Why I'm Supporting Tulsi

I want to preface this piece with the notion that I find politics in general ineffective in the US. What the majority of the citizens want is NOT reflected in the policies of this nation. Our government is owned and controlled by the multi-national corporations and their will is abetted by the mafia branch of the government, the CIA (et al). Secondly, we face the existential threat of rapid impending climate disaster and extinction, the future shock of which probably makes politics moot. That said, when looking at next years primary season, I think Tulsi is a better candidate than Bernie. Here's why...

Really it boils down to foreign policy. Consider the response of Tulsi and Bernie to the US coup in Venezuela...

Tulsi Gabbard
‏Verified account @TulsiGabbard

The US needs to stop using our military for regime change & stop intervening in Venezuela’s military. Throughout history, US-led regime change has been waged in the name of humanitarianism, but has resulted in more suffering, destruction & lives lost. #HandsOffVenezuela

Bernie posted 3 tweets

The Maduro government has waged a violent crackdown on Venezuelan civil society, violated the constitution by dissolving the National Assembly and was re-elected last year in an election many observers said was fraudulent. The economy is a disaster and millions are migrating. 1/3

The United States should support the rule of law, fair elections and self-determination for the Venezuelan people. We must condemn the use of violence against unarmed protesters and the suppression of dissent. 2/3

But we must learn the lessons of the past and not be in the business of regime change or supporting coups—as we have in Chile, Guatemala, Brazil & the DR. The US has a long history of inappropriately intervening in Latin American nations; we must not go down that road again. 3/3

He is incorrect about several things. Abby Martin reported from the streets of Venezuela and documented the violence was primarily from the US funded opposition. They literally were burning Chavistas. The election was not fraudulent. The opposition largely declined to participate, and instead attacked polling places dominated by Chavistas. The economic collapse in the country is due primarily to our illegal sanctions. The third tweet is better, but the sequence shows a lack of understanding of the situation.

Jimmy, Abby and Mike discuss the story...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6chIn6JRjBA (16 min)

Now I'm not going to run down Bernie. I know many of you support him and I'm certain he stands a better chance at the nomination than Tulsi. Many people vote strategically. In 2016 many of my friends voted for the $hill rather than Bernie because they thought she had a better chance to win in the general.

I feel similar to Caitlin about a possible Sanders presidency....

While Bernie might not start any new hot wars or engage in the kind of obscene regime change interventionism we’re seeing from Trump in Venezuela, under a President Sanders we can expect to see a continued escalation of the world-threatening cold war against Russia, continued starvation sanctions against nations which fail to comply with the demands of the US empire, continued military expansionism around the world, and very little pushback against the depraved agendas of military and intelligence agencies. We can expect to see him play right along with the establishment narrative if the political/media class decides that Assad is gassing civilians and needs a dose of Tomahawk missiles, and we can probably expect him to facilitate the persecution of Julian Assange as well.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2019/02/20/six-thoughts-on-bernie-2020/
(worth the full read)

So what's so great about Tulsi. Well she has issues too. Neither she nor Bernie are calling out Israel. As we saw with Ilhan last week...just mention Israel and they go off the rails. More evidence of the dysfunctional nature the US government, media, corporate stranglehold. However she is a strong anti-interventionist. On Cross-Talk yesterday they spent the half hour discussing Tulsi as the "Peace Candidate". (25 min)
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2rQQbvYYxo]
Excellent conversation!

The corporate media is at war with the peace candidate...
Jimmy covers some of the attacks...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlXhRBsOwpA (27 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yTStAk7XqM (10 min)

Yesterday the war mongers on the View dished out some hate on Tulsi... attacking her about both Syria and Venezuela
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w1zf3YyXRI (10 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lydWqDS1GbY (2 min)

Tulsi isn't just against regime change war (although that is what arouses most of the ire against her). She has introduced and supported many progressive policies. Here's a nice clip...What does Tulsi stand for? (12 min)
[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb_lrNBUF7U]

She was on Joe Rogan's show for an extended interview back in September
Full interview (1.75 hours) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oIb2lmHgd5s
Here's a 1 hour edit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPNGfAUWQ5o
or a 11 min excerpt about the 2016 primary - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szkh57R3IoM

You can read or watch her presidential announcement at:
https://www.tulsi2020.com/press/2019-02-02-tulsi-gabbards-full-speech-pr...

