No Extradition for Assange

Wendy messaged me the news just now so that is all that I know. Here are the links she gave me in case you want to look at them.

https://assangedefense.org/hearing-coverage/julian-assange-extradition-h...

https://sputniknews.com/news/202101041081639583-judge-rejects-every-argu...

https://twitter.com/DefenseAssange

Assange's fiance Stella Morris on the news:

More links to numerous tweets here:

https://twitter.com/DefenseAssange

As of now this is great News.

Thanks Wendy!

Tags: 
Share
up
25 users have voted.

Comments

TheOtherMaven's picture

attempting to please the Empire's Deep State and humanitarian concerns too. "He's guilty as sin, but if we let you extradite him he'll off himself so we can't allow that".

And OF COURSE the Deep State will appeal, and the case will drag on and on and on.

up
16 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

snoopydawg's picture

@TheOtherMaven

and if they are afraid of the risks then they should release him and let him finally get medical attention that has been stolen from him for over a decade. Gawd I hope one day he releases the files that would put the US authorities in deep dawg shit. Let them defend that.

up
16 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

snoopydawg's picture

Judge blocks the extradition of Julian Assange to the United States, ruling the abusive U.S. prison system could not protect him from suicide

In a ruling in which she accepted nearly every argument from U.S. government, Judge Vanessa Baraitser agreed with the defense’s claims that the U.S. prison conditions Assange would face if he were extradited, including solitary confinement, Special Administrative Measures, and extreme restrictions at ADX Florence, would drive Assange to suicide. She ruled it would therefore be unjust to extradite Assange to the U.S. and ordered his release.

The U.S. will appeal the decision.

Judge Baraitser summarized her lengthy opinion and the arguments at issue, siding with the prosecution at virtually every step, upholding dangerous arguments that would undermine the First Amendment protections of a free press. The judge ruled:

The U.K. Extradition Act should take precedence over the U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty, and the former removed the clause barring extradition for political offenses

You HAVE to read the rest of her ruling to see how much the power elite despises the Effing Rule of LAW!!

https://assangedefense.org/hearing-coverage/julian-assange-extradition-h...

ETA this LIE:


The release of unredacted cables was “indiscriminate”

A few weeks ago a recording of Assange's call to the State Department that showed her warned them that they were coming. ANd not one person was harmed from the leaks that were NOT Wikileaks' fault.

up
16 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

wendy davis's picture

@snoopydawg

i'll add a few more excerpts from assange defense's overview of baraitser's ruling, but first, as to this one:

The U.K. Extradition Act should take precedence over the U.S.-U.K. Extradition Treaty, and the former removed the clause barring extradition for political offenses

in their live tweets, she'd actually noted that the US/UK extradition treaty hadn't been enshrined into british law, so she had to go by the 2003 version had precedence. how does it get 'enshrined' into law save by a judge like yourelf?

anyhoo:

•Defense arguments about Assange’s political opinions were “extraneous”

•There was insufficient evidence that the charges were “pressurized” by the Trump Administration and instead showed healthy internal debate

•Though the intelligence community has harshly criticized WikiLeaks, it doesn’t speak for the administration

It isn’t the UK court’s place to comment on the case of UC Global spying on Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy, as it doesn’t have access to court documents in the case against UC Global in Spain

•Assange’s prospective jury pool in the Eastern District of Virginia would come from a large county, can’t prove it would only be ex-national security and ex-military officials

•Challenges of the U.S. prosecution’s “overbroadness” and “vagueness” should be made in a U.S. court, not adjudicated here, no reason to think Assange wouldn’t have constitutional rights when tried in the U.S. — “This court trusts that a US court will properly consider Mr Assange’s constitutional right to free speech”

as to the UCGlobal spying, from their live tweeting, this:

@DefenseAssange 12h

Judge seems to be potentially justifying spying on Assange because CNN reported that Assange had turned the embassy into a ‘command post’ for election meddling

re: (comprador) AMLO'S offer of political asylum, telesur english has it this way (h/t mr. wd)

The Latin American country is willing to protect the WikiLeaks founder as long as he does not interfere in the political affairs of any nation.

