FBI Whistleblower Reveals Robert Mueller Corruption

.

FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds exposes what has really been going on with this cast of criminally corrupt Obama-Clinton characters of which a key part of is .... Robert Mueller himself -- the anointed "special council investigator" that is supposed to tell us the truth(?), and prosecute the crimes (his own?).

Sibel Edmonds has also been a whistleblower previously on how the Sept 11 (2001) attacks were orchestrated and protected by our U.S. Government agencies (with Saudi involvement).

---

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=37&v=zUimjceikh0 width:640 height:480]

--

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DONbO-KOHf8 width:640 height:480]
Part 2

---

We currently have no Justice Department today (except a fruadulent one run by the Deep State itself).

And President Trump has made a terrible mistake in permitting Jeff Sessions to step aside and recuse himself from all DOJ job duties, and just hand over the operations to these longstanding Deep State operatives.

---

---

This is the Real News, and not the Fake News.

Share
up
0 users have voted.

Comments

Meteor Man's picture

It was not at all clear exactly what connection Mueller had to some oblique cover-up of something a Muslim cleric supposedly did.

In fact, I couldn't figure out exactly what the Obama/Hillary administration did either. Could you find some supporting documentation to this story?

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

@Meteor Man
.

So Sibel Edmonds (Source) revealed the following:

That General Mike Flynn tried to resist and expose these Terrorist Networks created by the Obama-Clinton administration [used to perpetrate "Regime Change" and overthrow Syria], and was then railroaded and forced out for not being a "yes man". Also ...

“There were FBI agents, not only in the Washington field office, but also in the Chicago and Patterson field offices, who were blowing the whistle on Mueller internally, saying he's squashing our investigations [into terror networks].”

"I know of several veteran, highly decorated FBI agents, if subpoenaed, would testify that how Robert Mueller, due to what he was doing as the director of the FBI, can not preside as the special counsel in this case."

---

Here is a link to some more documented detail on this: Robert Mueller protecting criminal operations

Robert Mueller is also neck deep in the "Uranium One" scandal as well.

Here's a link to that as well: http://www.newsweek.com/gop-using-muellers-role-uranium-deal-call-his-re...

up
0 users have voted.
Meteor Man's picture

@FreeSociety

Newsweek headline:

MUELLER PROTECTED OBAMA AND CLINTON, SO HE SHOULD BE FIRED, REPUBLICAN RESOLUTION CLAIMS

Really?

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

@Meteor Man

Let's try to have one standard of justice here.

If you protect the perpetrators behind these ISIS terrorist groups, and the "Uranium one" scandal, and the fake dossier propaganda (election manipulation) -- that makes you an accessory to these crimes and corruption.

Whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds know the truth.

This isn't a "left .vs. right" thing.
But it is (according to FBI whistleblower) a Deep State/Globalist/Oligarch .vs. Flynn/Trump thing.

up
0 users have voted.
Meteor Man's picture

@FreeSociety

This isn't a "left - right" thing. But it is a Deep State/Globalist/Oligarch - Flynn/Trump thing.

Keep shoveling. I still have no idea what "truth" Sibel Edmonds is revealing. Bye bye. I'm done here.

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

@Meteor Man
or CNN

up
0 users have voted.

@FreeSociety @FreeSociety really necessary?
Personally, I think AJ is a purveyor of ‘stupid dupism’ , but I’ll watch.
NOBODY should be cursed to inhabit daily kult, for any reason. The one rule here is CIVILITY.
Make your case, Bro, not insults.

Stop These Fucking Wars

peace

Edit; corrected spelling, added spaces as necessary. Coffee.

up
0 users have voted.

Ya got to be a Spirit, cain't be no Ghost. . .

Explain Bldg #7. . . still waiting. . .

If you’ve ever wondered whether you would have complied in 1930’s Germany,
Now you know. . .
sign at protest march

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@FreeSociety @FreeSociety Whoa. I am really uncomfortable with us adopting the language of the enemy, in this case "election manipulation."

