@ovals49

concise of the entire post WWII trajectory of the US empire. Thanks

Perhaps it goes back even further but it is certain that the influence of these two brothers, steeped in a religious fundamentalism with a full embrace of capitalism and wartime profiteering, were architects of projecting and maintaining US dominance. At first in clandestine activities, over the subsequent decades in more overt ways and with the direct participation of our armed forces, violence against our current “enemy” has been the life blood of our economic growth and the hammer of our diplomacy. The military budget dwarfs all other sectors of our budget for the simple reason that it is at the center of who we are as a nation.

We are the world’s most significant terrorists, and our goal remains complete world domination. Those who are known as “terrorists” in the news are simply resisting in kind.

From a distance it is clearly a case of global insanity, one that has become our new “normal”.

@Dawn's Meta

It became a war OF terror, not on terror...and the world sees it that way too.
Who do people see as the worlds biggest threat?

People are easily manipulated when they are scared. Many were frightened seeing the towers destroyed. They were willing to give up their rights and rule of law to be "safe". Ironically, they created their own fascist militarized forces powered by AI here at home.

The US became what they said they were fighting...terrorist.

Nothing new really... just on steroids. Round we go.

[comment:body]

@CB I believe that an asset had been in place for at least the previous 10 years.

That is why the data the "investigators" used to determine who it might have been only went back 5 years. What I mean is, they only examined the work records of men who had worked in the WTC for more than 5 years. They already knew the answer to my question. They are still examining remains, but it's way too late.

The key, for me at the time, when data was plentiful, was to develop how an asset could hide in plain sight for 10 or more years, and then disappear successfully after the planes hit.

Turns out, it would not be all that difficult. Develop a profile of who could move around all the WTC buildings freely and easily. A well known face. Probably, a young guy in a janitorial or security position. Of average height and build. Clean shaven.

Then, how could this person exit undetected, be declared dead, and live happily ever after.

Again, not so hard to imagine. Over the years, the asset stored what he needed in the basements of Bulding 7 and maybe the other buildings. It's easy to imagine him going from building to building setting up timed explosives and then exiting Building 7, disguised.

Well disguised. Lifts in both shoes. 1" higher in one foot to change his gait. An oversized jacket, to blur his build, a cap, ponytail, fake beard, glasses. who knows...Exit for the cameras walk north in the crowds and remove disguse in a selected location without cameras----easier in 2001 than now to do, appearing in civilian clothes and big glasses until safe wherever he was hiding until he could leave NYC behind.

That's my imagined scenario and 20 years later it still seems to me that it may very well be what happened.

9/11: A U.S. Deep State Insider Speaks …

An 8 part tweet stream by Pepe Escobar and posted with his permission

Pepe has two requests as follows:

Please retweet as much as possible

Please alert the Saker community – because at least parts of this thread may be “disappeared”, post-Allende-style, in no time. These are the parts that totally destroy the official narrative.

9/11: A U.S. DEEP STATE INSIDER SPEAKS Old school. Top clearance. Extremely discreet. Attended secret Deep State meetings on 9-11. Tired of all the lies. The following is what’s fit to print without being redacted.

Part 1 THE PHONE CALL. Up next.

“An emergency phone conference was held in the early afternoon of 9/11 based on the fact that WTC Building Number Seven was still standing. Demolitions were engineered to cause the building, as well as the others, to fall into its own footprint. I attended this call.”

Part 2 On WTC7: “No plane hit Building Number Seven.” “The CIA was brought to cover it up. The CIA set up failed asset bin Laden to blame as misdirection, then pulled the plug on Building Number Seven.” “The CIA doctored boarding tapes to show Arabs entering the planes.”

Part 3 On Mullah Omar: “Our CIA Arabists knew that if we blamed Osama, who was innocent of 9-11, Mullah Omar would not give him up in violation of the laws of Islamic hospitality. Mullah Omar requested evidence: then he would turn Osama over. Of course, we did not want that.”

Part 4 On heroin: “The Afghanistan heroin war was justified by 9-11. No one in Afghanistan was involved in 9/11. No member of Islam was involved. We invaded Afghanistan for only one purpose, which was to restart heroin production shut down by a righteous act of Mullah Omar.”

