A Look Back: Sept 11

----

As the U.S. News Media continues to program and reduce the American people into subservient, obedient, fearful, Military-loving, War-loving, flag-waving sheep (now also legally robbed of their civil liberties), over the 9/11 event -- it is important to have an Independent look back at ... just what we were told, who was protected, and how most of the public was completely duped.

I. What did not happen:

.

----

II. The Guilty Parties:

----

III. Beneficiaries; Where to Look:

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

bondibox's picture

A dozen of the seal team members who found OBL died in a helo crash?
That's whack.
These videos went way past the usual "something fishy about the collapse" CTs. Knowing what went on in the attacked offices really is eye popping.

All the silver stream whistleblowers had a meeting at 8:30 a.m.?

up
0 users have voted.

F the F'n D's

lotlizard's picture

Reportedly, some 46% of people polled don’t know (no longer recall) that a third skyscraper, not hit by an airplane, collapsed on 9/11.

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

IIRC, someone was put under heavy suspicion, and killed himself - only for it later to come out that he probably didn't do it.

There have been analyses of Building 7 that state that it was heavily damaged by falling flaming debris from the North Tower - with pictures that show as much. Also, the building's sprinkler system was inadequate to start with, and damaged to the point of ineffectiveness, which meant the fires could and did spread uncontrolled. Naturally, none of the "911-Truthers" believe this, preferring to cling to their claims of planted explosives and controlled demolition.

Can explosives be rigged with silencers? It has been claimed that sufficient planted explosive to bring down Building 7 - to say nothing of the Twin Towers - would have blown out the eardrums of every person within a half-mile of the site.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Big Al's picture

like it was being demolished, flat as a pancake. Right. There have been studies that show the studies you're referring to are bullshit.
So there we are, stuck in the middle of a bunch of studies.

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

Flaming debris started fires inside and out, which could not be fought with the broken sprinkler system and the low water pressure they had. The building burnt out from the inside.

Nobody wants to believe that nineteen lunatics could wreak so much havoc - it "had" to be bigger than them, involve more people, be a Ginormous Government Conspiracy. Because otherwise one has to face the facts that Random Shit Happens, and Shit Can Happen To Anybody.

Ask Chelyabinsk about Random Shit - they've gotten more than their share.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

This is NOT a building "falling down from fire" or from "structural weakening".
It is a steel and concrete building that is being pulverized and blown into tiny bits of dust before your very eyes!

Fire doesn't do that.
Anyone with a set of eyes in their head can see that (who is honest).

Over 2600 Independent Architects and Engineers have scientifically totally disproven the nonsense spouted by the well-heeled NIST (which is aligned with the U.S. government....hence their ".gov" URL).

Try learning what actually happened - see: Architects and Engineers on 9/11

---

-----

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

Your noise-to-signal ratio is so far off the charts it's out past Alpha Centauri.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Anyone with a brain knows this was not a building that simply just "burned down".
It is obviously, obviously controlled demolition (free-fall speed, symmetrical collapse).

-----

Watch the damn video, and stop protecting the corrupt Establishment!!

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

"Let's pull it" after he was informed that they couldn't get the fires under control. If there weren't explosives in place then how could they "pull it"?
And I don't believe that a building that is on fire would collapse in its footprint.
And as stated in the second video, the steel structures were built to withstand heat up to 2,700 degrees and jet fuel only burns at 1,300.
And DC is the most protected airspace in this country, yet the 4 planes flew for close to an hour or longer, yet not one jet was scrambled to intercept the planes? Plus the pentagon is protected by a missle defense system and as the plane was turning that was the best opportunity to shoot it down.
Where were the engines and the normal wreckage of an airplane crash one usually sees including the plane, seats and luggage.
The second video is very informative if you want to know about building 7

up
0 users have voted.

It is not until the tide goes out that you discover who has been swimming naked.

TheOtherMaven's picture

as in "pull them out", get them outathere because it's a lost cause. The firefighters were pulled back, weren't they?

What is not in dispute is that BushCo jumped at the chance to start their long-desired wars against Iraq and the American people.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

technical analysis of the towers' collapse comes from this group architectural and engineering experts. These are well respected, knowledgeable, and experienced professional people, whose concern here is with facts, not theories.

