The Dose

TheDose.jpg

An Open Thread for all things COVID

Please chime in!

Share
up
5 users have voted.

Comments

up
3 users have voted.
CB's picture

after reports that it can help COVID patients recover.

Stores Refusing To Sell Chicken Noodle Soup After Rumor COVID Patients Are Using It To Feel Better


...
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki confirmed a mandate to limit chicken noodle soup was recommended by the CDC. “As in the case of Ivermectin, a known horse de-wormer, many people were attempting to self-medicate with a hot bowl of soup. This is giving people a false sense of security and leading to violent overdoses in which belching and nausea occurred,” she clarified.

When pressed for more information Psaki referred reporters to the CDC, which will not answer their phone calls.
...

up
10 users have voted.

@CB and sad.

What a country we have deteriorated into. Not that we were ever the "shining city on the hill" of delusions.

But, bit by bit, less and less humane. Unless you consider the genocide of native Americans, and our Slave Nation of course.

That demonstrated "our values" centuries ago.

Now the internet makes certain citizens can see what's happening in ways they could not earlier on.

up
5 users have voted.

NYCVG

Shahryar's picture

@CB

and that it's not true, just the Babylon Bee doing what they do.

up
4 users have voted.

@Shahryar

the similarities to the mandated protection of vax or else is obvious
chicken soup for a cold? sorry kids, Fauci finds that unmitigated in the sense that only
4 jabs will help youse out of this. Forget Russian penicillin (garlic), or mothers chicken
soup. It's Fauci's way or the hi way to hell. According to trusted sources. Wink

up
4 users have voted.
CB's picture

Behavioral control
and the end of the American dream.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4NDs55GCfJs]

Remember those Johns Hopkins Pandemic war games that occurred over the span of decades? Where the outcome usually ended in a need to control the populace, by which behavioral modification techniques are used to enforce cooperation from the populace.

Right now, one can wander over to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and see their current projects include an analysis of “anti-misinformation actions'“, which they call the Environment of Misinformation.

World leaders, governments, big media, big pharma and tech giants are busy planning out the next pandemic response. So, maybe it is time for those of us who believe there is a better way to live than to be controlled, to plan out responses to all these draconian measures. As well as to begin to develop counter measures to a bio-threat that do not use censorship, propaganda, mandates and behavioral modification techniques. You know, the old fashioned way where the government relies on people to use their own critical thinking skills to assess what is best for themselves and their families, after getting all the information available.

So, let’s climb aboard and let’s have a think about how “we” are being controlled, nudged, censored and lied to during this pandemic, and to be aware that governments are already planning how to control us better in the next.
...

up
2 users have voted.
The Liberal Moonbat's picture

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/10/19/the-unvaccinated-are-looki...

That link in the second paragraph should be valuable to show even to those who'd never willingly look at any of the others.

up
0 users have voted.

In the Land of the Blind, the One-Eyed Man is declared mentally ill for describing colors.

Yes Virginia, there is a Global Banking Conspiracy!

snoopydawg's picture

@The Liberal Moonbat

The claim that there’s a pandemic of the unvaccinated is, therefore, patently untrue. As a retired nurse from California recently asked, “Why do the protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that did not protect the protected in the first place?” If the vaccine works to prevent infection, then the vaccinated have nothing to worry about. If the vaccine does not prevent infection, then the vaccinated remain at some risk, and the unvaccinated would be less likely to choose a vaccine that does not work well.

F2459DBD-1204-4C8C-BAE4-6981BC921286.jpeg

up
5 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

snoopydawg's picture

Letter to a Governing Body

“Everything went strictly ‘by the book,’ using means that were permitted by the constitution. At first there were ‘emergency decrees’ by the president of the Reich, and later a bill was passed by a two-thirds majority of the Reichstag giving the government unlimited legislative powers, perfectly in accordance with the rules for changing the constitution.”

- Sebastian Haffner, Defying Hitler

I am writing because you are considering legislation or policies related to COVID-19.

Although this letter is addressed to a governing body, I am actually writing to you—you, the living, thinking, feeling individuals who comprise this body.