Part 5 On CIA and heroin: “CIA heroin plantations in Afghanistan funded external, clandestine operations and lined some important people’s pockets. That was common practice when the CIA ran the heroin operation in the Golden Triangle.”

Part 6 On MOTIVE: “It was never in the U.S. strategic interest to lay a curse on Islam in the West.” “9-11 was a kind of Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation justifying a war on Islam and the invasion of Iraq, followed by other invasions of Islamic nations.”

Part 7 Afghanistan-Iraq: “The Taliban loved us as they did not know that we lured Russia into Afghanistan. It was idiotic to think that they wanted to hurt their ally on 9-11.” “With Iraq invaded over a new falsity, the neocons created a war of hatred against Islam.”

Part 8 Who’s in charge: “The apex of the U.S. command structure is not the presidency. It’s the Deep State. I use that term even though we did not as it is commonly used.”

@CB
here’s some food for thought from an Epoch Times interview (Part One) 9/4/21:

Dr. Malone: There was a pivotal interview with the director of the CDC and she was asked, “Do we have any data? Do we have data, or do we just have hope about the benefits of the third dose?” And she, to her credit, acknowledged that we don’t have data. All we have is hope.
Here’s the problem with that. Vaccine responses are not linear. More is not better. There are many cases where if you dose more or dose more frequently or move beyond a prime and a boost, you can actually quench the immune response. You can move into “high zone tolerance.” You can move into a situation where your immune responses drop.

Now there’s a little bit of foreshadowing on this in another paper that’s out where they looked at the effects of vaccination post-infection. Remember this was the policy, that those like me that have been infected should go ahead and take two jabs, take two doses of vaccine.

Mr. Jekielek: Which you did.

Dr. Malone: Which I did, hoping that it would be helpful for a long COVID period. That data hasn’t really played out that way. And there’s a paper showing that you can actually quench T-cell responses. You get an improved kind of a super immune response, they assert in that manuscript, after a single dose when you’ve been previously infected. But with the second dose, your T-cell population actually gets quenched, which is consistent with high zone tolerance.
So if that paper was to be expanded and verified with more robust numbers, it would suggest that one dose after natural infection would be a good thing. Two doses would be a bad thing. Now that’s the equivalent of three doses if you think about it, natural infection being dose one.
So to say that we don’t have any data is a little misleading. We have some leading indicators that suggest that it might not be such a good idea. And now, that data will come out from Israel. The conservative position to take is time will tell, and then we will know.

Link

Some figures:

• US - 41,743,069 cases with 677,037 deaths (yesterday 1,761 deaths)
• China - 95,153 cases with 4,636 deaths (ZERO since January 2021)

The US had MORE deaths in less than a week than China has had during the ENTIRE pandemic.

What is worrying to me is the increasing death rate despite vaccinations in the preceding month. What the fuck is going on? Why the sudden huge rise?

Is this related to the vaccinations?

China uses a standard killed virus vaccine that our antibodies can recognize directly. US vaccines use engineered mRNA coded for the S protein of the virus to be taken up by our cells causing them to manufacture the actual protein. This spike protein is then ejected by the cell where our antibodies can detect it.

The only way we will know is with honest VAERS reporting. Unfortunately these are being politicized.

@gjohnsit

Battle of Lake Champlain, 1814 (very underappreciated)
the release of Atari 2600

And the most significant event of all, President Bush The Elder's "New World Order" speech

Twenty-six years ago on this date, September 11, 1990, George Bush spoke to the Congress and the world. In his speech, George Bush declared a “new world order” as he prepared for war. (transcript, video)

FIRST NEW WORLD ORDER SPEECH

We gather tonight, witness to events in the Persian Gulf as significant as they are tragic. In the early morning hours of August 2nd, following negotiations and promises by Iraq’s dictator Saddam Hussein not to use force, a powerful Iraqi army invaded its trusting and much weaker neighbor, Kuwait…

Once again, Americans have stepped forward to share a tearful good-bye with their families before leaving for a strange and distant shore. At this very moment, they serve together with Arabs, Europeans, Asians and Africans in defense of principle and the dream of a new world order. That’s why they sweat and toil in the sand and the heat and the sun.

The George Bush vision of a “new world order” would be reiterated in other speeches over the period.