Widening Circles: A Case for Bernie Sanders

[also posting at NoIWillNotYield.com]

I've been thinking lately of circles radiating outward, like ripples on a pond.

The great poet Rainer Maria Rilke wrote:

I live my life in widening circles
that reach out across the world.

My friend Jon Young writes of circles, or zones, as well. Jon is a brilliant naturalist who can stand at the edge of the woods and tell you that there is a person coming up the trail in, say, ten minutes. Or that a dog will be coming from around the other side of the farmhouse nearby. Or that it’s a cat, not a dog, that’s coming. How does he do this?

Jon talks about two kinds of zones. The zone of disturbance is the degree to which we set off alarms among birds and other animals as we walk through the woods. Most of us are clumsy and noisy in our journey through the world. That’s why we might walk in the forest and see nothing: the creatures heard us from way off and simply moved out of our path before we ever knew they were there.

But we can learn to reduce our zone of disturbance by tuning into the natural world, slowing down, and paying attention. When we do that, our energy changes and the birds and animals can sense that we present no danger.

At the same time, we can expand our zone of awareness, which is our ability to take in and process the information available to us. At first, the behavior of the birds in the backyard might seem random, but when we become more aware, we can understand what the birds are doing and why.

Circles of Empathy

I like the image of these radiating zones. They've helped me think of another kind of circle that radiates out from us. You could call it a circle of empathy.

Imagine that each one of us has a circle of empathy that radiates outward. The process of growing up is largely one of extending our empathy beyond the ego to others — and, in fact, seeing the other as connected to ourselves.

But for some, even in adulthood, the circle of empathy remains quite small. Trump and his supporters, for example, have empathy that doesn't radiate very far, and that has very strong borders. Inside the zone is "people like me," which is to say, white Americans who share similar beliefs. Outside that is "the other:" people of color, people who have different beliefs, immigrants.

It looks something like this.

Screen_Shot_2016-03-11_at_1.06.42_PM.png

It's easy to criticize Trump supporters, of course, but it's a lot harder to find voters whose circle of empathy extends as far as it might. We're told to vote our own-self interest, but that's not nearly good enough anymore. We live in the wealthiest, most powerful country on earth, and there's not a person on the planet not affected by those we elect into office.

Many years ago, Wendell Berry wrote:

“We have lived our lives by the assumption that what was good for us would be good for the world. We have been wrong. We must change our lives so that it will be possible to live by the contrary assumption, that what is good for the world will be good for us. And that requires that we make the effort to know the world and learn what is good for it.”

This is what I believe: that we are far too limited in how we view and use our political power as the most privileged people on earth.

This election will affect the global climate for centuries. It will determine whether or not the gap between rich and poor continues to grow. It will determine whether or not our children leave college burdened with debt. It will determine whether or not the corrupting influence of multinational corporations continues to undermine the independence, safety, and health of people in other countries.

There is only one candidate who speaks to these things, who speaks for all of us. Listen to this man.

[video:https://youtu.be/YWnvBFwojNM]

Just watch that man speak. He believes in this to his core:

This is what I believe. Every great religion in the world — Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism — essentially comes down to: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." And what I have believed in my whole life — I believed it when I was a 22-year-old kid getting arrested in Chicago fighting segregation — I’ve believed it in my whole life.

That we are in this together — not just, not words. The truth is at some level when you hurt, when your children hurt, I hurt. I hurt. And when my kids hurt, you hurt. And it’s very easy to turn our backs on kids who are hungry, or veterans who are sleeping out on the street, and we can develop a psyche, a psychology which is "I don’t have to worry about them; all I’m gonna worry about is myself; I need to make another 5 billion dollars."

But I believe that what human nature is about is that everybody in this room impacts everybody else in all kinds of ways that we can’t even understand. It’s beyond intellect. It’s a spiritual, emotional thing.

What does this look like? I think it looks something like this. No barriers, no borders, just radiating empathy for others that translates into action.

Screen_Shot_2016-03-11_at_1.27.29_PM.png

There is only one candidate running with this worldview.

Only one candidate who has spent his life fighting against injustice, against sending our children to die in illegal wars, against discrimination of all types.

