Congress gave Boeing its power. After crashes, probers are looking into FAA’s role in crisis

Congress doesn’t give a damn. If they did they would take care to see that public safety is what counts, not the pocketbooks of Boeing and themselves.

After crashes, probers are looking into FAA’s role in crisis

Four weeks before a Lion Air jet plunged into the Java Sea in October, Congress passed provisions that gave the plane's maker, Boeing, even more power to oversee itself.
It was another win in Boeing's long-running campaign to get the federal government to delegate more of the Federal Aviation Administration's safety responsibilities to the company, but it also was a reflection of the difficulties of having a government workforce oversee the design and production of some of the world's most sophisticated machines.

*

Boeing reported spending $15 million lobbying Congress, the FAA and other federal agencies last year, and it has hired outside lobbyists to push the oversight delegation issue, according to disclosures filed with the Senate.

The provisions were part of a broader FAA funding and disaster relief bill, which passed by wide margins and was signed by President Donald Trump in October. The law gives private firms more power over the rule books describing what role the FAA has in approving designs.

*

After being directed by Congress, the FAA set up the certification system, known as the Organization Designation Authorization program, in 2005. It delegates power to a company unit inside Boeing that is supposed to do much of the detailed, technical legwork involved with finding whether a company is complying with safety standards.

Proponents of the system said the FAA was understaffed and too slow to issue approvals of new planes, hampering economic growth. Boeing pays the workers, which the company said numbered 1,000 employees in 2015.

The then-chief executive officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Ray Conner, defended the system before Congress that year, putting particular emphasis on the argument that the FAA should further cede control to Boeing in areas that are not as important for safety, such as for airplane "seats, lavatories, galleys," bemoaning the "inordinate amount of time spent sometimes on seat certifications, on interior certifications."

*

"Government regulation too often, in the name of protecting the public, makes us less competitive -- and actually does very little to protect the public," said Rep. Tom Rice, R-S.C., who thanked Conner "for American excellence in aviation, and for employing so many thousands of the people in South Carolina."

Rice added that Boeing has a "vested interest" in safety, because "if we sacrifice safety in American aviation, then we won't be competitive in that area very long."

https://www.nwaonline.com/news/2019/mar/25/congress-gave-boeing-its-powe...

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

snoopydawg's picture

What could possibly go wrong? Lobbying away people's safety is just a normal day on the Hill anymore. But then the agencies that are supposed to oversee safety regulations are just as corrupt as they are. Take mine safety regulations. After a horrific mine collapse we will learn that the mine over two hundred safety violations on record. And that anyone who blew the whistle on safety violations got fired.

Are people aware that the corporations get to decide who sits on congressional committees? Boeing most probably selected whoever is in charge of overseeing them. Then there are the people who work for the agencies being bought out which used to be a big no no.

Drug companies get to write their own reports on how effective and safe drugs are. And if down the line those drugs kill people it takes a huge number of deaths before they are recalled. Anyone remember Vioxx the arthritis drug that caused heart attacks? Took years and lots of doctors calling the FDA before they pulled it off the market. For a short time. Then it went back on with a black box warning saying this could kill you.

Anyone need to have a medical device installed? Did you do research on it to see how safe it was? Didn't find anything? This is because the FDA allows device makers to bunch their cases of defective devices. A pacemaker has a certain problem? You will only hear about one case of it even though over a hundred people also had problems with it. BTW...that device is still on the market.

My doctor wants me to have a device implanted that goes close to my spine. Yeah good luck talking me into doing that. Not only no, but hell No!

Rice added that Boeing has a "vested interest" in safety, because "if we sacrifice safety in American aviation, then we won't be competitive in that area very long."

LMAO! 700 people are dead because two planes crashed because Boeing put safety first. How many days were Boeing planes flying after the rest of the world grounded them? Safety first my ass. One plane was being flown somewhere to be looked at. The pilots had to return to the airport because the plane wouldn't fly right. "Vested interest" isn't in safety.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Voting is like driving with a toy steering wheel.

thanatokephaloides's picture

Rice added that Boeing has a "vested interest" in safety, because "if we sacrifice safety in American aviation, then we won't be competitive in that area very long."

"Competitive" ?? ROTFLMAO!! Name another American company which makes commercial civilian airliners today!

Boeing is a monopoly; it is American commercial aviation!

Grrrrrr.....

Diablo

up
0 users have voted.

"US govt/military = bad. Russian govt/military = bad. Any politician wanting power = bad. Anyone wielding power = bad." --Shahryar

"All power corrupts absolutely!" -- thanatokephaloides