I am asking that you listen not in your capacity as a member but as a fellow human being, as a neighbor, as a friend.

For nearly a year, you have been gradually conditioned to view the unvaccinated as enemies. You have been subjected to a relentless propaganda campaign designed to divide you from us; to dehumanize us; to paint us as science-deniers, conspiracy nuts, spreaders of disease, and threats to society.

“Men under pressure are first dehumanized and only then demoralized, not the other way around. Organization and specialization, system, subsystem, and supersystem are the consequence, not the cause, of the totalitarian spirit.”

- Milton Mayer, They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45

The United States Holocaust Museum describes this process as “Defining the Enemy: The Excluded”:

“One crucial factor in creating a cohesive group is to define who is excluded from membership. Nazi propagandists contributed to the regime’s policies by publicly identifying groups for exclusion, justifying their outsider status, and inciting hatred or cultivating indifference.… But a second, more sinister aspect of the Nazi myth was that not all Germans were welcome in the new community. Propaganda helped to define who would be excluded from the new society and justified measures against the ‘outsiders.’”

This CDC paper (“Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021”), explains that the study found “three-quarters of cases occurred in fully vaccinated people”:

“It also found no significant difference in the viral load present in the breakthrough infections occurring in fully vaccinated people and the other cases, suggesting the viral load of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the coronavirus is similar.”

New stories documenting COVID outbreaks in fully vaccinated groups keep emerging, including cruise ships such as the MS Europa, MS Europa 2, Mein Schiff 6, and Aidanova.

While reporting on a third Royal Caribbean cruise ship outbreak, this Miami Herald article notes:

“The CDC reported there were 5,013 confirmed COVID-19 cases on cruise ships between Dec. 15 and 29, compared to just 162 cases in the two weeks prior, Nov. 30 to Dec. 14.

“According to the CDC’s database for COVID-19 on cruise ships as of Wednesday, all 92 cruise ships currently sailing in U.S. waters had people on board infected by COVID-19.”

After Puerto Rico health insurer Mmm Multi Health lost a court case that struck down their mandate and restored employees’ rights to decide about what would be injected into their bodies, the company instituted segregation: one building housed fully vaccinated employees, while the second building housed unvaccinated employees.

Guess which building experienced a COVID outbreak—and which one didn’t? It’s the opposite of what the media tells you. In this perfect real-world case control study, the building with the fully vaccinated employees suffered an outbreak, while the unvaccinated remained protected by their natural immunity, which has been proven superior to vaccination by 145 research studies to date.

I know what you’re thinking, “Okay, but what about the hospitals being overwhelmed by the unvaccinated?”

Well, big surprise, you’ve been deceived about that, too.

At a regional New York hospital serving a community with an under–50-percent vaccination rate, “90% of the individuals admitted to [the] hospital were documented to have received this vaccine.

If the vaccine does not prevent people from spreading or contracting COVID; being hospitalized; or dying from COVID, what possible justification can you provide for instituting policies such as mandating the COVID-19 vaccine, requiring vaxxports, or detaining individuals and families in quarantine facilities?

Links in article not included here. You can read it at the source. Except I suggest reading the last one from a whistleblower. Novak D, the tennis player who was granted a passport to play in the Australian Open, but then was deported because of something he said 2 years ago is in jeopardy of not being allowed to play in the French open because of his vaccine status. If he does get jabbed how would that make people around him any safer since he could still get infected and spread the virus to others vaxxed or not? When will more people start asking this question and see things for what they are and decide that enough is enough? If people feel that they need to get vaxxed they can. What they shouldn’t insist is that everyone else must get jabbed too. People’s health should be a private matter between them and their doctors like it always has been before the Covid hysteria was cooked up. We don’t ask others about whether they have been vaxxed for other diseases or if they have them. Imagine asking someone about their HIV or STD status. Enough.

up
6 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

snoopydawg's picture

@snoopydawg

and exposes how fraudulent Pfizer’s trials were.

Using Pfizer’s own six-month data, this Canadian COVID Care Alliance presentation and the accompanying PowerPoint slides demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccinations cause significantly more harm than good. Indeed, Pfizer’s data shows the absolute risk reduction from its vaccine was only 0.84 percent, whereas there was a 300-percent increase in risk for adverse events.

