Book review: Naomi Klein, No is Not Enough
Submitted by Cassiodorus on Sat, 12/30/2017 - 12:21pmBook review: Naomi Klein, No is Not Enough: Resisting Trump's Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need. Chicago: Haymarket, 2017.
Book review: Naomi Klein, No is Not Enough: Resisting Trump's Shock Politics and Winning the World We Need. Chicago: Haymarket, 2017.
There's an meme going around that Identity Politics was the reason why Roy Moore lost in Alabama.
Many, if not most, people at c99p are fed up with the Identity Politics (IP) hijacking of the Democratic Party. Here is an article that succinctly lays out what is wrong with IP and what the worldview of the downwardly-mobile white working class (WWC) is:
Dr. Roberts is an economist who had a cabinet level position under Reagan. His writing often has a rightwing slant, but he is an honest rightwinger (a paleocon?). He also has a distinct anti-Israel bias. Yet here he is begging the Left to rescue itself.
The editorial choices of Counterpunch have made me very skeptical that it is a useful leftwing site anymore, as opposed to an ideologically pure, identity politics driven disinformation site in the business of discrediting the left.
Today, someone I never heard of, Rob Seimetz (who apparently has a radio podcast), offers this outright denunciation of Bernie as a racist:
I was reading this article and shaking my head in disgust, when I had an epiphany.
(attribution, imgur, from The Powerful Hampster, 4Chan Reddit) https://www.reddit.com/r/4chan/comments/5tkifk/centrists_are_a_danger_to...)
There is a division within the Democratic party, this is well known, but it extends far beyond any party or lack thereof. Among those that proclaim to be “left” within the party, one can see on a smaller scale the true division and choices facing us as citizens regardless of party affiliation and so I will use the party division to explore the two main paths that are currently struggling to shape the party to better explore the larger picture.
The Clintonite vision is of course neoliberal and tactically they attempt to gain power via “identity politics”, claiming that if one champions economic progressive values then one is somehow inherently against progressive social values, this is to be expected from that camp when one understands their ideals as laid forth since the rise of the DLC, the third way, and all other associated false flag infiltrators of a once proud party of the people (no longer even recognizable to those of us that remember an earlier time).
Well, of course it would happen that a few days after posting I have yet to see a decent summary of Thomas Frank's new book Listen Liberal, I see one.
The debate over identity politics continues to rage over the interwebs, but I've noticed one important question about the issue is rarely asked:
Is it winning? Is racism and sexism, as defined by pro-identity politics groups, being defeated?
The answer is unquestionably: No!