OK, I'm Done

birdiesanders_view2.JPG
(Reposted from Daily Kos at the request of Cassidorius)

I’ve been stuck in hotel rooms all week and spent too much of it reading Kos. And I’m tired of it. At this point, I’m surprised that there are any undecided people left on the left, but they are still out there, so I’m going to write up a brief summary of why I prefer Bernie and then try to move on.

Hillary’s Negatives

First of all, Hilary is not Satan. If you think that, get over it. I find her disappointing, frustrating and occasionally inspiring, but if you think she is evil, you really need to get out more. Travel somewhere that is really screwed up. I went to Turkey in 2012 and I’m glad I did because that place is not somewhere I want to go to any more.

Not being evil does not mean that I agree with her — on many things. Here are the negatives that really get under my skin:

  • She’s a hawk. I was a Conscientious Objector back in the 1980s. I’ve mellowed a bit since, but the way she goes on about being a “strong Commander in Chief” creeps me out.
  • She takes too long to get the right answer. Winston Churchill famously snarked that “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else.” I don’t know about Americans in general, but from observing her over the last 25 years, I think it fits. (It also means that she is a better choice than anyone in the GOP because she will actually get there at some point.)
  • It’s the money. The problem with the Clinton money swamp is not that anyone is buying votes — it’s more that you tend to absorb the world view of the people you hang out with. This has been documented for Senate donors, but it’s kind of subtle and tends to get lost in the heated rhetoric around here. It may not be evil to take money the way she does, but it is very unwise.

So I will vote for her in the fall, but I would prefer not to.

Bernie’s Positives

Just like Clinton is not Satan, Bernie is no saint. He is as human as you and I and there are a few things he has done that I would have wanted different. But it is hard to live 70+ years without having the occasional regret and the list seems surprisingly short for the time span involved. Here’s what I like:

  • He thinks like me. Maybe because I grew up in New York and New England, but the way he sees problems matches how I see them. His analyses seem pretty deep to me, but until recently he has not been connecting the dots on the stump. This never bothered me (I had already connected them) but I can see how others might have missed it.
  • He has good instincts. Most of the issues I care about are things he has been on the right side of as long as I have been alive. It’s good when people can change, but better if they don’t have to.
  • He only listens to constituents. I’ve lost track of the number of times in the past year when he has been able to hold a rally while Clinton is off hosting private fundraisers. This is arguably a political style, but it is the one I prefer.

As for electability, fear of the Orange One and so on, these are unrealistic. Both candidates do well in head-to-head match-ups, and I expect both will generate excitement. The election is our to lose, but I am very comfortable voting for the Bern. And so should you if you lean that way.

What Next?

Now that the Washington caucus is over, I’m starting to pivot to I-732. This is a revenue neutral carbon tax that will be on the November ballot. They need cash, canvassers and messaging, so please help them out if you can. You can find out all the gory details at the web site, but briefly what it does is:

  • Adds an inflation-indexed tax of $25 a ton on CO2 emissions;
  • Drops our highly regressive sales tax by 1%;
  • Drops some of the Business and Occupation excise tax on carbon-intensive manufacturing (so local businesses are not disadvantaged);
  • Fully funds the Earned Income Tax Credit for the state (this was approved but never funded).

Is it perfect? No. Is it enough to solve the problem? No. But it is a step in the right direction, it can happen in the next year and for those of you who follow the excellent climate diaries of Meteor Blades, we no longer have time for perfect.

OK, have at it. Just don’t try to talk me over (I’ve heard it all before) and don’t speak the Small Handed One’s name (make up your own deeply insulting and idiosyncratic name to frustrate Google!)

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

I read this this morning at TOP and thought it was great. Clear, succinct, unapologetic. Then I made the mistake at looking at the comments. Ugh.

Question: are you a Contentious or Conscientious Objector? I wasn't sure if it was a clever pun or the official category.

up
0 users have voted.
Hawkfish's picture

Nah, I'm just a Brit who can't spell in either dialect Wink Fixed now.

up
0 users have voted.

We can’t save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.
- Greta Thunberg

PastorAgnostic's picture

A. To catch a hawkFish in a cement pond, what bait do you use?

B. When four cars approach a 4 way stop, does the car to the right always go first?

C. When making a right turn, which hand signal is used across the globe?
i. Left hand extended fully to the left
ii. Left hand pointing down out of the window
iii. Left hand with raised center finger pointing straight up
iv. Right hand pointing 45 degrees from dead center

D. If a coin has a head and a tail, why isn't the edge called a wing? Or a body?

(On edit. Dim Spill Chicken)

up
0 users have voted.
thanatokephaloides's picture

B. When four cars approach a 4 way stop, does the car to the right always go first?

A better way to ask this -- and harder to solve, too -- is:

When four cars approach a 4 way stop at exactly the same time, which car goes first?

