He's my choice unless and until he says he's out. If he exits the convention and doesn't say he's done, he gets my vote as a write-in.

Jill Stein is my fall-back position if Bernie says he's done and leaves the contest.

Although it is getting harder and harder to motivate myself to vote at all...

A write-in candidate for the presidency must file a list of presidential electors and a declaration of candidacy in order to have his or her votes tallied. These forms must be filed with the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board by 4:30 p.m. on the second Tuesday preceding the general election. This deadline may be extended to the Friday following the election if the write-in candidate "is eligible to receive the electoral votes" of the state.[24]

So not only do they have to file, but they have to provide electors.

The Greens are on the ballot in WI, so that is probably your best bet.

Bernie is going to do what he said he would do, back the D Party against the Donald. The Democrats are dead to me but not to Bernie.

We need a progressive party. In spite of what Hillary says, she and her party are not progressive.

So friendly and peaceful.

I hope Grandma Yuppie celebrates so much that she passes out and drowns in her own vomit.

My first political donation in years.

No big hopes, but perhaps she'll be able to raise enough money to run some national ads and do a bit of consciousness-raising.

If they are on the ballot in Washington state, I will for Jill Stein.

For the life of me, I cannot see the value in voting for a non-candidate who has explicitly expressed his intention to vote for Hillary Clinton. Especially when such votes won't even be counted. And yet, many, many people are still talking about writing in Bernie Sanders. Why?

In 2012, Green Party candidate Jill Stein appeared on the ballot in 36 states, plus the District of Columbia. She appeared on 83 percent of all ballots cast. This year, the Greens are getting a lot more publicity, and there is an excellent chance they will substantially exceed the level of ballot access they achieved four years ago.

The Green Party is not perfect (nor is Senator Sanders), but its platform is extremely progressive, and Jill Stein is a thoughtful, articulate and inspiring individual who, unlike Bernie, has long recognized the futility of attempting to pursue a "people's revolution" through a deeply corrupt, venal, and corporate dominated institution like the Democratic Party.

Personally, I see no realistic scenario under which Clinton does not end up being the next president. But a major groundswell of support for Jill Stein and the Green Party could still change the contours of the U.S. political system in a way that would promote a substantially more honest and responsive government in the future.

Suppose one half, or even a third, of the Bernie supporters who turned out for his rallies and showed such enthusiasm for his candidacy showed the same level of allegiance to Jill Stein. "Green Party achieves critical mass" would turn out to be the story of the 2016 campaign. Stein would surely get into the debates, and would undoubtedly shine in comparison with the two corrupt hacks she'd be sharing the stage with. And the Green Party would qualify for federal funding, solidifying in peoples' minds that it represented a genuine, viable alternative to the two corporate dominated parties that offer nothing more than slightly different flavors of more of the same.

Sadly, it's very unlikely that anything like this will in fact happen, because most voters are still unable to bring themselves to embrace anything outside the confines of the established duopoly. The end result being endless repetitions of the Charlie Brown and Lucy Effect, wherein every four or eight years we once again convince ourselves that this time the insurgent Democratic candidate has a real shot, and the status quo, more of the same candidate is riding for a fall. Which in reality is about as delusional as believing you can beat the roulette wheel, even though the croupier has a button on the floor with which he can make it stop at any number he pleases. Good luck with that!

What it boils down to is that changing the system will remain an impossibility until we are first able to change ourselves.

an absolute certainty that this whole 'revolution' bit will go right down the dumper. So much of this primary was based on TRUST. Trust that it would be fair. Trust that it wouldn't be rigged. Trust that the Clinton cabal wouldn't cheat. THEY DID ALL OF THAT. If Sanders votes for her, in spite of all they did to destroy his campaign, you might as well just hold the door open to all those who got excited because they might actually have an honest person to vote for as they leave and never come back. They will feel betrayed and used. An honest person doesn't uphold what Clinton has done to the country and what her and the hubby's brand of politics has done to the minorities and the poor people of this country OR the way they rigged this election. To go along with all that, in particular that last one, would blow his credibility out of the water.

I hope he doesn't vote for her, but it's his vote and he can do what he wants. But you are either for or against corruption. This is not a 'middle ground' issue.

EDIT: Lost track of my thought and forgot part of my sentences.

I'd vote for Stein. Every vote for the greens benefits an actually existing (if imperfect) progressive organization while a large number of write-in votes for Sanders would looknice but leave no practical impact on the electoral sphere. A 5% share of the vote would net the Greens some federal matching funds which would allow them to more effectively compete on the state and locals levels. You know, make the Democrats actually earn our votes once in awhile.

And the Greens have been able to do some good stuff in those places where they've actually been able to exercise power (like two -term Richmond CA mayor Gayle McLaughlin (2007-2015))

Here's an option: http://www.unitedprogressiveparty.org/
I don't know why but I just don't think most people consider the Green party. Maybe something fresher is an option?