The dossier was creepy, crappy, scandal-driven American electoral politics, which has been business as usual since the early nineties at least. But it's no more "election manipulation" than any of the other campaign politics which also runs on hatchet jobs.

As I've said elsewhere, the frame of "election manipulation" or "election meddling," applied to anything that is not fraud or voter suppression, is actually an anti-democratic (small d) and even anti-republican (small r) frame designed to delegitimize influence over the electoral process by anyone the speaker doesn't like. Even though I despise the Clinton/Bush political cartel, and everyone involved with it, I'm not going to call the dossier "election manipulation" any more than leaking the DNC emails was "election manipulation" or posting anti-Clinton statements on Twitter is "election meddling."

This is a horrible frame built on moral quicksand. We use it at our peril.

And I say this as an ally who probably hates the Clinton/Bush cartel at least as much as you do.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

arendt's picture

@Meteor Man

I did not see that term in the post. It might have been in the links, but I'm not going to waste my time reading them.

As the poster, you sorta have a responsibilty to explain the "non sequitur" of your title. Just sayin.

up
0 users have voted.
Meteor Man's picture

@arendt
From Free Society's comment that I responded to:

http://www.newsweek.com/gop-using-muellers-role-uranium-deal-call-his-re...

I can't even believe the nonsense in this post. A GOP Resolution as proof that Mueller was involved in Uranium One? Really?

up
0 users have voted.

"They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war." Howard Zinn

arendt's picture

@Meteor Man

As I read the Newsweek story (taking shower now), the DOJ slow-walked (4 yrs) an indictment about the Russian Uranium deal while Mueller was head of the FBI.

Now, IIRC, the FBI doesn't do indictments (hence, the Comey overreaching by letting off HRC kerfuffle). Therefore, tarring Mueller with failure to indict is factually incorrect.

Having said that, the charge of conflict of interest has been out there ever since Mueller was appointed as special council.

I hope you are not saying that, because one especially stupid GOPer made an obviously false charge, that Mueller is somehow proven innocent. The close relationship between Comey and Mueller has been on the radar ever since Mueller was appointed.

USA Today opinion piece by William Otis, June 14, 2017:

Comey now finds himself at the center of the Russian investigation over which Mueller presides. Questions swirl around Comey — about whether the president wanted/hinted/hoped/asked/directed/or something else the investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn to be stopped/abandoned/slowed/soft-peddled/something else. This is probably the central element of the obstruction of justice case that Trump's opponents would like to see made against him.

Questions also swirl about Comey's notes about this conversation and why he gave them to a private individual (professor Dan Richman of Columbia Law) to convey to journalists. Additional questions have arisen about whether this curious and seemingly devious means of putting the contents of the notes in the public domain (leaking, in other words) was designed specifically to bring about the appointment of a special counsel outside the president's direct reach — and, indeed, whether Comey wanted, expected or intended his friend Mueller to get the job.

---William G. Otis is an adjunct professor at Georgetown University Law Center, a former federal prosecutor, and former special counsel for President George H.W. Bush.

Robert Mueller should recuse himself from Russia investigation

So, GHWB hates Trump; and this guy worked for GHWB. Now he's a law professor at Georgetown, which is a first-rate law school. But, obviously, this argument (made by many) has had no impact. It has not been refuted, it has simply been ignored.

My bottom line is that, two levels of wrong (the Congressman quoted in the Newsweek story, and the poster who used that as "proof") do not exonerate Mueller. He is as dirty as anyone in the government. You don't get to be head of the FBI by being a goody-twoshoes. You do it by playing hardball and pulling strings. Mueller has done both. He is deeply entangled with Comey and with the Obama Administration's blind eye to HRC's Russia dealings.

