It's also population control. Counter punch had an article about that a few months ago. Look at how many people our wars have already killed. Or the sanctions on Iran that's preventing medicine for cancer patients and other diseases.
The Iraqi sanctions killed over 500,000 Iraqi children and Madeline Albright said it was worth it.
Now cutting off funds to that country, how many more people will die?
Add in the drone strikes that kill innocent civilians in every country that Obama is dropping drones on.
Since 1945, the US has killed over 30 million by wars, coups or training militaries for other countries.
MLK was correct. Sure wish he was still around.
Those fuckers don't give a damn about anyone but themselves and how much money and power they get.
I got choked up yesterday after seeing a deer on the side of the road.
But for those that have killed and maimed not only people in other countries, but our own soldiers, they don't give a damn.
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVY BASE, CUBA
The 9/11 trial judge abruptly recessed the first hearing in the case since August on Monday after some of the alleged Sept. 11 plotters said they recognized a war court linguist as a former secret CIA prison worker.
Alleged plot deputy Ramzi bin al Shibh, 42, made the revelation just moments into the hearing by informing the judge he had a problem with his courtroom translator. The interpreter, Bin al Shibh claimed, worked for the CIA during his 2002 through 2006 detention at a so-called “Black Site.”
“The problem is I cannot trust him because he was working at the black site with the CIA, and we know him from there,” he said.
“I strongly support and continue to press for greater congressional oversight of the Fed’s regulatory and supervisory responsibilities, and I believe the Fed’s balance sheet should be regularly audited – which the law already requires.”
“But I oppose the current version of this bill because it promotes congressional meddling in the Fed’s monetary policy decisions, which risks politicizing those decisions and may havedangerous implications for financial stability and the health of the global economy.”
So what that really means is that she opposes the representatives of the people being able to participate in the monetary decisions of this country, instead she favors leaving those monetary decisions in the hands of a small group of private rich people.
So what that really means is that she opposes the representatives of the people being able to participate in the monetary decisions of this country, instead she favors leaving those monetary decisions in the hands of a small group of private rich people.
I disagree. Most members of Congress understand zero about how the Fed works and monetary policy. I don't want them anywhere near it. Although I don't like the idea of the 1% controlling it, it'll be more screwed up if Congress sticks it's nose in it.
up
0 users have voted.
—
"Never separate the life you live from the words you speak." --Paul Wellstone
much of anything they vote on, but the key is oversight and that doesn't have to be directly by Congress, it can be done by government workers who report to Congress. There is no oversight of the Fed and it is controlled by
the rich who cause recessions and depressions purposely with their actions. This country was taken over in 1913 with the
creation of the Fed Reserve System. It's one of the major impediments to any sort of democracy and probably the number one
problem to deal with regarding wealth inequality.
The Bank of North Dakota is a good example of what we could have in this country. A real public banking system, the only
state owned bank in the country. It can be done.
the fed could be a wonderful tool if it were run by incorruptible saints. as it is, it is such a powerful tool that people like warren don't trust their fellow politicians to have a voice in supervising it (which, of course opens the door to self-interested actions) and consider the sort of private interests that run it currently to be a better option.
it's pretty sad when you have to choose between the relative levels of corruption of bankers and pols.
we need a vastly different economic system. this one is utterly unsuited to the task.
"Three Federal Reserve officials criticized proposed legislation to expand congressional oversight of the central bank’s interest-rate decisions, pushing back against the bill as it is gaining attention.
Fed governor Jerome Powell on Monday called the bill, known to supporters as “Audit the Fed,” misguided. He said it would threaten the central bank’s independence.
The bill “risks inserting the Congress directly into monetary-policy decision making, reversing decades of deliberate effort by the Congress to insulate the Fed from political pressure in carrying out its day-to-day duties,” Mr. Powell said in a speech in Washington.
Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser, speaking earlier Monday on Fox Business Network, said of the bill, “To sort of second-guess and put political pressure on the Fed to make decisions…for short-term political reasons I think would be very dangerous.”
Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher , speaking later Monday on Fox Business Network, said that the bill is about “interfering with the making of monetary policy,” and that the central bank is already “audited out the wazoo.”
the central bank is already “audited out the wazoo.”
baloney! the fed has added items to its balance sheet like a drunken sailor in order to facilitate the demands of bankers to be kept in the appearance of solvency.
the fed has declined to regulate banks even during the worst of their excesses.
the fed has not operated in the interests of the people of the united states and as such should face very public accountability for its failures. frankly given the scale of their corruption, tar and feathers are not out of the question.
(i think that's as close as i come to typing "lol")
if the fed is "audited out the wazoo," where is the physical manifestation of that in terms of reports or presentations? there are no reports available to the general public that transparently and comprehensively describe the actions of the fed - a narrative with corresponding numerical data. further, the fed goes out of its way to use obfuscatory language in its public statements about its actions. these cryptic periodic emanations are the subject of regular textual deconstructions by "experts" attempting to divine the meaning of the at once vague and impenetrable commentary.
Comments
Their goal is not only hegemony
It's also population control. Counter punch had an article about that a few months ago. Look at how many people our wars have already killed. Or the sanctions on Iran that's preventing medicine for cancer patients and other diseases.
The Iraqi sanctions killed over 500,000 Iraqi children and Madeline Albright said it was worth it.
Now cutting off funds to that country, how many more people will die?
Add in the drone strikes that kill innocent civilians in every country that Obama is dropping drones on.
Since 1945, the US has killed over 30 million by wars, coups or training militaries for other countries.
MLK was correct. Sure wish he was still around.
How do these people sleep at night? (n/t)
Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy
Just fine I'm sure
Those fuckers don't give a damn about anyone but themselves and how much money and power they get.
I got choked up yesterday after seeing a deer on the side of the road.
But for those that have killed and maimed not only people in other countries, but our own soldiers, they don't give a damn.
this is just
sickening
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/a...
Elizabeth Warren
So what that really means is that she opposes the representatives of the people being able to participate in the monetary decisions of this country, instead she favors leaving those monetary decisions in the hands of a small group of private rich people.
I have a different take on that
I disagree. Most members of Congress understand zero about how the Fed works and monetary policy. I don't want them anywhere near it. Although I don't like the idea of the 1% controlling it, it'll be more screwed up if Congress sticks it's nose in it.
"Never separate the life you live from the words you speak." --Paul Wellstone
Most members of Congress don't understand
much of anything they vote on, but the key is oversight and that doesn't have to be directly by Congress, it can be done by government workers who report to Congress. There is no oversight of the Fed and it is controlled by
the rich who cause recessions and depressions purposely with their actions. This country was taken over in 1913 with the
creation of the Fed Reserve System. It's one of the major impediments to any sort of democracy and probably the number one
problem to deal with regarding wealth inequality.
The Bank of North Dakota is a good example of what we could have in this country. A real public banking system, the only
state owned bank in the country. It can be done.
heh...
the fed could be a wonderful tool if it were run by incorruptible saints. as it is, it is such a powerful tool that people like warren don't trust their fellow politicians to have a voice in supervising it (which, of course opens the door to self-interested actions) and consider the sort of private interests that run it currently to be a better option.
it's pretty sad when you have to choose between the relative levels of corruption of bankers and pols.
we need a vastly different economic system. this one is utterly unsuited to the task.
Ya, could be she's just being a parrot.
polly want a banker?
baloney! the fed has added items to its balance sheet like a drunken sailor in order to facilitate the demands of bankers to be kept in the appearance of solvency.
the fed has declined to regulate banks even during the worst of their excesses.
the fed has not operated in the interests of the people of the united states and as such should face very public accountability for its failures. frankly given the scale of their corruption, tar and feathers are not out of the question.
I've worked as an auditor
on Wall Street. It is not "audited out the wazoo."
"Never separate the life you live from the words you speak." --Paul Wellstone
i laughed bitterly at that assertion...
(i think that's as close as i come to typing "lol")
if the fed is "audited out the wazoo," where is the physical manifestation of that in terms of reports or presentations? there are no reports available to the general public that transparently and comprehensively describe the actions of the fed - a narrative with corresponding numerical data. further, the fed goes out of its way to use obfuscatory language in its public statements about its actions. these cryptic periodic emanations are the subject of regular textual deconstructions by "experts" attempting to divine the meaning of the at once vague and impenetrable commentary.