Clinton Insider: Sanders “is tapping into something that is very deep and very profound inside the Democratic Party"

The above title speaks for itself. It does not contain my interpretation of Sanders nor that of any Bernie Bro, or Berner or Millenial or Hobbit, either.

The title refers to a quote from a high profile Clinton supporter, Simon Rosenberg, the President and Founder of the NDN, a center-left think tank based in Washington, D.C. It’s mission is to understand and interpret a “new politics” - driven by enormous changes in demography, media and technology, economics and geopolitics” and “explain ... and offer innovative solutions to help policy makers and elected officials meet the new challenges presented by these new times.” They are big into studying “globalization and macro-economic policy, clean energy, immigration and border issues, Latin America, US demographic change, and the impact of new mobile technology on civil society.”

Here is what Rosenberg’s bio at NDN has to say about him:

Simon Rosenberg is President and founder of NDN, a leading, center-left think tank in Washington, DC. Rosenberg, a veteran of two presidential campaigns, including the 1992 Clinton War Room, got his start as a writer and producer in network television. He is a leading political thinker and commentator with a unique ability to identify important trends and decipher changes transforming American politics well before others.

... Together with Dr. Rob Shapiro, President Clinton’s Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs and Chair of NDN’s Globalization Initiative, he has fashioned a unique set of messages and policies around focusing on the economic well-being of everyday people based on Shapiro’s early analysis that even as GDP and productivity rose during the Bush years, wages stagnated and incomes declined.

Rosenberg is a member of the Aspen Institute’s 2001 Class of Henry Crown Fellows, and the Advisory Board of the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service at Tufts University. He won the national election prediction contest held by the Hill Newspaper in both 2012 and 2008. In 2007, he was named one of the 50 most powerful people in DC by GQ Magazine.

Rosenberg and his wife, Caitlin Durkovich, an Assistant Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, live in Washington, DC with their three children and Tug, a spirited bulldog.

So Mr. Rosenberg has been with the “Clinton team” since 1992. He been named one of the most powerful people in DC. He’s a member of the gosh darn Aspen Institute whose members include Republican billionaires, multinational corporate managers in the finance, real estate, defense and high tech industries, as well as Walter Isaacson, CNN’s CEO and Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, among others. His wife, Caitlin Durkovich, is President Obama’s Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection at the Department of Homeland Security.

Clinton supporters, he is “one of your own,” and to be honest I’m using that term loosely, since I suspect 99.999% of you do not run in the same political and social circles Simon does. So when he talked to the New Yorker about Bernie Sanders, I paid close attention. Maybe you should, as well. Here’s what he had to say:

Sanders “is tapping into something that is very deep and very profound inside the Democratic Party, which is this discontent with the system that is no longer producing for everyday people,” Simon Rosenberg, a Hillary supporter and the head of NDN (formerly the New Democrat Network), a liberal think tank in Washington, told me. “He has characterized Hillary as a champion of that system and as somebody who is actually a leader of the system, while he is the one that wants to change it.” Rosenberg added, “He’s not being perceived as a leftist. He is being perceived as somebody who is deeply in touch with a sense that something has gone wrong and that the system isn’t working.”

Obviously, he’s no idiot. He recognizes the enormous appeal Sanders has for many people who vote Democratic or lean Democratic in election years. He knows the demographics are shifting, and soon the young people, the same people you so casually dismiss as stupid, idealistic, easy to manipulate and be “scammed” kids are about to become a major force in American politics. Certainly if the Democratic party is to thrive, it will need to attract them in large numbers.

So slam Bernie all you want. Call him a far left Democratic Socialist, friend of Castro (yes, some of Clinton supporters have made that claim) and an outsider not in touch with the real concerns of real Democrats. Mr. Simon doesn’t view him that way. Rosenberg, quintessential Clinton insider, looks at Bernie Sanders and sees a threat to the very system in charge of the party that Rosenberg, the Clintons and other DLC/Third Way/New Democrats helped create in the 90’s, a system that controls the national party leadership to this day, as noted by the very same article in the New Yorker in which Rosenberg is quoted:

Clinton’s 1992 campaign and his Administration reflected two political strains that still define the Party: one is populist, anti-Wall Street, and pro-regulation; the other is more austere, more oriented toward the New York financial world, and more laissez-faire. Clinton’s Labor Secretary, Robert B. Reich, pressed for more government spending, but the top economic adviser in the White House, Robert Rubin, a former Goldman Sachs executive and later the Treasury Secretary, ultimately persuaded Clinton to abandon many of the liberal spending priorities that he championed during his campaign and to focus instead on reducing the deficit. Later, Rubin also pushed to deregulate the financial industry. That polarity remains. Hillary Clinton is surrounded by Rubin’s acolytes; Reich, an old friend of Bill Clinton’s from their days together at Oxford as Rhodes Scholars, recently endorsed Sanders.