There is no way Mueller is objective on this.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@Meteor Man If it's true that he was involved in quashing investigations into actual terror networks, I have a problem with that, and I don't really care what the partisan implications are. If it's true.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

WoodsDweller's picture

would be proud of you for this post. The operation to smear Mueller to try to distract from the methodical prosecution of the gangsters in the Trump regime was his idea.
We've been investigating the Clintons for 25 years and haven't managed to pin anything on them yet. Yes, I think they are guilty of many crimes, but so far have been clever enough to get caught. The priority has to be prosecution of those currently in a position to do the most harm, and that is the Trump/Pence regime along with their current and recent cronies.

up
0 users have voted.

"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function." -- Albert Bartlett
"A species that is hurtling toward extinction has no business promoting slow incremental change." -- Caitlin Johnstone

@WoodsDweller

.

  1. Who created, trained, armed, and funded ISIS terrorist groups?
  2. Not Trump => Obama-Clinton

  3. Who colluded with Russia and sold our own Uranium over to Russia?
  4. Not Trump => Obama-Clinton

  5. Who tried to steal an Election with various backdoor money laundering schemes (DNC-Clinton), and paying millions of dollars to a Russian Firm to create a totally Fake Dossier?
  6. Not Trump => Hillary Clinton

    ---

    Wake up soon!

up
0 users have voted.
kharma's picture

@FreeSociety Sounds like Alex Jones climbed in your head and took a shit.

up
0 users have voted.

There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties.. This...is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.--John Adams

@kharma

Since when are we to just excuse the multitude of high crimes and corruption coming from the Clintons, Obama, the FBI, the CIA, and the Deep State Establishment .. and blame the whistleblowers?

Also, Sibel Edmonds (FBI whistleblower) provided the information and content shown here, not Alex Jones who merely just gave her a platform to speak.

There should be even more platforms for whistleblowers here, not less.

up
0 users have voted.
Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@kharma ideological bent.

I don't necessarily agree with everything Free Society is saying here. But those three things he just said are more or less factual.


Who created, trained, armed, and funded ISIS terrorist groups?
Not Trump => Obama-Clinton

More true than not, though a bit clumsily expressed. It would be more accurate to say that the Islamic State was created, trained, armed and funded with Obama and Clinton's knowledge and either their consent or acquiescence. Their allies in KSA, Kuwait, and elsewhere were directly involved in creating, training, arming, and funding the Islamic State. I would not be surprised to discover that the CIA was directly involved as well, though I haven't got evidence of that. But certainly Trump had nothing to do with creating, training, arming, or funding the Islamic State.

Who colluded with Russia and sold our own Uranium over to Russia?
Not Trump => Obama-Clinton

This one's a bit more complex. Clinton obviously sold uranium to Russia. Clinton obviously also "colluded" with Russia (I don't like the word particularly, but let that go) in the sense that her campaign assembled the Trump dossier with help from sources inside Russia, apparently through connections of a former member of British intelligence. It's reasonable to assume that an ex-spy's connections in a foreign country are likely to include present or former spies. Present or former spies in Russia probably work or worked for the Russian state. That would mean that present or former members of Russian intelligence were probably involved with the assembly of the dossier. So, yes, to some extent, Clinton "colluded" with Russia. Trump has also "colluded" with Russia in the sense that he has corrupt business dealings with them. I'm at a loss to explain how these "collusions" are any different than the "collusions" that go on every day between politicians, foreign states, and powerful foreign nationals; I'm also at a loss to explain how gathering dirt on a rival politician to win an election, whether from foreign sources or not, is in any way different from the business-as-usual of American electoral politics for the past twenty years.


Who tried to steal an Election with various backdoor money laundering schemes (DNC-Clinton), and paying millions of dollars to a Russian Firm to create a totally Fake Dossier?
Not Trump => Hillary Clinton

Obviously true, though in my opinion among the least noxious of the many forms of election fraud committed by the Clinton campaign last year. Robbie Mook and John Podesta appeared to be putting on an election fraud clinic for the behalf of the American people (This is what you do if you have a really unviable candidate but you want to win anyway. It will give the additional perc of having about the same effect on American politics and culture that Chernobyl had on nearby property values.
Great, huh? Let us show you another one. You have no idea how many different ways there are to be a toxic asshole...
).