She's been campaigning in Iowa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lReq9xDG-M (2 min)
...and New Hampshire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgcitSCVZJA (5 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwjclS0I9UU (8 min)

You may have noticed that the MSM rarely even mentions her as a candidate. They exclude her in many polls. The way in which they sideline her makes me think she better represents the people than the corporations.

Voting may be futile at this point in time. Tim Canova and Jimmy discuss the problems with our election system.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6A452H6wA4

Here in Alabama the general election will go to Trump. However, the primary does provide an opportunity to have some effect. None the less keeping in mind Tim's comment in the clip above, in 2016 the outcome of the Alabama dim primary differed by 18 points from the exit polls (in the $hill's favor). So it is obvious the momentum is for Bernie, but my preferred candidate is Tulsi.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

mimi's picture

in US-European-ME-relations than Sanders. She needs to visit and tour Europe. She is more courageous than Sanders on foreign policy issues too. She is a woman I could imagine to be the first female President of the US and it would be quite a good sign, if she could become it.
I think she would be well loved and respected all over the world. Na ja, may be I am naive.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

@mimi
I am too. I still dream of things that could be.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

gulfgal98's picture

It is all about PEACE for me. I posted in 2015 over at the other place that I could never support the evil queen because of her war mongering. There are sins of commission like the above evil queen and there are sins of omission like nearly every Democrat on the public stage. Tulsi Gabbard is the exception.

I did not spend nearly every Saturday with a local Peace vigil because it was simply a social gathering. I did it because I believe that until we rid this country of the blood sucking and blood letting vampires of the military/ banker/industrial complex, this country and the world will devolve into chaos, especially with climate change looming like the sword of Damocles.

Not only is Tulsi Gabbard the only candidate who is bringing the issue of our war mongering/regime changing government into the public discussion, but she is the only candidate who has shown me that she has the leadership skills to confront those thorny issues and make those difficult decisions. The more I learn about Tulsi, the more I am convinced that this country needs her or someone with the backbone like her to stand up to the deep state.

Bernie is definitely my second choice for the Dems even though his foreign policy statements are sometimes cringe worthy. There is no other Dem that I will support and that includes the weasely Elizabeth Warren.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

snoopydawg's picture

@gulfgal98

RT has the article on it and my Twitter feed is loaded with it.

Megan McCain..ugh. The tone she took with Tulsi made me want to slap her. It was her own damn daddy that made the rounds with AQ and ISIS leaders and it's them that were using chemical weapons on Syrians. But for Megan it's wrong for anyone to try to get people to see that it's this country that is going around using chemical weapons in its illegal wars. Depleted uranium and white phosphorus were used in Iraq and Syria, but let's pretend that our poop aren't smelly.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Lookout's picture

@snoopydawg

that Tulsi was portraying Maduro, Assad, Qaddafi, etc were dictators. At least on the View this AM (see links in essay) If so, then T-rump is a dictator too. She partially redeems herself in arguing our invasion (for humanitarian reasons - yeah right) result in worse lives for the people in those countries, and promotes more terrorism making the US less safe.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@snoopydawg

is military. If she thinks Assad is a brutal dictator, she's no doubt right. If she thinks he has used chemical weapons on his own people, she may know something we don't know. Her point is that WHAT WE HAVE DONE in supplying Al Qaeda, ISIS and their thug partners with enough weaponry to destroy Syria in our effort to proxy the Saudi assault on Syria is WORSE.