There is only one candidate running who has rejected the lure of corporate money.

Only one who fights the criminals on Wall St. who cost millions of Americans our homes.

Who is against fracking because it poisons our water and harms our climate.

Who has spent his entire career fighting for the middle class, not the corporate class.

Who believes access to health care is a basic human right.

Who wants our kids to be able to go to public university without sinking into debt.

There is only one candidate whose life's work reflects the belief that "When you hurt, when your children hurt, I hurt. I hurt. And when my kids hurt, you hurt."

There is only one candidate with rock solid, unimpeachable integrity. And only one candidate whose campaign is funded entirely by we, the people.

This is about more than Bernie Sanders. This is about all of us and how we choose to use our power as citizens. We can choose business as usual. But can we not, given this rare opportunity, elect a man who believes we can do much, much better?

Please consider voting for this remarkable man at this critical moment in our history. Let us, in this moment, live our lives in widening circles that reach out across the world.

Tags: 
Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

SnappleBC's picture

And when we talk, I listen to them. I seek to understand and empathize with their world view.... to actually get it. And honestly, the only time I have failed was on a discussion of climate change where the end answer, when I dug long enough, was "screw the rest of the world, I'll be dead before it's a problem for me." I have that same problem with a liberal friend who is of the same mind set.

In a different example, I still remember a plane trip I took a few years ago. Next to me sat a young, slim, blond woman who was the epitome of conservative. She was from the south. She was a proud Republican. Her family had a long tradition of military service and she drew great pride from that. She was deeply religious and she felt that being gay was a sin. Her picture could've appeared in the dictionary next to the word "conservative".

We chatted politics for a good two hours. We learned that we agreed on way more things than we disagreed on. We both agreed that we would take a random person on this plane... literally... in place of any person in DC right now. I agreed that I'd rather see her as president than Obama and she agreed she'd rather see me. Both of us felt strongly that despite the places we disagreed, we would represent and benefit regular people a TON more than Obama.

It's fascinating what you learn when you get past childish slurs like "rethugs" and seek to understand alternate viewpoints.

Insofar as the specific point of "voting for my self-interest", when has narcissistic greed ever been a really useful viewpoint for solving problems? My vote went to Bernie and that is certainly not in my own interests. My personal interests would probably point to Clinton or maybe one of the Republicans.

up
0 users have voted.

A lot of wanderers in the U.S. political desert recognize that all the duopoly has to offer is a choice of mirages. Come, let us trudge towards empty expanse of sand #1, littered with the bleached bones of Deaniacs and Hope and Changers.
-- lotlizard

Pat K California's picture

... my hat is off to you. I'd like to get to the point where I could have these kinds of discussions with conservatives ... but I sure can't say I have a talent for it. I think for many of is, being able to have meaningful discussions with people who have very different viewpoints is a struggle.

Back in 2003 when the war on Iraq blew up, I joined a peace vigil in my home town that met for 2 hours on a busy street corner once a week for 6 years. And for many of those years we had an opposition group on the opposite corner that wasn't above pulling some pretty rancid stuff trying to silence us. Oh, man, but I spent so much of that time angry as hell at "those dumbshits". Someone from the other side would come over to argue, and I'd lose my temper so fast it wasn't funny. Gradually, I began to note that many in our vigil group did not get angry. They actually seemed to have a knack for talking quietly with "those people" ... and although they seldom changed minds, the atmosphere was sure a lot calmer and less rancorous! And no one stormed off mad as hell. I vowed from that point on to learn the secret to this quiet talk, which actually wasn't so much quiet talk as it was quiet listening. No, I'm still not good at it. But I'm trying. After all, isn't this what empathy is all about?

up
0 users have voted.

"Long term: first the rich get mean, then the poor get mean, and the rest is history." My brother Rob.

gulfgal98's picture

over at dkos and they were met with near universal derision. The team blue atmosphere is so strong that most people cannot see that we must find common ground with others whom we may disagree. How else can we fight the system? Here's the way I look at it. How can you convince someone that there might be a better way when all you are doing is looking down on them?

It's fascinating what you learn when you get past childish slurs like "rethugs" and seek to understand alternate viewpoints.