I can understand that trusting facts that come from an ideological opponent is difficult, because often one believes (sometimes rightly) that the opponent is unreliable. However, in this case, most of these facts have been corroborated by people from various parts of the ideological spectrum. It will take more than asserting that right-wing nutjobs are happy about these facts to debunk them.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

@Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal

.

Remember that Bill Clinton was also directly paid-off a whopping $500,000.00 dollars from a Russian Bank (in the form of a "speaking fee") right around the same time that this whole Uranium One deal (sell out) was going down.

---

It amazes me just how much the Clintons can get away with (and Obama, Mueller, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Pedesta as well) over this whole corrupt period -- free from any rules of Law or any prosecution. And this apparently isn't going to change until a new attorney general (different from the ever Establishment-loyal Jeff Sessions) can be appointed. And that isn't going to happen now until the year 2021. But they may succeed at overthrowing Trump first, and it will then never happen at all.

Just like the evil (CIA) Bush Crime Family, the Clintons & Obama are too completely untouchable, and the "swamp" is not getting drained. We may even see Hillary Clinton propped-up and run for President yet again in 2020....she certainly hasn't and isn't going away.

That's why drawing attention to this is important. We will never have government that works for the people, until the real corruption is routed out and the swamp is drained.

WikiLeaks has already made clear that Russia had nothing to with DLC Emails or making Hillary lose. The Mueller investigation is just a manipulative sideshow (to delegitimize Trump) from a so-called "investigator" who was himself part of this corruption.

up
0 users have voted.
The Aspie Corner's picture

@FreeSociety Who's bankrupting the state department and pocketing all the money through his own resorts? Trump.

Who owns stock in DAPL? Trump, Obama and Clinton.

Who has affiliates in Indonesia attempting to overthrow their elected government for ISIS? Trump.

Who released the guy who ultimately formed and founded ISIS? George W. Bush.

Turn off Alex Jones, kid. He's in on it just like the rest of them.

up
0 users have voted.

Modern education is little more than toeing the line for the capitalist pigs.

Guerrilla Liberalism won't liberate the US or the world from the iron fist of capital.

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@The Aspie Corner Your main point is well taken; Trump, Obama and Clinton (and the Bushes) are ultimately all in the same club (and we ain't in it).

If there is actually animosity between these people, it's because Trump refused to job for Clinton like he was supposed to. Instead he wrote his own Wrestlemania booking, live on the air, and didn't end up looking up at the lights, but putting the championship belt around his waist. He's just clever enough, and just stupid enough, to do that.

I don't give a damn, really, whether facts which have been corroborated by other sources are also touted by Alex Jones or not. So a fuckwad picks up actual facts and talks about them because they are useful to his political agenda. I don't have to like him or his political agenda--really all that is irrelevant as hell. The only question is: are these facts, or not?

As I said to kharma, it will take more than dislike of Alex Jones to debunk the fact that yes, the Clinton campaign worked with people in Russia to assemble the dossier, and probably, given who was doing the work on the ground (a former British spy), some of those people in Russia were present or former Russian intelligence; that yes, Clinton did approve a uranium sale to Russia; that yes, Clinton did cheat in just the ways Free Society said she did, though she also cheated in much worse ways that he doesn't mention; and that yes, both Clinton and Obama have more to do with the rise of the Islamic State than Donald Trump does. Donald Trump hadn't even declared for the Presidency when IS began its rise. That started in 2014! Are we imagining that Trump was engineering the Islamic State in 2014?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

@WoodsDweller
It's a matter of priorities. You are saying that the chronological order of crimes should determine their priority. I say the depth and the consequences and the meaning of those crimes should be the determining factors. In that Hillary should certainly be the first priority, IMHO.
We will survive Trump, like we survived Reagan (unless Obama's failures prove fatal) but Hillary, and by extension Bill and Obama, are direct, existential attacks on the very concept of democracy, even more so than Bush the Usurper.