It is the same system that allows Simon Rosenberg to hobnob with the wealthiest and most powerful people in America, many of whom support Hillary, but many of whom support Republicans, or who just hedge their bets and support both sides to insure that whichever party is in power, the “system” will keep running smoothly. A system that benefits people like Simon Rosenberg, who caters to policy makers and elected officials, such as — well such as Hillary Clinton who has been one in the past and hopes to become one again in November. No surprise that Rosenberg supports Hillary and has supported her and her husband for a very long, long time.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

I could do all three here. Excellent as always, Steven D!

The info about Rosenberg is very valuable, IMO. His vision has shaped and directed the Dem Part for thirty years, and his quote a out Bernie as the current focus of an inevitable wave is better than gold, IMO. A progressive future IS coming.

up
0 users have voted.
detroitmechworks's picture

Involving the underpaid waitstaff at Democratic party functions simultaneously spitting in the food before "Accidentally" dumping it onto the heads of every one of those sanctimonious assholes.

Because Rule One: Don't Fuck with People who handle your food.

Democrats have been breaking that one for FAR too long.

up
0 users have voted.

I do not pretend I know what I do not know.

bodysurfer's picture

But I can't talk about that.

up
0 users have voted.

All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I'm fine. -- Jeff Spicoli

an audio recorder at one of those shindigs, similar to how we got Romney's talking about the 47%ers back in 2012, then getting that recording to Anonymous for transcription and release.

up
0 users have voted.

Modern Democratic Party leaders are aristocrats who send filled baskets to the peasants at Christmastime, but wouldn't dream of upsetting the system that created peasantry in the first place. They are essentially the same as Republicans - they benefit from unfettered capitalism, have true empathy only for those who are as wealthy and powerful as they, and have nothing but contempt for people who have found it damned near impossible to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. I'm sick of the whole gang.

up
0 users have voted.

Twain Disciple

Martha Pearce-Smith's picture

I think rather than;

"Sanders “is tapping into something that is very deep and very profound inside the Democratic Party..."

I think it is coming from deep inside the Human spirit. We instinctively KNOW when something is wrong, something is immoral. And again, instinctively we eventually rebel against it.

up
0 users have voted.

Please help the Resilience Resource Library grow by adding your links.

First Nations News

AreJay's picture

Is that we are not humans. we're identity-driven political blocs only in service to the party.

up
0 users have voted.
Martha Pearce-Smith's picture

that may be what TPTB think. But more and more people are rediscovering their Humanity...
The following was shared at my UU Church just last week...

____________________

The Great Turning

You've asked me to tell you of the Great Turning
Of how we saved the world from disaster.
The answer is both simple and complex.
We turned.

For hundreds of years we had turned away as life on earth grew more precarious
We turned away from the homeless men on the streets, the stench from the river,
The children orphaned in Iraq, the mothers dying of AIDS in Africa

We turned away because that was what we had been taught.
To turn away, from our pain, from the hurt in another's eyes,
From the drunken father, from the friend betrayed.

Always we were told, in actions louder than words, to turn away, turn away.
And so we became a lonely people caught up in a world
Moving too quickly, too mindlessly toward its own demise.

Until it seemed as if there was no safe space to turn.
No place, inside or out, that did not remind us of fear or terror, despair and loss, anger and grief.

Yet, on one of those days, someone did turn.

Turned to face the pain.
Turned to face the stranger.
Turned to look at the smouldering world and the hatred seething in too many eyes.
Turned to face himself, herself.

And then another turned.
And another. And another.
And as they wept, they took each other's hands.

Until whole groups of people were turning.
Young and old, gay and straight.
People of all colours, all nations, all religions.
Turning not only to the pain and hurt but to beauty, gratitude and love.
Turning to one another with forgiveness and a longing for peace in their hearts.

At first, the turning made people dizzy, even silly.
There were people standing to the side, gawking, criticizing, trying to knock the turners down.

But the people turning kept getting up, kept helping one another to their feet.
Their laughter and kindness brought others into the turning circle
Until even the nay-sayers began to smile and sway.

