The destruction of France's mainstream parties
Yesterday's presidential elections had a very disappointing outcome.
The run-off election will pit the incumbent, Emmanuel Macron, finished first, with 27.8 percent; against the far-right Rassemblement National, Marine Le Pen, with 23.1 percent.
Macron is an odious and arrogant neoliberal, while Le Pen is a xenophobic near-fascist.
The tragedy is just how close far-left candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon came to upsetting this dynamic.
most surprisingly, Mélenchon, whose 2.5-point gain put him closer to Le Pen than any of the polls had predicted. If he had been able to reach an agreement with the Communist Party, which supported him in 2017, he might have made the runoff, which would have transformed the race entirely.
While Mélenchon took 21.95%, no other candidate came even close to double-digits.
This is the third time he's run for president. In 2012 he took fourth place and achieved 11.10% of the vote. In 2017 he ended up winning 19% of the vote in the first round, placing fourth again.
The problem is that he's 70 years old, so this may have been his last chance. After the election he vocally refused to support Le Pen, but he didn't endorse Macron either.
An Ipsos poll carried out Sunday night showed that despite Mélenchon’s admonition, only 34 percent of his supporters plan to cast a ballot for Macron on April 24, while 30 percent will vote for Le Pen, and the rest either plan to abstain or haven’t yet made up their minds. The same poll suggests that Le Pen will get 85 percent of Zemmour’s vote, so Macron, despite his four-point lead, will need a better-than-even split on Mélenchon’s vote to avoid an upset.
Other than this depressing near-miss by the left, the other big story is the epic destruction of the center, and center-left parties.
Socialist Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, finished with a humiliating 1.75 percent, and Valérie Pécresse, the candidate of Les Républicains, descendants of the once-proud Gaullists, finished with a miserable 4.8. As a result, neither party will qualify for government reimbursement of its campaign debts, for which the bar is a minimum of 5 percent.
The Socialist Party once boasted presidents François Mitterrand and François Hollande, but Hollande sold out to the neoliberals and now the party is as good as dead.
most of the other nominally left-wing candidates instantly announced their support for Macron in the second round: Paris’s mayor Anne Hidalgo, of the neoliberalized Parti Socialiste (PS), took mere seconds to do so, apparently hungry for the TV coverage her result would not otherwise have warranted. She took 1.7 percent, in the fullest expression yet of the destruction of historic workers’ parties by free-marketeer leaders, pushing “reforms” that made people’s jobs more precarious and their retirements shorter.
Les Républicains is the party of President Jacques Chirac, now also on the verge of irrelevance.
Finishing fourth, and the only other party to break the 5% level is Reconquête, running on a platform very similar to Le Pen. However, the party has almost no representatives in parliament.
Finishing sixth is the Green-European Alliance. Résistons! appear to be some sort of populist party. Finally in 8th is the communist party, which never came close to competing, but had just enough votes that they theoretically could have swung the vote for Mélenchon.
Comments
I think that Mélenchon was the victim of the Bernie treatment.
Most of the polls leading up to the election (that I saw) only included head to head matchups with Macron and Le Pen. I think that this was intentional despite the fact that Mélenchon was gaining traction. As a result the preferred result took place.
Preferred b/c
a Le Pen doesn't win the second round election. (17.8% in 2002 and 33.9% in 2017)
Can't see where Le Pen picks up enough votes from the first round losers to be a real threat to Macron. (Although in 2016 I couldn't see how Trump could get more than 260 ECV.)
I have no idea how it will end up but.
I think it is not so much that Le Pen has become more popular but rather Macron has got plenty of negatives. There were the protests of the gilets jaunes and the looming inflation which are not a winning combination.
As Le Pen only added 1.85 percentage points
to her 2017 first round number, her popularity isn't increasing. Macron added twice that amount to his 2017 number, but it's still nothing to brag about. Voter participation was down by about a million, but it dropped by two million between the first and second rounds in 2017. Plus the blank null vote in the 2017 2nd round increased by three million. IOW - a five million vote decline.
LaSalle, who in some way endorsed the yellow vest protestors, gained almost two percentage points from his 2017 showing.
PS/GRN voters (about the same number as in 2017) will likely split in favor of Macron again (71%) but 10% voted null and only 2% for LePen. He won't have an advantage with the remaining republicans nor with Zemmour voters. So, looks as if the decision in in the hands of the Melenchon voters. Only 7% switched to LePen in 2017.
To be more correct
PS (socialist) collapsed in 2017. That year the EELV-The Greens withdrew in favor of Hamon who finished with 6.4%. 2022 PS plus EELV = 6.38.
Gains:
Macron 3.84%
Le Pen 1.85%
Melenchon 2.35%
PCF 2.28 (2017 withdrew in favor of Melenchon)
La Salle 2.1%
Losses:
republican 8.2 (Zemmour plus Pecresse)
Dupont-A 2.6
Is the desruction
of mainstream parties these days bad or good? This coo-coo world it's hard to tell the bad from the good. Up is down and fascist's seem to abound globally. Keep hoping the leftists if there are any will win somewhere. Globalism sucks. Propaganda abounds everywhere so who the heck knows who's what. Thanks cacus99 percent. The sanest place I go to.