Personally, I have no doubt whatsoever that 9/11 was an inside job. However I don't claim to know exactly who was responsible for it, or how it was done.

up
0 users have voted.

native

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

This video has firefighters and other people saying that they heard explosions going off while they were in the towers way before they came down.
You seem to be belittling "9/11 truthers"
The explosive noises would have been covered up by the sound of the towers falling.
Have you looked at any of the evidence that the 'truthers' base their claims on? If not then how can you come to that conclusion?
Edit to add that my comment is for The Other Maven.

up
0 users have voted.

It is not until the tide goes out that you discover who has been swimming naked.

TheOtherMaven's picture

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Watch the video again ... dear...

---

up
0 users have voted.

argue the points and drop the personal insults, for intellect's sake.

up
0 users have voted.
lotlizard's picture

not from Iraq, as mysterious government source(s) supposedly leaked to ABC News.

The case of some U.S. government employee (whether it was Bruce Ivins, the FBI-targeted suspect who committed suicide, or not) using U.S. government anthrax qualifies as an “inside job” to me.

https://www.salon.com/2008/08/01/anthrax_2/

The 2001 anthrax attacks remain one of the great mysteries of the post-9/11 era. After 9/11 itself, the anthrax attacks were probably the most consequential event of the Bush presidency. One could make a persuasive case that they were actually more consequential. The 9/11 attacks were obviously traumatic for the country, but in the absence of the anthrax attacks, 9/11 could easily have been perceived as a single, isolated event. It was really the anthrax letters — with the first one sent on September 18, just one week after 9/11 — that severely ratcheted up the fear levels and created the climate that would dominate in this country for the next several years after. It was anthrax — sent directly into the heart of the country’s elite political and media institutions, to then-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt), NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, and other leading media outlets — that created the impression that social order itself was genuinely threatened by Islamic radicalism.

If the now-deceased Ivins really was the culprit behind the attacks, then that means that the anthrax came from a U.S. Government lab, sent by a top U.S. Army scientist at Ft. Detrick. Without resort to any speculation or inferences at all, it is hard to overstate the significance of that fact. From the beginning, there was a clear intent on the part of the anthrax attacker to create a link between the anthrax attacks and both Islamic radicals and the 9/11 attacks. This was the letter sent to Brokaw:

09-11-01
This is next
Take Penacilin Now
Death to America
Death to Israel
Allah is great

The letter sent to Leahy contained this message:

We have anthrax.
You die now.
Are you afraid?
Death to America.
Death to Israel.
Allah is great.

By design, those attacks put the American population into a state of intense fear of Islamic terrorism, far more than the 9/11 attacks alone could have accomplished.

Much more important than the general attempt to link the anthrax to Islamic terrorists, there was a specific intent — indispensably aided by ABC News — to link the anthrax attacks to Iraq and Saddam Hussein.

up
0 users have voted.
Cassiodorus's picture

The original 9/11 happened in 1973 in Chile and was supervised by Nixon and Kissinger. The Pinochet regime thus installed through massive violence was intended as the incubator regime for the global neoliberal regime which rules the world today.

up
0 users have voted.

"The future is inside us/ It's not somewhere else." -- Radiohead

RantingRooster's picture

He's published a new video series that breaks down the "9/11 suspects".

It's pretty gosh darn, well Shok interesting. As I've mentioned before I don't believe the "physics" in the NIST report. I don't really believe in CT Secret , I am more into the CA, conspiracy analysis Pleasantry , to determine if a theory holds water or not, make sense? ROFL

I'm sure the news this weekend is going to be all "patriotic", the propaganda will be overflowing, gushing even, and Mrs. Clinton will be like "I...9/11, and I...9/11 and on 9/11...I ....Wall Street are my constituents and I... 9/11...."

15 years on and very, very few recognize it was an actual crime scene that was wiped clean of any evidence.

It is illegal to fly a plane into a building. Scratch one-s head

up
0 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

TheOtherMaven's picture

that not only the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), but also the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE); the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE); the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA); the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC); the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH); and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY); were all willing to prostitute themselves for a government coverup. All of these organizations contributed to the investigations.

That's a bit much to swallow, innit?

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Funny how you just love to always defend and protect the most corrupt people on the planet .. innit?

Wake up: This is NOT a building "falling down from fire" or from "structural weakening".
It is a steel and concrete building that is being pulverized and blown into tiny bits of dust before your very eyes!

Fire doesn't do that.
Anyone with a set of eyes in their head can see that (who is honest).