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

WoodsDweller's picture

@doh1304
The priority is the neutralize the most immediate threat - those currently in power. That would be the reverse chronological order.
Roger Stone's scheme is to specifically derail Mueller's investigation. Special prosecutors are appointed when the normal chain of command is potentially compromised because some of the targets of the investigation can use their office to obstruct justice.
Any crimes (and I am sure there are many) from previous administrations can be prosecuted normally, and Sessions can initiate investigations as the situation warrants.

up
0 users have voted.

"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function." -- Albert Bartlett
"A species that is hurtling toward extinction has no business promoting slow incremental change." -- Caitlin Johnstone

@WoodsDweller

I'd just like to point out that members of the several previous administrations, despite being out of public office, are still very much involved in the current Admin.

Obama still has his nose in, as does Hillary Clinton and Dick Cheney, to name three. They're all in it together, all still working for their cut as total global dominance comes closer to being achieved and they all need to be investigated.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@WoodsDweller You think that being elected determines who's currently in power?

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@doh1304 Was with you right up to the bit about Bush--

As far as I'm concerned, there's no longer any daylight between these two camps (Clinton and Bush).

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@WoodsDweller I haven't delved deeply into any of this, but I'll say this much:

The issue for me is not whether or not Clintons, Bushes or Trumps do the most damage (though the fact that the Clintons and Bushes constantly evade prosecution or even investigation when they break the law, and therefore are more or less above the law, would suggest that they obviously can do more damage than someone who can be called to account). The issue for me is whether the man investigating corruption is merely a puppet of a competing political faction. If he is, he will accomplish little of value.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

arendt's picture

Folks, they are all corrupt. Mueller is corrupt, Comey is corrupt, Hillary is corrupt, Trump is corrupt, Mike Pence is corrupt. At this point, no one can honestly investigate anything, because they are all dirty. The minute any investigation gets any traction, some extraneous BS comes along to shut it down.

Princeton grad, ex-Marine hard-ass, life-long GOP apparatchik Mueller is the progressive's friend? Only in Hillary-land. Fishing expeditions like this one (and Ken Starr's) are good for democracy? No. But, the minute it was a GOPer who was the target of one, the left decided they were a good thing.

This whole "special prosecutor" thing is just a big circus to distract you while TPTB loot what little is left of America.

Tell me how any of this kerfuffle stops the GOP from passing a budget that will destroy the government by handing out massive tax breaks to the 0.1% and paying for them by SHUTTING DOWN basic government functions?

You all should go read strollingone's OP "I am a recovering stupid dupe."

up
0 users have voted.
arendt's picture

@arendt

Also, Sibel Edmonds (FBI whistleblower) provided the information and content shown here, not Alex Jones who merely just gave her a platform to speak.

Rule number one on political boards: never give the respondents an easy cheap shot to discredit your post.

Alex Jones is an asshole, a bad CTer.

By associating Sybil Edmonds with him, you completely destroyed the message that SE was putting out.

SE got started because she was a translator who tried to blow the whistle on a lot of 911 stuff. Then, as a person of Turkish extraction, she tried to blow the whistle on Denny Hastert's corrupt ties to Turkey and the Gulen (CIA) network. In both cases, no one listened to SE.

I sympathize with people like SE, who start out to be truth-tellers, and wind up shouting into the wind (or worse, going on Alex Jones's show).

TPTB have bought all sides of the media. Of course they own the corporate media, lock, stock, and barrel. But they also own a goodly percentage of the alternative media; and clowns like AJ are heavily funded by rightwing millionaires.

All of this is why I have completely tuned out on the Mueller carnival. It is more disinfo.

up
0 users have voted.

