This is my fourth essay on Hillary Clinton's neuropathology. Once again, I have not received any factually-based rebuttal. And once again, I fervently request that independent evaluators (by which I mean, no connection to Clintons, CGI, or DNC) review this work. As far as speculation is concerned, I freely admit to that charge. The only thing which will validly contravene my speculation are facts.

So, I am not, nor never have been, a fan of Maureen Dowd. I think she's pretty close the to the definition of what's wrong with the main stream media.

She's also notorious for what we formerly called HDS (Hillary Derangement Syndrome) but which we now know as HRS (Hillary Reality Syndrome).

But when she is right, she is right, and she does an excellent job of laying out points that most of us here agree on in her new NYT editorial.

Despite the mounting evidence that election fraud is real and pervasive, many still dismiss it as a "conspiracy theory." I've explained why this label doesn't make sense, but not everyone will buy that explanation. So instead, let's focus on some real-world examples of election rigging being caught.

Rolling Stone magazine has published an editorial endorsing Hillary Clinton written by the prominent historian Sean Wilentz of Princeton University. Wilentz, reportedly a long time friend of the Clintons, praises Hillary in the strongest terms, saying she would "carry on the Democratic Party's progressive traditions and transform America." Wilentz goes on to give a highly selective account of what President Hillary Clinton would offer America.

My Gut Reaction: I suspect that Wilentz has a slightly different definition of progressive than I do.

More below the fold....

Hello dear friends,

From The Guardian 7/13/16 - so this count is PRE-Convention:

I know that several people were interested and I didn't want to the link I posted in the first topic to get lost in the shuffle.

From The Hill:

Report: Members of Congress to receive notes from Clinton's FBI interview

Two sources told CNN that members of Congress will have access to notes taken during the FBI's interview with the Democratic presidential nominee over her use of a private email server while secretary of State.