It doesn't take a genius to predict this outcome.
Almost no bankers got thrown in jail for systemic fraud, and few bankers lost their jobs for making stupid loans.
So with no consequences, why not do it all again but repackaged, amirite?

If you are like me, you probably thought the DNC fraud lawsuit was over last August when a Florida judge dismissed the class-action suit.

Short answer: All Of Them.

Long answer: Some are more responsible than others.

I was asking myself: "self, what is a day without sunshine like?" Answer: a day without an Awan story. There's gonna be plenty of sunshine now.

Okay, then I asked myself: "self, what is a day without news?" Answer: a day without a story of political corruption.

So, now this is going to be beautiful day. You want Awans? We got 'em. You want corrupt congress critters? You are in luck, we got a whole lot of them.

Unless you've been living under a rock, you have heard of bitcoin.

Lots of legal issues to unpack in the dismissal order, but the crux of the judge Zloch's argument rests on a specious and wholly unsupported legal theory of consumer protection that places an unconscionable burden on political donors to prove they actually heard a politician say he or she was honest, before the donor can sue the politician for being dishonest.

Well, hello, mighty C99!! If anyone is interested, there's a note on "where the hell has Luna been?" below--but trust me, this is way more important than moi. For now, I absolutely had to (reset my password, it's been that long) come out here and share some DNC-lawsuit-related thoughts amongst the fine denizens of the only blog I really trust at this point....

"You must think how we tell you to think, act like we tell you to act, and stay where you are at all times".

This is almost like poetry it's such good propaganda. It's like Emerson meets Bernays for the final act of the 2017 American Health Care theatrical presentation.

A friend of mine, with a doctorate and very intelligent, was utterly surprised to learn about the DNC fraud lawsuit. She is quite knowledgeable about economics, science and 20th century world history. She also watches the TV news, winnowing her choice of viewing gradually from the usual suspects down to only Fox News. Is she reactionary? No. Is she Republican? Is she pro-Trump? No. Does she like Medusa? No.