5
Which party was Sarkozy, and how did it do?
He was 'M. France' for a long time there (and at least provided us with the amusement/aggravation of showcasing France's reaction to an adultery scandal in contrast to America's); now you never hear about him.
In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.
Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!
Union for a Popular Movement – UMP
Sarkozy was elected to a single term as president (2007-20012). So, not a towering figure in French politics.
Political parties in France are only semi-permanent. Factions emerge and often splinter and create new parties. Although on a left-right continuum the new one(s) is/are near the old one. Later they may kiss and make-up as happened in 2002 when UMP was created under Chirac from several conservative (Gaullist) parties. Political personalities appear to be prime movers in the splintering and creation of new parties which seems to be a reason why the lifespan of many isn't that long.
Melenchon split from PS – Socialist party - in 2008. In 2017 and 2022, his vote share was substantially higher than that for the PS nominees. (In 2022 the communist party nominee did better than the PS nominee.) In 2012 he got 11% and Hollande (PS) still finished first in the first and second rounds. Will the party survive without Melenchon (who is now 70 years old)?
Macron (& Co.) created a brand new party in 2016 “En Marche! – Forward. A word with a positive connotation but substance free and on which anything can be projected. Very attractive to younger voters in 2017 who had no clue that they were voting for a neo-liberal. Or that En Marche was positioning itself to pick up where MoDem/Francois Bayrou had left off. (In my mind somewhat like the UK's LibDems.)
In 2015 the conservative party reconstituted itself as The Republicans (LR). The 2017 nominee, Fillon, got 20% in the first round. The 2022 nominee received 4.8%. In 2022 LR was challenged from the right by a new far right party (but different from the far position of Le Pen). That candidate took 7%.
Hope this helps.
Well, it *was* disappointing
- but predictable - that Macron would finish first in the first round. But as Marine has a decent chance in the second, there is reason to be optimistic.
Not sure if I can dig it up just now, but saw a head to head poll - Macron v. Le Pen last week broken down by age groups and Le Pen was substantially ahead of Macron in all age groups under 60 or 65.
So, a lot may hang on turnout by younger people, perhaps?
Also, in terms of how many Melenchon voters will break to Le Pen - what about vax/Covid policy?
Melenchon (as with Le Pen and most of the Right) has been opposed to vaccine passports and mandates, obviously a stark difference from Macron Is that going to be a positive for Marine's chances of picking up support from Melenchon supporters?
Check this snarky coverage from July 2021 from the World Socialist web site:
I'm confused
In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.
Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!
There's none.
Politically in the west, there's no measured, rational, and scientific Covid-19 position. (That puts me at odds with the two factions here at C-99 and why I haven't participated in discussions on this since the early days in 2020.) It's all reactionary through a favored distorted lens. The Covid-19 political alignments will die out whenever this or a subsequent novel coronavirus ceases to pose a significant threat.
At that point, the French electorate returns to its baseline; one-third right, one-third centrist right, and one-third left. Better than the US where there is no left and structurally cannot emerge absent crushing events (ie major depression, civil war); therefore, once the New Dealers were ousted, the choice has been limited to right v. centrist right. So far in France, their presidents have been either centrist right or soft left.
Well...
(Yes, I would much prefer to see Le Pen win - these elite globalist autocrats, which Macron exemplifies - have gone from annoying to downright dangerous and need to be stopped.)
As to Le Pen's prospects, I'm no authority, but it does appear that factors such as who and how many abstain from voting, relative turnout by younger and older voters (Le Pen appears to have a definite advantage with the former, Macron with the latter) and also how Covid policy and Ukraine figure in voters' decisions are going to be important. Melenchon's opposition to vaccine mandates and passports is clearly in line with Le Pen's and in stark contrast to Macron's.
Also, Le Pen is correctly perceived as much less rabidly confrontational toward Russia than Macron. That may appeal to those more inclined toward a negotiated end to the Ukraine conflict than to continued escalation.
Whether or to what extent any of that actually works to Le Pen's benefit remains to be seen. As others have said, the direction that Melenchon's supporters from the first round break in the second seems likely to be decisive.
Guess we'll find out soon enough.
Edit: to add that at least Macron has been in direct touch with Putin on a regular basis to discuss the Ukraine situation - apparently, most other Western leaders can't be bothered.
Fair enough
To introduce an analogy I first imagined in the mid-'000s, Le Pen and Trump and the Deplorables (or at least the 'Innermost Ring' thereof - as gjohnsit said a while ago, "we're all deplorables now"), and certainly the Charlottesville Tiki-Torch set, are The Tail Of The Rattlesnake: Old, distinctive, scary to the eyes and ears...desiccated and harmless and actually a valuable warning.
The Head of the Rattlesnake? It is always fresh, always new, hard to recognize and detect, as far as possible from the Tail...and IT is the dangerous part.
In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.
Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!