Let me repeat that. Our government, our workplaces, our organizations are demanding that its citizens accept a 300-percent increased risk of adverse events—including death—in exchange for less than a 1-percent risk reduction of contracting COVID.

up
7 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

@snoopydawg

it will do you no good for the omicron variant

up
6 users have voted.

@snoopydawg Track and trace. Or whatever this part of the nightmare is called.

I call it Report on Your Neighbors.

NYC thought this was A-OKay under Bloomberg re: terrorism."If you see something, Say something."

up
4 users have voted.

NYCVG

CB's picture

@snoopydawg

up
3 users have voted.
zed2's picture

covid. A better way to put things involving statistics would be to simply state whatever statistic is involved and of what without any attempt at interpretation, unless you understand exactly what the statistics mean.

A good book on visualization which is good at showing the issues involved with deceptive use of statistics is Edward Tufte, "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information"

up
1 user has voted.
Bisbonian's picture

look at what he, his colleages, and his government has done... prompted by good interviewer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnMMYJKZvnU

up
3 users have voted.

"I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” —Malcolm X

ggersh's picture

The NHL will no longer test asymptomatic players.

Tell me it's not about the money and control.

up
7 users have voted.

I never knew that the term "Never Again" only pertained to
those born Jewish

"Antisemite used to be someone who didn't like Jews
now it's someone who Jews don't like"

Heard from Margaret Kimberley

https://www.covidtests.gov/

I ordered mine.

It took less than a minute.

up
4 users have voted.

NYCVG

usefewersyllables's picture

@NYCVG

Looks like I'm finally testing negative again, after 3 weeks. So I'm pretty much recovered- just a little lingering cough, but my throat feels like a throat again.

I figure that the gummint tests will show up in 12-16 weeks, and will then sit on the shelf in the pantry until the next time we move. But what the hell- they are paid for. I may try one when they come in to see if I get a false positive...

Meanwhile, I'm waiting to see if a notation of "Infected/recovered" will show up on my Colorado vaccine passport app, or if they will keep it specific to the jabs.

up
5 users have voted.

Twice bitten, permanently shy.

snoopydawg's picture

Britain fired care workers if they refused to get jabbed and they are close to firing thousands of nurses for the same reason even though they are 100,000 short of staff already. But here is how they are going to fill the position for care workers.

WHAT has become of our society that we care so little for old and vulnerable people that we don’t care just who looks after us when we find ourselves needing help from others to eat and drink, dress, wash or go to the toilet? Anybody will do, provided they have arms and feet and a back. No training is needed, and no vocation to care, either.

On Friday the Telegraph reported: ‘Asylum seekers who have waited more than a year for a decision can now work to help ease the care home recruitment crisis under a rule change sanctioned by Priti Patel, the Home Secretary.’ The Government’s Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) said this would not only have an economic benefit but there was also evidence it had a ‘large positive impact’ on asylum seekers’ long-term job prospects if their applications were successful, and helped them integrate better into British society.

Importantly, this article states: ‘Asylum seekers do not require visas as they are already in the UK and, unlike other shortage occupations like butchers, welders and laboratory technicians, care workers do not require specialist training.’

WTF? People in care homes shouldn’t require their care workers to know what the fck they are doing? The ungawdly low paid CNAs have to have training to work in nursing homes here and I hope that goes for every country, but good lord what a message that sends to the ones who had worked through the first 2 years of the epidemic.

But wait there’s more.

This is certainly shown by a study in the British Medical Journal published December, which found that neglect was one of the biggest killers in care homes during the pandemic. It said: ‘The pandemic has disproportionately affected people living in care homes, who accounted for an estimated 30 per cent of all deaths from Covid-19 across 25 countries despite making up only 1 per cent of the world’s population, a report has estimated.’

The report says that ‘the pandemic had exacerbated long-running problems in the care sector, such as chronic underfunding, poor structural organisation, staff undertraining, underskilling and underequipping, and a lack of humanity in dealing with the most vulnerable members of society.’

