military-strategy successes since 1945" Ukraine came out with more tanks than they went in with, even accounting for losses.

I wouldn't place bets on what the outcome of a free and fair election in Crimea would be without Russians. The two largest Russian speaking cities in Ukraine, Kharkiv and Odessa, turned out to be the bulwarks against the Russian invasion. Putin and nukes is the last thing I worry about, Putin knows he is likely to be Gaddafied if he isn't careful. I've been hearing Putin and nukes since he got his ass handed to him trying to take Kiev. Russia can always just go home and quit invading neighbors. Any wagers on the # of POWs?

Russia itself announced they weren't sending more troops in. Today's news.

Good vid, starts at the 2 min mark.

up
0 users have voted.

@ban nock @ban nock From what source, ban...That seems to be your problem.

up
4 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

@on the cusp The vid is from the original post. I don't even respond to things a simple google search would pull up or common knowledge. I see many links which are simply to wherever they pulled the propaganda source from which is useless. Just because it's on the internet doesn't make it true. So there are sources, and then there are sources.

People make disparaging remarks about the MSM, but generally they all use the same sources, and the straight news is fairly accurate. Russians, Ukrainians, Europeans, they all have the same facts. Opinion and propaganda is where they vary.

up
0 users have voted.

@ban nock WMDs? White Helmets? Gulf of Tonkin? But just this once, all facts from both sides of the Ukrainian conflict are the same?

up
5 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

snoopydawg's picture

@on the cusp

‘Remember the Maine' and 'Saddam has WMDs'

Good grief no wonder he’s been wrong on Russia since the conflict started if he only gets his news from the lying mainstream media and calls all other sources propaganda. There’s no way to reason with this mindset.

What’s that Gloebells said?

"This is the secret of propaganda: Those who are to be persuaded by it should be completely immersed in the ideas of the propaganda, without ever noticing that they are being immersed in it." ~ Joseph Goebbels

"If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself." ~ Joseph Goebbels

"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play." ~ Joseph Goebbels

"The essence of propaganda consists in winning people over to an idea so sincerely, so vitally, that in the end they succumb to it utterly and can never escape from it." ~ Joseph Goebbels

Hermann Goering said it best:

“Why of course the people don't want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don't want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

up
9 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

@ban nock

last neighbor I can think of we took over was back before the civil war. You know, TX, NM, and all that. Not sure what you are on about Syria and Kosovo, last I looked we had 50 states. Of course I might be wrong, me and the rest of the free world.

But you've gone so far out of the way to "not understand" my point, that you would have to be a complete moron to come up with useless reply, and I don't believe that you are a moron in any way.
Therefore, your reply is simply disingenuous hand-waving.

I wouldn't place bets on what the outcome of a free and fair election in Crimea would be without Russians.

I would because there was plenty of referendums before 2014, and Crimea always voted against Ukraine.
But you knew that, because you've read my essay on this. So once again, you are being disingenuous.

up
7 users have voted.
dystopian's picture

@ban nock Rightly so!?!?! To who you and Zelensky? What about the Crimeans? You must not give a flyin' rats rear about the actual people there. You want to impose foreign rule on them. That is what being in Ukraine was to them. They have already suffered 60 years of that.

Glad to you see back with more BS.

Crimea will be returned to Ukraine, and rightly so. No country in this day and age should be able to simply take pieces from a neighbor.

Russia did not take Crimea. Crimea VOTED themselves (90%+) to end the brief assignment they had shoved up their arses by Kruschev, to be part of Ukraine. Do you not know basic history, or choose to ignore it for the propaganda? Crimea has only been part of Ukraine since 1954, and that against their will. Kruschev gifted his Ukie buddies with it. They never agreed or wanted or asked to be part of Ukraine. They are ethnic Russian, not Ukrainian. They mostly hate the Ukies. Nice to see you want to dictate how they live with total disregard for their wishes.

up
13 users have voted.

