@Pluto's Republic

"Here, let's add some niggling little easily-circumventable rules to convince the masses we are DOING SOMETHING(tm) while we go about business as usual."

As if rules about bumper stickers might even remotely address the fact that the entire organization sold itself to the Clintons and the sort of cultural corruption that implies. Press civil and criminal cases. Bar others from ever participating in the Democratic party. Address how riggable the elections are to start with. In other words, do some house cleaning. That's what the party would need to do in order to begin to convince me.

The rules would prohibit DNC staffers and officers from financial contributions to particular candidates, attendance of events that could suggest partiality, public statements or social media posts espousing presidential preferences, internal communications expressing views for or against Democratic candidates, and even gestures like displaying bumper stickers or lawn signs for individual campaigns.

The DNC is trying to promote "staff bias" as the problem they are going to fix — as if "bias" is what the accusers meant when they referred to the physical "election rigging" that took place across many states.

They are going to make sure staffers don't have a bumper sticker for their favorite candidate on their car? Or a lawn sign at their home? Cause that was the problem?

This is why they lose. It's just more of the same coordinated bullshit.

@snoopydawg Exactly!!! (See my comment, immediately above yours; with your commentary being much more informative than what I posted.) Thank you!

Hey any word on the $84 million money laundering lawsuit? You know when donated money raised for state parties by the Hillary Victory Fund were then passed back to the DNC and on to Clinton’s campaign.

The Anatomy Of Hillary Clinton's $84 Million Money-Laundering Scheme

Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway. As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.

Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy together.

Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed.

Not sure of the accuracy of the Donna article because it starts out with this BS.

"When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign."

Nothing more recent than July. Is she going to skate on that? The DNC lawsuit had a hearing this week, but I can't find anything about it.

@snoopydawg
I still don't understand how that's illegal. It's slimy, but sliminess is always associated with infidelity; not illegal that I know of except for the campaign funds thing, and if those funds were used, of course it's illegal. Both Cohen and Trump have enough money not to have to dip into campaign funds for anything. I obviously don't understand the whole thing.

Thing is, this hush money stuff took place fairly recently, as opposed to just how long ago the Hillary Crime Machine, including Her DNC Branch, did all the shit it did and nothing but a few, get-your-hopes-up, teases. These are real crimes. Crickets on the 3 Letter news stations too -- Cohen and other bullshit is all over every broadcast. Yet we're crazy if we think there just might really be something to that whackadoo Deep State "theory".

Hey any word on the $84 million money laundering lawsuit? You know when donated money raised for state parties by the Hillary Victory Fund were then passed back to the DNC and on to Clinton’s campaign.

The Anatomy Of Hillary Clinton's $84 Million Money-Laundering Scheme

Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway. As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.

On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.

Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy together.

Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed.

Not sure of the accuracy of the Donna article because it starts out with this BS.

"When I was asked to run the Democratic Party after the Russians hacked our emails, I stumbled onto a shocking truth about the Clinton campaign."

Nothing more recent than July. Is she going to skate on that? The DNC lawsuit had a hearing this week, but I can't find anything about it.