@arendt

Alex Jones does a good thing by giving whistleblowers a platform in which they can speak. And he does this all the time -- which I respect. I'm mean seriosuly, is CNN or MSNBC or CBS or ABC going to expose the CIA/Deep State created Terror Networks?

The point is, of course, the exposure itself of these serious crimes and the courageous whistleblowing.

Also, Alex Jones exposed the corruption of the evil Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld administration as well -- including the 9/11 attacks which is to be admired, and the Iraq War madness. He is not some knee-jerk "rightwinger" (wrong). He is an anti-Establishment (both sides), anti-Globalist Libertarian (somewhat in the Ron Paul, Rand Paul mold).

---

And hopefully we're all wise enough by now to know that the term "conspiracy theorist" is a term invented by the CIA to quell criticism of the Warren Commission cover-up of the Kennedy Assassination. Corruption, bribery, plots, mass-violence, False Flag Black Ops, Theft, Treason, etc. are all rampant and exists in this Country.

The People who expose that deserve a lot more respect than the Fake News Lamestream Establishment Media (CIA infiltrated and dishonest since the 1950s).

up
0 users have voted.
arendt's picture

@FreeSociety

I simply do not find him credible. He puts up inflammatory crap, like climate change denial and racist hatemongering. He puts up bogus BS, like UFOs. He does it all for the ratings. He doesn't care a bit about truth; only ratings.

Most people on C99 are familiar with the origin of CT. No need to condescend to me. But, AJ is only a CTer because he can use it to get ratings. He isn't committed to anything but making a profit. If he were truly fighting the establishment, he would be blacklisted, like Chris Hedges.

You say he lets all anti-establishment figures on. So what? The fucking neo-Nazis are anti-establishment. Are you saying that the collateral damage of giving a platform to scumbags like them is worth the "good" AJ is doing?

Every once in a while, someone like SE goes on the show. IMHO, that was a mistake on her part and tarnishes her brand.

The harder you defend AJ, the more people you offend.

up
0 users have voted.

@arendt
if AJ hadn't spotlighted the story of Hillary's "Parkinsonism" would more people have listened?

up
0 users have voted.

On to Biden since 1973

arendt's picture

@doh1304

This doctor was posting half-hour videos on topics like HRC's blue glasses, which have dramatic effects on PD sufferers.

I didn't need AJ to find that story for me.

up
0 users have voted.

@arendt

Your hate of AJ is quite clear since your descriptions of him are only smears, that are obviously just malicious attacks, and entirely untrue.

  • AJ is not a "racist". That is false.
  • Nor has he ever promoted anything that is "racist" (and criticizing violent U.S. funded & trained Terrorist groups is not about "race").
  • AJ also never at any time gave any "Neo-NAZIs", or any skinheads a platform to speak.

--
There are very few alternative media platforms where real CIA and FBI informants and whistleblowers are routinely brought on to expose to the public the DEEP STATE-Globalists infiltration, corruption, and destruction of our government, and our Country. AJ does this all the time (which the Establishment does not like).

Both the Establishment Mainstream Media, and some Establishment hacks in the U.S. Congress have attacked him (with the same smears that you use and emulate), and tried to effectively "blacklist" him. If AJ ever wanted to write an editorial or news piece for The NY Times -- just like Chris Hedges -- he would also be denied.

Whistleblowing faces many risks, including murder.

Now you claim AJ provides this whistleblowing platform just for "ratings", and so he should just dismissed and ridiculed. That's your illogical and biased opinion -- another distortion that is not based in any facts.

But, again, the point here is the whistleblowing itself.

That's what matters. It doesn't matter who does it, as long as the corruption is finally exposed in total. Platforms that actually do this are far more valuable than our useless TV Fake News (and most Internet News sites).

AJ can make mistakes like anyone, but he deserves credit for not being intimidated like so many others, and for having the balls to go right after the corrupt Globalist-Oligarch Evil Empire and their enablers (and "prosecutor" Robert Mueller is one of them) each and every day -- which otherwise would have the wool pulled over our eyes 24/7.

