The destruction of France's mainstream parties

Yesterday's presidential elections had a very disappointing outcome.
The run-off election will pit the incumbent, Emmanuel Macron, finished first, with 27.8 percent; against the far-right Rassemblement National, Marine Le Pen, with 23.1 percent.
Macron is an odious and arrogant neoliberal, while Le Pen is a xenophobic near-fascist.
The tragedy is just how close far-left candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon came to upsetting this dynamic.

most surprisingly, Mélenchon, whose 2.5-point gain put him closer to Le Pen than any of the polls had predicted. If he had been able to reach an agreement with the Communist Party, which supported him in 2017, he might have made the runoff, which would have transformed the race entirely.

While Mélenchon took 21.95%, no other candidate came even close to double-digits.
This is the third time he's run for president. In 2012 he took fourth place and achieved 11.10% of the vote. In 2017 he ended up winning 19% of the vote in the first round, placing fourth again.
The problem is that he's 70 years old, so this may have been his last chance. After the election he vocally refused to support Le Pen, but he didn't endorse Macron either.

An Ipsos poll carried out Sunday night showed that despite Mélenchon’s admonition, only 34 percent of his supporters plan to cast a ballot for Macron on April 24, while 30 percent will vote for Le Pen, and the rest either plan to abstain or haven’t yet made up their minds. The same poll suggests that Le Pen will get 85 percent of Zemmour’s vote, so Macron, despite his four-point lead, will need a better-than-even split on Mélenchon’s vote to avoid an upset.

Other than this depressing near-miss by the left, the other big story is the epic destruction of the center, and center-left parties.

Socialist Anne Hidalgo, the mayor of Paris, finished with a humiliating 1.75 percent, and Valérie Pécresse, the candidate of Les Républicains, descendants of the once-proud Gaullists, finished with a miserable 4.8. As a result, neither party will qualify for government reimbursement of its campaign debts, for which the bar is a minimum of 5 percent.

The Socialist Party once boasted presidents François Mitterrand and François Hollande, but Hollande sold out to the neoliberals and now the party is as good as dead.

most of the other nominally left-wing candidates instantly announced their support for Macron in the second round: Paris’s mayor Anne Hidalgo, of the neoliberalized Parti Socialiste (PS), took mere seconds to do so, apparently hungry for the TV coverage her result would not otherwise have warranted. She took 1.7 percent, in the fullest expression yet of the destruction of historic workers’ parties by free-marketeer leaders, pushing “reforms” that made people’s jobs more precarious and their retirements shorter.

Les Républicains is the party of President Jacques Chirac, now also on the verge of irrelevance.
Finishing fourth, and the only other party to break the 5% level is Reconquête, running on a platform very similar to Le Pen. However, the party has almost no representatives in parliament.
Finishing sixth is the Green-European Alliance. Résistons! appear to be some sort of populist party. Finally in 8th is the communist party, which never came close to competing, but had just enough votes that they theoretically could have swung the vote for Mélenchon.

Share
up
15 users have voted.

Comments

Most of the polls leading up to the election (that I saw) only included head to head matchups with Macron and Le Pen. I think that this was intentional despite the fact that Mélenchon was gaining traction. As a result the preferred result took place.

up
15 users have voted.

@humphrey
a Le Pen doesn't win the second round election. (17.8% in 2002 and 33.9% in 2017)

Can't see where Le Pen picks up enough votes from the first round losers to be a real threat to Macron. (Although in 2016 I couldn't see how Trump could get more than 260 ECV.)

up
7 users have voted.

@Marie

I think it is not so much that Le Pen has become more popular but rather Macron has got plenty of negatives. There were the protests of the gilets jaunes and the looming inflation which are not a winning combination.

up
11 users have voted.

@humphrey
to her 2017 first round number, her popularity isn't increasing. Macron added twice that amount to his 2017 number, but it's still nothing to brag about. Voter participation was down by about a million, but it dropped by two million between the first and second rounds in 2017. Plus the blank null vote in the 2017 2nd round increased by three million. IOW - a five million vote decline.

LaSalle, who in some way endorsed the yellow vest protestors, gained almost two percentage points from his 2017 showing.

PS/GRN voters (about the same number as in 2017) will likely split in favor of Macron again (71%) but 10% voted null and only 2% for LePen. He won't have an advantage with the remaining republicans nor with Zemmour voters. So, looks as if the decision in in the hands of the Melenchon voters. Only 7% switched to LePen in 2017.

up
4 users have voted.

PS (socialist) collapsed in 2017. That year the EELV-The Greens withdrew in favor of Hamon who finished with 6.4%. 2022 PS plus EELV = 6.38.

