Aren't they a lovely couple? And the great thing is, regardless of which one you vote for, you still get almost all of the others policies.

I hate to use Fox news, but I can't find any other outlets. It is obvious to anyone who looks SHE is special. You may bow.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/06/exclusive-internal-cable-from...

The 2011 cable, bearing the subject line “Securing Personal E-mail Accounts,” told employees to secure personal/home email addresses, given increased targeting of government employees by “online adversaries.” It also emphasized that these personal accounts should never be used for government business and cited department procedures which prohibit the practices.

Sent to diplomatic and consular staff in June 2011, the unclassified cable, bearing Clinton's electronic signature,  made clear to employees they were expected to "avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts." The message also said employees should not "auto-forward Department email to personal email accounts which is prohibited by Department policy.”
The cable underscores that government policy strongly discouraged officials from using personal email and violators faced disciplinary action, even though Clinton for years relied exclusively on hers – and her own server -- to conduct official business. The White House, without condemning Clinton’s activities, has made clear that employees were urged to use government accounts.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/06/clintons-personal-email-use-d...

A year later, then-U.S. ambassador to Kenya Scott Gration resigned amid a series of clashes with the department, including over email. 

"My experience was somewhat different than Secretary Clinton's use of her commercial account, yet I was 'fired' for the use of Gmail in the US Embassy, my insistence on improving our physical security posture, and other twisted and false allegations," Gration told FoxNews.com in an email Friday, while adding: "I've chosen to move on and to be better, not bitter." 

In addition, Gration claims he only used Gmail "for unofficial business and for my personal emails," and his official emails were "fully captured in the State Department data bases." 

By contrast, Clinton simply stayed off the government system and used personal email -- for virtually all business. 

Bernieorbust!

be a fascist while ignoring all the evidence that Hillary is an aspiring Feudal Overlord....

She doesn't want constituents, she wants serfs.

You don't gotta answer to serfs...

this predictive analysis --

http://www.ninaillingworth.com/2016/06/01/the-foggy-bottom-of-clintons-m...

The author calls her writing style 'Gonzo Lite' and it is a dense, longish read, but well worth it. In May 1 article, Nina analyzes the main players in the Server Drama (ie, Obama, Atty Gen Lynch, FBI's Comey, etc) then games out how each faces a series of choices they have to make regarding possible indictment as both government representatives (their legal constraints) and and as political (electoral) players. She also games out the best timing(s) for various moments, ir, what moment(s) are best for Comey/Lynch to move toward indictment.

Nina sees Obama on the horns of a dilemma: He *must* allow indictment, and he *can't* allow indictment. To traverse this, he must give HRC full-throated support, then allow enough new information to enter the news stream to make if self-evident that Obama has no choice but to let an indictment begin. At some point HRC will leave the race (or, more likely, will be forced out), whereupon Obama will take the exceptional step of granting a pre-emptive pardon (unless another device presents itself), so that Obama can still be seen as 'protecting/supporting' HRC. The the Dem Party will parachute in HRc's replacement (Nina thinks Biden/Warren will be likely). (I have omitted Nina's mentions of Bernie, and much else. One point I must include is that at some point, per Nina's scenario, Obama will have to have a long talk with Bernie to explain these plans and discuss how O/Dems would like Bernie to behave during all this.)

One week after Nina published this (May 8), Obama had a big day (1) endorsing HRC, (2) meeting with Bernie and (3) meeting with Atty Gen Lynch. On May 9, WSJ released the first damning new info about what was on HRC's server; the WSJ story was covered on Reuters the same day, bringing it out from behind the WSJ paywall. (I read Nina's article on May 9, and clicked on my next open link to read the Reuters' coverage. Whoa, I thought. Obama fullfilled Nina's 'new leaks' prediction really fast!)

I've lost count of how many new leaks there have been, but I think it's been 3-4 that I've seen, in the four days between May 9 and today, May 12.

Here's what is different about the recent spate of new links: Up til May 9, the leaks (including the State OIG's report, which demonstrated Hillary's duplicity) were, for the most part, about how her server violated FOIA and Federal records-retention laws and regulations. Beginning May 9, the leaks (which are being placed in a wide array of media so a wide array of demographics will find the leaks reported on the media they trust) have dealt with violations of the laws/regs that deal with maintaining sensitive government documents securely -- ie, with Espionage Act offenses. (Which many of us learned about during the 2010-11 Wikileaks era, and even more of us learned about during the 2013 Summer of Snowden.)

One of the very coolest aspect of the Espionage Act, in this context, is not necessary to prove 'intent'; it is enough to show 'negligence' -- which the State OIG's report has already done.

Stock up on popcorn!

but I hadn't heard about the back-turning incident of the govt's response.

I do remember reading a speech that HR had just made overseas, about the USA's 'exceptionalism' in the areas of Free Speech and Internet Freedom -- and I remember cursing her under my breath as a lying bitch, because I had been reading heavily about America's attacks on Wikileaks, Asssange, and the (still-unknown?) Manning. Hillary had placed herself at the head of the pack of hounds baying for Assange's blood (as she did later with Snowden).

Although the earlier reports about HRC's server focused on FOIA-related issues, I had learned enough from those earlier years to recognize the the mere existence of her unprotected server, open to anybody who cared to look, was in and of itself a violation (actually, a number of violations) of the Espionage Act. I must admit that when I recognized that, I discovered in my self a kind of quiet, sharp-toothed glee that must be 'schadenfruede'. And I must admit that that sharp-toothed part of myself really does want to see her in an orange jumpsuit for a long, long time.

Hillary's ultra-calm demeanor throughout this despicable incident put me in mind of the behavior of President Park of South Korea. While delivering a speech, an assassin struck, accidentally shooting and killing Park's wife. Park calmly continued to finish his speech, without stopping to inquire after his wife.