In the last few days a hack of DNC information has been posted to the web in a variety of places including 'proper mainstream media entities" such as the Washington Post as well as a variety of blogs. A good bit of the hack, known as Guccifer 2.0, was provided to wikileaks and there is huge internet musing on what it may be.

I am not interested in being tagged as a conspiracy theorist, nor am I interested in walking into some sort of propaganda trap. I am not exactly clear on what these leaked documents mean, ultimately, or if they mean what I think they mean. I see reports the DNC is being tightlipped about it.

I am unsure if some of the documents which are being treated as a smoking gun regarding the DNC choosing Clinton as the POTUS candidate over a year ago is nefarious or even relevant or meaningful. I am unsure.

I do think the leaked documents have been avoided by the bulk of the mainstream media and I have not seen a peep about it at TOP. My guess it would be banned as CT over there. Or at least outside the parameters established by the site owner.

Some of the tweeting I am seeing about it is just nut-baggy over the top CT stuff, acting as if a few highlighted items are going to bring down this wealthy and extremely powerful woman.

Snopes has even weighed in, for what that may be worth.

Back on March 15, 2016 , Markos issued guidelines and veiled threats about what people can and cannot say about her. A number of things which may be legitimate have been lumped in with "rightwing talking points' and are thus VERBOTEN. And in and of itself I don't care about that either. It is his blog and if he wants to paint it polka-dot he can.

My concern is that there is a general knowledge that all is not right in Denmark and that which is not right can't be discussed. And that we are being expected to toe a line we can't really discuss.

And there's a lot that appears not right so there's maybe a significant amount of "stuff" to be managed and evaded. "Muddied" was a term in one of the leaked documents.

Thus the censorship of various topics and a HUGE impetus for all Trump all the Time..

Trump represents fearmongering: vote for her or all is lost.

Trump also represents chaffe in the radar: all Trump all the Time sucks the air out of discussing anything else and if it does accidentally get leaked out and discussed, there is fearmongering to encourage you to keep it quiet lest you be banned or Trump wins the presidency.

However.... Trump will NOT be winning the election. This idea is utterly preposterous now. Even the GOP can't stand him.

The way to really deal with him is to SHUT UP and let that fool talk. Feed him 30 miles of good rope. He is working harder than anybody to hang his prospects. It's amazing what it going on.

But to listen to the DNC line, we must quake in our boots (or Gucci loafers, depending on your socioeconomics), and/or talk about him TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL ELSE.

Clearly, to me, this is about selling a car with a number of valid issues to a customer who suspects something may be not quite right but who is systematically not allowed to be told what those issues might be.

Somebody has leaked a list of issues with the car and it is being "overlooked" in favor of selling the questionable car to the suspicious but uninformed buyer.

And that is really unethical and say a WHOLE LOT about the car dealer.

We should - I argue - stop with the Trump Freak Out, let him rattle on and try to jumpstart more discussion of whether this leaked info is worthwhile or a whole lot of nothing.

I have created an email alert for Guccifer 2.0 docs as more may be coming out soon and the current crop of docs still might grow legs. I don't know.

Please feel free to 'set me straight" on this, if I am missing some sort of key piece of info.

But I suggest Trump needs to be left alone to explode on his own and to allow 'space' for other things to get aired.