Even Joe Biden said this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-29528482

… "Our biggest problem was our allies," Mr Biden told students at the Harvard Kennedy School.
"The Turks… the Saudis, the Emirates, etc, what were they doing? They were so determined to take down (Syrian President Bashar al) Assad and essentially have a proxy Sunni-Shia war, what did they do? They poured hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tonnes of weapons into anyone who would fight against Assad."

These policies ended up helping militants linked to al-Qaeda and ultimately IS, he said.

Even Hillary Clinton said this:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774

On Aug 17, 2014 3:50 PM, "H"
wrote:
Note: Sources include Western intelligence, US intelligence and sources in the region.

… While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region...

And especially our Defense Information Agency under Michael Flynn said this:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Pg.-291-Pgs.-287...

… THE GENERAL SITUATION:

A. INTERNALLY, EVENTS ARE TAKING A CLEAR SECTARIAN DIRECTION.

B. THE SALAFIST, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND AQI ARE THE MAJOR FORCES DRIVING THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA.

C. THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE OPPOSITION; WHILE RUSSIA, CHINA, AND IRAN SUPPORT THE REGIME.

… C. IF THE SITUATION UNRAVELS THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A DECLARED OR UNDECLARED SALAFIST PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT, IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME, WHICH IS CONSIDERED THE STRATEGIC DEPTH OF THE SHIA EXPANSION (IRAQ AND IRAN).

D. THE DETERIORATION OF THE SITUATION HAS DIRE CONSEQUENCES ON THE IRAQI SITUATION AND ARE AS FOLLOWS:

--1. THIS CREATES THE IDEAL ATMOSPHERE FOR AQI TO RETURN TO ITS OLD POCKETS IN MOSUL AND RAMADI, AND WILL PROVIDE A RENEWED MOMENTUM UNDER THE PRESUMPTION OF UNIFYING THE JIHAD AMONG SUNNI IRAQ AND SYRIA… ISI COULD ALSO DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA, WHICH WILL CREATE GRAVE DANGER IN REGARDS TO UNIFYING IRAQ AND THE PROTECTION OF ITS TERRITORY...

I don't give a shit how many ways the liberal media try to make her into an Assad apologist. She and the members of our military who criticize our bad policy are not supporters of Assad. They are critics of our bad policy of supporting Al Qaeda and Salafist head choppers.

up
0 users have voted.
snoopydawg's picture

@Linda Wood

as this tweet says. This isn't the only tweet that is pointing that out. I know that she is against regime change and our arming terrorists, etc. my post is only about what was said on the View and about Megan's dad palling around with terrorists.

Sheesh. Guess no one has read my other comments about Tulsi here.

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

Lookout's picture

@snoopydawg

if she re-evaluated after the AM Joe attacks to concede the dictator point in order to drive home the fact that these wars have made things worse not better. Otherwise is was a constant argument about if these leaders are bad. As if...
bad leader = destabilize the country + civilian deaths + steal their resources

Just speculating, not excusing though.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@snoopydawg

I didn't mean to express my anger at you or at the points being made in your comment. You are a stalwart of research and contribution here towards peace and justice. My anger is at the media's assertion that anyone in our military who criticizes the corrupt, treasonous, failed policy of arming terrorists against a dictator is somehow soft on dictators!

And, yes, it disheartens me to read that she has said Assad has used chemical weapons on his own people because I think each of the supposed cases we have been misled about has turned out, after much scrutiny, to have been a false flag attack. But maybe she knows something we don't know about those or other cases.

Even so, what we have done in response has made matters immeasurably worse. I think you and I agree here, and I apologize if my anger overwhelmed my comment and landed on you instead of on the mainstream media.

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

@gulfgal98

Stopping our insane war economy is not only important it also begins to deal with the climate problem. https://www.projectcensored.org/2-us-department-of-defense-is-the-worst-...

...and provides funding that could be used for social services and a green new deal. Our future hinges on this issue. Our national morality (if we ever had any) has been squandered.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@Lookout We cannot begin to invest in our domestic economy and infrastructure, not to mention pay for Medicare for all, free college tuition, etc., until we stop the ruinous spending on overseas bases and interventions.

up
0 users have voted.