Mexico's President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) Monday offered political asylum to Australian journalist Julian Assange after Britain's Crime Court refused to extradite him to the U.S.

"Our Foreign Affairs Ministry will ask the U.K. government to release Assange so that Mexico can offer him political asylum," AMLO said.

"The court's verdict is a triumph of justice. Assange is a journalist who complied with his duty," he stressed.

no, AMLO: it is s not a triumph of justice it still allows political persecution of other media organizations that publish leaks. given that she'd rejected every other defense argument, but 'because suicide' ruled, it's ass-covering.

you also may recall that he was in league w/ trump's deporatation schemes. the zapatistas don't trust the liar one iota, nor do i.

up
4 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

The judge has ruled Assange should be discharged. The U.S. government asks for him to be kept in custody while they appeal; the defense requests his immediate release.

Defense lawyer Ed Fitzgerald said that the judgement itself, ruling Assange should be discharged, constitutes the strongest grounds for granting bail. However he said the defense would like to put all of its arguments forward, including the deleterious conditions in Belmarsh prison, so the defense needs time to put together the formal bail application. Court is adjourned until Wednesday 10am GMT for the full bail application. Assange will be physically produced then and will be kept in HMP Belmarsh until then.

up
11 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

snoopydawg's picture

up
18 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

@snoopydawg

Does the USA actually want him out of the UK so that assassination will have fewer political consequences?
Will they use polonium and blame it on Putin?

up
11 users have voted.

I've seen lots of changes. What doesn't change is people. Same old hairless apes.

snoopydawg's picture

@The Voice In the Wilderness

Rising covered the breaking news and you should look at what Glenn has to say. Just a few minutes in.

Bottom line is that the judge accepted all of the US government's accusations and rejected Assange's defense. This still does not bode well for him or any journalist. The effing AP finally covered the trial and while it diidn't go out of its way to say this is bad at least it did not smear Assange. Small comfort.

up
15 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

@The Voice In the Wilderness
But recall that Mexico gave safe haven to Bolivia's president.

This is actually a terrible ruling, otherwise.

up
10 users have voted.

@snoopydawg

up
3 users have voted.

NYCVG

QMS's picture

and tearing open ops to assassination attempts begin?
They tried to silence Julian behind bars
now the Brits are going to give the US
'intelligence' agencies open season, not in jail
to silence the push back to war crimes.
We'll see. Why Australia doesn't take him back?
He has to go to other countries for protection.
The empire can not let this loose cannon free.
Too much exposure risk. Hate to say it but
his free time on this earth is limited. He has been
judged as a danger to the ptb's control of information.

up
10 users have voted.

Until Assange walks free, all “good news” about his case should be looked on askance. Empires can not permit any exoneration for those who reveal inconvenient truths about their crimes. This “victory” has won nothing but a continuation of an indefinite term of confinement.

up
14 users have voted.

“ …and when we destroy nature, we diminish our capacity to sense the divine,and understand who God is, and what our own potential is and duties are as human beings.- RFK jr. 8/26/2024

snoopydawg's picture

@ovals49

I don't think anyone is actually relieved about the verdict except that he isn't being sent here right now. But her ruling should give every journalist a cold chill including the ones who parrot the party line. If Wikileaks is guilty of the charges then so are the NYT, Guardian and other papers that published. The guardian should be charged for releasing all files even though Wikileaks were redacting public info.

Kevin writes about it. Good thread.

up
6 users have voted.

Was Humpty Dumpty pushed?

mimi's picture

Chris Hedges: The Empire is Not Done with Julian Assange

I am not clear about the copyrights violations if I would excerpts from the scheerpost.com's article. but Chris Hedges is always worth reading.

It says on the bottom of the story: Copyright 2020 Chris Hedges. Repost freely, giving appropriate credit to ScheerPost.com and Chris Hedges.

Ok, it is a long piece. Just read it. I remember the name of Michael Ratner and was at the time impressed by him. But now I am old and worn out , with holes in my brain. I hate getting that old. Good Night.

up
5 users have voted.