Over 2600 Independent Architects and Engineers have scientifically totally disproven the nonsense spouted by the well-heeled NIST (which is aligned with the U.S. government....hence their ".gov" URL).

Try learning something for once that is not just spoonfed to you by the mouth of the corrupt Establishment (you're bosses I presume) - see: Architects and Engineers on 9/11

Also, declassified documents prove that "Operation Northwoods" was a similar Pentagon-CIA hatched domestic terrorist attack plan --- that was stopped by President Kennedy once he learned about it.

-----

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

yet you persist in bullshitting me with Towers 1 and 2 - which are NOT BUILDING 7.

I was talking ONLY about BUILDING 7.

THIS is why nobody knows SQUAT about what happened on Sept 11 2001 - too much MISINFORMATION, DISINFORMATION, MISAIMED CROSSTALK, and just ranting NONSENSE.

Its ALL noise now and NO signal left at all.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

We also know that no steel frame buildings in all of World history (doesn't matter which one) have ever collapsed due to fire.

up
0 users have voted.
RantingRooster's picture

any government organization, ya feel me. Not a single concrete and steel building has ever, in the history of human kind, ever, been pulverized into dust like WTC1 &2, or collapsed for that matter, from a fire like WTC7. Period.

I spent 6 years as PM for major engineering outfits (structural included), and at the root of all of it, is physics. Period. Physic doesn't lie, the laws of motion and thermodynamics don't all of a sudden change one day and revert back the next. It just doesn't happen. Unless of course you "literally" believe in the bible.

The (expletive) Iraq war was based on lies, that almost (99%) of every major newspaper, TV show, Cable news network, radio program, MSM internet sites, in the country was touting the LIE as the gospel.

The only popular TV person to really question the war, Phil Donahue, was fired for it! How many got fired for repeating the lies of the GWB administration, failing their 1st duty as journalists?

That sends a message to others, and they back off, and keep their jobs, and paychecks...

We have over 2000 water systems in this country leeching lead into peoples homes, but our "government" won't do (expletive), but hey, we got half a trillion for making war and maintain something like over 1000 military installations, exerting our global hegemony over the planet and it's people, while it burns from record temperatures, cause by climate change.

We have elected official that don't even believe in climate change! Let that sink in...

But you think questioning the (expletive) up physics used in the NIST report valid, based on what? Just because some government organizations say so?

Where is the "EVIDENCE"? Oh, gee, there isn't any, because it was hauled off, and NEVER analyze by any of those organization you site. So why would I believe them, who never analyzed any of the evidence, over real physics?

Does that not compute to you?

But hey, if you want to believe that few guys armed with nothing more than box cutters, can cripple the world's only superpower, who spends more on toys for their military than the top 10 nations combined, I reckon what ever floats yer boat, but I'll never be convinced with anyone touting bad physics as form of proof, which, all of those organizations you site, do just that, support bad physics. They support a LIE, just like all the other people that 'fall in line", keep their cushy jobs, and their pay checks.

You see what Obama does to whistle blowers...

No offense, but are you smoking some of that Wacko tonight? Please share, will ya....

RR Drinks

up
0 users have voted.

C99, my refuge from an insane world. #ForceTheVote

snoopydawg's picture

On all 4 planes? They might have used them in the plane that crashed if that information was relayed through the phone call before someone said "Let's roll". Wasn't there some questions about whether the phones would have worked at that altitude?
Then there's the molten steel pouring down the sides of the building before it fell, plus as another person mentioned, huge amounts of steel and other objects were blown out at a great distance and as the building was falling you can see explosions going off on the floors below.
I wonder how many people who label people conspiracy nuts have ever bothered to look at the evidence and the videos before making the claim?
As for how much it is costing us for the illegal wars, here's a website that shows the amount of money being spent each second.
It takes less than 7-8 seconds to spend $100 dollars.
I can imagine a lot of other things that money could be spent on in this country and its citizens.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/

up
0 users have voted.

It is not until the tide goes out that you discover who has been swimming naked.

TheOtherMaven's picture

'Nuff said.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Did NOT work on airliners then. They didn't roll out cellular nodes on passenger jets for ANOTHER TWO YEARS!
Cognitive Dissonance much?

up
0 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
Sign at protest march

bondibox's picture

Tell that to Peter Hanson's father, who spoke to his son on the phone as it slammed into the south tower.

up
0 users have voted.

F the F'n D's

you can look up the tech aspects yourself. The fact that American Airline rolled out inflight