Mary Bennett

Lookout's picture

@Nastarana

Do no harm. Sadly we spread ever more aggression. War in Venezuela and Iran are knocking at the door and may be rammed down our throats before we get rid of T-rump.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

gulfgal98's picture

@Lookout cost was my most effective talking point. Although my personal reason for doing the Peace vigil was the moral and ethical reasons, that is not an effective way to bridge the political gap. We had a lot of self described conservatives stop to talk to us. Some approached us with initial antagonism. And then we would bring up the fiscal cost of these wars. Most folks were shocked to find out just how much these wars were costing the US taxpayers. It helped them to make the link of why things were falling apart here in the homeland and why waging endless war was so wasteful. This is why I have been surprised that Bernie has not used this approach in his campaign.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

Lookout's picture

@gulfgal98

resonates across the political and social spectrum. I always wondered why Bernie didn't make it a major plank. I do appreciate his focus on the "too big the fail" banks and other economic issues - medicare 4 all, $15/hr, etc. - and think he is much better than Warren on these points.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

k9disc's picture

And I mean the State of Isreal, which should go without mention...

Seems to me that support for the State of Israel as a global superpower puts you smack dab in a world of extra-territorial intrigue. Essentially supporting the State of Israel is incompatible with non-interventionism.

Practically, can you have both? I wondered similarly about Bernie's FP, but it wasn't such a clear cut Achilles heel in his case...

up
0 users have voted.

“Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.” ~ Sun Tzu

Lookout's picture

@k9disc

Can You Be For Non-Intervention and Support Israel?

I finally figured out that Israel is a big part of the arms business. Spreading war and chaos improves the bottom line. The US also uses this strategy as the leading merchants of war. We're in business together causing death and destruction. Israel sent trainers and advisors to Brazil last week in order to prepare for a Venezuelan invasion.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

Them from stealing elections is to provide armed guards around the voting places and armed escorts for all ballots being transported. And tons of witnesses.

up
0 users have voted.

I supported Bernie last time around, and I would be okay if he ended up being president, but it makes me nervous him parroting all the neolib talking points about Russiagate, etc. He does seem to have been influenced.

Tulsi speaks truth, but it is correct she is nowhere near as popular as Bernie. That's because she's still not visible to most people--perhaps the caucuses and primaries in the initial states will change that. If she gets into the debates, perhaps that will change that.

I do know she would wipe Trump off the map in an election--she has wide cross-appeal. I hope she gets the nomination, but if not, I hope Bernie gets the nomination and takes her on as VP.

Why VP? Bernie is old. There is a fair chance that, just because of his age, he would pass away in his first or second terms of office. Then, Tulsi would step in as a worthy first woman president. Or even more ideally, Bernie would serve two terms, people would want more of it, and Tulsi would win the following election and serve two more terms after Bernie! Sixteen years of progressive leadership!!!

A guy can dream . . .

up
0 users have voted.
Lookout's picture

@apenultimate

that Bernie never called out the DNC and instead adopted the russiagate narrative (which I find absurd).

Tulsi has been calling out corrupt pols on both sides of the aisle. We'll see what we'll see.

Thanks for your comment.

up
0 users have voted.

“Until justice rolls down like water and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

@Lookout
that the shutdown was the result of both Parties being unwilling to sit down and work out a compromise. She didn't come out and say it, but it seemed obvious to me, that she felt both sides were playing politics and didn't really give a rat's ass about the "issues" involved. And they sure didn't care about the hardship inflicted on furloughed workers.

up
0 users have voted.

chuck utzman

TULSI 2020

Cassiodorus's picture

It's easy to imagine 2020 being a repeat of 2016. I'm sure the Democrats already have a plan in place for how 2020 is to be rigged, perhaps following the plan laid out in 2016. Remember the lawyers' defense against the lawsuit against the DNC: the Democratic Party is not legally obliged to offer fair primaries.