Gains:
Macron 3.84%
Le Pen 1.85%
Melenchon 2.35%
PCF 2.28 (2017 withdrew in favor of Melenchon)
La Salle 2.1%

Losses:
republican 8.2 (Zemmour plus Pecresse)
Dupont-A 2.6

up
5 users have voted.
shaharazade's picture

of mainstream parties these days bad or good? This coo-coo world it's hard to tell the bad from the good. Up is down and fascist's seem to abound globally. Keep hoping the leftists if there are any will win somewhere. Globalism sucks. Propaganda abounds everywhere so who the heck knows who's what. Thanks cacus99 percent. The sanest place I go to.

5

up
9 users have voted.
The Liberal Moonbat's picture

He was 'M. France' for a long time there (and at least provided us with the amusement/aggravation of showcasing France's reaction to an adultery scandal in contrast to America's); now you never hear about him.

up
1 user has voted.

In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.

Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!

@The Liberal Moonbat @The Liberal Moonbat
Sarkozy was elected to a single term as president (2007-20012). So, not a towering figure in French politics.

Political parties in France are only semi-permanent. Factions emerge and often splinter and create new parties. Although on a left-right continuum the new one(s) is/are near the old one. Later they may kiss and make-up as happened in 2002 when UMP was created under Chirac from several conservative (Gaullist) parties. Political personalities appear to be prime movers in the splintering and creation of new parties which seems to be a reason why the lifespan of many isn't that long.

Melenchon split from PS – Socialist party - in 2008. In 2017 and 2022, his vote share was substantially higher than that for the PS nominees. (In 2022 the communist party nominee did better than the PS nominee.) In 2012 he got 11% and Hollande (PS) still finished first in the first and second rounds. Will the party survive without Melenchon (who is now 70 years old)?

Macron (& Co.) created a brand new party in 2016 “En Marche! – Forward. A word with a positive connotation but substance free and on which anything can be projected. Very attractive to younger voters in 2017 who had no clue that they were voting for a neo-liberal. Or that En Marche was positioning itself to pick up where MoDem/Francois Bayrou had left off. (In my mind somewhat like the UK's LibDems.)

In 2015 the conservative party reconstituted itself as The Republicans (LR). The 2017 nominee, Fillon, got 20% in the first round. The 2022 nominee received 4.8%. In 2022 LR was challenged from the right by a new far right party (but different from the far position of Le Pen). That candidate took 7%.

Hope this helps.

up
5 users have voted.

- but predictable - that Macron would finish first in the first round. But as Marine has a decent chance in the second, there is reason to be optimistic.

Not sure if I can dig it up just now, but saw a head to head poll - Macron v. Le Pen last week broken down by age groups and Le Pen was substantially ahead of Macron in all age groups under 60 or 65.

So, a lot may hang on turnout by younger people, perhaps?

Also, in terms of how many Melenchon voters will break to Le Pen - what about vax/Covid policy?

Melenchon (as with Le Pen and most of the Right) has been opposed to vaccine passports and mandates, obviously a stark difference from Macron Is that going to be a positive for Marine's chances of picking up support from Melenchon supporters?

Check this snarky coverage from July 2021 from the World Socialist web site:

On July 17, tens of thousands participated in protest in France against mandatory coronavirus vaccination and social distancing restrictions. The protests were called and supported by neo-fascist figures, including Marion Maréchal Le Pen and Florian Philippot, the leader of the Patriots Party.

The protest took place against the backdrop of a rise of COVID-19 across Europe, driven by the Delta variant. The Macron government is rejecting scientifically-based social distancing policies, including the closure of non-essential workplaces and schools. Rather, Macron proposes only that health workers be vaccinated and that a “health pass”—demonstrating either complete vaccination, or a recent negative test result, or recent recovery from the virus—be required before entering restaurants and social events. Maréchal Le Pen and Philippot have themselves denounced obligatory vaccination and any social restriction aimed at saving lives.

Their call to let the virus spread unimpeded has won support not only among neo-fascist activists, but inside Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s Unsubmissive France (La France Insoumise—LFI), as well as a layer of the Greens. Some Unsubmissives joined the protests of Philippot and Maréchal, which gathered thousands in several demonstrations in Paris, 5,500 in Montpellier, 4,500 in Marseille, 2,800 in Strasbourg, 2,500 in Toulouse and Nantes, 2,000 in Rennes, and 1,200 in Perpignan and Nancy.

At the head of the march in Paris were Philippot, former leader of the National Rally (RN) of Marine Le Pen; Nicolas Dupont-Aignan of the far-right party Debout la France; and Jacline Mouraud, a known “yellow vest” figure who was broadly opposed among protesters after she urged them to run for positions within the state apparatus. There were chants of “Macron resign” and “Freedom,” and signs declaring “No to mandatory vaccination. Vaccine freedom is a right,” and “Don’t touch our children.”

