Lots of commentary has been devoted to HRC's flurry of flip-flops, one that could easily fill one of Imelda Markos's shoe closets. However, there are other questionable aspects of HRC's behavior unrelated to flip-flops. One aspect is her plan for HRC's policies on Wall Street Reform. On TOP there is an excellent pro-Hillary diary by Ollie Garchie. Unlike many anti-Hillary stories and pro-Hillary diaries "over there", the "tone" of OG's diary is laudable, factual and almost compelling. That diary focuses on one of HRC's economic advisors, who, although being a former Goldman Sachs executive has been pivotal in bring some semblance of justice to reign in the Wall Street fraudsters. I recommend that interested readers research that diary (unless you are too angry to venture back to TOP). So after reading this preamble you might be wondering WTF? I am a Berniecrat and proud of it, so you can take my biases for what they are.

One (of many) major problems saddling Hillary is the untrustworthiness of much of her rhetoric, e.g., flip-flopping like a barracuda freshly delivered to the deck of a fisherman's boat. So caveat emptor: if you are going to be swayed by WhichHillary's recent forays into anti-Wall Street rhetoric, the crucial question is not how good her advisors are, nor how grand her proposed anti-Wall Street remedies are on paper, but will she actually enforce these grand economic reforms should she be elected president?

Wikileaks and the Panama papers:

You remember who strongly supported NAFTA? You remember who not only touted the "wonderful" promise of the TPP, helping to design it. In typical WhichHillary fashion, before she overtly was running for President, Hillary called the TPP "the gold standard" of trade deals. Lo and behold, this conservaDem-erstwhile progressive, retroactively moderate, once again progressive stalwart, champion of the establishment, now says that she doesn't like the TPP--well, no; it's actually that she doesn't like some aspects of the TPP.

The above paragraphs are now leading us to the main point of this essay (finally! you say, exasperatedly). So Hillary, up to now the champion of all trade deals, except for her recent partial back-tracking on TPP, is now being shadowed by another emerging crisis (No not the emails again!). Her chief political advisor John Podesta is both indirectly and directly involved in serving two masters. Read the link. John Podesta One master is of course HRC and the other (shock) is Vladimir Putin.

Talk about a conflict of interest here! At the very highest level of the Clinton Mafia, is chief advisor John and his brother Tony Podesta, with shall we say conflicting loyalties. "You cannot serve two masters", even if a person describes one of the masters as Master-in-Chief.

Now the effects of this glaringly obvious conflict of interest at the heart of WhichHillary's campaign is so far nebulous--because a terabyte+ of data is a heck of a lot of reading to do, unravelling this rabbit trail will be far more time-consuming that, for instance the email controversy (dang! How did I let that slip in?)