It's also easy to imagine two neoliberals running against each other and the public gearing up for another four years of getting nothing. Bernie will lose again and endorse the Democrat again. Maybe this time around Biden or whomever will win or something like that, though. Remember that Trump only won through razor-thin margins in the upper Midwest and that if he'd lost two or three of those states he'd have lost. The Democrat winner in 2020 will try to imitate the successful formula of Clinton and Obama -- look sharp and be neoliberal. And we will all have died having changed nothing about America or the world.

Well that's what it's easy to imagine. Our Revolution clearly wasn't enough to change the culture of American politics -- we need another organization, one dedicated to that. Lessons can be learned from, for instance, the Zapatistas, or the South Central Farmers. When my situation with a forthcoming inheritance (or lack thereof) settles down I hope to form such an organization.

up
0 users have voted.

"I'm starting to believe that they want Donald Trump to get elected." -- Compton Jay

Anja Geitz's picture

@Cassiodorus

Right after they all recovered from the shock of losing to the Orange Hairball

I'm sure the Democrats already have a plan in place for how 2020 is to be rigged, perhaps following the plan laid out in 2016.

For me personally, that was the only glint of light in that entire fiasco of an Election. The DNC power machine having to eat shit on election night. Oh, the sweet satisfaction when Hillary couldn't even bring HERself to come out and give a concession speech and thank her many fervent supporters. The shock of it all. As if none of them couldn't see HER losing as obviously as watching a train rolling down the tracks.

up
0 users have voted.

There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier

@Cassiodorus South Central Farmers, but do try to learn from their mistakes. In a state where rents are outrageously high, and practically no landlords, including minority landlords, I might add, won't no how anyhow allow tenants to garden, a message of "What about our community?" wasn't going to get much public support. I looked at a house being rented out by a couple from Mexico. Not only was the rent high, but the man and his son did all the yard care, the tenant had no say in what was planted, or, presumably, when it was sprayed and with what chemical brew. They could charge extra rent for having a "nice yard", but it didn't look like the tenant got to use said yard.

up
0 users have voted.

Mary Bennett

Cassiodorus's picture

@Nastarana Revolt would really be a bonus at this point.

up
0 users have voted.

"I'm starting to believe that they want Donald Trump to get elected." -- Compton Jay

@Cassiodorus the excesses of the Ancien Regime, including its' tax free status, until the day when the price of wheat rose beyond what Parisian housewives could pay. Balzac details in Pere Goriot just how that wheat price was deliberately manipulated. No need to assume conspiracy, greed provides a perfectly sufficient explanation, though of course there were conspiracies waiting for a sparks they could fan into bonfires.

up
0 users have voted.

Mary Bennett

Can't bring myself to watch this.
What happened?

https://www.rt.com/usa/452095-tulsi-gabbard-the-view-mccain/

Edit. snoopy has this upthread. missed it,sorry.

up
0 users have voted.
ZimInSeattle's picture

debates. Her anti-war stance is desperately needed in the conversation. In the end, I believe Bernie will have a better chance and if he makes it to the presidency Tulsi should definitely be in his cabinet maybe VP. Good article here on Venezuela: The War on Venezuela is Built on Lies

John Pilger one of my all time favorite journalists. A couple snips:

“Of the 92 elections that we’ve monitored,” said former President Jimmy Carter, whose Carter Centre is a respected monitor of elections around the world, “I would say the election process in Venezuela is the best in the world.” By way of contrast, said Carter, the US election system, with its emphasis on campaign money, “is one of the worst”.
~snip~
In 2018, Maduro was re-elected President. A section of the opposition boycotted the election, a tactic tried against Chavez. The boycott failed: 9,389,056 people voted; sixteen parties participated and six candidates stood for the presidency. Maduro won 6,248,864 votes, or 67.84 per cent.

up
0 users have voted.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - JFK | "The more I see of the moneyed peoples, the more I understand the guillotine." - G. B. Shaw Bernie/Tulsi 2020

Pages