Wink

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides

PastorAgnostic's picture

Funny. AI driven cars have a nervous breakdown at 4 way stops.

They also don't get the idea of rolling stops, and get rearended more often than human driven ones.

up
0 users have voted.

When four cars approach a 4 way stop at exactly the same time, which car goes first?

I Do!

up
0 users have voted.

We all arrived the same time
I yielded to the man to the right of me
And he yielded it right back to mine
Well, the yield went around and around and around
Till Pamela finally tried
Just then the man in the light blue sedan
Hit Pamela's passenger side."

-- John Prine
The Accident (Things Could Be Worse)

up
0 users have voted.

"The real power is in the hands of small groups of people and I don't think they have titles. -- Bob Dylan"

GreyWolf's picture

n/t

up
0 users have voted.
GreyWolf's picture

wow, my first double comment! fun, fun

up
0 users have voted.
skod's picture

Ideally, a 1978 Chevy Caprice Classic ex-cop-car with sections of railroad rail welded on for bumpers... That would have the right of way like the Staten Island Ferry has in New York Harbor!

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

"Religion is what keeps the poor from murdering the rich."--Napoleon

What could be worse?

It turns my guts that her support is concentrated amongst those of an age to know just how evil HFK was.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

HF stated as fact that HRC is not evil, but when she looks up to HFK who genuinely is evil (a many-time war criminal and a traitor) the assertion seems a bit shaky, at best. Her smug statement on Qaddafi's death should give anyone pause: although there is extraordinary evil in the world, the more banal forms end up doing the most harm.

up
0 users have voted.

up
0 users have voted.

"The real power is in the hands of small groups of people and I don't think they have titles. -- Bob Dylan"

I will just agree to disagree!

up
0 users have voted.
Bollox Ref's picture

As a holder of a passport from Her Britannic Majesty..

Well done.

up
0 users have voted.

Gëzuar!!
from a reasonably stable genius.

up
0 users have voted.

With their hearts they turned to each others heart for refuge
In troubled years that came before the deluge
*Jackson Browne, 1974, Before the Deluge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SX-HFcSIoU

MarilynW's picture

I thought there was a way to delete comments.

up
0 users have voted.

To thine own self be true.

You're famous now!. Just relax, put some shades on, life is good. Smile

up
0 users have voted.

With their hearts they turned to each others heart for refuge
In troubled years that came before the deluge
*Jackson Browne, 1974, Before the Deluge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SX-HFcSIoU

Miep's picture

up
0 users have voted.

Stay on track. Stay in lane. Don't throw rocks.

snoopydawg's picture

I do not understand why we tax payers are giving them over $3 billion a year when they have great health care and other social programs and our congress tells us that we can't afford it here.
Or why the congress has not come down more forcefully against them destroying and stealing the Palestinian's lands.
Lets Israel get away with killing US citizens like Rachel Corey and the person who was on the ship trying to bring in supplies to the Palestinians.
The continued cover up of their war crimes and the cover up on what they did to the men on the Liberty.
Her speech to AIPAC was very disturbing to me. The Palestinians have no right to self defense against Israel's aggression or the heinous conditions that they force the Palestinians to live under.
I would think that a country and people who had experienced what happened in the camps in Germany would have more compassion and try to find a way to obtain peace. How many years has the IS been trying to get that?
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/28/hillarys-latest-bow-to-aipac/
This article sums up how I feel about her speech.

But Mrs. Clinton’s speech was newsworthy for its moral obtuseness and the way in which it promised unilateral White House belligerence should she become president. A reader would never know that her condemnation of Palestinian terrorism omitted any reference to the fact that Israel is the occupier of what is left of Palestinian lands, colonizing them, seizing their water and land, brutalizing the natives and continuing the selective blockade of Gaza, the world’s largest Gulag ever since Israel closed its last colony there in 2005.

Clinton emphasized her condemnation of Palestinian children being taught “incitement” against their Israeli oppressors and the recent deplorable knife attacks against Israeli soldiers and civilians. She neglected to point to massive, daily Israeli incitement backed up by U.S.-supplied deadly weapons that over the last decade have caused 400 times more Palestinian fatalities and serious injuries to innocents than the defenseless Palestinians have caused their Israeli counterparts. One of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s coalition partners, for example, from the Jewish Home Party, called for the slaughter of all Palestinians, the elderly and women in general. “Otherwise,” the partner said (in an English-language translation from the Hebrew), “more little snakes will be raised there.”

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.