.

up
0 users have voted.
arendt's picture

@FreeSociety

As I said, I find him to be a self-promoting conman; and I find his continued high public profile to be evidence that TPTB have no problem with him.

As I said, if he were really hurting the Establishment, he would be shut down, banned, or hit with some sex scandal. That's what they did to Assange. That's how they treat Chris Hedges.

Given that none of that has happened to AJ, the conclusion is that TPTB are perfectly happy to let this high-profile guy continue. It is his visibility that gives away the game. TPTB do not bother to shut down lower profile anti-establishment types, unless and until they become high profile. Example: Caitlin Johnston.

You can't square the obvious power of TPTB to squash any counter-narrative with AJ's survival as a high-profile, "influentical" person. So you don't speak to it. You just accuse me of "hating" him.

up
0 users have voted.

@arendt
.

[video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=90&v=CZIp8D8TV8o width:320 height:240]

up
0 users have voted.

@FreeSociety

If they're accurate enough for the censoring propagandists to get panicky about shutting them down ASAP, I should have been paying more attention to them. And even if they weren't, this crap would still be sickeningly scary.

On the plus side, this ought to get the 'right-wingers' going.

The more this goes on, the more I suspect that the bulk of the 'gun rights demand' crowd consisted of NRA/people who benefited one way or another from arms sales, because nobody in the US seems to much care about their actual Constitutional rights being unconstitutionally stripped away.

Not even after all of the years of internet denial over living in a police state because they 'still had free speech' - even while kids making obvious jokes on the internet were being hailed off to prison as 'terrorists' over something they said which sure looked like jokes to me.

So, what comes after total information control? I guess we'll never know until it happens to us individually.

up
0 users have voted.

Psychopathy is not a political position, whether labeled 'conservatism', 'centrism' or 'left'.

A tin labeled 'coffee' may be a can of worms or pathology identified by a lack of empathy/willingness to harm others to achieve personal desires.

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@arendt I really dislike the whole tenor of the debate. Partisan loyalty, right-vs-left framings and character attacks are the frameworks of the enemy, no matter who's using them.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

@FreeSociety Arendt is talking strategy here, and you decided to get mad at her rather than take her advice.

Wait a minute...sorry, arendt, if you are actually not a woman. It's just that I automatically think of Hannah Arendt, your namesake, when I think of you.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver

Anja Geitz's picture

In the past in terms of credibility, I am less compelled to rely on them in the present. That you are asking me to do so because you personally believe this information is accurate is not enough for me to suspend my disbelief.

up
0 users have voted.

There is always Music amongst the trees in the Garden, but our hearts must be very quiet to hear it. ~ Minnie Aumonier

snoopydawg's picture

but I don't know what to make of this information. Another article I read said that Flynn had been paid by Erogden (?) to kidnap Gulen because he thinks he was involved with the attempted coup.

As to this Mueller investigation, I doubt anything is going to come from it. The PTB don't shit in their own sandbox.
There is more evidence of corruption on Hillary and Bill and no one is looking into it. Her entire time as SOS was filled with graft when she was taking money from foreign governments after completing their business with the state department. There is no way that was legal, yet where is the investigation.

This Mueller crap is this cycles distraction from what the PTB are doing behind the scenes.
We can see how well it's working by looking at the wreckage of ToP. The wreck list is full of the Mueller investigation and tabloid gossip topics on the daily cycle of Trump and his family.

Anyone that wrote about something important watches as their diary slips further down. That's if anyone even bothered to cover it.

As for Alex Jones, YES he's a creep and usually full of it. But is it possible that this was the only medium that Sibel could use to talk about this?

I'm disappointed how much she is charging to read her website. This is unfortunate because she has so much to say.

my $.02

up
0 users have voted.

Which AIPAC/MIC/pharma/bank bought politician are you going to vote for? Don’t be surprised when nothing changes.