We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.
Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.
both - Albert Einstein

QMS's picture

@dystopian

tell it like it is

up
8 users have voted.

@dystopian Kick it, Dysto!

up
7 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

snoopydawg's picture

Link

The New York Times has disclosed that the US shared vital intelligence with the Ukrainian military and took part in the preparation of the latter’s current “counteroffensive” near Kharkov. No matter the Biden Administration’s motivations in publicising its role in what western media is celebrating as a success story — presumably, with an eye on domestic politics in America — it could be factually correct. The media leak puts the dramatic happenings in the past 3-4 days in proper perspective.

There are two ways of looking at the surge by the Ukrainian military: one, Kiev has inflicted a heavy defeat on the Russians and forced them to retreat, or, the American intelligence finally got wind of the unobtrusive thinning out of the Russian frontline in Kharkov that had been going on in the recent weeks as part of a larger re-deployment of military formations, and shared the intelligence with Kiev, who of course gleefully acted on it.

The New York Times report effectively confirms the latter reading of the situation, which has been the stuff of hearsay and whispers so far.

Indeed, there has been hardly any fighting as such in Kharkov region during this Ukrainian surge, and the Russian focus was, unsurprisingly, to pull out the residual forces in the frontline under the cover of heavy artillery fire. The Russian operation ensured that there was no significant casualty. The new frontline that was being steadily put together in the recent weeks (or months) along the Oskol River has crystallised.

Gilbert Doctorow said that Russia evacuated 40,000 people from the area before Ukraine took over so hopefully they will find few people to murder for being pro Russia. Unless they just go on a witch hunt and kill people like they did in Bucha and torture others like when they taped people to lampposts and invited others to beat them…and more. I wonder if the people supporting the Ukraine Nazis even know about those events? Not if they only get their news from the mainstream media. Gosh I thought that lesson was learned long ago. Hey remember when babies were being thrown out of incubators and we all fell for it? Good times.

up
11 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

snoopydawg's picture

DIANA JOHNSTONE: The Specter of Germany Is Rising

The European Union is girding for a long war against Russia that appears clearly contrary to European economic interests and social stability. A war that is apparently irrational – as many are – has deep emotional roots and claims ideological justification. Such wars are hard to end because they extend outside the range of rationality.

For decades after the Soviet Union entered Berlin and decisively defeated the Third Reich, Soviet leaders worried about the threat of “German revanchism.” Since World War II could be seen as German revenge for being deprived of victory in World War I, couldn’t aggressive German Drang nach Osten be revived, especially if it enjoyed Anglo-American support? There had always been a minority in U.S. and U.K. power circles that would have liked to complete Hitler’s war against the Soviet Union.

Never forget which countries supported Hitler’s dreams and how many people in America had no problem with his eugenics program. Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie….

Maybe Germany should remember that it’s still occupied by Americans and that Russia was the one that let east and west Germany reunite. And then Clinton pooped in the punch bowl and started moving NATO East.

up
9 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

QMS's picture

@snoopydawg

For which they will pay dearly.

Germany has crossed a red line with Russia by sending arms to Ukraine, Moscow’s ambassador in Berlin said on Monday. The decision undermined decades of reconciliation since the end of World War II and the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, the diplomat added.

“The very fact that the Ukrainian regime is being supplied with German-made lethal weapons, which are used not only against Russian military service members, but also the civilian population of Donbass, crosses the red line,” Ambassador Sergey Nechaev said in an interview with Izvestia newspaper.

He added that Berlin should have known better, “considering the moral and historic responsibility that Germany has before our people for the Nazi crimes.”
“They have crossed the Rubicon,” Nechaev stated, using an idiom for passing the point of no return.

up
7 users have voted.

@snoopydawg

Never forget which countries supported Hitler’s dreams and how many people in America had no problem with his eugenics program. Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie….

Hitler modeled his on ours.

up
12 users have voted.