As the people turned, they began to spin
Reweaving the web of life, mending the shocking tears,
Knitting it back together with the colours of the earth,
Sewing on tiny mirrors so the beauty of each person, each creature, each plant, each life might be seen and respected.

And as the people turned, as they spun like the earth through the universe,
The web wrapped around them like a soft baby blanket
Making it clear all were loved, nothing separate.

As this love reached into every crack and crevice, the people began to wake and wonder,
To breathe and give thanks,
To celebrate together.

And so the world was saved, but only as long as you, too, sweet one, remember to turn.

Christine Fry (October 19, 2004)

up
0 users have voted.

Please help the Resilience Resource Library grow by adding your links.

First Nations News

Is it possible to share that on Facebook? Christine Fry is the authoress right?

up
0 users have voted.

glitterscale

I have a hard time with choosing Hillary as the best of the evils because as I'm expected to fall in line for the good of the party and people, when does the party hold their candidate accountable? Obama said he would not let another trade deal through when he stumped; now, he not only is pushing more than one, he got 'fast track' rammed through congress. Where is the dem party holding his feet to the fire over it? Nowhere, so I can only assume hillary can do the same with no consequences and why wouldn't she?

up
0 users have voted.

every bit as much as the Republicans lie to their base. We've made fun of them for years for actually believing their candidates will put prayer back into the schools, and we've been the suckers who've believed we'll get actual support for labor and jobs out of the Democratic Party. I was able to remain in denial about this until the party threw Hillary Clinton at us with almost one hundred percent unanimity. I contributed to some of those people who are now telling me it's my fault if Hillary loses and scary Donald Trump gets into office. I feel like a fool, and I should.

up
0 users have voted.

Twain Disciple

I am a total bookworm right now, just can't help myself and keep reading this stuff even when it makes me absolutely enraged. I just finished Thomas Frank's "Listen, Liberal" and while nothing in there is too terribly shocking to me anymore, he really pulls together what their agenda now is. He goes into the fallacy of "meritocracy" and how that plays into inequality, he goes into Bill Clinton and mentions how Bill was working hard to privatize Social Security but what stopped him was most likely the Lewinsky scandal. He met with Newt Fucking Gingrich back in 1997 to do that. At that time, I remember telling my mother, Tea Bag Repugnant, that the ONLY party that matters in this country anymore is the Green Party, and I do NOT mean the environmental Green with that statement but the Green of MONEY. I told her then that I thought they all sat around and decided who would be "for" this, and who would be "for" that in public, but in private they'd all be on the same page. She asked me how I could be so cynical. I asked her even then how could she not? We see it in front of our faces every day, we hear how actual progressive policy is just "naïve" and "Unrealistic" and we keep on buying it. And we buy it because they have a "D" behind their name.

up
0 users have voted.

Only a fool lets someone else tell him who his enemy is. Assata Shakur

gulfgal98's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

shaharazade's picture

I think it's healthy and a long time coming. People are waking up and Bernie's message is not about partisanship or fear it's about humanism, democracy and the common good. There is a reason why independents are now at 43% and rising. There is a reason why were seeing democracy and the principles of equality being rekindled globally. The powers that be have gone so far that people of good spirit have no choice but to take a hard look at the corrupt violent anti-democratic face of who and what rules the world.

up
0 users have voted.
mjsmeme's picture

are damaged inside. Their instincts are off or they don't pay any attention to them. religion and/or lead paint may have something to do with that.

up
0 users have voted.
Steven D's picture

corrupt. They attract corrupt people and create a culture of corruption.

case in point: the history of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Democratic party devolved into a very corrupt state. It was always corrupt to some degree, but the push to follow the corporate money by the DLC pushed it into territory even Boss Tweed would admire.

up
0 users have voted.

"You can't just leave those who created the problem in charge of the solution."---Tyree Scott

larryrant's picture

It is organization which gives birth to the dominion of the elected over the electors, of the mandatories over the mandators, of the delegates over the delegators. Who says organization, says oligarchy.

from Robert Michaels, "Political Parties," 1911

Hence the maxim regarding "eternal vigilance" ...

up
0 users have voted.
mimi's picture

Rosenberg, quintessential Clinton insider, looks at Bernie Sanders and sees a threat to the very system in charge of the party that Rosenberg, the Clintons and other DLC/Third Way/New Democrats helped create in the 90’s, a system that controls the national party leadership to this day, as noted by the very same article in the New Yorker in which Rosenberg is quoted:

Good, I hope the threat becomes so overwhelming that "the very system in charge" will be changed.