Finding that small amount of common ground gives us the opportunity to expand and reach out. I am finding this with one conservative family member. He even mentioned to me that his liberal friends (and me) were far more courteous than his conservative friends. And now we are engaging in polite political conversations. We are all products of our environment. As a southerner, I know this far too well.

I think what Bernie is doing in his campaign is finding common ground with a wide range of the people. How else can you explain his appeal to Independents and the 2,500 write in votes he got from Republicans in New Hampshire?

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

I was struck by the diary linked below (a review of what Sanders' campaign takes from major political figures), and by these 2 paragraphs about the moral framework he gives to his issues, which offer common ground for our better selves:

Another remarkable feature of the Sanders campaign has been the success of its message on religious conservatives, an economic and political appeal on moral grounds. He never fails to lose an opportunity to point out the remarks of Pope Francis on issues ranging from income inequality, greed and climate change.

He invoked numerous passages from the Bible at his speech at Liberty University, informing the student audience that he respectfully disagreed with them on issues such as abortion, and moved on to what he saw as moral common ground on corporate greed, the wealth gap, Wall Street speculation as usury, and basic human welfare. In addition, Sanders has held public meetings in mosques, defended Muslims against bigotry, toured black churches and Historically Black Colleges. [emphasis added] www.dailykos.com/...

up
0 users have voted.

"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." --Jiddu Krishnamurti

(i tried to embed directly from the playing for change site, but was told "This video provider is not currently supported".)

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

trouble deciding between Sanders and Clinton.

up
0 users have voted.

The earth is a multibillion-year-old sphere.
The Nazis killed millions of Jews.
On 9/11/01 a Boeing 757 (AA77) flew into the Pentagon.
AGCC is happening.
If you cannot accept these facts, I cannot fake an interest in any of your opinions.

but if Red Green doesnt scream for a question from a Canadian it could only be because Bob and Doug McKenzie have hijacked the thread.
I do not do essays (poor grammar), and this is probably the first or second post I have ever made. I have lurked about for years at the other places left of centre, (yes, centre is spelled correctly, (see colour, metre and so on)), and being Canadian and asking a question here, you can likely figure out my political leaning. Here goes...
So as the primaries continue,and Hilary gets indicted (yay!) and drops out, would the delegates automatically go to Sanders or at convention, could they say throw Bloomberg in there and manufacture a win for him?
Just curious how a scenario like that would play out.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

First, I do not believe Hillary will be indicted although it is quite possible one or more her aides might be. Knowing the hubris of the Clintons, she will not drop out short of a major medical problem. They believe that they are above the system.

However if your scenario did occur, those delegates would not necessarily go to Sanders. The establishment is very afraid of Sanders and my guess is that they would go with plan B which would be Uncle Joe Biden under a brokered convention.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

for the clarification. I will be lurking and reading until I have another politics 101 question.
BTW, I always enjoy your essays and diaries!

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

To be clear, I am no expert and that was simply my opinion, of which I am never lacking. LOL.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

should hillary drop out: the establishment chooses the nominee, not the delegates (unfortunately).

& since the establishment doesn't want bernie, my guess is they'd give it to someone they prefer...guaranteeing a d loss in november b/c bernie's supporters won't turnout to vote for whomever that is.

up
0 users have voted.
mileser's picture

Have you ever looked at Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Model? It's frequently used to examine child development, but I personally feel it has much greater applications. You're discussion of circles really reminded me of his model.

up
0 users have voted.

-9.75, -8.21

Mass Southpaw's picture

Thanks, I'll take a look.

up
0 users have voted.
gulfgal98's picture

I am so glad that you have posted this beautifully written essay here for us at CC99. I read it over at dkos and recommended it there too.

We need to think of ourselves as human beings first and overcome the obstacles that are being used to divide us. We all have much more in common with one another than we have in our differences. Bernie Sanders is showing us how to do just that.

up
0 users have voted.

Do I hear the sound of guillotines being constructed?

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." ~ President John F. Kennedy

CS in AZ's picture

Wonderful post, thank you for sharing it here.

up
0 users have voted.
Mass Southpaw's picture

I appreciate it.

up
0 users have voted.