They say that there's a broken light for every heart on Broadway
They say that life's a game and then they take the board away
They give you masks and costumes and an outline of the story
And leave you all to improvise their vicious cabaret-- A. Moore

CB's picture

@Johnny Q

This Is How Americans Saluted The Flag Until 1942

This was the United States' national salute until being replaced by the Pledge of Allegiance in 1942.

The photograph seen above wasn’t taken at an American school that supported the Nazis, though you’d certainly be forgiven for mistaking it as such. The truth might be even more surprising, as the now infamous, fascistic hail was once how Americans saluted the flag while pledging allegiance.
...
The Bellamy Salute

Ford and Bellamy printed instructions for the salute in Youth’s Companion, and did so under the latter’s name. It was known as the Bellamy Salute ever since.

The instructions themselves were rather basic. The magazine described extending one’s right arm straight ahead, slightly upward, with the fingers directed at the flag (if present). Though generations have passed and most Americans are entirely unaware of this, the Bellamy Salute was, indeed, the standard salute for decades.

Of course, that all changed in the mid-20th century when Nazi Germany came to power and utilized virtually the same exact gesture as a token of loyalty to Hitler’s Reich, or Mussolini’s Italy. What had been a pledge to the American flag and its symbolism was now the equivalent of roaring “Heil Hitler!”
...
Congress Steps In — Changes To The Pledge

On Dec. 22, 1942 Congress officially amended the U.S. Flag Code to alter the standards of behavior during the Pledge of Allegiance. The mandate said the pledge should “be rendered by standing with the right hand over the heart,” as is still commonly done to this day.

up
9 users have voted.
usefewersyllables's picture

@CB

History, as they say, is (re)written by the victors.

And let's not even talk about how we shoehorned the whole "under Gawd" thing into the Pledge, and splattered him all over all the cash, back in the 40s and 50s. Free Market Jaysus and all that jazz. Lots of stuff happened back then that has been carefully wallpapered over. Look, it's Halley's Comet! Nothing to see here...

up
6 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

Pluto's Republic's picture

@snoopydawg

A war that is apparently irrational – as many are – has deep emotional roots and claims ideological justification. Such wars are hard to end because they extend outside the range of rationality.

up
6 users have voted.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"
earthling1's picture

is Russia steps over the border not even 100 miles and the whole Western world freaks out in the most cowardly fashion with "Oh Noes, the Russians are coming, the Russians are coming!
Home of the brave. Yeah right.

up
12 users have voted.

Neither Russia nor China is our enemy.
Neither Iran nor Venezuela are threatening America.
Cuba is a dead horse, stop beating it.

snoopydawg's picture

bigserge has 3 excellent essays on the Ukraine Russia conflict and his recent one seems to look at the issue with open eyes. He’s getting kudos from lots of people others here follow.

It is difficult to overstate the extent to which Ukraine is sustained solely by the west. Ukrainian soldiers are trained by NATO officers, armed with NATO weapons, accompanied in the field by NATO soldiers foreign volunteers, and the Ukrainian pseudo-state is kept running by cash injections from the west. Videos from the Kharkov front abound with English speaking soldiers and foreign weapons.

The point isn’t just to point out, yet again, that Ukraine is a failed state - a corpse that is given the illusion of life by outside actors moving its limbs. The point is that Russia understands this and correctly understands itself to be in a civilizational collision with the west. To that end, we must understand that Russian escalation is underway, and think about what that means.

Smile

up
11 users have voted.

A leftist is someone with morally correct politics. A liberal is someone who wants to feel morally correct w/o ever putting themselves at odds with power or costing themselves opportunities or experiencing the uncomfortable emotions that truth causes.

Pluto's Republic's picture

up
3 users have voted.
IMAGINE if you woke up the day after a US Presidential Election and headlines around the the world blared, "The Majority of Americans Refused to Vote in US Presidential Election! What Does this Mean?"