Link

Welp lack of humanity ain’t going to get fixed if this is allowed. Nor will the lack of training be either since it’s no longer a job requirement.

I’m still looking for the article on the 120,000 foreign workers that are lined up to come take jobs from American nurses.

up
3 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

snoopydawg's picture

@snoopydawg

that have proved so ineffective that people need 3 jabs that are also ineffective against omicron. This makes no gd sense at all and I would like to see more people questioning it. The 3rd jab was ineffective in Israel and Scotland and many other countries because there are now more triple jabbed people in hospitals than there are unjabbed. When will the jabbed start questioning the reasons behind this massive push to jab the world when the drug companies themselves are refusing to give them to people in many 3rd world countries? I’m not trying to offend anyone and apologies if I have. I just don’t understand why more people aren’t questioning whether there is an agenda behind this or if they think that the great reset is a joke or conspiracy theory. Shwab actually wrote about this plan to make it so that we won’t own anything and will be happy about it. It doesn’t seem to be a joke to me.

Here is the data from Florida where counties with the highest rates of jabbed people have the highest rates of infections as opposed to the counties with the lowest rates of jabbed people have the lowest rates of infections. So again what’s the need to get everyone jabbed if they aren’t working?

up
5 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

CB's picture

Are "Highly Inflammatory" & What Else Is In The Vax?
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jd5ZuvtzpI&t=46s]

up
3 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

Among the first reports handed over by Pfizer was a “Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports” describing events reported to Pfizer up until February 2021. It reveals that the drug behemoth received more than 150,000 serious adverse event reports within three months of rolling out its COVID shot, but here we will focus on Table 6 of the data on pregnant and lactating women who received the shots in the first few months of the rollout, which began December 11. Most of these women would have been healthcare workers because that was who the first rounds of shots went to. As the clinical trials preceding the rollout excluded pregnant women, these would have been the first pregnant and lactating women to have ever received the vaccines.

Table 6 states that of 270 “unique pregnancies” that were exposed to the vaccine, “no outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies.”

This leaves 32 pregnancies with known outcomes.

Pfizer’s report states that there were 23 spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), two premature births with neonatal death, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and one pregnancy with “normal outcome.” That means that of 32 pregnancies with known outcome, 28 resulted in fetal death.

Because of this confusion, I called Pfizer and emailed questions to their media rep. Were 28 of 32 known pregnancy outcomes actually fatal in the first 10 weeks that the vaccine became available, as their report suggests? That’s an 87.5% pregnancy loss rate? And only one pregnancy outcome was “normal”? Please correct me if I’m wrong about this.

No reply.

The FDA would have had these data in their hands by the end of April. Maybe this is why they wanted to hide it for 55 years?

But Pfizer and the FDA ignored events with temporal association and plausible cause for injury and have blithely declared the vaccine “safe and effective” for pregnant women. Allowed it to be mandated, even.

5F92F35B-F43A-46E9-92FB-4C3DF2F10B92.png

Dr. Daniel Nagase, an Alberta doctor who was ordered to leave his Alberta hospital for treating three COVID patients (all of whom who went home from hospital alive) with ivermectin, told a reporter that he had been informed of 86 stillbirths in Waterloo, Ontario between January and July.

“Normally, it’s only five or six stillbirths every year. So, about one stillbirth every two months is the usual rate,” he said. “So, to suddenly get to 86 stillbirths in six months, that’s highly unusual. But, the most important confirmation that we have from the Waterloo, Ontario report was that all of the [mothers of the] 86 stillbirths we’re fully vaccinated.”

What all of this tells us is that we have public health agencies and scientists willing to manipulate data to protect pharmaceutical interests rather than the women and babies they exist to serve. At least some of the stories that are percolating around us of stillborn babies, hemorrhages, and miscarriages are linked to the experimental new injections – perhaps many more than we think. But it will be a long time – and many more babies’ lives will be lost – before we learn the whole truth.

Only 8 more months until Pfizer has to release all of its information on the 'vaccines'. How much more damage and heartbreak will their 'vaccines' cause before then?

up
3 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

but they will remain un-typed, as a courtesy.

up
1 user has voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981