Look, all I'm saying is physics doesn't behave in that fashion. Also flying a plane into a building is a crime, it's called murder and no investigation was carried out on the crimes committed that day. Terror is a feeling, a tactic and or a strategy. The top 20 floors of a building are not heavy enough to crush 80 floors into powder, physics doesn't work that way. Conspiracy, I don't fucking know, but I do know PHYSICS does not behave in that kind of fashion, period. This kind of remark is an "artful smear" (lol) to discredit anything I say, just because I won't swallow a big fat turd (9/11 commission).

There are so many holes in the "official" explanation it's completely absurd. Our world is in flames as a result of it (9/11), we've lost our civil liberties as a result of it, and you want to bury your head in the sand, I don't. So shoot me with your verbal barrage of linguistic bullets, conspiracy theory.

Shutting down discussion is a form of the "bounding of debate" within the propaganda model. If you don't want to know the truth, I reckon that's your choice. I have ZERO intention to diary about it, but I will not be shut down by you or anyone else, anymore. Ban me if you like, but the truth is we were LIED too and most people accept it, I don't. That simple. We can agree to disagree. But like I said I don't intend to write about here.

The "pancake theory", which is exactly what it is, a theory, and can be disproved simply by a comparison of building demolition fails videos, if your not willing to work out the MATH on paper. It's physics, plain and simple. Physics doesn't change on one day and revert back the next, didn't happen, won't happen, so far as our best and brightest scientists know, it can't happen. Buildings don't turn into powder because of gravity. Steel and concrete buildings don't self destruct into powder as a result of fire. Never in the history has that happened. Physics proves it.

Does it not bother you that a BBC reporter was reporting on Building 7, that it had fallen but was actually standing right behind her on the screen as she was describing it's destruction? Does that not peak your interest, even a little? It was a full twenty minutes BEFORE the building had fallen. Does that not provoke you into inquiry?

There are so many unanswered questions it boggles the mind, especially considering we are supposed to be a country that is ruled by the rule of law, which numerous laws were broken that day, but never investigated, because the evidence was destroyed, which is a crime in and of it's self.

I'm not into conspiracy, all I'm saying is, physics doesn't lie, but people do. Who and why it happen, we're probably never really know, but we do know what was reported in the 9/11 commission report, the "pancake theory" is bullshit, simply because physics proves it's bullshit. I know 9/11 is a touchy subject for a lot of people, and I have left it alone for the most part, because too many are too afraid to actually investigate what the heck actually happened, because the truth would be too overwhelming, at least that is the theory, but there's no conspiracy to it.

I guess the North Vietnamese attacked US ships in the Gulf of Tonkin.
I guess George Bush found his WMD's in Iraq, after he and his administration lied 935 times on national TV, as well as at the UN.
I guess the launching Iraq war wasn't a crime in violation of international law and didn't rise to the level of a crimes against humanity.
I guess the US doesn't torture people, no one has been prosecuted for it, except the person that blew the whistle on it.
I guess our president doesn't murder by drone, in violation of international law, as well as our own constitution, nor does he authorize double tap drone strikes, that would be illegal, right?

What "conspiracy theorizing" have I engaged in? NONE. I'm only saying PHYSICS doesn't LIE!

Now, if we get into the fact that Donald Rumsfeld was testifying before congress in 9/10 about 2.3 trillion in missing transactions within the DOD, and that the plane, if that is what it was (we have no definitive proof), that hit the Pentagon, where the investigation of the missing 2.3 trillion was taking place, that kind of peaks my interest. But I won't write about here, nor did I write about it in the great orange waste land either.

Add in the fact that the DOD hasn't been able to audit it's self since a federal law was enacted in 1996 that required BY LAW, all government agencies are supposed to account for every dollar they spend, but the DOD hasn't been able to comply, EVER. That kind of peaks my interest, and begs the question, why? Sure they have multiple system that don't talk to one another. Why? They've known they are required by LAW to account for all their spending, but can't, even after twenty years. Again why?

I'm not saying or implying anything, only that I still have unanswered questions and the "official" reasons / explanation, do not hold water under even the slightest scrutiny. Where is the 2.3 trillion in missing transactions within the DOD? We don't and probably will never know. It's been lost in the giant memory hole of public awareness. Why?

Lobbing the "conspiracy theorist" label is a tactic to shut down debate, especially when one hasn't engaged in conspiracy theorizing, only questioning the official narrative about physics, which is BULLSHIT, that's all. I do not accept everything I'm told by our government. Being skeptical is not engaging in conspiracy theories, it's actually healthy for the human mind.

Would it be considered engaging in conspiracy to say that Mrs. Clinton is not a progressive? That would be more important during this presidential campaign than bringing up 9/11. We'll probably never know what really happened, but just because I don't believe the "official narrative" doesn't mean I'm engaging in conspiracy theory.

It's physics, not theory.