(This didn’t surprise me. How jaded can one get?)Clinton Struck Deal With Obama State Dept. to Keep Records Private:

Submitted by Amanda Matthews on Fri, 12/15/2017 - 5:08pm

I’m just sitting here drinking some warm Black Cherry Berry tea trying to figure out if those two worthless shits know how much damage they’ve done?

How can ANYONE with an I.Q. over the double digit range and having even a tiny drop of ethics in their body trust anyone running the ‘party’ ever again? History may not be very kind to the Clinton Creature and the Empty Suit.

Clinton Struck Deal With Obama State Dept. to Keep Records Private

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton struck a deal with the State Department while serving in the Obama administration that allowed her to take ownership of records she did not want made public, according to recently released reports.

Clinton and her then-deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin were permitted to remove electronic and physical records under a claim they were "personal" materials and "unclassified, non-record materials."

Judicial Watch made the revelation after filing a FOIA request with the State Department and obtaining a record of the agreement.

The newly released documents show the deal allowed Clinton and Abedin to remove documents related to particular calls and schedules, and the records would not be "released to the general public under FOIA." Abedin, for instance, was allowed to remove electronic records and five boxes of physical files, including files labeled "Muslim Engagement Documents."
records

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/clinton-struck-deal-obama-state-...

Judicial Watch: State Department Made Deal with Hillary Clinton to Keep Call Log, Schedules Secret

DECEMBER 14, 2017
(Washington, DC) –

Judicial Watch today released new U.S. Department of State documents showing former Secretary Hillary Clinton and her then-Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin were permitted to remove electronic and physical records under a claim they were “personal” materials and “unclassified, non-record materials,” including files of Clinton’s calls and schedules, which were not to be made public. The documents show the Obama State Department records would not be “released to the general public under FOIA.”

The new records also show that Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Documents.”

Judicial Watch obtained the reports about the records from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:

Any and all DS-1904 (Authorization for the Removal of Personal Papers and Non-Record Materials) forms completed by, or on behalf of, any of the following individuals:

Former Secretary Hillary Clinton

Former Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills

Former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin

Former Deputy Chief of Staff Jacob Sullivano

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-s...

Tags:

Records? What records?

Vote

Comments

Submitted by EdMass on Fri, 12/15/2017 - 5:33pm

Tea? Wine? Title Cluster?

Good article as always. Title? Way to confusing. I read cause it's you.

I'm shocked that Her collaborated with Him about anything. The Beastie was the most qualified candidate evah. He told me so, so must be true?

IMO a declarative sentence is the writers best friend. Title Dominance for the Clicks!

Peace

—

Prof: Nancy! I’m going to Greece!
Nancy: And swim the English Channel?
Prof: No. No. To ancient Greece where burning Sapho stood beside the wine dark sea. Wa de do da! Nancy, I’ve invented a time machine!

Firesign Theater

Stop the War!

Submitted by Amanda Matthews on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 8:25am

My entire life was/is/will be a cluster until

@EdMass @EdMass
I’m finally plant food.

And as ‘they’ say in programming, it’s not a bug, it’s a feature.

You should meet the family.

EDIT: it’/it’s

—

I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa

Submitted by snoopydawg on Fri, 12/15/2017 - 5:34pm

I read this yesterday and it didn't surprise me either

It wasn't just the state department that let Hillary get away with so much shit. The Justice department, the FBI, NSA and congress as well as Obama all were involved in keeping the things she did secret. She ran for president while under investigation by the FBI.

That she didn't turn over her emails only came out because of the Benghazi hearings and that is when congress told her to turn them all in. Yet she deleted 30,000 of them and congress and the FBI should have charged her with obstruction of justice.

A special prosecutor should have been named after Bill met with Lynch. Period. That showed that the justice department was not being neutral on this.

Then there's this:
Source

Strzok is now also known to have been the person who changed the wording in Comey’s statement clearing Hillary Clinton for her misuse of her private email server to say that Hillary Clinton had been “extremely careless'” as opposed to “grossly negligent”.

Srzok has been shown that he too was not neutral and that he had a huge bias towards Trump.
The whole damn Russian crap was started to make sure that Hillary became president and now it's crept into a coup against the duly elected president.

Submitted by Wink on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 12:07am

yep. n/t

@snoopydawg

—

the little things you can do are more valuable than the giant things you can't! - @thanatokephaloides. On Twitter @wink1radio. (-2.1) All about building progressive media.

Submitted by snoopydawg on Fri, 12/15/2017 - 8:13pm

Why wasn't he charged for this?