I suspect, as does snoopydawg, that she goes to whatever media outlet which lets her talk.
Still, the whole Mueller investigation has not held my attention for more than a few seconds.
I am more interested in expanding our wars, and trying to survive with my new tax burden looming in the distance.

up
0 users have voted.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." ---- William Casey, CIA Director, 1981

for seeing Mueller as an obstructor of justice is that he did NOTHING as FBI Director to solve the anthrax case.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/04/head-fbis-anthrax-investigation-c...

HEAD of the FBI’s Anthrax Investigation Says the Whole Thing Was a SHAM
Posted on April 17, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog

The FBI head agent in charge of the anthrax investigation – Richard Lambert – has just filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t:

Defendant FBI Director Mueller reassigned Plaintiff from the FBI’s San Diego Field Office to the Inspection Division at FBI Headquarters and placed Plaintiff in charge of the AMERITHRAX case as an “Inspector.” While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation.

On July 6, 2006, Plaintiff provided a whistleblower report of mismanagement to the FBI’s Deputy Director pursuant to Title 5, United States Code, Section 2303. Reports of mismanagement conveyed in writing and orally included: (a) WFO’s persistent understaffing of the AMERITHRAX investigation; (b) the threat of WFO’s Agent in charge to retaliate if Plaintiff disclosed the understaffing to FBI Headquarters; (c) WFO’s insistence on staffing the AMERITHRAX investigation principally with new Agents recently graduated from the FBI Academy resulting in an average investigative tenure of 18 months with 12 of 20 Agents assigned to the case having no prior investigative experience at all; (d) WFO’s eviction of the AMERITHRAX Task Force from the WFO building in downtown Washington and its relegation to Tysons Corner, Virginia to free up space for Attorney General Ashcroft’s new pornography squads; (e) FBI Director’s Mueller’s mandate to Plaintiff to “compartmentalize” the AMERITHRAX investigation by stove piping the flow of case information and walling off task force members from those aspects of the case not specifically assigned to them – a move intended to stem the tide of anonymous media leaks by government officials regarding details of the investigation. [Lambert complained about compartmentalizing and stovepiping of the investigation in a 2006 declaration.

… (f) WFO’s diversion and transfer of two Ph.D. Microbiologist Special Agents from their key roles in the investigation to fill billets for an 18 month Arabic language training program in Israel; (g) the FBI Laboratory’s deliberate concealment from the Task Force of its discovery of human DNA on the anthrax-laden envelope addressed to Senator Leahy and the Lab’s initial refusal to perform comparison testing; (h) the FBI Laboratory’s refusal to provide timely and adequate scientific analyses and forensic examinations in support of the investigation; (i) Defendant Kelley’s erroneous and subsequently quashed legal opinion that regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) precluded the Task Force’s collection of evidence in overseas venues; (j) the FBI’s fingering of Bruce Ivins as the anthrax mailer; and, (k) the FBI’s subsequent efforts to railroad the prosecution of Ivins in the face of daunting exculpatory evidence.

Following the announcement of its circumstantial case against Ivins, Defendants DOJ and FBI crafted an elaborate perception management campaign to bolster their assertion of Ivins’ guilt.

… Plaintiff continued to advocate that while Bruce Ivins may have been the anthrax mailer, there is a wealth of exculpatory evidence to the contrary which the FBI continues to conceal from Congress and the American people.

up
0 users have voted.
TheOtherMaven's picture

@Linda Wood

so we will never, ever know what the real story was.

up
0 users have voted.

There is no justice. There can be no peace.

Cant Stop the Macedonian Signal's picture

He's busy worrying the juicy bone of fat DEA budgets and kickbacks from the prison-for-profit industry.

up
0 users have voted.

"More for Gore or the son of a drug lord--None of the above, fuck it, cut the cord."
--Zack de la Rocha

"I tell you I'll have nothing to do with the place...The roof of that hall is made of bones."
-- Fiver