Whatever influential and smart these institutions are, they couldn't even once on their website spell out what NDN stands for. (Or I couldn't find it, and that too should not be the case on a website) And if you want to register, the page that comes up say they don't take any donation anymore. Wonder why. And wonder how old the NDN really is. I seems to me they pop up and grow regularly out of nothing with intentions that are not quite clear.

Let's just tap into that something deep and profound some more, I like tap dancing.

up
0 users have voted.
Martha Pearce-Smith's picture

"Rosenberg, quintessential Clinton insider, looks at Bernie Sanders and sees a threat to the very system in charge of the party..."

He should see us as a threat too.

up
0 users have voted.

Please help the Resilience Resource Library grow by adding your links.

First Nations News

We will have to be aware of the ways in which they will seek to co-opt us. It will no doubt start with the demands that Sanders endorse and campaign for Hillary, should she win the nomination. At that point the movement will have to decouple from the figurehead.

Politics is a transactional business. If you demand nothing in return for your support, that's exactly what you'll get. Which is why the establishment is so intent on scaring us with visions of Zombie Republicans: frightened citizens are much more easily manipulated. We must rise above our fear of Trump, and demand a real price from the Democratic party for our votes. Not rhetoric, something much more tangible. The movement will need to figure out what that price is.

up
0 users have voted.

Please help support caucus99percent!

He still has to go back to the Senate and work with Democrats -- if he doesn't endorse Clinton at the very least, some of those Democrats would make the workplace a difficult place indeed.

up
0 users have voted.

Bernie has to do what he has to do. We have to do what we have to do. Neither of us should expect the other (or any of us) to take the path that any of us choses.

up
0 users have voted.

glitterscale

Raggedy Ann's picture

he us such a class act, I believe he will be just fine and will probably fight even harder for us. He'll be able to remind others of campaign promises, including his.

up
0 users have voted.

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11

lotlizard's picture

What a double standard. If you’re in their little club, you can get away with anything.

up
0 users have voted.

Good post here also!

The mob is thirsty for bannings today. Calling for the wrath of the Blogowner on Tasini for bringing up thevAUMF vote by Hillary. Verboten according to them.

up
0 users have voted.

I'm done with it. And I'm done with a party that nominates Hillary. At some point hearing "we don't need you anymore" is going to end up in a painful lesson for democrats. Keep abandoning 20% or so of the democratic vote, keep pushing it away, and eventually it will take the hint and leave. Republicans did that with the black vote in the civil rights era, and it hurt them, severely, for decades. Democrats are risking that now with progressives.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

Thanks for the heads up Tom!

up
0 users have voted.

"The war on Gaza, backed by the West, is a demonstration that the West is willing to cross all lines. That it will discard any nuance of humanity. That it is willing to commit genocide" -- Moon of Alabama

You're better than that!

up
0 users have voted.

Twain Disciple

I decided to ban myself last night after this post was hidden:

"Bernie voters appreciate his honesty and his judgement. People that appreciate those qualities are unlikely to choose Hillary. "

Truth hurts.

up
0 users have voted.

This election has laid bare the very real, deep, and wide differences between the dominant center-right "socially moderate, fiscally conservative" Clinton democrats and the ignored center-left and progressive-left FDR democrats.

If nothing else is accomplished, my hope is that millennials observe and take in this rift. More importantly, that they act on it. My preference would be for them to realize that political parties are themselves institutions of corruption, and to leverage the social media and other tools we have to realize the parties aren't needed anymore.

up
0 users have voted.

Republicans and Democrats in particular, corporate shills, globalist war mongers, sold out to the wealthy donors. As anyone can tell you that gets paid $675,000 for three speeches to Goldman Sachs.

up
0 users have voted.
ngant17's picture

if bernie doesn't make it to the nomination. i will switch back to no party affiliation. i only switched to democratic party to vote for bernie in the primaries. i refuse to support any other democratic candidate.

up
0 users have voted.

"no party affiliation" after the June primary here in California, as a protest of what DWS' mismanagement has done to the Democratic Party.

up
0 users have voted.

No party that nominates Hillary Clinton expresses my viewpoint. I have no business in it.

up
0 users have voted.

Twain Disciple

Raggedy Ann's picture

We are going to switch to dem to vote Bernie on June 7th, but we'll go back to Indie June 8th, or so.

up
0 users have voted.

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11

Okay, have no idea what happened here...

up
0 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

up
0 users have voted.