In a country that has a functioning justice system, Strzok should be the one who is on trial for collusion or something similar to it. Is treason too far out?
The foundering Russia gate

As much as the U.S. mainstream media has mocked the idea that an American “deep state” exists and that it has maneuvered to remove Trump from office, the text messages between senior FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and senior FBI lawyer Lisa Page reveal how two high-ranking members of the government’s intelligence/legal bureaucracy saw their role as protecting the United States from an election that might elevate to the presidency someone as unfit as Trump.

This sure looks like collusion to me.

It’s unclear what strategy these FBI officials were contemplating to ensure Trump’s defeat, but the comments mesh with what an intelligence source told me after the 2016 election, that there was a plan among senior Obama administration officials to use the allegations about Russian meddling to block Trump’s momentum with the voters and — if elected — to persuade members of the Electoral College to deny Trump a majority of votes and thus throw the selection of a new president into the House of Representatives under the rules of the Twelfth Amendment.

The scheme involved having some Democratic electors vote for former Secretary of State Colin Powell (which did happen), making him the third-place vote-getter in the Electoral College and thus eligible for selection by the House. But the plan fizzled when enough of Trump’s electors stayed loyal to their candidate to officially make him President.

Submitted by Amanda Matthews on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 9:00am

That last paragraph is very telling. That is

@snoopydawg @snoopydawg
something, a soft coup attempt by the FBI. With Obama’s backing and approval (IMO).

It would be very interesting to hear the ‘reason’ that some electors just happened to write in Powel’s name (another sleazy, corrupt, lying SOB).

I sincerely hope that enough dirt comes out on old Hopey-Changey Transformational Peace Prize to end his speaking career and consign his legacy to history’s garbage bin. Right next to the Clinton Creature’s, her hubby’s, and all the newly resurrected trash from the bush**/cheney crew who’s lies and war crimes are now acceptable because they said mean things about Trump.

EDIT: typo and poor grammar.

—

I'm tired of this back-slapping "Isn't humanity neat?" bullshit. We're a virus with shoes, okay? That's all we are. - Bill Hicks

Politics is the entertainment branch of industry. - Frank Zappa

Submitted by snoopydawg on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 2:04pm

That's what many alternative websites are saying

@Amanda Matthews

something, a soft coup attempt by the FBI. With Obama’s backing and approval

This started when Trump was talking about detente with Russia and since Obama and NATO had spent two years putting military equipment and troops in countries that surround Russia, he had to be neutered.

There's a diary on ToP this morning about how Trump ignored the January 6 memo from Brennan and Clapper about how Putin himself had interfered with the election, yet the wording in that memo are words such as "attempted" and others in that vein. Not that they had definitive proof that Putin did anything. Yet the idjits on ToP have taken this to mean that Putin was able to change votes, stop people from voting or who knows what else their minds are making up? Another diary there is full of people praising the FBI with one member saying that they are the most patriotic agency in history. WTF? Illegal spying anyone? Or the number of other things that they have done during their history? How about the things HOOVER did? SMDH, those people have fallen into the koolaid bowl and now they are cheering that some old members of the FBI are putting Fox news on notice because they have the audacity to say something bad about Mueller. Here's one thing that not many people are aware of. I'm sure many of you remember the report from the FBI agents that warned of Saudi nationals being in the country and getting support from the Saudi government before 9'11? And that they warned that people on the terrorist watch list were taking flying lessons. During the 9'11 commission hearings, someone wanted that FBI agent interviewed but MUELLER told them not to do it? Yeah Mueller is full of integrity. My Ass he is.

Meanwhile after that meeting, Obama addressed the nation and said "there is no proof that the election was interfered by an outside entity." NO PROOF WHAT SO EVER!

VIPS sent Trump a letter stating that the DNC computer hacks were actually a leak because of the rate of speed the information was copied. 87 seconds isn't enough time for an outside agency to hack information from a computer, but it was enough time for someone to download it to a thumb drive.

I'm so disgusted with people that have let their idolatry of The Clinton Creature and their hatred for Trump to take over their line of reasoning. People that I once respected have lost it because they cannot see that they are having the biggest Phsyops done to them.

Submitted by nosleep4u on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 8:29am

How is that even legal, at all?

Those records belong to the government, and last I heard, it was illegal for government employees to just hand government property to their buddies.

Everyone involved in this should be going down for felonies.

Submitted by Raggedy Ann on Sat, 12/16/2017 - 9:08am

But they won't because

@nosleep4u

that's not part of the plan being carried out by the club to which we are not members.

—

"The “jumpers” reminded us that one day we will all face only one choice and that is how we will die, not how we will live." Chris Hedges on 9/11