The demonstration had a heterogeneous character. Among the demonstrators were health care workers wanting to denounce Macron’s policy, restaurant owners opposed to the requirement that they inspect “health passes” of their customers, and former “yellow vests.” Jerome Rodrigues, a well-known figure of the movement whose eye was shot out by the police, called for refusing vaccination, but refused to participate in the demonstration led by the neo-fascists.

However, the political character of this demonstration was clearly dominated by the extreme right. In France and around the world, the extreme right is leading the opposition to a scientifically-guided policy of vaccination and social distancing to contain the virus. This opposition is fundamentally reactionary, given that the pandemic has already killed more than four million people internationally, and 1.1 million in Europe, and is once again accelerating.

Philippot welcomed the tacit support of police for the policy of propagating the virus, saying on Twitter, “I’m meeting a surprising number of restaurant owners who have absolutely no intention of supporting the #PassSanitaire [health pass] and, even more unprecedented, police officers who tell me they have no intention of actively enforcing them… Humanity still exists.”

Marion Maréchal Le Pen, present at the protest, told the far-right Valeurs actuelles: “I am resolutely opposed to the mandatory vaccination against COVID and the health pass. It seems to me that the right to doubt should still be permitted in the land of Descartes!” She added, “And now, one should justify one’s state of health to a stranger to have the right to drink a coffee? There is an obvious drift taking place, a radicalisation of those who hold the reins of power.”

... Mélenchon adopted all the arguments of the far right against not only Macron's reactionary policy, but also a scientific policy against the coronavirus.

He called the obligation to present a health pass “a profound change in our way of life,” “a considerable restriction of freedoms” and “collective conditioning that pushes everyone at every moment to feel obliged to say who they are, what they are sick with, and what they are not sick with.” He claimed that this “totally abnormal” situation would lead to “a society of permanent and universal control,” and to “a society of permanent conflict...

up
2 users have voted.
The Liberal Moonbat's picture

@Blue Republic Where's the "reason to be optimistic" in all this (don't get me wrong, I'd love to see it)?

up
2 users have voted.

In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.

Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!

@The Liberal Moonbat
Politically in the west, there's no measured, rational, and scientific Covid-19 position. (That puts me at odds with the two factions here at C-99 and why I haven't participated in discussions on this since the early days in 2020.) It's all reactionary through a favored distorted lens. The Covid-19 political alignments will die out whenever this or a subsequent novel coronavirus ceases to pose a significant threat.

At that point, the French electorate returns to its baseline; one-third right, one-third centrist right, and one-third left. Better than the US where there is no left and structurally cannot emerge absent crushing events (ie major depression, civil war); therefore, once the New Dealers were ousted, the choice has been limited to right v. centrist right. So far in France, their presidents have been either centrist right or soft left.

up
3 users have voted.

@The Liberal Moonbat @The Liberal Moonbat

(Yes, I would much prefer to see Le Pen win - these elite globalist autocrats, which Macron exemplifies - have gone from annoying to downright dangerous and need to be stopped.)

As to Le Pen's prospects, I'm no authority, but it does appear that factors such as who and how many abstain from voting, relative turnout by younger and older voters (Le Pen appears to have a definite advantage with the former, Macron with the latter) and also how Covid policy and Ukraine figure in voters' decisions are going to be important. Melenchon's opposition to vaccine mandates and passports is clearly in line with Le Pen's and in stark contrast to Macron's.

Also, Le Pen is correctly perceived as much less rabidly confrontational toward Russia than Macron. That may appeal to those more inclined toward a negotiated end to the Ukraine conflict than to continued escalation.

Whether or to what extent any of that actually works to Le Pen's benefit remains to be seen. As others have said, the direction that Melenchon's supporters from the first round break in the second seems likely to be decisive.

Guess we'll find out soon enough.

Edit: to add that at least Macron has been in direct touch with Putin on a regular basis to discuss the Ukraine situation - apparently, most other Western leaders can't be bothered.

up
2 users have voted.
The Liberal Moonbat's picture

@Blue Republic It might be worth it, if only for truly purely political purposes, to distinguish "optimism" from "I gotta support Stalin because the alternative is Hitler" - but I most certainly do agree that there is NOBODY worse than the so-called NeoCons/NeoLibs, the true Global Fourth Reich.

To introduce an analogy I first imagined in the mid-'000s, Le Pen and Trump and the Deplorables (or at least the 'Innermost Ring' thereof - as gjohnsit said a while ago, "we're all deplorables now"), and certainly the Charlottesville Tiki-Torch set, are The Tail Of The Rattlesnake: Old, distinctive, scary to the eyes and ears...desiccated and harmless and actually a valuable warning.

The Head of the Rattlesnake? It is always fresh, always new, hard to recognize and detect, as far as possible from the Tail...and IT is the dangerous part.

up
2 users have voted.

In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.

Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!