Many report overcharges after donating to Clinton Campaign
Submitted by bondibox on Thu, 09/15/2016 - 9:18pmThe New York Observer has broken a story about donors to the Clinton campaign being systematically overcharged.
The New York Observer has broken a story about donors to the Clinton campaign being systematically overcharged.
Issuing my thanks to sandernista1812 who has expertly whacked the hornet's nest at TOP with a handsome old lovingly carved Hickory Stick. This beautiful piece of artwork displays all the bits and pieces of that most hated of thing at TOP, the Truth as supported by Facts.
Should you care to also feel the spread of the warm glow by venturing over to the other side of The Wall, here is your destination:
This is great news. First this is good because it shows that at least some pols will be held accountable for their bad behavior. Second, because she's an obstacle to progress in general.
I hate having to say this but if we are to protect our democracy it means holding both parties accountable.
I think the public would like to have the President answer a few questions;
1. When did you first find out Hillary was using her personal email for State Department Business?
2. What actions did you take to address this and when?
3. At what points did you get updates on this case, by whom, what dates and what did they tell you?
Their is a lot of talk about whats wrong with US elections, and sadly to much of it is center one of two parts of the system rather then the entire process, It is rather disturbing how little security our elections have, and its not just the voting machines, or the tabulation machines, or the county ran database that swaps every ones party affiliation so that prechosen candidates can win. Its not enough to complain about an issue however so I want to outline what we can do about it.
I don't see anything when I Google, so I wondered if anyone here knew if this was still going forward.
Any information would be greatly appreciated.
First, the players:
A. Illinois Supreme Court. The top court in Illinois, elected by the public, retained if they achieve a certain level of supporting votes. Pretty much respected for being fair, smart, and beyond ethical reproach (See Iowa, Kansas, NC, Texas, and the New Jersey Supremes for a comparison)
sites, one topic that is rarely discussed is hispanic and young white voter suppression, particularly outside the South. In two recent cases one can see how both IL and CA have suppressed both. In IL the Clinton surrogate state election official ensured that university towns did not receive enough ballots, disenfranchising tens of thousands of actual liberal voters.
Good morning you 99%'ers. I've been missing in action here lately as I got sucked into the big suck hole of this election at dkos and on FB. I have gone all partisan or have I? I just can't let go. Why should I have to I'm a human, a citizen, a person who cares about the world I'm living in. Still getting bogged down in total crap is demoralizing. I really can't wrap my feeble mind around why I'm having to do this over and over again.
When Iceland's President, Olafur Ragnar Grimmson was asked about his country's recovery from the 2008-2009 financial crisis, he famously said: