Hey, everybody!

This will be a TL;DR kind of post, I suspect, but I think this is important.

Spoonamore-Duty_to_Warn_letter_to_Harris

This is a letter from Stephen Spoonamore to Kamala Harris, describing what he believes was a hack of the election, explaining how it could be accomplished, and also how a hand recount could put all doubt to rest. A couple of other similar letters have been sent to her by other clued and careful observers, but I can't seem to find the link, right now. Anyway- I've been aware of this guy since 2005, following the sudden, last minute loss of Kerry in Ohio, with exit polls well outside the margin of error, a "tell" that usually causes our State Department to tell other countries: "You've had a fraudulent election".

Spoonamore is a comp-sec pro, with long experience trying to protect systems like banks and governments against things like hacking and credit card fraud. He has also been concerned about election integrity the whole time. This is not just some random IT nerd. He has seen how exploits are done, how they are mitigated, and what to watch for. I recommend following the link, and reading the whole thing. In short, he sees statistically-unlikely evidence that the Swing States were hacked. -All of 'em.

This business of voting on computers is tons more secure than it was in the early two-thousands, partly due to various State governments finally listening to people like Spoonamore, and enacting systems like they have recommended. I am currently not worried about the voting machines themselves, at least not in my home state. That part of the system is indeed secure. Four people from the suburbs tried to vote twice this year, and our State AG has them up on felony charges. That's four people, not four million migrants. FOUR.

However, the hack Spoonamore suggests is an end-run around the machines themselves, and sounds at least rational to me. -And the beauty of it, is that the systems could find out if he's right with a hand audit. The systems have improved enough that this can be definitively proven, one way or another. The biggest problem would be getting the Dem's attention about this, and convincing them to push for audits.

-And that's the part that has me hesitant; nobody wants to consider this ugly possibility, especially after listening to the redhats whineing that their boy won for the last four years. But they had 61 court cases FAIL for lack of evidence, and Spoonamore didn't see anything wrong with 2020 OR 2016.

But anyway, silly me; I just want to see whether Don-Don did indeed actually win. I have this insane need to find out actual facts and shit. Plus, it would be so cool to have nice, boring Cabinet picks that aren't sexual predators... -or Science deniers... -or religious fanatics... -or...

If you agree that it's worth pursuing, PLEASE repost elsewhere, and hope that somehow, it gets through, and gets the donkeys off their ass, so to speak. Thank you for your time.