Candidate Political Compass according to PoliticalCompass.org
Submitted by mileser on Mon, 03/21/2016 - 11:17am
Just thought this would be interesting to some. Probably not surprising to everyone. It doesn't have Kasich, probably because it was made before the last round of primaries.
Found at: PoliticalCompass
Comments
I pulled all my diaries down at TOP,
except two. I left them to make a point...which no one will probably see. One was to get everyone to take this sort of test...in 2012. The other was to post the results. All the candidates were upper right. All the responders were lower left.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
Did you save your diaries and comments?
If you did, how does one go about this?
I was also using my comments as kind of a story and although I'm a piker compared to many, I was wondering if there is a way to save the comments?
They are also a memory tool for me.
Anyways, I saw your test a few weeks(?) ago and it seems why yes, there is a real choice to be made.
Thank you.
You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again you did not know. ~ William Wiberforce
If you can donate, please! POP Money is available for bank-to-bank transfers. Email JtC to make a monthly donation.
I just saved them as a .txt file
I just copied and pasted the text from the diaries into the new file. On a couple of the diaries, I saved all the comments...most weren't really worth keeping. The ones I did were about my grandmother's 100th birthday...lots of nice comments, and those are happy memories. The other was a diary about a misleading mailer the Republican party put out, here in Arizona. It was before the Markos edict, but the comments were weirdly what we have come to expect after the edict...rationalizing, illogical, obfuscating, non sequiters...in short, maddening. All the expected 'players' were represented. There was no mention of Bernie, whatever, but it was obvious from their comments, they saw the implications of the mailer TO Bernie. Thought the comments (and the commenters) were worth saving.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
Trump's positions are all over the map
Donald Trump defies conventional left-right categorization. In the graph, he ought to get more than one dot. Some of his policy positions are actually progressive -- to the chagrin of the Tea-GOP establishment.
Trump supports single-payer health insurance.
He wants to raise taxes on the wealthy.
He rejects so-called "free trade" deals and has threatened high tariffs on goods imported from Mexico and China.
He thinks affirmative action is okay.
He supports current federal policy on funding Planned Parenthood.
He doesn't believe you should be able to fire someone just for being gay.
He doesn't want to cut Social Security or Medicare.
He's in favor of a ban on assault weapons.
He has questioned Israel's commitment to a Palestinian peace deal, and says the USA ought to be neutral.
"We've done the impossible, and that makes us mighty."
Trump has backed off of 'single payer,' but
says he wants Everyone to have coverage.
Because of conservative pushback, he's now touting CDHC's (Consumer Driven Health Care) plans, which were mostly intended for healthy or younger folks, as well as for more affluent beneficiaries, who can afford $10,000 plus in annual deductibles and co-pays.
Spot on regarding all his other stances.
(Music City) Mollie at C99P & DKos
elinkarlsson@WordPress
"Vision without action is a daydream. Action without vision is a nightmare."--Japanese Proverb
"Every time I lose a dog, he takes a piece of my heart. Every new dog gifts me with a piece of his. Someday, my heart will be total dog, and maybe then I will be just as generous, loving, and forgiving."--Author Unknown
Everyone thinks they have the best dog, and none of them are wrong.
I'm not buying the designation of Clinton either.
Perhaps there should be two dots for Clinton -- one for who she says she is, and the other for who she really wants to be.
“One of the things I love about the American people is that we can hold many thoughts at once” - Kamala Harris
Clinton's should have one big dot
- that covers the entire graph
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” -Voltaire
well, maybe the right 51% of the graph.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
Hubby just said 'Clinton's
Hubby just said 'Clinton's dot should wander all over the graph.' If someone could make a GIF of that that would be awesome. XD
This shit is bananas.
She's in the Right-Authoritarian box
Which seems appropriate enough to me, though she might in reality be further to the NE corner.
Hunh
Looks like I'm further left and more libertarian than even Sanders is.
I never would have thought that possible.
littlevoice
I am too.
When I did this test four years ago, and got as many commenters from GOS to do it as I could, we were ALL to the left of Sanders's position on this graph. In fact, see the record of a bunch of people in the comments below.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
If I recall correctly, . . .
. . . the candidate ratings are based on their pronounced policy proposals, their platform. What passes for a political position in the States does not always translate to what politics are anywhere else in the known universe (see Trump, Donald), so the location of a candidate will be based on the Political Compass team's intuitive evaluations of their positions as much as real policies.
I hardly need to remind folks here that the graph reflects an international spectrum of politics, not just the American norm, and an American candidate's positions can deviate markedly from what is considered reasonable in the international community. That's why (a) American politicians are skewed so far to the right on the graph, and (b) why foreigners think we're nuts. We know this here, of course, having seen Political Compass for years now, but not everyone who might wander in to read this knows that site's context or criteria.
Most telling in its own way is where Sanders turns up on the graph, at a frighteningly radical two squares from the center.
I've been called a square, especially by the cool kids in class.
Never been described as two squares, not even from the center. Although given age, weight, etc., a large pear might be closer to home.
Shared that with my students
They are always an eye-opener, especially in election years.
I typically rate somewhere deep down in the lower left of the scale, somewhere near "Stark raving anarcho-socialist". I have no idea why. Here was my last result, somewhere southwest of the Dalai Lama.
Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.51
Mine was -8.75, -6.51 (n/t)
-7.75, -5.95
I feel so conservative in comparison to you both!
You can see my dot in my picture.
You guys are so right-wing. Well, compared to me that is.
Since the last time I took the test, I've moved left and down. Most people become more conservative as they get older, but I've bucked the trend and become more progressive. Could be the medications of course.
-9.75, -8.21
IIRC, this was originally a recruiting tool for the Libertarian
party. (Nothing against it, I'm not saying it's ACCURATE, just that I recall every time I saw it about ten or fifteen years ago, it always linked to the LP)
And Yeah, Clinton Should be a LARGE circle, since she's taken positions essential diametrically opposed to each other.
I do not pretend I know what I do not know.
I wonder where Kasich falls on the map.
His dot might have been totally eclipsed by Christie's, for obvious reasons.
as noted earlier, Bernie is far to the right of us
if Hillary is +7,+4 and Bernie is -2,0 then the total distance between them is 13.
Most of us are approximately -7, -7. The distance between that point and Bernie totals 12.
So basically we're as far from Bernie as he is from Hillary.
(And yes, I know how to calculate the other side of a triangle.)
Yes
I noticed the same thing when I did a sort of group test, four years ago. Bernie wasn't on the radar, but we were ALL left and below his current dot.
"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X
-7.75, -5.23
I don't remember what mine was the last time I took it, probably in 2008 but I think I've moved further down and left since then too.
This shit is bananas.
-10, -7.75
But that was before I became more radical.
Improve the Resilience Resource Library by adding your links.
Vote Smart - Just the Facts - 40,000 politicians by name or zipcode
Political Compass
I've long thought that this is the only meaningful political test I've taken. A simple left/right slider is completely insufficient. I like to take this test once every two years or so, see if I've changed at all. It hasn't moved much since the first time I took it, back in 2006 or so. Here's mine from last October.